RBS Foundation India - leading the KPC initiative

RBS FI mission is to build resilience of India’s ecologically critical landscapes and the vulnerable communities which reside within these. With this view, RBS FI has been supporting its partner CSO – FES since 2010 in the KPC landscape.

 

Overtime, RBS FI recognized that KPC is facing threats that hamper its functionality as a wildlife corridor, carbon sink, watershed, and livelihood source. These threats are multi-dimensional and to address these there is a need to get relevant stakeholders together and working towards a common goal. (esp. in absense of a single leading legal framework)

 

Multiiple stakeholders with varying interests and orientations exist and influence a landscape, including the community that resides within. It is thus critical to create a balance within these stakeholders. Getting stakeholders together requires a driving force - it can be an individual/ group /organisation/a set of organisations - they can be a public/private or a civil society.

 

RBS FI took a lead role in getting all the stakeholders together, including Forest Department, CSOs and other government agencies. Contributed self funds of USD 2.12 million and leveraged another USD 2.56 from UN Climate Adaptation Fund. RBS FI continues to contribute with time and resources towards the well being of KPC

- Long term engagement with the landscape, RBS FI has been working in the KPC since 2010. 

- Continuous flow of financing for the project interventions. RBS FI, CSOs and government agencies have ensured that efforts are ongoing in the landscape through provision of sustainable financing

- Having a flexible approach

- Encouraging CSOs and government agencies with strong ideologies to work together requires having a flexible approach and engaging with the agencies involved regularly. 

Continuous engagement, especially with government agencies is required, especially since corridors don’t enjoy a special legal framework. While they do get covered under a combination of them corridors comprise of protected areas, territorial divisions, revenue and private lands where there are multiple legal systems at work including Forest Department, Revenue Department and others.

 

Another challenge is that government officers keep getting transfered to other roles in the system, and we have to start rapport and context building with them from scratch. 

 

Thus, creating institutions like the PSC and ensuring that they become robust is essential in initiatives like these. Such institutions put the onus on the government and its representations to ensure continuity of one streamlined approach in the landscape to address the most pressing issues.

Civil Society Organisations - Thematic experts and driving implementation

 The project is being implemented by four CSOs.

 

FES 

Core expertise/ issues addressed: Commons governance

Institutional Development; Eco Restoration; Invasive species management

7,500 families in 87 villages in Mandla and Balaghat Districts

www.fes.org.in/

 

PRADAN

Core expertise/ issues addressed: Gender issues; Women self-help groups; Women centric livelihoods; Small enterprises – poultry, goat rearing.

10,000 families in 136 villages in Balaghat District.

www.pradan.net/

 

WOTR 

Core expertise/ issues addressed: Watershed treatment; Agricultural development; Agro advisories using local weather stations; disaster risk reduction, Knowledge Management

4,000 families in 132 villages in Seoni District.

www.wotr.org/

 

BAIF

Core expertise/ issues addressed:- Livestock management; Selective breed improvement; Feed and disease management; Dairy value chains

BAIF has livestock expertize, working in all three districts and supporting all 3 partner CSOs on livestock management. 

www.baif.org.in/

 

The CSO partners work in tandem. They undertake regular cross-learning & best practices sharing to ensure that the threats to KPC are addressed holistically. The CSOs form an important building block of the larger "working together" concept.

Enabling factors include - adopting a transparent and participative approach. 

Recognizing and appreciating the efforts and expertise of each CSO working in the landscape.

Identifying their core skills and helping them adopt core skills of other CSOs

 

A catalyst is required - to get the CSOs working together and build relationships/partnerships. This takes a lot of time and effort. Requires the stakeholders involved to be flexible and make joint efforts for the greater good of the landscape.  

Having a set of partners working in the same landscape with a set of diverse core skills made RBS FI recognize the need to help these CSOs in identifying areas of improvement to achieve one common goal. 

With this view cross learning and best practice sharing was established. This helped all the CSOs working together appreciate efforts of one other and incorporate others CORE skills into their project too.

 

PRADAN learnt from FES, started appreciating the important role commons play and started incorporating conservation efforts in their plan of activities. They initiated a dialogue in their villages to conserve and use natural resources sustainably.

 

FES from PRADAN, recognized the role women plan in conservation and started gender focussed activities and started encouraging women partcipation in the village institutions 

 

WOTR learnt from FES, recognized the importance of invasive species eradication and techniques of eradication. FES learnt from WOTR the benefits of watershed development and so on.

 

These CSOs are now regularly adopting best practices from one another  

Project Steering Committee to institutionalise partnerships

The project includes a multi layered - governing and implementing framework. The Project Steering Committee forms the highest level of this framework. The PSC is chaired by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife) Madhya Pradesh Forest Department, and co- chaired by the Head, RBS FI. Other members of the PSC include:

Representatives from the Indian Forest Services; ( the Field Director of Kanha Tiger Reserve, the Field Director of Pench Tiger Reserve, and the Chief Conservator of Forests of the Mandla, Balaghat and Seoni Districts);

A representative of the National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development, Government of India;

Concerned government agencies from the State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh comprising the Farmer welfare and Agriculture Department, the New and Renewable Energy Department and the Animal Husbandry Department;

The Regional General Manager of the Forest Development Corporation;

The Chief Functionary/ representatives of Implementing CSO partners as well as the Civil Society Organisations (including the ones implementing the project)

 

The PSC meets every 6 months. It provides supervision for the implementation of the project activities. It facilitates collaboration among its diverse membership for intensifying project impacts. It resolves any challenges.

The PSC brings the concerned government agencies, with their respective mandates, manpower and government funding, together with the Civil Society Organizations, who bring specialized technical skills in natural resource management and other fields. This requires the willingness on behalf of the senior government officials to participate in such a forum.  It requires a high level of technical expertise from the participating Civil Society Organizations to provide valuable inputs into the multi-stakeholder forum.

.

The multi-stakeholder membership of the PSC provides an important institutional platform for ensuring sustainablity of the interventions. Chairmanship of the PSC is provided by a senior government official (the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State of Madhya Pradesh - a senior Indian Forest Service officer), which ensures excellent coordination among concerned government agencies, and collabration with other stakeholders who are working in the Kanha Pench Corridor. 

The diverse membership, and mix of stakeholders, with different knowledge and perspectives, share lessons learned and experiences with each other. The CSOs can interact directly with the Government agency representatives which ensures that their respective livelihood schemes are implemented effectively. The PSC also allows the project team to have a dialogue with relevant government agencies and ensures that viable on-going government schemes are leveraged for the project area. 

The ecosystem approach into practice

Under an ecosystem approach, efforts seek to improve the livelihoods and resilience of ecosystems in order to reduce the vulnerability of local communities to the challenges of erratic rains, changing pf seasons, storms and consequent loss of crops. The EbA measures promoted are:

  • Restoration of riverbank forests to prevent river bank erosion during extreme storms and flash floods. This is promoted with annual Binational Reforestation Days and guided by a Restoration Opportunities study in river banks. 
  • Agrodiversification was undertaken with local farmers to increase the number and varieties of crop species, fruit and wood trees in their plots, while combining with animals. This aim to improve the resilience of the system against erratic rainfall and changing seasonal patterns. The model is locally named as "integral farms".
  • Learning and exchange through a network of resilient farmers with knowledge on EbA.
  • Organization of agrobiodiversity fairs for the promotion and rescue of endemic seeds.

The model used a "learning by doing" approach and the adoption of iterative decisions that identify short-term strategies in light of long-term uncertainties. Learning and evaluation allows new information to be considered and inform policies at different levels. 

  • Climate change and, in particular, changes in rainfall patterns, are factors that concern many basin stakeholders, which increases their willingness to prioritize actions that favour water and food security. As a result, many farmers agreed to incorporate sustainable agricultural practices in their farms, taking full ownership of them.
  • The integral farms model facilitates understanding of the value of ecosystem services and helps to substantiate governance with an ecosystem approach.
  • When promoting dialogues on EbA, traditional and indigenous knowledge and experiences concerning climate variability and natural resources must be taken into account. This not only favours coherency in the selection of EbA measures, but also allows elements to be captured that can inform the actions of agricultural extension agencies in the basin and enrich national and regional policies.
  • Indigenous knowledge is fundamental when it comes to knowing which seeds and crop varieties are best adapted to the socio-ecological context. Organization of agrobiodiversity fairs for the exchange and preservation of endemic species seeds intended to enhance the planting of native species. Some are more resilient against climate related stressors; a diverse farm enable and agro-ecosystems turns into protecting communities from negative impacts of climate change, providing food security.
  • The reforestation events proved to be highly valuable activities. This type of action leaves an indelible mark on children and youth, and motivates them to replicate the activity in the future.
Achieving participatory governance for adaptation

The Binational Commission for the Sixaola River Basin (CBCRS) needed to diversify participation in the basin’s governance. Although it brought together actors from different sectors and levels of government (national and municipal), some actors were still missing (such as the Municipality of Bocas del Toro, Panama, which joined in 2016). The CBCRS management was not yet consolidated, because of its complex composition and that it had neither a binational territorial planning tool with which to articulate efforts on both sides of the border, nor its own budget. Through an extensive participatory process, the CBCRS drafted a Strategic Plan for Transboundary Territorial Development (2017-2021) and expanded its project portfolio. Encouraging participation in this process, and in bi-national activities, has created conditions for civil society and municipalities to take an active role in the implementation of the plan and adaptation actions. Providing a space particularly for women, youth and indigenous people, usually marginalized of decision making. CBCRS plan also urged greater equality in the access to and use of natural resources on which local communities depend, thus favouring those groups most vulnerable to climate change and creating a sense of ownership.

  • Communities are willing to participate in dialogue, learning, search for solutions and joint actions. Most stakeholders in the basin are concerned and affected by climate change excessive rainfall that causes flooding.
  • In order to achieve a broad participation, the integrating role of the CBCRS as a binational governance and dialogue platform, and of the (Talamanca-Caribe Biological COrridor Assotiation) ACBTC as a local development association, was indispensable.
  • In governance for adaptation, effective participation can enrich planning and decision-making processes, leading to results that are accepted by all parties involved
  • Coordination between projects, and initiatives such as the Central American Strategy for Rural Territorial Development (ECADERT) that provided funding for the first project awarded to the CBCRS, contribute to the up-scaling and sustainability of the actions.
  • Social participation and strengthening of organizational capacity, through the identification of spokespersons and leaders (amongst youth, women and men) is an important factor for the consolidation of these processes and, with it, governance structures.
  • Encouraging public participation increases dialogue and the assessment and incorporation of knowledge (technical and traditional), as well as the inclusion of lessons learned from each sector.
  • Future efforts should consider how to strengthen the incorporation of the agri-business sector (e.g. banana or cacao) into the governance for adaptation agenda.
Achieving multidimensional governance for adaptation

The Binational Commission of the Sixaola River Basin (CBCRS) functioned as a multidimensional (multisectoral and multilevel) governance platform for the basin. The CBCRS brings together representatives from different levels of government and sectors (including indigenous peoples and the local private sector of both countries) but needed to attain more effective vertical and horizontal integration. The preparation of the Strategic Plan for Transboundary Territorial Development (2017-2021) had the effect of fostering inter-institutional and inter-sectoral coordination and cooperation, forging dialogues on national frameworks and local needs, and promoting EbA.

 

At the local level Eba measures such as agricultural diversification with integral farms and reforestation actions were implemented. The aim was beyond individual impacts, to scale up lessons to the basin scale, such as: 

  • the CBCRS´s project portfolio
  • the coordination of binational activities, such as Agrobiodiversity Fairs.
  • the Biological Corridor Association of producers, which facilitated the  exchange of experiences and peer-to-peer contacts (producers, municipalities)
  • The prior existence of the CBCRS (since 2009), covered under the Cooperation Agreement for Border Development between Costa Rica and Panama, was a key enabling factor, since the purpose of this binational structure (achieving greater transboundary coordination and leadership for good governance and the integral development of the basin) was fully consistent with the objective of improving adaptation capacities to climate change impacts in the basin.
  • Multidimensional governance is a central part of adaptive capacity. It is based on vertical integration of different stakeholders (local, subnational, national, regional), through the creation and/or strengthening of institutions where entities of multiple levels participate. It is combined with horizontal integration of sectoral authorities (public, private, civil society) in order to reduce isolated approaches in management and decision making, and allow mutual benefits and synergies between sectors and their adaptation needs to be identified.
  • In adaptation, inclusion of municipalities is vital, since they have a mandate in territorial management, but also responsibilities in the implementation of national adaptation policies and programs (e.g. NDCs, NAPs).
  • Peer exchanges (such as meetings between local governments) are an effective mean to awaken interest in the "natural solutions" offered by ecosystems.
  • The articulation of project efforts across a territory is fundamental (e.g. between AVE and BRIDGE in Sixaola) in order to achieve greater impact through a coordinated work agenda.
Revitalizing governance for adaptation

To be effective, governance for adaptation must be multidimensional and participatory, which entails involving farmers, municipalities, ministries and other public institutions in the area, community leaders, public health units and educators, in water management and adaptation processes. In the Sumpul River, this was achieved particularly through "action learning" processes and the revitalization of the Binational Community Committee of the Sub-basin. The work and local legitimacy of the Binational Committee was enriched by the inclusion of community bodies that for years were disjointed and lacked participation, such as the Water Committees, which are important entities in each community. New management instruments were also generated, leadership and the active participation of youth and women was promoted within the Binational Committee, and training and exchange of experiences were carried out for collective learning. Other contributions to governance came from producers who implemented EbA measures on their farms (and are now spokespersons for the benefits derived from such measures) and from municipalities (La Palma and San Ignacio) that integrated the EbA approach into their policies through the formulation of Local Adaptation Plans.

  • The prior existence (since 2012) of the Binational Committee is a key enabling factor, as it was not necessary to start from scratch, an existing structure could instead be strengthened through restructuring, after a diagnosis of its operations and key actors/leaderships.
  • In order for the Water Committees to contribute to a shared management model with a basin-wide vision in the Binational Committee, they must first improve their own organizational and management capacities, to then be better able to advocate for and represent their communities.
  • Having biophysical studies and specific technical information on water resources and EbA facilitated the processes of raising awareness, motivating participation, adopting agreements and implementing targeted actions, which in turn helped to avoid the dispersion of resources.
  • Increasing the effectiveness and sustainability of governance processes entails constant efforts over many years, which often exceed the duration of cooperation projects. Therefore, it is convenient to seek to, on the one hand, maximize synergies between projects and, on the other hand, maintain a presence and accompaniment in the territory through successive projects.
Facilitation skills

For effective implementation, It requires highly skilled and experienced facilitator to work with various stakeholders like pupils, teachers and community members.

1.use of existing facilitator

2. use of existing institution

3. Use of multistakeholder approach

1. institutional interest should be considered when working with many stakeholders

2. it takes time for field staff to understand, gain experience and confidence  to facilitate this process.

Integrated Land Use Design

This is an inclusive and participatory process that school communities use to develop whole school land design and food forest to meet their needs.

It involves working with all school community/Stakeholders( pupils, teachers, parents, surrounding and local leaders}

1. Use of local available resources

2. involvenment of pupils, teachers and parents leading to intergeneration learning

3. Use of existing institutional  structure and systems

4. Joint responsibility

5. It based on community felt needs

 

1. improved working relationship between stakeholders

2. Its a good approach in addressing other social problems affecting communities like, negative attitude towards agriculture among youths. youth unemployment, crime.

 

Challenges

1. it takes time to take off, because one need to mobilize and create awareness among various stakeholders.

2. Negative attittude towards agriculture in school.

3. Inadequate time allocated for extra carricula activities in schools

Reviewing of the Park General Management Plan to include climate resilience aspects

This block addresses the work of revising the management plan so that it integrates aspects related to climate change resilience.

 

It was agreed during the National Validation Workshop held in December 2017 in Lusaka between the Department of National Parks and Wildlife and the Lake Tanganyika Development Programme (the funder of the GMP review) and other key stakeholders that the Nsumbu GMP will be reviewed in 2018 to include climate change aspects by pulling together information from the approved climate change strategy. Further it was agreed that the Park Climate Change Strategy will be annexed to the revised GMP.

 

As of March 2019, the review of the GMP is ongoing and expected to be completed towards the end of this year.

Key enabling factors in this BB include:

  1. Stakeholder awareness on climate change impacts and adaptation strategies for protected areas
  2. Effective facilitation of the GMP review process by qualified experts
  3. Effective stakeholder participation in the review process

To better integrate climate change aspects, emerging lessons show that its is critical to: 

  1. Rivise the protected areas management planning framework  to include climate change. This would allow for the integration of climate change during the GMP development, rather than the review process
  2. Review existing biodiversity threats to include climate change.
  3. Revise management objects to capture climate change resilience.