Improved water use practices to compensate for reduced water availability for agriculture.

A series of measures have been implemented to improve water use, such as the implementation of technified irrigation, improvement of lined canals, and the use of crops resistant to water stress. In the lower zone of the Shullcas sub-basin, 6 technified irrigation systems have been implemented incorporating 261 ha of agricultural land and 2 improved irrigation canals for 175 ha. The families use them, allowing for the efficient use of irrigation water, with results in improved and increased agricultural production, which also represents an improvement in family income (previously only during the rainy season).

Currently, an irrigation system operation and maintenance committee has been formed and has received training to ensure the sustainability of the infrastructure. The training topics have been basically related to operation and maintenance. Both operation and maintenance must be systematic and meticulous, repairs must be carried out on time and must be of good quality and establish the original performance in terms of both capacity and function, ensuring the system's operability throughout its useful life.

  • A proper diagnosis of the problem for a better design of the measure.
  • Technological changes and human capabilities are required.
  • The adaptation of new forms of agricultural and forestry production to the impact of glacial retreat and climate change will be expressed in a livestock and forestry activity that will continue to develop, but with technological changes, with improved human capacities strengthened by training and awareness, and in a planned form of agricultural production.

The implementation of this component has clearly identified the need to know and prioritize crops that are more resistant to extreme weather conditions such as frost and hailstorms; in the Shullcas sub-basin, native potatoes and quinoa have proven to be an excellent alternative.

Reforestation and conservation of natural grasslands and pastures to promote water retention

The aim was to recover the ecosystems, their water ecosystem services and the service of providing food for livestock. Awareness-raising and agreements were worked on at both the community and family levels. For the implementation, agreements were signed for the installation and maintenance at the family level, since the community has given them possession of the plots of land. In the first stage the project assumed all the costs and later when the benefits were visible, the community contributed their labor. It was implemented:

Reforestation: To contribute to the regulation of the hydrological regime and the health of the ecosystems.

Conservation of natural grasslands: To prevent soil erosion, maintain adequate vegetation cover, enhancing wetland functions, maximizing water infiltration and retention capacity. Includes:

  • Temporary closures, in degraded areas that can recover naturally, and that will be subjected to a total restriction of use for a minimum period of three years.
  • Construction of infiltration ditches.
  • Installation and management of pastures: formation of silvopastures, reintroduction of natural pastures.
  • Concern of the population and institutions about the effects of climate change (deglaciation).
  • Platforms for interinstitutional work in which multiple institutions converge.
  • Organizational and leadership capacities of the community.
  • Local capacities to develop research and monitoring.
  • Integration of the measure into a larger strategy such as Integrated Water Resource Management and Community Development Plans.
  • Trust building process.
  • Technical accompaniment is required through field promoters, who provide personalized technical assistance and take advantage of community meetings for training.
  • Awareness-raising and appropriate communication of research results on changes in the water regime and the role of vegetation cover in protecting the soil and improving rainwater filtration have given the community and families a practical understanding that water will be scarcer or more irregular in the future and what actions they can take to minimize this effect. Therefore, they decided to take care now, using systems to reduce water consumption and taking actions to recover the ecosystem.
  • The community is required to visualize the benefits of the intervention to facilitate their contribution with their own contributions, especially labor.
  • Due to the parcelization of the territory, the implementation of the practices requires not only agreements with the community but also with the families that own the land.
Practical: Construction of rustic dams or dams: structural and natural measures

The qochas are built by taking advantage of natural depressions in the ground or natural lagoons, constructing a dam to increase the level of the dammed water and therefore capture and store more water from rainfall. Three types of qochas are identified :

1. Water harvesting qochas, used to store water superficially, thanks to their impermeable base and edges.

Water planting qochas, which store water for a short time thanks to their permeable base. The stored water infiltrates and recharges the subsoil and local aquifers.

3. The qochas for planting and harvesting water (mixed): they have both characteristics due to their semi-permeable characteristics.

Structural components: earth, clay and champas dams, the spillway with its overflow ditch, and the collector or adduction channel (where required).

Non-structural components/green measures: complement the qocha forming an integrated system. Conservation of natural grasses, afforestation and reforestation with native species, and infiltration ditches.

  • Land tenure security.
  • Agreement of the population to use their land to carry out the practices, especially to implement multi-family or communal qochas. In some cases, use restriction zones were even declared to facilitate the implementation of the practices.
  • Certainty of obtaining water benefits for the families working the qochas, which may come from local knowledge or hydrogeological studies.
  • Availability of local labor.

  • The construction of qochas cannot be conceived only as an individual or family effort at the level of scattered agricultural plots, since a territorial approach is required that involves comprehensive and "tailor-made" actions at the level of families, groups and community organizations.
  • A comprehensive analysis of the problems of the micro-watershed and the incorporation of the qocha construction measure as part of the intervention strategies at a larger level is required. The experience of implementing the qocha construction measure, as the axis of other practices (closure and replanting of pastures, agroforestry or construction of infiltration ditches) in Huachrahuacho, reinforced the conviction that this is a win-win measure. Thus, this measure was incorporated into: a public investment project in four communities in the Cusco Region, the National Program for Planting and Harvesting Water and the National Hakuy Wiñay Program.
  • The qochas work synergistically with other measures or practices such as infiltration ditches, pasture protection, reforestation, among others.
Mobilization: Water planting and harvesting contest

The contests, developed at the family and community level, were designed to motivate the implementation of technologies for adaptation to climate change, taking advantage of the culture of healthy competition and family and collective work that exists in rural communities.

The communities and/or families that participated received advice and technical support throughout the process, generating technical capacities for the proper management of natural resources and productive activities, with the focus on increasing the water retention and recharge capacity of the micro-watersheds and contributing to food security.

The families were motivated to demonstrate good practices, which opens the door to local recognition by the population and public and private institutions. During the contests, each family or group carried out activities for the habilitation or improvement of the qochas, such as: elaboration of a talking map, construction of a dam, delimitation of the tributary area (upstream) and area of influence (downstream) of the qocha, rustic collector or feeder canals and infiltration ditches.

  • Community organizations committed to group work demonstrations.
  • Advisory institutions and farmer promoters are required to disseminate the practice appropriately.
  • Building confidence in the usefulness of the implementation of the measures through appropriate communication of the benefits.
  • Involvement of local government with specific resources
  • The demand for water, a felt need in the community.
  • Initial motivation is key, starting with showing that these practices "work" with previous cases.
  • Motivation is important to implement the practices since they are labor-intensive. The contests reinforce the interest of farming families in the implementation with the incentive of obtaining public recognition that could give them access to other incentives.
  • The direct advisory action is facilitated during the contest, it is a way to learn by doing and to promote more knowledge for the implementation of this measure, and complementary measures (reseeding of pastures, infiltration ditches, afforestation, pasture protection, etc.).
  • In the end, the families are satisfied to see the results of change in their land, beyond winning or not some recognition, the family keeps the work done through the contest because they are aware of the benefits. Their land acquires greater value (reduction of vulnerability).
  • This methodology is assimilated by the local authorities, who incorporate the modality in their strategies to promote good agro-productive practices, linking these strategies to small irrigation projects.
Support from local institutions and grassroots organizations

The Project Unit Coordinator has been forming an alliance with local governments, research centers and grassroots organizations with specific presence in each of the project basins. This way, effective communication with producers and other actors in the territory could be ensured. Thanks to the network of local NGOs, information and results workshops had high levels of impact and thereby allowed for a more efficient translation of stakeholder insights into practicable solutions in the field. Examples of this support on the ground include: i) the management of different interests and potential conflicts between actors in the Cofre de Perote NPP; ii) the connection of governmental social assistance programs, subsidies, etc., to river basin zones that coincide with the project, which in turn created useful synergies; iii) the establishment of coordinated lines of work from the government level to protected natural areas (ANP) and to CSOs; iv) the coalition among CSOs has had impact on the river basin and in reducing costs, by making complementary use of the different capacities of the actors involved.

  • A network of NGOs experienced enough to offer practical training to producers;
  • Existing levels of organization of communities, producers, and local authorities on which to build initiatives, e.g. ejido assemblies, fishing cooperatives, rural production units, etc.;
  • A shared sense of identity and belonging among producers, communities and local authorities.
  • It has been vital to have a network of civil society organizations that collaborate in the project and help to promote good practices in the river basin.
  • Each basin is different, therefore having local CSOs and NGOs as partners of the project has allowed better tailoring of project activities according to the characteristics of each community or zone.
  • It is essential, however, to have a good management and coordination of the CSO/NGO network to ensure that all involved stakeholders are aware of each others' activities.
Key elements for ecosystem conservation are also anthropic

As part of PAMIC, great consideration on the dynamics of landscape transformation is being made. There is an attempt to identify and conserve those elements that are key for ecosystem conservation, whether they are of natural or anthropic origin. In PAMIC´s philosophy, conservation does not mean maintaining pristine ecosystems. On the contrary, conservation includes restoring managed landscapes and using sustainable practices. This allows the maintenance of the whole socio-ecological system through a sustainable use of the land, as demonstrated by shade-grown coffee production, agro-silvo-pastoral and community forest management projects, which support both livelihoods and ecosystems. 

  • Confidence in the social and environmental benefits of sustainable community management
  • Institutional learning about the long term limitations of the "do not touch" vision of conservation as a means of conserving ecosystems;
  • Network of actors with knowledge on land use and water management 
  • Long term mentoring of the producers;
  • It is vital to make use of existing local cooperatives to generate, lead and manage the introduction of new approaches to existing productive activities
  • When communities feel that their productive activities are not being threatened, they are more willing to get involved and undertake self-organized initiatives for the sustainable management of ecosystems.
  • Likewise, when they identify the project as a window of opportunity to obtain support and possible financing to improve their productive activities, the commitment and interest to sustainably manage the ecosystem increases.
Funding across the ecoregion enabling ecosystem management of habitats and wildlife on a landscape level

PONT is active in the following sectors:

• Conservation and enhancement of biodiversity – we provide long-term operational grants to Protected Areas to increase management effectiveness according to European / International standards. We give grants to Environmental Actors (mainly NGOs and some research institutes) to support important conservations actions in the Protected Areas and in the wider landscape to enhance connectivity conservation in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. For the latter we determined the important Connectivity Conservation Areas.

• Sustainable management of natural resources – local people play a key role in the landscape and therefore we support activities linked to sustainable natural resource management (nature-based tourism; cultivation of medicinal aromatic plants and other non-timer forest products; support to various women groups; shepherds; local participation; citizens science, support to seasonal workers to assist in fire management; maintenance of hiking trails; etc.). Since 2022 PONT adopted and is implementing an Environmental and Social Management System.

A donor willing to pay for staff salaries and overheads

Long-term secure financing

Long-term organisational development and presence on a local level

PONT managed to increase its funding base by 300%. This has resulted in a growth from 1 grant in 2016 to 40 grants in 2023 (10 PAs and 30 EAs). PONT disburses about € 3-4 million per annum for two grant programmes supported by various donors (BMZ/KfW; MAVA Foundation; Hans Wilsdorf Foundation; Sigrid Rausing Trust; and the French Facility for Global Environment). “PONT’s Value-Added to the Focus Area. PONT has the agility to work directly on transboundary cooperation rather than through bilateral arrangements which is often the case for multilateral or bilateral donors. PONT is viewed as being a neutral actor in the region. Having no “agenda” and being recognized as a good listener and problem-solver, PONT has been able to contribute to advances in sensitive policy areas. PONT has the flexibility to provide operating support that is complementary to investments made with donor funding. It is one of few institutions that can provide grants for operating costs. PONT has stepped in to finance just in time studies that would have been delayed by donors’ complex procurement processes”. K. Mikitin, External Evaluator, 2023

PONT strategy promotes transboundary cooperation between government and non-government partners

The PONT strategy was elaborated by drawing on the experiences of the PONT partners who have worked in the area for a long time. By working directly with these NGOs and protected area management bodies the main conservation and capacity development objectives were determined. This resulted in a strategy focusing on the financing of the gaps and building of strong partnerships with stakeholders that have a mandate, vision and the expertise to achieve the conservation results in the PONT Focus Area. The PONT strategy promotes transboundary cooperation between government and non-government partners based on previous experiences.

A comprehensive study gathering lessons learned of what was done in the last 25 years and where the remaining gaps are

 

Making use of the PA Management Bodies and NGOs to work on the PONT Strategy on a transboundary level for the entire PONT Focus Area

 

Available funding for both government and non-government partners

Instead of re-inventing the wheel the previous experiences were gathered by PONT partners who have been working in the geographical area for a long time. This was done under coordination of WWF Greece who knows the area very well and could verify the results. The recommendations for the conservation objectives were verified by the protected area bodies and this formed the basis for the conservation objectives for the PONT strategy. With the help of PONT expertise other objectives such as organisational development and capacity development were identified and added. Over the years and several rounds of grant giving this resulted in an updated participatory developed strategy for the extended PONT Focus Area that was accepted by both government and non-government stakeholders within and across state borders. To focus financing on the identified gaps potential grantees are identified based on their mandate, vision, proven track record and expertise to work in the area. Eligible PAs being ‘PONT ready’ are directly invited to apply for grants while most NGOs enter the partnership via open Calls for Proposals.

Promotion of livelihoods diversification and food security

The aim of this building block was to promote diversification of families´income and their sources of food through the reforestation of riparian zones using fruit trees and other species of economic importance. People from participating communities were trained on nursing and looking after young plants. In particular, women´s groups were the ones who were trained to carry out delicate activities of caring for seedlings and planting them.

  • Good knowledge on the area, the community, and its people´s needs so that support is better directed to support local ways of life;
  • Nurseries that have been stablished for the development of specific plants of economic and nutritional importance
  • Innovation-friendly local producers who are willing to be the first ones to modify their practices
  • Committed and consistent support from experienced, local NGOs
  • Capacity development to support the diversification of food and income sources was deemed to be more important for the long-term sustainability of the solution than capacity development through conditional monetary transfers. This is because the former can drive active participation in the solution in the long-term, especially when, as in this project, awareness-raising about the importance of ecosystems for livelihoods and wellbeing has been a success.  
Building grey & green infrastructure to combine cattle raising and hydrological fluxes

"Without a good water flow, no mangrove system can sustain itself" - said a local NGO field expert. Hence it is important not only to open channels to restore water flows, but also of keeping alive the dynamics of these flows in the long term. One of the activities that most affects wetlands is livestock. The farmers, seeking to provide firm ground for their cows, cover the channels and drain water bodies. In doing so, cattle farming has been affecting marshes and mangroves directly or indirectly. On way to reduce the impact of this activity is to combine the productive interests of the multiple farmers in the area, with the protection of water flows, by building three elevated bridges in piles for the passage of livestock in strategic sites. Also, "living fences" were established around the reforestation areas to keep the area safe. For these fences, plants and trees of economic use were used for the benefit of the communities.

 

  • Awareness-raising about the importance of maintaining the hydrological flux while continuing to raise cattle in the rehabilitated area;
  • Innovation-friendly local producers who are willing to be the first ones to modify their practices
  • Creating and maintaining channels within the mangrove system for facilitating natural flows between salt- and freshwater sources is a key component for reducing salinization problems, as well as making sure that a healthy mangrove is maintained;
  • Conservation and livelihoods are two sides of a same coin. For those ecosystems in which communities live, you cannot have one without the other.  
  • It is better to be realistic and keep in mind that productive activities will not disappear from the area, so it is better to combine impact activities such as livestock with restoration activities and maintenance of hydrological flows. Being flexible can bring many more benefits.