Building an Endowment for Sustainable Community Protected Area Management

Financial sustainability is an overarching aim for YUS landscape management. Woodland Park Zoo, with the help of Conservation International’s Global Conservation Fund and other donors, established a two million dollar endowment for the Tree Kangaroo Conservation Program and the YUS Conservation Area in 2011. The non-sinking endowment is managed by Woodland Park Zoo (WPZ) and follows procedures outlined in WPZ’s Operations Manual. Four percent of the interest earned by the endowment is to be disbursed annually by WPZ in accordance with TKCP-PNG annual plans and budget formulated in December of each year, and is designed to provide partial funding for core landscape programs in perpetuity. 

  • Partnership with organization that has expertise in establishing protected area endowments.
  • Long-term institutional support for endowment fund management (Woodland Park Zoo).
  • It is important to link the allocation of endowment funds to clear outcomes in TKCP-PNG annual plans, and to the long-term targets of the YUS Landscape Plan.
  • It is necessary to continue to attract additional funding streams for the rest of the core programs, non-core programs, and operational costs not covered by the endowment fund disbursements (WPZ and TKCP continue to submit funding proposals to donors for this purpose).

 

Improving Community Livelihoods through Sustainable, Wildlife-Friendly Products

To ensure the long-term sustainability of the YUS CA, local communities must participate in and benefit from its protection. To encourage community engagement and sustainable development, TKCP builds partnerships to address local needs for livelihoods, health, education and skills training. 

 

The YUS Conservation Coffee program is an integrated approach to optimizing supply for a sustainable crop, while building connections to international markets. By selling farm-direct to Caffé Vita and other buyers, YUS coffee farmers earn revenues more than 35% higher than local market rates. Adequately covering production and transport costs, premium coffee export has become an economically viable industry for YUS communities. TKCP is now working to replicate this success among cocoa farmers by working with the PNG Cocoa Board and chocolatiers to improve local cocoa quality and to identify new markets. In addition, TKCP is facilitating the establishment of a YUS Conservation Coffee and Cocoa Cooperative to strengthen the management and marketing of the two crops.

 

TKCP's community livelihoods programs have fostered community buy-in for conservation, which is further bolstered by environmental education and community health efforts, ensuring the social and cultural sustainability of TKCP. 

 

  • Holistic approach to responding to the needs of people and the ecosystems on which they depend.
  • A wide range of national and international partnerships (government, private sector, academia and the NGO sector) to address economic and social needs of local communities.
  • Long-term time commitment to working with local communities (TKCP has been in existence since 1996).

 

  • Recognition that YUS is a living landscape where human well-being is the result of environmental protection. 
  • Understanding that the tree kangaroo is a special species for YUS. The Matchie’s tree kangaroo is endangered, mainly due to pressures from hunting, a complex and important cultural practice in YUS. The guarantee of its long-term survival is what prompted YUS landowners to create a protected landscape. 
  • Recognition of the need to make a long-term commitment to achieve success with sustainable livelihood initiatives.  
  • Commitment to having the YUS people take a leadership role in creating a vision of what is needed to create a place where wildlife can thrive and where people benefit from looking after the land and sea that supports them.
Scaling-up and sustainability of adaptation measures

Promoting EbA measures with a high level of community involvement and binational ties was an effective way to achieve greater interaction between community, municipal and national actors, and also between peers (network of resilient producers; local government encounter). The results are, on the one hand, greater local empowerment, and on the other, scaling-up of EbA measures both vertically and horizontally. Thus, contributions are made towards institutionalizing EbA and creating conditions for its sustainability. The replication of the integral farm model arose from networking between producers, communities and local governments, and from a regional project with the Binational Commission of the Sixaola River Basin (CBCRS) that provided the financing. The Agrobiodiversity Fair, the work of producers as a network, and the Binational Reforestation Events, which are now all under the auspices of local and national institutions, were important mobilizing forces of change and spaces for exchange and learning. In the vertical sense, the scaling-up of EbA included working with the CBCRS to integrate EbA in the Strategic Plan for Transboundary Territorial Development (2017-2021), and with MINAE in the National Climate Change Adaptation Policy of Costa Rica.

  • Much of the work was accomplished thanks to the channelling and guiding role of the CBCRS (created in 2009) as a binational platform for governance and dialogue, and the ACBTC as a local development association. Both advocate for local and territorial interests and know the gaps and needs that exist in the area, and with this project were able to address the challenges that communities face and improve governance in the basin, promoting an ecosystem approach and a broad participation of actors.
  • Coordinating efforts through the CBCRS has shown that it is more cost-effective to work with existing structures and governance bodies, with powers and interests in the good management of natural resources and in achieving an appropriate representation of key actors, than to aim to create new groups or committees to deal with EbA issues.
  • Improving multilevel and multisectoral governance is a fundamental part of effective adaptation. Here, the role of subnational governments (such as municipalities) needs to be underscored, since they have a mandate in the management of the territory, but also responsibilities in the implementation of national adaptation policies and programs (e.g. NDCs and NAPs).
  • The identification of spokespersons and leaders (amongst men, women and youth) is an important factor in effectively fomenting the uptake and up-scaling of EbA.
Community ownership of adaptation measures based on ecosystems and biodiversity

Communities took ownership of the following EbA measures once prioritized and implemented in a participatory manner in the basin:

  1. Restoration of riparian forests. Binational reforestation events are held involving local communities and schools. These efforts reduce erosion, mitigate the risk of floods, and reinforce cross-border cooperation and local empowerment, including youth. The sustainability of this action is integrated into a reforestation strategy for the middle basin.
  2. Integral farms / agroforestry systems. Practices are incorporated to manage ecosystem services and generate a high diversity of products (agricultural, forestry and energy). Soil conservation practices and a transition to agroforestry systems with crops and tree diversification, tropical orchards, sowing of basic grains and protein banks are promoted.
  3. Recovery and valuing of autochthonous seeds and varieties. Agrobiodiversity Fairs are organized to promote the conservation of genetic diversity (criollo seeds) and their traditional knowledge. The impact attributed to the Fair can be seen in the increases in: participation (exhibitors), diversity of species (> 220) and offer of value-added products.
  • The Agrobiodiversity Fair was born out of the need, identified by communities, to highlight the importance of genetic diversity for local livelihoods and adaptation.
  • Since its first organization in 2012, the Fair is becoming notorious, and consolidated, with the involvement of more and more institutions (indigenous associations; municipalities; government institutions such as ministries, institutes for rural development, learning or agricultural research; universities; and the CBCRS) as well as visitors.
  • Local wisdom relating to climate variability and extreme events, comes from traditional knowledge on resilience and adaptation, and is a key ingredient in building community responses to climate change.
  • Working with families was an effective model, as was the promotion of 9 demonstrative integral farms (replicated in 31 new farms). The integral farm produces a high diversity of products (agricultural, forestry and energy) and optimizes the management of natural resources. If it is framed at the landscape level, this production model consolidates the EbA approach and facilitates its scaling up.
  • The Agrobiodiversity Fair turned out to be a valuable space for producers; there they can create direct contacts for exchanging experiences, information and genetic material, and so there is a growing number of exhibitors that come from more and more communities.
  • The level of institutional commitment observed in the organizations involved, gives importance to the conservation and rescue of native seeds and their relationship with adaptation.
“Action learning” and monitoring to increase capacities and knowledge

In addition to training and supporting communities to implement EbA measures through their productive practices, the aim is to generate evidence on the benefits of these measures and create conditions for their sustainability and up scaling.

  • The socio-environmental vulnerability of 7 communities in the Sixaola River basin is examined in order to then identify and prioritize EbA measures.
  • Diagnoses are made (productive, socioeconomic and agro-ecological) to identify families with a commitment to transform their farms and select those with the greatest potential to become integral farms.
  • Technical support is provided to communities, complemented with traditional knowledge, to ensure that EbA measures contribute to food and water security.
  • Exchanges and training are organized for producers (men and women), indigenous authorities, youth and municipalities on climate change, food security, natural resource management, organic fertilizers and soil conservation.
  • Monitoring and evaluation is carried out to understand the benefits of EbA measures, and inform horizontal and vertical up-scaling.
  • Activities, such as the Agrobiodiversity Fair and binational reforestation events, are carried out collaboratively with local actors.
  • IUCN’s and ACBTC’s years of previous work with the local communities were a key enabling factor to ensure effective and inclusive participation processes, achieve a high level of ownership of EbA measures, and empower stakeholders (in this case, producers, community groups, municipalities and Ministries).
  • The binational agreement between Costa Rica and Panama (from 1979 and renewed in 1995) facilitates work at the binational level and inter-sectorial coordination, and endorses the Binational Commission for Sixaola that operates since 2011.
  • Self-diagnosis of vulnerabilities in the face of climate change (in this case, through the CRiSTAL methodology) is a powerful tool that allows communities to jointly prioritize what is most urgent and important and achieves greater collective benefits.
  • Applying the "action learning" approach at the community level allows for a better understanding of multiple concepts related to EbA and creates a community of practice that values and takes ownership of adaptation measures.
  • It is important to recognize the complementarity between scientific and traditional knowledge for the implementation of EbA measures.
Community Management of a Protected Area

PNG is one of the most diverse places on Earth — a country with over 850 languages and numerous mountain ranges that have historically limited contact between clans. These clans traditionally manage their own land their own way. Yet over the past two decades, communities scattered across the Huon Peninsula have defied tradition, joining hands to create a community-based group that collectively manages what in 2009 became known as the YUS Conservation Area (YUS CA), the first legally protected area of its kind in PNG.  Stretching over 75,000 hectares, YUS encompasses cloud forest peaks towering 4,000 meters high, coral reef on the coast below and tropical rainforest in between. The YUS CA protects not only the Matschie’s tree kangaroo, TKCP’s flagship species, but also a host of threatened species, as well as critical habitat that local communities depend upon for subsistence agriculture, clean water and hunting.

The YUS Conservation Area is managed in partnership among TKCP, the YUS community and the PNG government. TKCP manages the YUS conservation ranger team and the Ecological Monitoring Program conducts community awareness-raising, mapping and facilitates the YUS Conservation Area Management Committee.

 

 

 

  • A wide range of national and international partnerships (government, private sector, academia and the NGO sector).
  • Long-term time commitment to working with local landowners to understand community needs.
  • Working in partnership with local landowners and their families in conservation efforts;
  • On-going efforts to raise community awareness about the importance of YUS conservation;
  • Creation of the YUS Conservation Ranger Team;
  • Creation of YUS Ecological Monitoring Program; and
  • Establishment of a YUS Conservation Area Management Committee.

Fostering the design, establishment, and long-term management of a protected area in Papua New Guinea requires action appropriate to unique local conditions. Lessons learned for wildlife conservation include:

 

  • Significant planning and analysis should precede commitment to a site for conservation work. 
  • Long-term success requires a long-term investment of time  (it took more than a decade to establish the YUS Conservation Area). 
  • It is essential to build a trusting and respectful relationship with landowners. 
  • Community needs must be incorporated into conservation goals.
  • There is a need to build relationships with all levels of PNG government as project stakeholders.
Institutional Autonomy for More Efficient, More Effective Administration

UKG has been given several special autonomous rights in public administration delegated by its members under the Local Autonomy Act. In addition to promoting regional-wide administrative works mentioned in the first Building Block, it partially takes over the role of the national administration. For policymaking on important issues, UKG constitutes a special coordination body composed of governors and mayors of UKG members. Each member is appointed as a commissioner responsible for decision-making and implementation for each administrative field/sub-field of UKG, and field offices are set up under each responsible member governments. Furthermore, councils can be set up to discuss important issues of the region with participation of local stakeholders. This governance system ensures that UKG represents the regional voices. Nevertheless, the finance of the Union entirely depends on mandatory contributions from the member governments and subsidies from the national government as the right of taxation is not included in the given rights.

  • Several special autonomous rights in public administration delegated by the members under the Local Autonomy Act
  • Establishing a governance system that ensures that UKG represents the regional voices for policymaking on important issues

An intergovernmental organization can administrate cross-jurisdictional issues more effectively and efficiently than the national government when the member governments in the system reflect regional needs and make good use of the local knowledge and network.

Intergovernmental Collaboration for Issues Beyond Administrative Boundaries

UKG is responsible for policymaking and implementation across jurisdictions of each member government in seven fields, namely disaster prevention; tourism cultural and sports promotion; industrial promotion; medical care; environmental conservation; qualification tests and licensing; and training for officials. This unitary approach enables the member entities to address economic, social, and environmental challenges more efficiently and effectively through development and implementation of regional-wide policies, such as public infrastructure projects and public service programs, while reflecting their local contexts.

  • Unitary approach of UKG to manage regional infrastructure

  • Local Autonomy Act Amendment in 1994 and the effectiveness of the Omnibus Decentralization Act in 2000 (roles played by the national and local governments largely changed with local authorities becoming more autonomous than hierarchical, which also meant more opportunities for decentralized development under the aegis and guidance of the central government)

  • Spontaneous leadership from cities within the Kansai Region

The national government, in general, plays a central role in developing and managing large-scale infrastructure, such as rivers works, arterial roads, or national parks. Although the delivery of contemporary infrastructure increasingly requires localized knowledge, business partnerships, and social involvement, there has traditionally been a lack of institutional capacity building to cope with region-wide matters between national-local entities. An intergovernmental body beyond administrative boundaries like UKG is set to become more important to ensure multi-stakeholder participation in planning and managing complex and expensive projects on the basis of locally-rooted research, and consensus-based decision-making. 

Effective inspection and surveillance

This building block is described in detail in the solution"A holistic strategy for Protected Area management", building blocks 1, 2, 3 and 5. The other four building blocks described in this solution are part of building block 4(Long-term financing for MPA management) of the holistic solution.

The first step is to have a diagnosis of inspection and surveillance in the protected area through interviews with experts and field visits.

The second is to promote inter-institutional coordination so that the responsible and empowered authorities are on the water.

The third step is to have the necessary resources, equipment, technology, and capacities to be present.

The fourth and critical step is the joint operation at sea, to ensure compliance with regulations. This is done by the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (CONANP) alone (Marietas) or with the support of other authorities (Cabo Pulmo and Loreto) and local organizations (Espiritu Santo). The information from each tour is systematized in a mobile application and reports are generated to make operational decisions and verify the proper use of resources.

The leadership of this building block is implemented by authorities and/or the local organization.

Collaboration agreements between organizations and government.

Working within a protected area allows the responsible authority to be identified.

Pronatura Noroeste and the Citizen Observers Network have been working for more than seven years to strengthen inspection and surveillance in some of these sites.

Alliance with partners who are experts in geographic information systems and mobile applications to design the online logbook.

Private funding of organizations that enable their continued participation.

Organized civil society has multiple roles in strengthening the inspection and surveillance of natural protected areas.

Alternative financing mechanisms allow for significant progress in this building block.

Technology can play a very important role in reducing operational costs and increasing the effectiveness of actions. It is important to acquire appropriate technology for the sites that is easy to use and repair.

Involving communities in marine surveillance can be successful when there are exclusive rights to use the resources and there is rule of law, otherwise it results in frustration for the users.

Marketing for social change

The Se buscan Héroes campaign is designed to promote and recognize the contributions of individuals and companies to the financing of natural protected areas.

Its web page describes its partners, the sites where it works, the risks and threats it addresses, its work logic and what is done with the donations. It also thanks all the companies that contribute to the cause and has a module to receive donations.

On Facebook, it maintains a fresh, fluid and very graphic communication with its more than 19,500 followers to position the brand and recognize the partner companies.

Uses various public spaces to make brand presence and promote donations, including the installation of donation boxes in hotels and billboards in public places.

Organizes events to launch the campaign and recognize contributors.

This building block is led by Paralelo 28.

  • Initial design of the campaign was done by an important international marketing company, who donated part of the costs.
  • The partners of the Paralelo 28 initiative are recognized as serious and professional organizations, with extensive experience in conservation in the region.
  • We have two years of funding for the implementation of the campaign.
  • The heads of the Ministry of the Environment and CONANP support the campaign and convey to their teams the importance of replicating it in other PNAs.

It is easy to disperse the efforts of communication campaigns. At Paralelo 28 it has been key to clearly define the objective of the campaign from the beginning, allowing members, partners and funders to have clarity on the actions to be taken and the metrics to be evaluated. The objective is to raise funds for NPA management and monitoring.

Having a coordinator for the initiative has made it possible to adequately manage the participation of the four partner organizations and always look out for common interests.

Generating designs that are easily adaptable to other PNAs significantly reduces campaign costs.

Having well-defined roles and leadership for each partner at each site allows for effective coordination.