Institutional agreements and participatory decision-making based on MARISCO method
Planning and implementing EbA requires a holistic approach and strong inter-institutional coordination and cooperation. The multi-pronged approach adopted in Tungurahua encourages the participation of policy-makers, the private sector, farmers, civil society and universities, among others. The establishment of a cross-institutional platform enables frequent meetings for exchange and follow-up, while addressing concerns of all stakeholders. Tailor-made capacity development contributes to a shared understanding of the main problems and options for action. Participatory assessments (such as the MARISCO methodology) have allowed stakeholders to better understand how climate and non-climate risks can reinforce each other and how to deal with the resulting complexity. Complementary to the participatory assessments, technical assessments, hydrological models and a hydro-meteorological monitoring system provide decision-makers with hard facts on which to base policy. The results are clear and holistic strategies, theories of change and a monitoring system accepted by the majority.
*Political willingness to enable cross-institutional cooperation. *Willingness of key stakeholders to cooperate. *A shared understanding of the problem and its underlying causes. *Reliable empirical database to underpin participatory decision-making.
*Potential resistance to climate change actions can be reduced by inviting different stakeholders to participate in capacity development measures. *Building ownership and empowering communities by involving them in every step of the process (from identifying the problem to proposing solutions and implementing them) is an important success factor for the process.
Integration of climate change into development planning
The institutional integration of climate change related risks and opportunities is a significant step in order to strengthen the legitimacy of any action and allows economic and human resources to be allocated to the subject and related activities. Water availability was addressed as a current (political) issue and connecting element, establishing links to other topics such as agriculture, health, biodiversity and stakeholders engagement. Climate change was introduced in development planning as a cross-cutting issue, rather than a separate topic. A systematic approach for integrating climate change risks and opportunities in combination with capacity development measures helped to minimise the additional challenge for development planners at the practical level.
*Well-developed legal and institutional framework for climate change at the national level. *Established development planning processes at the sub-national level *Long-term partnerships with key stakeholders. *Multi-level approach (linking local, sub-national and national level).
*Addressing initially current and tangible problems - such as water provision - helps to introduce the rather abstract topic of climate change into political decision-making. *The intensive support of the process of integrating climate change into the development plan of one local entity pays off as it serves as an example for others to follow.
Ecological Mangrove Restoration
There are two approaches that have been used for mangrove ecosystem restoration worldwide. The artificial regeneration or planting approach that has been used extensively and the other approach that has been used more recently is the natural regeneration or the Ecological Mangrove Restoration (EMR) approach (http://www.mangroverestoration.com/pdfs/CBEMR-Infosheet-URLs.pdf). Guyana has adopted EMR principles to design and implement its mangrove restoration program. EMR principles purports five critical steps that are necessary to achieve successful mangrove restoration, the sixth step (seedling planting) is only recommended as a last option. Following the guiding principles of EMR, seedling planting was only used to increase recovery time of a site that met the necessary criteria, particularly elevation, to support mangrove restoration. At sites that did not meet restoration criteria, the project implemented sediment traps to aid accretion and planted Spartina grass to support soil consolidation.
Baseline information on the proposed restoration sites must be captured to determine the suitability of the site and guide selection of the most appropriate intervention. Baseline information collected should include physical (elevation, soil conditions, etc.), biological (presence of natural recruitment) and social factors (livestock grazing, harvesting, etc.). Suitable elevation is critical to successful restoration and one of the key criteria in determining the most suitable intervention.
The restoration of Guyana’s coastal mangroves is possible if planned properly with the collection of detailed baseline data on potential restoration sites. Thorough site analysis should be conducted prior to any intervention and baseline data, such as wave energy, shoreline elevation, anthropogenic activities and hydrology should be collected and analysed before any intervention is undertaken. Implementation of the EMR principles increases success rates significantly and has the potential to reduce restoration cost. Monitoring data under the GMRP indicates that when conducted on accreting sites of the right mud elevation, and soil consolidation, restoration of a protective belt of mangrove forest can be established rapidly.
Barrier Island Restoration for Disaster Risk Reduction
Barrier Islands have long been reported to provide disaster risk reduction from storm surge. Modelling shows that barrier islands contribute to storm surge attenuation, but do not remove it completely. Benefits include annual hurricane and storm damage risk reduction to the mainland, annual recreation benefits, and annual fishery losses avoided. By replacing sand back into the littoral zone, there is a long-term contribution to the sediment budget of the islands and an opportunity for island chains to replace lost sands from one place to provide growth in others. Sands are either barged in from other locations, or dredged from nearby sources, then pumped into degraded area in stages, which allows for some natural settling to occur.
Major funding, typically by federal government sources, is needed to conduct these restoration projects. Permitting and environmental impact studies must be completed to ensure no non-intentional adverse impacts occur.
Near shore and splash zone fauna will be temporarily displaced. Activities of nesting sea turtles may also possibly be displaced. Oversight of contractors performing sand placement is essential to ensure sand is placed properly in the correct place and to correct elevations.
Extensive public engagement/consultation during design phase
For Wallasea Island, the public was largely content with creating new habitat in place of low-productivity agricultural land, but objected to the loss of farmland and potential impacts on recreation sailing, oyster fisheries and estuary processes. Another issue was the sense that past generations had worked hard to reclaim these areas from the sea and that this should not be reversed. However, according to the Environment Agency’s flood risk maps, the project estimated that hundreds of years of such reclamations had resulted in thousands of hectares along the Essex coastline that should be inundated. Extensive public engagement and consultation processes were thus carried out during the planning and inception phases of this project to gain understanding and support. Public engagement took place in the form of consultation events, talks to interest groups, site visits for key stakeholders, new updates for involved stakeholders, the establishment of a Local Liaison Group and the appointment of a public engagement manager in April 2010.
Public engagement during the design phase was particularly important to gain public support, as the project entailed destroying productive agricultural land in favor of habitat creation. Targeted outreach and dissemination activities helped to raise awareness and understanding of potential damaging climate change related impacts (i.e. flooding) and the range of benefits which would be offered by the project (e.g. recreational opportunities, flood risk management, increased amenity values etc).
Early and comprehensive consultation are key to ensuring successful implementation and generating public support for many EbA projects, the extent of which depends on the sensitivity of the location and/or proximity of residential areas and socio-economic resources. In the case of Wallasea, early and frequent public consultations required significant education about potential climate change impacts and the risks of sea level rise in order to gain acceptance for the planned project activities.
Transforming the water body to nature-like banks
Given the history of the Ruhr region, the Heerener Mühlbach was a canalised water body used as an open wastewater system. Conducting a mixture of waste and storm water in a straight concrete bed, the water body got classified as heavily modified according to the EU Water Framework Directive and required that a number of problems be resolved. Discharges of wastewater in the stream derogated the ecosystem tremendously and the concrete bed of the water body and the specific management of the banks harmed biodiversity. Another problem was the dangerous shape of the canal which prohibited the recreational use of the water body. And finally, bad smell regularly disturbed the neighbourhood. As a first essential step towards ecologic enhancement, a sewer pipe was placed underground along the river. The concrete bed was then removed (apart from few exceptions, e.g. under bridges), which led the river to flow on a new sole that was higher and wider than before and meander where possible. The hard banks were converted into nature-like banks. The initial plantation is complemented by wild and natural vegetation: green plants have the chance to flourish along the blue water body.
A precondition for the nature-like development of the water body was the separation from waste water and clean surface water. Thus, the construction of the underground sewer was the absolute necessary first step. For the development of biodiversity, it was important to give as much room to the water body as possible; adjoining property was thus included in the creation of wetlands. Ultimately, the support of the community and decision-makers made the planning and implementation possible.
In other locations where water bodies were ecologically enhanced by the water board, too much initial vegetation was planted shortly after completion of the construction works. As nature develops itself as soon as the conditions are good, the vegetation grew to such an extent that the trees and shrubs required almost the full amount of water coming from the water body, turning the habitat into a purely green corridor without open water. The green-blue corridor has now developed into a balanced ecosystem with the water body and adjoining wetlands.
Realizing the entrepreneurial capacities in local housewives for adaptation to climate change
CONANP has supported a new women’s cooperative (“las orchidias”) aimed at providing additional and innovative, non-capital intensive, eco-touristic services, and thus delivering additional sources of income to climate-change threatened lobster fishing families. Examples include: bicycle and kayak tours, and environmental interpretation routes. CONANP has provided support in the form of : a) Training for multiple actors b) Financing, c) Certification of activities and services d) Organizing women’s peer-to-peer knowledge exchange and mentoring The additional co-benefits of this approach have been to increase the confidence and self-esteem of local housewives, and to raise their position in the eyes of their families, as well as to provide a new potential organized group as a platform for future activities.
Existing (or newly generated) formal organizational capacity; Awareness-raising not only amongst women, but within the community, as to the benefits of women-led productive activities. Peer-to-peer exchange and mentoring opportunities. a) Sufficient resources for supporting: b) Awareness-raising c) Training d) Idea generation e) Certification f) Equipment
Women play a great role in the maintenance and resilience of the livelihoods of their families and communities, and there is much unused capacity that can be unleashed in the generation and implementation of new businesses. However, the barriers to doing so are high, and extra resources are needed. It is not a building block that can be implemented cheaply. If there is not a formal organizational capacity (such as cooperatives), it has to be generated, for this type of effort to be successfully realized; In situations where traditional productive activities are led by men, much effort and resources need to be employed to overcome entry barriers for women in front of productive activities. Training, certification and equipment, are not enough for women’s immersion in new businesses. It is crucial to promote the exchange of lessons learned between women of different communities, and long-term peer-to-peer mentoring. Need of business skills capacity development. Evidences are needed
Participative Vulnerability Assessments

Vulnerability assessments are key for identifying drivers of climate change induced vulnerability. Following IPCC’s AR4 terminology, vulnerability assessments explore exposure to climate change, drivers for sensitivity and current adaptation capacity. By assessing the causes of vulnerability, decision makers are able to identify potential adaptation measures that may contribute to reduce this vulnerability.

 

Given the limited availability of sound quantitative data on climate change impacts, the focus was placed on a participatory process and the use of qualitative data. Basically, the vulnerability assessment was performed in two workshops (one for the entire municipality, another one for an especially vulnerable district) and focused on previously identified key systems of interest.

 

The combination of Metaplan and other participatory methods during the workshops helped to engage stakeholders and to mobilize their knowledge. As one of the key outcomes, an impact model that visualizes drivers of exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity, served to identify (ecosystem-based) adaptation measures to be considered in the Duque de Caxias city master plan.

  • Stakeholder mobilization and engagement, including the incorporation and valuation of their knowledge.
  • Measures directed at establishing a common level of understanding among all participants in the beginning helped to better define future tasks.
  • A well-thought and well-managed schedule allows for a good monitoring.
  • The identification and participation of relevant stakeholders in order to obtain realistic information and validate the results is a decisive factor in gaining credible results.
  • Ludic methodologies aimed at focusing on people’s experiences in order to determine climate change vulnerability, linked with capacity-building elements, revealed insights that quantitative desk-studies would not have produced.
  • A clear and user-friendly presentation of outcomes (maps, impact chains) is important to get attention and acceptance of key stakeholders for the main study and workshop results.
  • The participatory approach used to perform the vulnerability assessment resulted in increased acceptance and involvement.
  • Nevertheless, the availability of high-quality quantitative data, including climate modelling, is needed to increase the acceptance of the results among decision makers, technicians, and the population.
Maximizing social benefits and acceptance through engagement
Prior to the restoration, Mayesbrook Park was unloved and underused. For the project to be a success, it was thus important to reconnect the neighbouring communities with the park and its planned refurbishment. Extensive public consultation helped the partners address local concerns about the park and served to ensure significant social benefits, such as an increased number of visitors in the park, as well as a greater feeling of safety. As the park was home to criminal activities and antisocial behavior prior to reformation, the use of an on-site ranger has helped to reduce this threat and provide greater comfort to visitors and the surrounding communities. In addition, Natural England also worked with the schools to see how the park could be most relevant to their needs and based new natural play facilities and trail markers in the on designs by these children. The improvement in landscape, social and aesthetic value helped shape new recreation facilities and enabled better access for park users.
A public consultation was carried out. The main concerns raised were over security within the park and provision of play facilities and good park maintenance. It was determined that local park visitors wanted the park as a whole to include a balance of sports, play and natural areas, plus toilets, seating and eating areas – and these concerns were integrated in the project design. Equally important has been to help local people understand the natural services provided by the river.
Ongoing consultation has been important in establishing links with the wider community, and the integration of their concerns in the restoration plan has served to validate their involvement. By linking up the local council’s environmental health officers and Thames Water’s Misconnections Project, which is part of the national Connect Right Campaign, people are also more informed about making sure their home plumbing is not discharging into the Mayes Brook. Lastly, combining social and environmental regeneration goals increased the financial and human resources available from a wider range of sources.
Maximizing co-benefits through smart planning
While the core purpose of the project was to address flooding related to an over-utilized combined sewage system, the neighbourhood of Augustenborg was also in a state of socioeconomic decline prior to the urban regeneration project. Thus, the generation of socio-economic benefits became central to the project’s goals, such as improving the livability and aesthetics of the neighborhood, alongside biodiversity objectives. Furthermore, the project is part of a larger regeneration initiative within the neighbourhood of Augustenborg, which is also nested within ambitious sustainability plans for the City of Malmö. More specifically, the ‘Eco-city Augustenborg’ initiative aimed to transform Augustenborg into a socially, ecologically, and economically sustainable settlement. Ultimately, the work has represented a significant transformation of the neighborhood, and has become emblematic of a more pervasive shift towards sustainability. It has also resulted in the development of several businesses in the area of water innovation. Media coverage and public relations value are viewed as being additional benefs to the city and its residents.
Forward thinking during the inception and planning phases drew attention to the range of benefits which could potentially be fostered. It was key to first identify these benefits, then engage with local residents, planners, engineers, decision-makers and other stakeholders to develop an integrated approach to ensure their delivery. Ultimately, the SuDS was designed to provide amenity and recreation values to local residents, while also delivering on the primary objective of flood prevention.
Integrating stakeholders into the planning process drew attention to potential foregone recreational uses which would have resulted from the planned measures (i.e. large open fields which were previously used for sports were to be used for retention ponds). These aspects were taken into account following public consultation and ultimately resulted in the creation of new spaces for communal activities and recreation, rather than removing them. The consultation process also resulted in a local innovator designing part of the system and developing a growth business in water innovation, which has since spawned other businesses as well. Furthermore, by providing these added values, the SuDS system wound up ultimately being more cost efficient than a traditional grey infrastructure approach. By regenerating the neighborhood, however, a potential undesired side effect was the increase in property values – which may serve to exclude lower income groups from being able to afford the raised cost