Technical Assistance (TA)
Unlike Social Marketing, the Technical Assistance (TA) is based on more personal interactions with the fishers at the fishing group level (cooperatives or associations) or at the individual fisher level. This allows the issues to be addressed with more detail and depth, although larger groups of people are not reached. The overarching goal is to promote fishers´ support for conservation actions (e.g., creation of FRZ, adoption of sustainable fishing practices). Technical assistance tools are targeted towards building capacity in coastal communities and removing technical barriers, emphasizing leadership among fishers to improve the management of fisheries resources. Examples of technical assistance activities include one-on-one conversations, fishing trips, fisher exchanges among sites, formal training in specific fishing methods through workshops and courses, informal training, meetings with the authorities, follow-up with administrative and legal processes (e.g., fishing concession/permit renewal) and providing organizational materials (e.g., file cabinets, blackboards, etc.).
• High level of technical experience and skills of implementing partner allow deeper and more detailed TA interventions with fishers. • Well designed, implemented and analyzed formative research supports the definition of thematic areas for TA. • Partnerships with government agencies and NGOs to add human and financial resources and give fishers assurance that their effort is acknowledged. • Target audience participation in the design and future implementation of TA activities to generate ownership and contribute to reducing the resistance to the campaign effort.
Technical Assistance interventions help the campaign address issues identified in the Barrier Removal step, but interventions are not necessarily limited to that stage in the process. Despite the differences in the context of each campaign site, defined by the conditions of the country and the fishing industry, very similar thematic areas were identified for each TA strategy. Building trust with the fishers is a primary step for all TA activities. Those activities which involve as many fishers as possible generate ownership in fishers and facilitate the adoption of behaviors. Moreover, fishers are empowered to follow up on the agreements derived from each activity, improve their self-organization, establish agreements internally or with third parties to publicly reaffirm and guarantee their collective decisions, and promote their participation in activities that impact the fisheries management decision-making process.
Cost-benefit analysis
Alternative adaptation options were analyzed via the Marine InVest tool to identify costs and benefits of these approaches. Costs were incorporated directly into the scenarios and InVEST. This included the costs of implementation of adaptation options combined with any associated costs to ecosystem services quantified by our models, and benefits represented by the positive return in ecosystem service values quantified by our models. Local experts helped in reviewing the selected ecosystem services and adaptation options. A technical report was developed on the activities.
The models had the capacity to effectively quantify the potential costs and benefits of climate change and alternative adaptation strategies to lobster fishing and coastal protection, and alternative adaptation strategies to tourism and carbon storage and sequestration. The ecosystem service models provided a useful framework for tackling a complex set of issues within limited timeline.
Using storylines, spatial scenarios for Integrated and Reactive adaptation approaches, three models for ecosystem services, model for seawall protection from storms, information from the literature, and stakeholder expertise, we were able to effectively quantify the benefits of adaptation options in terms of revenue from lobster and tourism, carbon storage and sequestration, and avoided damages to coastal infrastructure. Outputs from models are relevant to Belize’s decision-makers, the public and private sectors, as described in building block 5. This CBA approach helped to clearly assess the costs and benefits of alternative adaptation options in an efficient way. Standardizing both costs and benefits, such as ecosystem services, in monetary values enables cross-sector decision-making and allows for a more complete economic assessment of options.
Gaining an invitation to the CBD EBSA meeting in Moscow
We carefully prepared our maps and other data and then wrote a supporting letter to one of the organizers of the IUCN CBD EBSA meeting in Moscow in March 2013. After some back and forth, we managed to get a formal invitation and to raise the funds to send researcher Mikhail Nagaylik. He attended and submitted a strong case for a large EBSA covering most of the east coast of Kamchatka. This EBSA was accepted and supported both by the scientists as well as the Ministry in Moscow.
The fact that FEROP co-director Erich Hoyt had attended MPA meetings and was an IUCN WCPA and SSC member helped in approaching the organizers of the CBD meeting in Moscow to obtain a place for a FEROP researcher. FEROP's deep experience in the region meant that the expertise would be essential.
Think creatively and just because you aren’t formally invited to something doesn’t mean you don’t belong, or that you can’t get in.
Declaration of an Indigenous Community Conserved Area (ICCA)
The Fishermen Association of the Rural Municipality of Mangagoulack (Casamance, Senegal) was informed that— following international CBD decisions and IUCN recommendations— Senegal was promoting and respecting locally established “community conserved areas”. The association thus mobilized the community to create Kawawana ¬ (“our local heritage to be preserved by us all”) in its ancien estuarine territory. In Kawawana, the ancient governance and management rules– renovated and agreed upon also by the municipal and regional governments – are finally again respected.
Only available in French. To read this section in French, please download the document "Blue Solution Template in French: ‘L’aire du patrimoine communautaire KAWAWANA: La bonne vie retrouvée par la conservation’” from the bottom of this page, under 'Resources'.
Only available in French. To read this section in French, please download the document "Blue Solution Template in French: ‘L’aire du patrimoine communautaire KAWAWANA: La bonne vie retrouvée par la conservation’” from the bottom of this page, under 'Resources'.
Participatory Planning
The Israel Marine Plan’s basic approach emphasizes that the marine space is essentially (ultimately) public. It aspires to view the different interests of all the stakeholders fairly and guarantee the provision of its ecosystem services over time. Through its goals, the plan offers way for informed and responsible management of the sea, applying an overall ecological approach. It aims to develop marine knowledge, to improve public awareness of what exists in the marine space, and to shape the way it is depicted spatially. Stakeholders are actively involved in the planning process and accompanied by local and international professional scientific advisory committees. The planning process is supported by the use of the interactive GIS tool that helps to visualize resource use, potential conflicts, and management scenarios and thus enables comprehensive planning.
1) Time needed to showcase and use the tool 2) Enthusiasm by those involved 3) Public relations for use of the tool (i.e., mentioning it at every opportunity, etc.)
Lack of support among the core-team staff was a problem. Diversity of members on the team should be maintained (i.e., background, age, expertise, etc.). Time is crucial so that efforts are not rushed and full professionalism is maintained, especially for the compatibility matrices. This "solution" will not be appropriate in all situations; it depends on the level of funding, use of the internet and digital tools among the general population. After we started developing the tool we discovered that other organizations/entities had similar tools available. We could have tapped into these to avoid redundancy & improve base data. It would have been helpful to tie the information from the compatibility matrices to the ASDA tool so that one could see the compatibility and/or conflict found each areas as competing uses are selected. Monitoring usage of the tool would have been very helpful. High usage (and diverse usage) would generate more support for tool development and promotion.
Documenting and sharing the success story
This building block focuses on documenting and disseminating results so that the experience can be captured and replicated elsewhere. Sharing and disseminating successful project results can encourage other interested parties to conduct site visits to observe the project first hand and meet the people involved. This kind of peer to peer learning can often be the first step towards replication. Documentation can also be used as a powerful advocacy tool to create leverage for greater commitment to waste management policies at regional and national scales. Documentation can be in many different formats ranging from a brief project summary or personal testimonies from the people involved, to powerful images that show the project in action or short film clips that can be embedded in websites and shared on social media etc. The greater variety of visual documentation the project has, the greater influence it can have on decision making processes related to waste management (or any other issue of concern). Documentation of results also plays an important role in the review and evaluation phase so that project leaders can identify the contribution of each building block to the overall outcome.
Ability to document project results in a visually appealing way, access to dissemination pathways.
One of the most powerful media for sharing results is through personal testimonies on film. However, this can be expensive if done through a professional media house. However, there is plenty of free, online digital editing software available that can be used to produce a film clip ‘in-house’ for a fraction of the cost.
Theory of Change (ToC)
A Theory of Change (ToC) is a road map that plots the journey from where we are now to where we want to be. The ToC serves to create a common vision of long-term goals, how they will be reached, and how progress will be measured along the way. A ToC forms the basis for strategic planning, and it clearly articulates how shifting behaviors and social norms will reduce threats to biodiversity. There are seven elements of a Pride campaign ToC: Conservation Result points to the conservation target (ecosystem or species) the campaign is trying to conserve, and what the expected long-term result is. Threat Reduction points to the main threats to the conservation target that can be reduced. Behavior Change focus on the human behavior that must change in order to reduce the identified threat. Barrier Removal identifies the barriers to adoption of the new behavior and how can they be removed. Interpersonal Communication describes what conversations are needed to encourage people to adopt the new behavior. Attitude identifies what attitudes must shift for these conversations to happen. Knowledge is the cognition needed to increase awareness and help shift these attitudes.
• Campaign site and thematic knowledge and experience • A prior analysis of site conditions including geographic scope, conservations targets, threats and contributing factors. • Clear long-term goals of implementing partner
Some of the key elements of success related to the ToC include, a clear, unequivocal connection between the expected conservation result, and the threat the campaign is trying to reduce. Even though the selected threat may not always be the most important menace to the conservation target, it has to be one that can be mitigated through human behavior change. Likewise, identifying a specific behavior change that is directly linked to the selected threat is vital.
Social license
Networking and linking up with other organisations to support fishers’ initiatives.
Availability of social media
Networking and linking up with other organisations is an important way to grow awareness and support for the fishers’ initiatives, for the first couple of years this was note done well.
Control of lionfish populations
Lionfish management requires the involvement of all affected parties, coupled with tailored strategies to reflect ecological, cultural and social differences within the region. Legal policies regulate the aquarium trade of lionfish, as well as conditions and gear for lionfish removal.
Committment to cooperate and share knowledge and experiences.
Strategies and tools for control differ depending on local variables and the spatial scale at which control is enacted. Sharing knowledge on removal tools and techniques can ensure the use of best practices in the Region. Partnerships with reef-reliant industries such as the fishery and tourism sector enhance resources available for removal.
Presenting work in Petropavlovsk to local people & groups
We presented our work in the local schools and community centres through talks and slides, and we were interviewed by local newspapers to explain our work and gain support within the community. We also offered to talk about our work on tourist ships. Outreach is an important part of gaining community support among local people, including researchers, fishers, and of course media. The rationale is that without their support, marine habitat protection will be less likely to be respected.
Openness of some schools and tourist ship companies to allow us to present.
The ability to communicate scientific information to the public, as well as persistence, is needed to get messages across. Knowledge about whales, dolphins and the marine environment is limited and the idea of marine protection is new to many.