Evaluating and Disseminating Outcomes for Continuous Improvement and Sustainability

Another key component of the Agroecology Leadership Academy was the regular evaluation of its outcomes. Participants were frequently surveyed about their experiences with the Academy, its content, and their personal progress. This feedback was utilized not only to adapt the Academy's programme flexibly to meet the demands of the participants - an aspect previously identified as a success factor in other building blocks – but also to evaluate the entire programme more effectively and derive lessons learned for potential future academies. After the Academy concluded, these findings were compiled and discussed in an internal workshop involving the implementing organisations. The lessons learned, along with other relevant materials, are shared on various platforms, particularly Agroecology TPP, to assist organisations in planning and implementing similar projects. Additionally, the project was presented in a public webinar upon completion. During this webinar, Academy participants had the opportunity to showcase their transformation initiatives, providing a valuable chance to expand their networks and enhance the sustainability of the Academy.

  • The regular collection of feedback from participants not only allowed for real-time adaptations of the Academy programme but also served as the foundation for the internal evaluation workshop held after the Academy’s conclusion. The feedback addressed a wide range of aspects related to the Academy, including content, formats, logistics, learning experiences, and more, in order to achieve a more comprehensive evaluation at the end.
  • It is important to note that the webinar following the Academy provided a platform not only for the implementing organisations to present the Academy itself, but also, and importantly, for the Academy participants to present the initiatives they had developed. This fostered engagement beyond the Academy’s boundaries and enabled participants to forge new connections that could be beneficial for furthering their initiatives.
  • While some surveys yielded helpful insights, others unfortunately had low response rates. It is therefore advisable to use brief surveys with no more than 10 questions at the beginning of the Academy and after each international learning event.
  • The planning of follow-up activities should include considerations for how this Academy could be adopted by other institutions, follow-ups on the country transformation initiatives, and strategies for further embedding the Academy in the countries involved. It is recommended to develop a clear action plan aimed at maximising the sustainability of the Academy approximately nine months before its conclusion.
International Learning Events and Online Sessions

Two international four-day learning events framed the Academy, occurring at its beginning and end. The first event took place in February 2024 in Kisumu, Kenya, as part of the Sowing phase of the Academy. The objective of this event was to bring all participants together for the first time in a spirit of collaborative learning and support. It aimed to introduce the participants to the key concepts of leadership and agroecology while laying the foundation for successful work and group cooperation. During this event, participants began developing stakeholder systems maps to advance agroecology in their countries and collaborated to create a vision for change. Additionally, a field visit took participants to a local demonstration farm (BIOGI) and a farm practicing agroforestry, supported by the NGO Trees for the Future. 
After several months of learning in country groups and meeting the global cohort online four times, the second event was held in November 2024 in Hawassa, Ethiopia. This marked the final official activity of the Academy and served as the core event of its Harvesting phase, transitioning participants into the Transforming phase. The key objectives of this event were to support country groups and individuals in taking and scaling up action, to deepen the learning from previous months, to discuss the potential for upscaling the initiatives developed during the Academy, and  to celebrate and strengthen the networks that had formed.
During this event,  participants reflected on and shared learnings with other country teams, exploring key topics such as personal ecology, individual leadership, habit formation, and communication. A field visit included a tour to a local coffee co-operative processing facility and a diversified small-scale farm. Participants also planned their next steps as transformation makers for agroecological change.
The two international learning events were complemented by a total of four online session, each lasting 2,5 hours, which took place in March, May, July and September 2024. These sessions provided participants with additional insights on models and tools for leading transformation initiatives and advancing agroecology, including effective communication, overcoming obstacles, and influencing political narratives. Thus, these online sessions constituted an important component of the Academy’s Growing phase. 

  • Both events featured a highly interactive blend of training and workshops, guided by a pre-set agenda while allowing ample opportunity for participants to influence the programme.
  • The translation services provided during both live and online events were seamless. Thanks to the excellent interpreters, particularly at the two learning events, language barriers were effectively addressed.
  • Participants appreciated the field trips, which were made possible by hosting the international learning events in cities that offer access to rural areas, rather than in capital cities.
  • While the focus between the two in-presence International Learning Events was on country-specific transformation initiatives, the international online meetings provided an opportunity for the entire group to reconvene, maintain collective momentum, and to share insights with one another.
  • Regarding the field trips, it is preferred for future events to concentrate on a single field visit per learning event, dedicating more time, ideally an entire day – to the farm. Effective and timely coordination with country partners is essential to ensure that suitable locations, logistics, and adequate facilities are available on-site.
  • The bilingual nature of the events necessitated translation services for all sessions. While this was highly effective during in-person international learning events, the quality of interpretation and the technical setup for translation during online events fell short, creating additional work for facilitators, such as repeating sessions. Therefore, it is recommended to utilise software with easy-friendly translation features (such as Zoom, if permitted by the organising entity of the Academy) and to provide participants with more thorough briefings on overcoming technical challenges.
  • Thorough logistical preparation is crucial for international learning events. Participants from various countries need to converge at an appropriate location. Important processes, such as obtaining necessary visas and exploring travel options, should be initiated well in advance.
Building Bridges: The Academy’s Multidimensional, Multistakeholder Approach

The purpose of the Academy was to support participants in developing the skills and experience necessary for leadership in navigating complex systems and fostering agroecological transformation.
A suitable concept to fulfill this purpose was developed over a span of three months (July – September 2023): 

Consequently, the purpose was distilled into three key objectives: Learning, Acting, and Networking. These objectives were reflected in the design of each session and supported at three levels:  individuals, country teams, and the global cohort.
The methodology of the Agroecology Leadership Academy was based on 7 principles:

  • A close connection between the topic of Agroecology (the “What”) and Transformation and Leadership (the “How”)
  • A clear focus on transformation skills and mindset
  • Transformation initiatives as core learning projects
  • In-Country facilitators to support the country teams
  • Linking Learning, Acting and Networking
  • Systemic, experiential and relational learning
  • The strong role of communication

The general structure of the Academy was organised into four phases: Sowing, Growing, Harvesting and Transforming. Various learning formats were implemented throughout these phases, including an online kick-off event, two international in-presence learning events, four international online sessions, and individual workshops for the different country teams. These formats concentrated on the aforementioned levels. While the meetings within the country teams emphasised teamwork at the national level, the international sessions facilitated mutual learning among the global cohort. 

After the concept development phase, the participant selection process commenced. The goal was to assemble a heterogenous group representing diverse stakeholder groups, skills, ages and genders. 
A call for applications was sent out to a pre-defined group of potential participants from agroecology-networks in the respective countries. Following the evaluation of initial applications based on predefined selection criteria, individual selection conversations were conducted to finalise the group composition, with five participants chosen from each country. 
In selecting participants, not only individual criteria were considered, but also the need for complementary skills within the group composition.  Each participant was expected to contribute something from their personal background that would benefit the group as a whole.
This selection process ensured that different levels of the agricultural and food system were represented - participants included, among others, farmers, founders of agricultural enterprises, university professors, and representatives of ministries of agriculture - as well as ensuring a balanced gender ratio within the group.

  • Utilising a core model developed during the concept development phase, which was introduced at the beginning of the programme and referenced throughout The core model for Agroecology Leadership was designed in a circular format with multiple rings. The centre of the model, Agroecological Transformation, was to be achieved by interweaving elements of the inner circle – leadership elements at various levels – with the outer circle – agroecological principles.
  • Implementing a communication action plan to ensure that all participants understood the planned communication tools and materials, alongside establishing frequent communication to share information and include modules on effective communication.
  • Involving country focal persons in the development and implementation of the Academy to provide context specific support for both the facilitation team and participants. 
  • Adapting the Academy’s curriculum based on participants’ needs to ensure those needs were adequately met. Regular feedback from participants was solicited for this purpose. 
  • The overall structure and duration of the Academy appeared appropriate. The 11-month duration, combined with a mix of live and online events and transformation initiatives, was beneficial for learning.
  • The participant selection process was effective, as invitations sent through agroecology networks attracted two to three times as many applicants as available spots. The application process utilised simple and streamlined forms, and requesting application videos proved helpful in assessing participants.
  • Country teams, with diverse representation from various sectors (public sector, start-ups, academia) were highly active and successful. It is essential to emphasise the critical need for farmer representation and participation in forums like this.
  • The facilitation team demonstrated adaptability in creating a programme that addressed participants’ learning needs.  Rather than establishing a fixed curriculum at the outset, topics were developed based on participant feedback, which proved to be effective.
  • Initially intended to focus solely on creating materials such as videos and factsheets, communication activities became integral to all aspects—from the application process and session preparation to facilitation, documentation, and participant management. Therefore, it is recommended to incorporate the strong role of communication consistently into future Academies from the onset.
Strengthen cooperation in scientific research and continue to carry out scientific research monitoring

Strengthen cooperation in scientific research and continue to carry out scientific research monitoring. The application of infrared cameras and other modern monitoring technology for research, in-depth understanding of forest musk deer habits and survival methods, in-depth cooperation with the Three Gorges University, the Chinese Academy of Forestry and other scientific research institutions, with the help of professional forces to improve the level of protection, jointly carried out forest musk deer protection research. More than 160 cameras have been continuously deployed in Dalaoling Reserve for more than 7 years, and the population dynamics and habitat distribution of forest musk deer have been obtained in real time, so as to strengthen the protection of forest musk deer activity sites and reduce the corresponding human interference.

1.Continue to carry out field monitoring;
2.Strengthen cooperation with universities.

1.Monitoring equipment should be updated in time; 
2. The professional level of monitoring personnel should be continuously improved.

Multi-Sectoral Stakeholder Approach to Addressing Gender Equality and Environmental Sustainability

This building block fosters collaboration among diverse stakeholders to address the structural and systemic issues intersecting gender equality and environmental sustainability. Through activities such as training sessions, conflict management meetings, and leadership support, stakeholders from the gender sector (led by the Division of Gender) and the environmental sector (led by the Ministry of Fisheries) engage in cross-sectoral discussions to align objectives and integrate solutions. For example, fisheries stakeholders provide insights into resource management and illegal practices, while gender sector members contribute expertise on GBV prevention and response mechanisms. The initiative also influences policy by advocating for and supporting the revision of legal instruments like the Fisheries Act and the Anti-GBV Act of 2011, ensuring they address the unique challenges at this intersection. Additionally, technical support is provided for mainstreaming gender considerations in other sectors and integrating cross-cutting issues into broader policy frameworks. By aligning community-level efforts with institutional policies, this approach ensures scalable, sustainable, and contextually relevant interventions.

  1. Policy and Legal Advocacy: Engaging stakeholders in revising key policies, such as the Fisheries Act and Anti-GBV Act, ensures the alignment of national frameworks with the realities of community-level challenges.
  2. Cross-Sector Collaboration: Inclusion of diverse stakeholders—district committees, line ministries, community leaders, and local institutions—promotes synergy in addressing interconnected challenges.
  3. Institutional Support for Integration: Providing technical assistance for mainstreaming gender across sectors ensures that interventions align with broader national development goals.
  4. Accountability Mechanisms: Regular reporting and feedback loops between community actors and state-level stakeholders strengthen coordination, transparency, and long-term support.
  5. Contextual Awareness: Recognizing the socio-political and cultural dynamics, such as cross-border issues in Sesheke, enables flexible and tailored solutions.
  1. Policy Influence Requires Persistence: Revising laws and policies to reflect grassroots realities, such as integrating "sex for fish" dynamics into the Fisheries Act, is a gradual but essential process.
  2. Integration Enhances Impact: Addressing GBV and environmental issues in isolation is less effective than integrating these efforts into other sectors, such as health and education, to reflect the interconnectedness of societal challenges.
  3. Collaboration Fosters Sustainability: Strong partnerships between gender and fisheries sectors help stakeholders appreciate mutual dependencies, resulting in better coordination and ownership of interventions.
  4. Respecting Local Dynamics Is Critical: Communities dependent on resources may resist government interventions due to historical or systemic inequalities. A participatory approach rooted in respect and understanding is essential.
  5. Adaptability in Complex Contexts: Addressing intersectional challenges which are deeply embeded in neoliberal systems and structures such as intersectional inequality, rural marginalization and cross-border security issues, requires flexibility and innovative resource use to sustain project momentum.
Awareness Raising and Gender Training on the Interlinkages Between GBV and Environmental Degradation in the Fisheries Sector

T his building block focuses on raising awareness and providing tailored gender training to highlight the interconnectedness of GBV, particularly exploitative practices like "sex for fish," and environmental degradation in the fisheries sector. With men dominating fish harvesting and women constituting 90% of post-harvest activities, the sector reveals stark gender dynamics. The initiative educates communities and stakeholders on how these transactional relationships exacerbate resource depletion, harm biodiversity, and perpetuate power imbalances between men and women. Using diverse forms of communication, such as roadshows, community dramas, and GBV Watch Committee activities, the project aims to transform perceptions, foster collaboration, and inspire action to address these interwoven challenges.

  1. Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration: State actors, resource custodians, and legal systems working together to tackle the dual challenges of GBV and resource depletion.
  2. Diverse Communication Strategies: Using roadshows, drama, community awareness sessions, and GBV Watch Committees to effectively convey complex issues to different audiences.
  3. Local and Cross-Border Contexts: Acknowledging the unique socioeconomic and cultural contexts of communities along the Zambezi River, which spans multiple countries.
  4. Understanding Power Dynamics: Addressing the control and access to resources as central to the exploitation, rather than blaming victims or perpetuating stereotypes.

Lessons Learned

  1. Sensitivity Is Critical: Miscommunication or misrepresentation, such as media captions, can harm awareness efforts; careful messaging is essential.
  2. Continuous Engagement: Awareness raising is an ongoing process that requires sustained efforts and integration into existing platforms.
  3. Community Dynamics Matter: Resource-dependent communities can resist government-led resource management; respect and understanding of their perspectives are crucial.
  4. Challenging Stereotypes: Awareness efforts must emphasize that "sex for fish" is rooted in power imbalances rather than reducing women to instigators or sex workers.
  5. Resource Management Challenges: Disputes over ownership and responsibility for natural resources highlight the need for clear roles and strengthened governance.
Delopment of the SIREN App

This building block is to explain how I developped an App that allow fishers to contribute to marine science knowledge in Africa. 

Initially we gave fishers a pre-printed form to report opportunistic sightings they encountered. However, the form was getting lost most of the time. 

We decided to move to a digital solution. The existing App by then required internet to work and was just too complicated for fishers. So we thought we shoud develop an App that will be more userfriendly for fishers. 

We wrote the  algorithm (workflow) of the App and then contracted an Indian development company to write the code. 

Later we had to bring the development of SIREN back to Cameroon to reduce the cost of developement. 

We work with volunteer around the world that will continuously support with the development of the SIREN

  • passion and determination
  • availability of seed fund to develop an initial version of the SIREN App
  • Collaboration with local App developpers
  • Extending the collaboration to international volunteers 
  • understand
  • The first developper company I contracted for the development of SIREN was a foreign company based in India. The cost of develpment was very high and there was a lot of miscomunication due to language barriers. When we started working with local developpers, the cost of development decreased importantly and it was easier to communicate.
  • Before giving a smarphone to fisher for data collection you must develop a trust relationship with him before otherwise the phone will never be used by the fisher to report sightings.
Collaborative Partnerships for Conservation

This building block focuses on the establishment of strong partnerships between academic institutions (Universidad Politécnica de Yucatán), local governments (Secretaría de Desarrollo de Sustentable del Estado de Yucatán), and conservation organizations (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources), private sector (Huawei), and local communities (Dzilam de Bravo) to enhance the collection and analysis of biodiversity data, access to technological infrastructure, government program instrumentation and application, and local ownership and execution.

The purpose of this building block is to foster cooperation among diverse stakeholders to ensure the effective implementation of conservation technologies. These partnerships enable the sharing of resources and expertise, empowering local actors to participate in conservation projects and creating a framework for sustainability.

Enabling factors:

  • Strong engagement and alignment between stakeholders, including academic institutions, government agencies, conservation organizations, private sector and local communities.
  • Signed agreements that define clear roles, responsibilities, and benefits for all parties involved.
  • Access to local knowledge and expertise to ensure the relevance and effectiveness of conservation actions.
  • Transparent communication between stakeholders is crucial to build trust and ensure the long-term success of partnerships.
  • Including academic institutions fosters innovation and provides opportunities for student involvement in meaningful projects.
  • Government involvement helps to create conservation policies and facilitates execution in the community.
  • Partnerships with conservation organisations strengthen the scalability and visibility of conservation initiatives by pooling resources and knowledge.
  • Community of Dzilam de Bravo provides data on field and by taking ownership of the project, they contribute to efficient project execution 
  • Private sector provides infrastructure and expertise to facilitate the development of the technology
Enhancing Safe Fishing Practices

FFMA delivers real-time weather forecasts, disaster alerts, and ocean state information in regional languages, ensuring accessibility for diverse fishing communities across India.

Embedding Fisher Friend within the Fish for All Centre Programme:
MSSRF integrated Fisher Friend into its Fish for All Centre Programme, focusing on sustainable fisheries development. This alignment leveraged existing resources, expertise, and networks, providing a strong foundation for promoting Fisher Friend.

Engagement with INCOIS:
Collaborating with the Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS), MSSRF ensured the provision of critical oceanographic data and advisories. This partnership enhanced the app’s accuracy and relevance for fishers.

Engagement with Departments of Fisheries and the Indian Coast Guard:
MSSRF worked closely with government departments to align Fisher Friend’s services with government priorities. These partnerships also facilitated policy advocacy and integration with existing fisheries initiatives.

Partnership with Fisher Associations and Local NGOs:
By partnering with fisher associations and local NGOs, MSSRF leveraged local networks and expertise, promoting Fisher Friend through trusted channels and building credibility among fishers.

Geospatial Planning and Risk Mapping

Dynamic risk maps, built using GIS and geospatial analysis, identify high-risk areas and guide resource allocation. This tool can be used for urban planning, disaster risk reduction, or managing natural resources like water or land.

  • Regularly refreshed data on terrain, vegetation, and weather is crucial for accuracy.
  • Trained personnel must operate geospatial tools and interpret risk maps.
  • Risk maps should inform planning and resource allocation at local and regional levels.
  • The expertise is crucial to help you build the correct framework in order to be scalable.