Multi-layered management ‘tools’ (spatial and temporal)
Zoning is only one of many spatial tools used in the Great Barrier Reef. Other spatial layers are depicted in the maps below, showing the same area of the GBR with differing layers overlying the zoning. A range of multi-dimensional management tools (spatial, non-spatial and temporal) are applied, some of which are part of the statutory GBR Zoning Plan, while others are in other statutory documents. Non-spatial management includes bag limits or size limits for fishing, or a wide range of permits; temporal management includes seasonal closures at key fish spawning times or temporary closures for short-term activities like military training. So rather than a single GBR management plan, a comprehensive three-dimensional Management system exists, comprising federal agency plans, State agency plans and other plans (e.g. fisheries management, ports, etc). Today this full suite of management tools comprises a comprehensive management framework, integrated and coordinated across agencies and jurisdictions. However, not every aspect of spatial management is shown in the publicly available zoning maps. Permits (often tied to specific zones or locations within zones) allow a detailed level of site management not possible by zoning alone.
The Intergovernmental Agreement (the IGA, developed in 1979 but updated in various iterations, i.e. in 2009 and 2015), provides the basis for governments to work cooperatively to manage the GBR using multi-layered management tools. Other parts of the GBR legislation provide the statutory ‘head of power’ to enable the various management provisions to be applied in the GBR and to have force in law (see also the Blue Solution titled the Sound Legislative/Governance Framework for the GBR)
• If all these management layers were to exist in a single two-dimensional zoning plan, it would be extremely complex and confusing; however, the publicly available zoning maps show only those management layers that are important for the majority of recreational users. • The State of Queensland ‘mirrored’ the federal zoning in the majority of the adjoining State waters which means there is complementary zoning for virtually all the State and Federal waters across the entire GBR from high water mark out to a maximum distance of 250 km offshore • Other complementary management approaches, both spatial and temporal, operate across these jurisdictional boundaries. They have been developed with differing levels of government and with various industries, stakeholders or community groups, and are designed to provide more effective and integrated protection of the entire GBR and thereby increase the resilience of the GBR to cope with escalating pressures.
Multifactor diagnostic chart
This building block helps to identify the factors that threaten sea lion populations with a spatially-explicit, multifactorial approach. The outcome is a set of prescribed actions for each population in the same geographic realm, depending on their diagnostic characteristics, avoiding an “all-purpose” general, possibly ineffective solution. For each colony or population of sea lions, a set of environmental factors is selected and described with a historical perspective. Examples of relevant factors are: sea temperature, upwelling index, pH, chlorophyll, diet composition of sea lions, microbial load, heavy metals. Next, a group of drivers are identified as influencing the region of interest and for a given year, their influence in factors is determined and qualified. Drivers can be: ENSO, climate change, over-fishing, pollution. The end result could be that only a few or several colonies could be affected, even in the same geographical region or sub-region.
1. Information about population: total number of individuals; numbers of pups; numbers of females, diet information for sea lions, pollution data. 2. Availability of environmental variables. All the time series of environmental variables were fetched from internet specialized public sites.
Because this Building Block requires a fair amount of data, some basic information might not be available. At the end, using a data-poor approach, one has to use a set of available environmental variables, namely temperature, chlorophyll and upwelling.
Population trend and environmental influence model
This building block is very useful to understand the population trend and how environmental factors take a part and influence this tendency. Modification and adaptation of existing population models which describe trends as well as the relationship between the parental stock size and newborns make it possible to understand how the environment influences sea lion population growth rates and abundance. These model approach helps to understand whether a given sea lion population is influenced or not by environmental variables. The approach ultimately allows deciding if one or several sea lion populations could be good indicators of environmental change.
1. Information about population: total number of individuals; numbers of pups; numbers of females. 2. Availability of environmental variables. All the time series of environmental variables were fetched from internet specialized public sites.
Developing these models helped me to understand that population trend is a very complex phenomenon: -It could be not directly related with the population trend but could work in synergy with other events. -El Niño event isn’t the only or main event that influences the population trend and recruitment process. - Not all the colonies are influenced by the same environmental change; a few are not responsive of the variables tested. - The environmental conditions seem to influence more the survival rates than fecundity. It is very important to have sufficient information about population and apply the rates of other similar animals just in extreme necessity because these trends are very specific for species.
Population trend and environmental influence model
Multifactor diagnostic chart
Transparent sharing of information
The results of the project have been shared with Belize’s Ministry of Forest, Fisheries and Sustainable Development (including Coastal Zone Management Authority and Institute and National Climate Change Office) and the Ministry of Tourism to facilitate replication, and uptake of the process and recommendations. The results have also been shared with local communities, local NGOs, land developers and the private tourism sector to build capacity, awareness and implementation of greener landscape practices within the coastal zone.
• Continuous and transparent sharing of information and best practices with communities and stakeholders. • Interest and wish to conserve the natural ecosystems exhibited by local communities, stakeholders and government decision-makers.
Working in partnership and building a sustained relationship with local communities and stakeholders (e.g. private tourism sector groups) on the Peninsula opened doors for us to influence better practices on the ground. This is very important since these groups can play important roles as advocates, sponsors, partners and agents of change. WWF has been carrying out conservation and climate adaptation related projects on the Placencia Peninsula since 2007, and over the years have built credibility within and among the communities and sectors on the Peninsula. Where there is trust, communication can be very effective.
Formative Research
During the planning phase extensive formative research informs the Social Marketing, as well as the Technical Assistance components of a campaign. Research sets the baselines that allow the assessment of social and conservation impacts following a campaign. Qualitative research (e.g. focus groups, observation, in-depth interviews) is geared towards understanding target audience opinions, feelings, concerns and perceived benefits of current as well as desired management practices. Qualitative research is about creating a casual conversation with and between participants to establish a comfortable relationship, and to reveal underlying information unobtainable through quantitative research. Quantitative research surveys capture specific answers to specific questions to describe demography, identify media preferences, and assess the current state of knowledge, attitude, communication and readiness of target audiences regarding a certain behavior change. Both components ultimately inform campaign decisions like objectives, respective activities, materials, and messages for both Social Marketing and Technical Assistance.
• Training on qualitative and quantitative research methods. • Generic qualitative research guide/procedure to support researcher in preparing and during research rounds. • Templates to facilitate qualitative research analyses. • Quantitative research (i.e. survey), following best practices for survey question design to avoid bias in respondent answers. • Committed base of volunteers to support survey implementation. • Software to process and analyze quantitative data.
Qualitative research techniques (e.g., focus group and in-depth interviews) geared towards understanding the target audience opinions, feelings and concerns regarding a certain behavior change are essential to create casual conversations for participants. This enables creating an environment of trust in which fishers feel comfortable expressing what they really think instead of expressing what others want to hear. The latter would make data barely reliable. Surveys that are built on qualitative research results tend to better inform campaign strategies, making them more aligned with campaign goals and objectives. It is essential to avoid setbacks when it comes to survey implementation, and detailed planning based on sample sizes and human resources is necessary. In that sense, building strong relationships with a committed group of campaign volunteers to support this task is essential.
Participatory management planning and capacity building
Participatory management planning and capacity building of locals for long-term conservation of forests is one of the final steps of the community-based conservation model. Developing a participatory management plan helps communities to manage their forests effectively. Recently, we drafted a management plan for one of the conserved areas, using participatory decision making tools to identify different units of land-use, human-used areas for basic livelihood needs, grazing grounds and their associated values related to the biodiversity and livelihoods of the community. Through participatory tools, we identified areas where conservation action is needed, areas for regeneration and some of the pockets that needs better protection through the patrolling and monitoring. We undertook social mapping ensuring participation from all segments of the community i.e. elders having knowledge on village history/natural resources, herders, headman (gaonburah), women and youths to delineate all forest usage units. Once forest units and associated actions were identified, we outlined a budget and identified funding sources to support these planned endeavors. The management plan is valid for a period five years, and will be reviewed annually.
- Baseline information on various use forms and quantification of natural resource use for livelihood - Identification and involvement of all segments of the community especially elders, key decision makers, influential members of the community, youths and women - Identify different resource user/ user groups i.e. herders, prospective farmers, hunters (former hunters), traditional healers, etc - Involvement of local authorities including forest department and district administration for leverage and convergence
Enabling development of a participatory management plan ensures sustainability of a conserved area. Effective management planning and its implementation helps protect biodiversity as well as ensure long-term sustainable livelihoods. The community and the management committee of the conserved area in particular should feel the need and have ownership in preparing a management plan. Otherwise, it will be merely a document. We have undertaken numerous conservation education events with different segments of the community and involved them in participatory discussion. These programmes help raise their interest and clarify conservation linkages to their day to day livelihood. We have also taken enough time during our participatory appraisals ensuring optimum participation from the community segments.
Creating materials and promoting means of communication
Our staff is composed by professionals with technical graduations such as biologists, engineers and social sciences but there no special admission exams for communication professionals. The role that should be done by journalists, designers, publicists are done by the ones previously mentioned. In order to cover part of this gap volunteers with communication experience have given some important contributions. In this case the work is not necessarily done in a regular basis. Some products we have had so far include: logo modernization, media collection organization, promotional material creation, high-quality pictures production and social networks fostering.
- Allow some activities to be sent by volunteers from home - In the beginning it is even more important to explain to the volunteers about the institution mission and the importance of the work as: a) they have not usually had specific training in environmental issues and b) they can do part of the work out of our headquarter so they do not experience much of the daily routine.
- Sometimes time expectation for the products to be concluded must be much longer than if it was done by a company as the volunteers from this knowledge area are usually very busy - Social networks fostering is a powerful mean of communication with the society from different ages, localities and income levels. Young people usually deal very easily with new technologies. We can have help from them to make our work more effective.
Sharing a common past through preservation of cultural sites
The aim of this activity was preservation of cultural sites and promotion of cultural tourism through reconstruction of buildings and production of information in order to improve knowledge of the past in Paanajärvi National Park in Russia. The border area was ravaged in past wars and the border shifted leaving parts of what is now Paanajärvi NP that belonged to Finland on the Russian side. Through understanding of the past we can learn from it and promote peace and cooperation in our time. Two buildings were constructed using an old building technique for log houses after models from the 1930s in the old Finnish settlement of Arola in Paanajärvi NP (now part of Russia) and one in the old Russian Karelian village of Vartiolampi. Information panels about the history of these sites were placed in the vicinity of the buildings and an exhibition of historical objects was set up in the building in Vartiolampi. Also history books were produced in order to highlight that the NPs share common roots and want to share a common future as well.
It was crucial that there were craftsmen that could build with an old building technique. They gave capacity building to younger craftsmen and skills were also exchanged across the border. It was essential that the management of both Oulanka and Paanajärvi NPs were interested in promotion of cultural tourism and preservation of cultural sites in areas that are more known for their wilderness character.
It is important to collect stories from people when cultural heritage sites are to be interpreted as they make the sites alive. We took former inhabitants of the old Finnish settlements (now in Russia) to visit the reconstructed Finnish site and that was an emotional journey for them. Also it was a great learning experience for us. It is good to involve people that have ties to the cultural heritage sites in the heritage interpretation of the site. When reconstructing buildings it is important to have them as historically accurate as possible and using appropriate old techniques. It is also important to tell the visitor that the buildings are reconstructions, not historical ones. Even if it might be painful to dig into past that is not always peaceful and harmonious, it is good to tell about this to the visitors in order to make them realize that we can learn from the past. Work in transboundary NPs teaches us that we can work together with a common goal even with a shared darker past.