Mobilizing and building capacity of community Institutions

KENVO mobilized the community institutions (CFAs and WRUAs) into an organized group and built their capacity to engage in PES. Further, awareness on policies was raised among the community upstream. To strengthen the CFAs and the WRUAs, they were trained in all aspects related to PES – policies, practices, rights, responsibilities, fund management, monitoring and compliance. 

 

Community consultation engagements were held with CFAs and WRUAs and produced actions plans. The main objectives of the action plans was support land use practices that improve water quantity and quality and capacity build the local community to secure catchment restoration through water payment services scheme. 

 

KENVO was ready to broker relationships between community and the businesses.

The community institutions were in existence and willing to participate and commit to businesses.

• The local community institutions, CFAs and WRUAs are an asset for forest restoration as they have enough labor to do the work.

• Local community represented by CFAs and WRUAs need support to negotiate with the business sector.

• Businesses are willing to work with local community institutions, CFAs and WRUAs that demonstrate financial management capability and delivery of planned targets.

Develop a tool to test if young people will pay to learn conservation skills

1)      Conservation has become an increasingly popular career choice for young people all over the world. But many conservation organizations complain that young graduates don’t have the right attitude or the real-word skills. Nature Seychelles created the Conservation Boot Camp (CBC) on Cousin Island Special Reserve to test if the island could be used as a laboratory to equip young people with conservation skills, while at the same time use the fees paid as a sustainable funding mechanism for the MPA. The program was financially supported by the GEF from April 2016 to December 2019. The GEF project pays for a full time CBC Coordinator, equipment, and materials and other.  The coordinator manages the application process, and receives and integrates participants into the program.  A conservation manager leads on conservation work, while the Chief Warden manages all the logistics. The CBC is exclusive and takes a maximum of 6 persons per session and takes place the whole year. Each session lasts for 4 weeks and costs Euro 1000.00 (not including airfares and food). A 2 week program was been introduced due to demand. Nature Seychelles is a Private Training and Educational Institution under Seychelles law and a Certificate of Completion is awarded at the end of the training. 

  1. Cousin Island Special Reserve - the 50 year old conservation success story - as a laboratory to test the program.
  2. Funding to support the initial implementation and testing of the program
  3. Nature Seychelles is a certified private training institution by law
  4. Leadership and mentorship from the CE who has over 35 years conservation experience
  5. Existing human resource to support the implementation
  1. Initial funding is important as program depends on participants to fill all slots for it to be viable and sustainable. Not all slots were filled throughout the year.
  2. Having well-known successes provides credibility and helps in attracting participants.
  3. Necessary information laid out in a CBC handbook provided prior knowledge before sign up. 
  4. One size doesn’t fit all - although targeted at people interested in conservation careers, some participants had no previous or post interest in conservation.
  5. Mentorship with well-known figure helps to boost confidence and catalyse conservation careers
  6. Program not able to attract participants throughout the year. Under review to improve numbers so that it remains viable after the GEF funding ends. 
  7. The program was valuable for people from the region, in particular from Madagascar (18 participants), especially where there are not
    exposed to conservation success stories. 
The NMS-COUNT Iterative Framework: Phase 2

Phase 2 brings together various agency managers, local stakeholders, and researchers to address a set of management objectives and associated monitoring needs. In this collaborative process, all stakeholders contribute their knowledge and perspectives on legal mandates, policies and factors that influence visitation and use within a specific sanctuary. Managers and local informants participate in a series of surveys and workshops that progress from a more broadly-based questionnaire to one with more specific questions based upon prior feedback. The expert panel discusses visitor trends and challenges specific to monitoring visitation at their site. The results of each iterative survey and workshop provide detailed insight into the current state of knowledge on visitation and level of confidence in the ways this information has been obtained. 

Phase 2 requires full engagement between the local managers and researchers. When managers engage local stakeholders and inform them of the process, the information provided to researchers is more comprehensive. This portion of the process relies on interpersonal relationship development for researchers and stakeholders alike. Development of such working relationships via workshop contact and other interactions helps establish a foundation of trust and cooperation for the NMS-COUNT process to proceed upon.

In Phase 2, the research team engaged managers and stakeholders to better understand current visitation status at the sanctuary. Working with the NOAA Office of NMS, researchers were given access to contact 32 local resource managers and stakeholders with institutional knowledge about the site. This allowed the research team to develop a panel survey and engage the local stakeholders in a panel forum. All stakeholders were sent an initial questionnaire asking for their insights on visitation to the sanctuary in general. Three stakeholders responded to the questionnaire, providing general feedback on visitor activities, temporal and spatial patterns of use, pathways to and through the Sanctuary, and current visitor counting status. Based on this feedback, a second round of questionnaires were refined for use at the panel workshop. The in-person workshop featured detailed discussions of identified challenges to visitation monitoring at Gray’s Reef NMS. It also allowed detailed discussion of existing data availability for initial visitation monitoring strategies and modeling efforts.

Community outreach and governance

IUCN entered into the Dhamra port project because of concern about the port harming Olive Ridley turtles. As IUCN dug into the problems, however, it learned that the mortality rate of the turtles had already increased dramatically. A report prepared by the Wildlife Institute of India indicated that turtle mortality had increased from a few thousand a year in the early 1980s to more than 10,000 by the mid 1990s. Mechanized trawl fishing and gill net fishing were seen to be responsible for the mortalities.

 

Local community awareness regarding the value of the turtles was low. To address this, the IUCN team engaged in community sensitizing activities, including creative educational programs, as well as traditional outreach. DPCL also established a community training centre so that local villagers could develop new skills.

 

IUCN also identified that the use of Turtle Excluder Devices (TEDs) could be helpful in reducing turtle mortality due to trawl fishing, one of the biggest problems in the areas. The devices weren’t new to fishers in the Dhamra area – Indian NGOs and scientists had tested them with the fishers in the past – but they weren’t being used. The IUCN DPCL team consulted extensively with local fishing cooperative officers and communities to better understand the issues.

A training workshop was organized and a number of practical trials of the TEDs for fishers in the area were facilitated. Changing the practices of local fishing communities remains a major priority, but will require long-term education programming combined with policy solutions.

The last obstacle to be tackled in this public arena was governance. In the beginning, local authorities seemed more concerned about fishers’ rights than turtle safety. However, as understanding spread, government agencies became partner advocates for the holistic, long-term solutions. There were alternative livelihood trainings to provide income generating options to the community besides fishing.

Science and technical expertise

Dredging, recognized as a serious threat to the marine turtles, was identified by IUCN as a priority.  IUCN, with experts from the Species Survival Commission’s Marine Turtle Specialist Group designed and developed a dredging protocol to be followed during port operations. These included installing turtle deflectors on all dredger drag-heads to help ensure turtles were not pulled into the dredger. Trained observers were assigned to all dredgers to monitor this process. These observers would check screens on inflow and overflow pipes on a 24/7 basis. These measures (deflectors, screens, and human observers) were put in place to ensure that the dredging was “turtle friendly”. Such measures were the first to have been put in place in the history of dredging activities in India.

 

Lighting was the second major threat identified because excess glare is known to distract turtle hatchlings as they instinctively move towards brightly lit areas and away from the sea. For this, the IUCN Commission experts provided specific guidelines for the port’s lighting plan, which was adopted by the port authorities. IUCN further supported Tata Steel in identifying the right design for these lights. Today, Dhamra Port is the first and only port in India to have installed “turtle friendly” lighting.

IUCN supported DPCL in developing an Environment Management Plan (EMP). This plan was scientifically robust and practically implementable, going beyond the existing legal requirements. Most importantly EMP was designed in such a way that it becomes the integral part of the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) of DPCL. This makes it different from other EMPs.

 

Large-scale infrastructure can be designed to successfully incorporate biodiversity considerations.

Data collection system in Toubkal National Park

Between 2015 and 2019, the Direction du Parc National de Toubkal (DPNT) has developed data collection sheets for monitoring i) infractions linked to tourism activities, and ii) wildlife.

These are paper sheets given to local eco-guards to fill in during their field surveys, illustrate with photographs and then hand over to the Toubkal National Park Zone Managers (PNTb): from these sheets, the latter then draw up quarterly reports and location maps for the DPNT, which feed into a database.

From the end of October 2019, the DPNT plans to improve and facilitate data collection for local eco-guards: the Toubkal National Park ecotourism officer, in collaboration with the scientific monitoring officer and the PNTb zone managers, has adapted the CyberTracker software for this protected area in order to develop an easy-to-use mobile application for monitoring in the Toubkal National Park. Training in the use of this application is planned in the near future for the PNTb's eco-guards.

Training in monitoring (types of data to be collected, filling in forms, use of GPS and digital camera) is an absolute prerequisite before local eco-guards can begin field surveys.

Rigor in data collection by the eco-guards, then in the centralization and synthesis of this data by the Toubkal National Park Zone Managers.

In addition, the use of the GIS tool by the latter is not superfluous.

Thanks to this monitoring system set up by the DPNT, a veritable database has been created and periodically updated, enabling us toimprove our knowledge of wildlife (for priority species) and the location of "black spots" relating to tourist activity.

Better still, the implementation of these patrols and monitoring operations in the Toubkal National Park has reduced the reaction time between the discovery of an offence in the core zone and the issuing of the Official Statement of Offence, as the local eco-guards are constantly on the ground and in permanent contact with the PNTb Zone Managers (thus playing a key role in the fight against poaching and illegal construction).

However, it turned out that the local eco-guards still had many shortcomings in data collection, mainly due to the fact that many of them are illiterate. The CyberTracker software seems an interesting solution to this problem. To be continued...

Wildlife monitoring training

The local eco-guards recruited via an outsourced service had a perfect knowledge of the high mountains and their inhabitants. However, they had gaps in their knowledge of the identification of certain fauna species, and had never carried out monitoring according to a pre-established data collection protocol.

It was therefore essential for them to benefit from training sessions in this area: theoretical sessions in the classroom to familiarize themselves with species identification and data collection sheets, and to start handling technical equipment such as GPS and digital cameras (01 day/session), and practical sessions in the heart of the Toubkal National Park (PNTb) to assess the beneficiaries' physical abilities and knowledge of the mountain territory, and to apply what they had learned during the theoretical sessions (06 days/practical session).

It is important to have a budget for logistics, i.e. accommodation and catering for beneficiaries, and the rental of camping equipment, particularly for practical sessions in the high mountains.

During the 1st session, forestry technicians from the Toubkal National Park (PNTb) also had to be trained by the wildlife expert so that they could lead the subsequent training sessions themselves, scheduled by the PNTb management.

It is necessary to organize several training sessions to ensure that the eco-guards are able to perfectly identify the priority fauna species and correctly draw up the collection sheets.

However, it turned out that most of the eco-guards were also illiterate and had great difficulty in filling in the collection sheets: the Toubkal National Park Management therefore planned to adapt the CyberTracker software to its monotoring and to train its eco-guards in it (from the end of October 2019) so that data recording would be much easier for them.

Developing and trialing innovative financing mechanisms

In order to develop innovate financing tools for the proposed protected sites, it was important to thoroughly understand the profiles of the islands’ clientele , and to develop mechanisms that would not be seen as extorting more money from clients who were already paying hefty sums for their holidays on these private islands.

Extensive discussions about various funding options needed to be held at different management levels. e.g. the islands owners, the hotel managers, and marketing personnel in order to gauge an understanding of what products could be developed for the clients of these resorts. The resorts offer different holiday packages – from a five-star all-inclusive holiday package to a four-star sustainable island concept. 

Therefore, options were trialed for adoption or adaption, or for dismissal. One such example was the tree planting activity allowing guests to commemorate important life events, thereby becoming involved in the protection of the environment. 

The idea proved to be a popular and in-demand finance option on Denis Island, and it was assumed to also work well on North Island. However the scheme did not get approval, because North Island offers all-inclusive holiday packages, and so tree planting could not be charged.

The adoption of the financing solutions requires their approval by the owners as well the clientele’s willingness to pay for it. Is it important therefore that all management levels are consulted and on par with the mechanisms proposed.

Further, mechanisms need to be innovative and appealing and not portrayed as yet another product put on sale. In order to get to the stage of adoption of a funding scheme, trialing needs to take into account its practically, and its fit with the product offered by the respective resorts.

The discussions and approval of innovative financing mechanisms takes a long time to materialize, as these business decisions need to be thoroughly evaluated, and need approval from top management or island owners. 

In small islands contexts, limited expertise available locally can restrict possible funding schemes to be developed. It may be important to obtain ideas on a regional scale, or at sites that have similarities to North and Denis Islands. In the case of North Island, its context resembles that of Chumbe Island off Zanzibar, so it was necessary to learn what has worked there.

Support Protected Area (PA) and community cooperation through the Protected areas Friends Association (FA)

At the project inception, neither Mtirala or Machakhela National Parks were supported by any locally-based NGO’s or support groups. However, such an organization could play an important role in: promoting the PAs, building local community and PA collaboration, and addressing their development priorities.

 

Based on an assessment of the international and national experience and particularly the existing experience of other PA’s in Georgia, the project supported the establishment and functional capacity building of the Mtirala and Machakhela PAs Friends Association (FA).

 

The major risk identified was that many such organizations are heavily supported by donors and once such support ceases, they face problems to remain financially viable. Thus, a major focus of support was on building capacity of the FA to be financially sustainable in the long run via a strategy that ensures long-term core funding from reliable sources.

 

The Mtirala and Machakhela FA was established in 2016 and has been undertaking a variety of activities to build PA/Local Community relationships and collaboration, ranging from Junior and Community Ranger Programs, organization of ecological visits by schools, tourism promotion and application/implementation of local development projects with donor funds.

  • Existing national experience of establishing a similar NGO to support a Protected Area (Tusheti National Park) and an active, relatively established civil society in the country
  • A focus from the outset on building the NGO financial sustainability and ensuring of bringing in the existing in-country capacity and experience to support the initial establishment process.
  • The existence of national “summer camp” programme and tradition for schools and thus an existing opportunity of the NGO to tap into demand for services.
  • Support to the establishment of conservation/rural development NGOs is a popular mechanism for donor projects to implement activities. However, they face significant challenges in terms of maintaining ongoing financial viability and maintenance of their original mandates and objectives.
  • There is demand for environmental ed­u­cation and awareness services in Georgia, particularly in the context of youth summer camps and similar youth related experience bu­ilding events. This provides a potential source of core financing for PA related NGOs while remaining true to their intended aims.
  • There is limited experience and capacity within Georgia on the sustainable organization and management of NGOs/CBOs, particularly regarding sustainable financial planning. This is an aspect that needs support and focus by donors.
  • The Junior Ranger approach to involve local communities and the education of local future generations, is a popular, highly viable, and cost effective approach. The application of the Community Ranger approach is more challenging and requires the right circumstances and approach.
Tourism development inside and adjacent to Machakhela National Park

Appropriate tourism development is an important means and opportunity for Protected areas (PA) and communities located adjacent to them to meet their aims and needs.

 

In the case of the Protected Areas, the aims are:

- to provide a recreational service to visitors

- to increase public awareness and understanding of the importance of conservation

- to generate incomes that enhance management and strengthen sustainable financing for that purpose.

 

In the case of local communities, the aim is to increase sustainable incomes, improve and diversify livelihoods.

 

In both cases, the emphasis is on “appropriate” tourism, i.e. tourism that does not overwhelm or degrade the fundamental tourism attraction (i.e. the pristine nature and cultural landscape). In the PA’s case, there is also an emphasis on educational and awareness aims. This requires that tourism development is carefully planned and focuses on maximizing overall longterm benefits, rather than short term financial benefits.

 

In this context, project's support concentrated initially on developing a sound strategic vision for the Ajara PA system as a whole and individual colchic forest PAs in particular. On this basis, appropriate tourism development was supported on the ground both in the new Machakhela NP and generally in the valley.

  • Existence of well-developed tourism sector on the Black Sea coast and generally “pro-tourism” policy of the Ajara and Georgian government
  • Development of a long-term tourism development policy that attempted to balance benefits with core conservation aims helped to build initial consensus and understanding of issues and approaches within Ajara-level tourism actors and national PA actor - the Agency of PAs
  • Use of regionally-based contractors helped to ensure incorporation of the input and experience of the existing tourism enitities

  • There is a very significant opportunity for colchic forest PAs to increase visitor numbers based on their nature values alone, without investments in substantial infrastructure – the primary “marketing value" of PA's are their intrinsic scenic and nature values, not artificial “attractions” which may be inappropriate.
  • Tourism operators are often focused on quantity of service and not quality - for ecologically and culturally sensitive destinations like Machakheli, tour operators need to prioritize sustainability criteria and focus on quality over quantity.
  • Individual consultations and trainings on the job appear as a most successful method and acceptable for locals in terms of capacity building.
  • Management of PA should build more intensive com­mu­nication with local community, involve them in decision making process for product development. Macha­khela NP should be communicated by Agency of PA, local government and tourism department of Ajara as integral part of the Valley. Tourism development strategies and action plans should be communicated to local community