IUCN
Achieving multidimensional governance for adaptation
Achieving participatory governance for adaptation
Achieving flexible governance for adaptation
Achieving ecosystemic governance for adaptation
IUCN, Mónica Quesada
“Action learning” and monitoring to increase capacities and knowledge
Community ownership of adaptation measures based on ecosystems and biodiversity
Scaling-up and sustainability of adaptation measures
IUCN, Mónica Quesada
“Action learning” and monitoring to increase capacities and knowledge
Community ownership of adaptation measures based on ecosystems and biodiversity
Scaling-up and sustainability of adaptation measures
IUCN, Mónica Quesada
“Action learning” and monitoring to increase capacities and knowledge
Community ownership of adaptation measures based on ecosystems and biodiversity
Scaling-up and sustainability of adaptation measures
IUCN, Mónica Quesada
“Action learning” and monitoring to increase capacities and knowledge
Community ownership of adaptation measures based on ecosystems and biodiversity
Scaling-up and sustainability of adaptation measures
Funding through European research calls (PLANET4B project and InSPIRES project)

To achieve the aims of the project, funding was secured through two Horizon Europe research calls, in the form of projects PLANET4B and InSPIRES. Although some parts can be done on a voluntary basis, according to the experts and teachers, some source of funding is essential to support the school and the researchers. Funding can also be used to invest in nature-based solutions, such as insect hotels, to support local biodiversity. Spending money on complementary activities, like the participatory theatre or the photovoice study and related photo exhibition, can further strengthen engagement and environmental stewardship.

Supporting research environment, funding, partnerships with the schools and artists

While many enthusiastic teachers are already adopting experiential teaching methods without financial support, it is crucial that they receive proper funding. Financial support not only formally acknowledges their efforts but also helps prevent burnout and self-exploitation, providing a safe and stable environment in which they can bring their creative ideas to life. Moreover, investing in other engaging interventions, such as arts-based learning methods, can further enhance student involvement and help strengthen partners that offer best practices. One drawback of relying on research grants, however, is their limited duration – typically only 2 to 5 years. As a result, funding often ends before the full impact of the work can be realised, and the short-term nature of such support can add an additional layer of uncertainty.

Verification and traceability tools

This step seeks to ensure, on a scientific basis, that products labeled with the seal do not contain shark or other species that are threatened or protected by law. This principle is the backbone of the seal's credibility. 

To this end, random genetic sampling will be carried out on the protein used to prepare or has been used to prepare ceviche labeled with the seal, at least twice a year. The samples are sent to a certified genetic analysis laboratory (e.g., COIBA AIP, in the case of Panama) to verify whether or not species excluded by the seal are being used. 

The company covers the costs of the analysis, and if prohibited protein is detected, the right to use the seal is withdrawn.

  • There must be reliable laboratories that use molecular techniques to detect proteins from sharks, rays, and other endangered fish species. 
  • If there are no laboratories in the country interested in joining the initiative, laboratories in other countries may provide support with sample processing. 
  • The sampling and analysis protocol must be rigorous and always carried out through random sampling without prior notice.
  • Scientific traceability gives the seal technical legitimacy. 
  • If samples from one country have to be processed in another, permission to access genetic resources must be obtained in both the country of origin and the country of destination. 
  • The possibility of financing part of the genetic analysis should be explored so that the cost does not fall entirely on the commercial partner. This will make it easier to attract more people interested in participating in the initiative, increasing its reach to more people and increasing the volume of ceviches that do not use protein from sharks, rays, or endangered species.
Regulatory and technical framework

The main objective is to establish the rules of the game by defining what the seal is, what is expected of those who use it, and how its integrity is guaranteed. In this first stage, the legal, scientific, and operational basis of the seal is established to ensure the transparency and legitimacy of the process. 

This involves informing interested parties of the regulatory documents, such as the regulations for use of the seal, the checklist, the brand manual, and the application form, which have been developed by Fundación MarViva. Their function is to guide the application, verification, and renewal process step by step.

  • Have clear, detailed, and public regulations. 
  • Ensure that regulatory documents can be adapted to other countries/contexts.
  • Have a reliable scientific or legal basis that facilitates understanding of the exclusion of certain species as a protein source for ceviche (e.g., sharks and rays).
  • Having clear regulations and standards builds trust and avoids ambiguities in certification. Otherwise, potential allies to the initiative may mistrust or misinterpret the requirements. 
  • All documents should be properly shared in preliminary meetings, using previous cases as examples, without sharing business information.
Fostering the integration of ABS into National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans (NBSAP)

This building block supports the integration of ABS and biotrade into National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs), aligning them with the Global Biodiversity Framework - particularly Target 13 - and fostering synergies with other instruments, such as the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. 

ABS mainstreaming involves embedding ABS into policies and plans across sectors such as trade, agriculture, health, finance, and research, rather than limiting its implementation to conservation authorities. At the 13th Pan-African ABS and Biotrade Workshop, participants discussed challenges, including limited funding, complex regulations, and insufficient involvement of non-environmental ministries. They explored Whole-of-Government and Whole-of-Society approaches, with a strong focus on private sector engagement in valorisation to generate socio-economic benefits.

Country examples, such as Uganda’s multisectoral working group involving local authorities, NGOs, IPLCs, and businesses, showed how early stakeholder mapping, integration into national development plans, and cross-sector collaboration can make ABS integration into NBSAPs more practical, inclusive, and impactful.

Success was supported by an interactive format combining expert inputs, panel discussions, and concrete country cases. Contributions from organisations such as FAO and UNEP broadened perspectives. Building on outcomes from a previous workshop ensured continuity, while structured guiding questions helped participants identify challenges, and to align ABS with other instruments, (such as the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture) and define practical steps for mainstreaming in their national contexts.

Mainstreaming ABS into NBSAPs is most effective when positioned as both a conservation tool and an economic opportunity. Workshop discussions showed that broader stakeholder involvement is essential: it goes beyond ministries for environment or conservation and includes sectors such as trade, agriculture, health, finance, research, and users such as the private sector and research institutions. 

Synergies with the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture can strengthen coherence and align benefit-sharing across instruments. Early stakeholder mapping involving local authorities, IPLCs, NGOs, and businesses builds ownership and helps address monitoring and data gaps. 

Valorisation strategies, industry-wide agreements, and Whole-of-Government and Whole-of-Society approaches ensure ABS is embedded in business models, policy frameworks, and community initiatives, creating sustainable value chains and fostering long-term ABS integration.

Treelings

1. Digital MRV (Measurement–Reporting–Verification) System

  • What it is: AI-powered monitoring platform combining drones, satellite imagery, and blockchain verification.
  • Why it matters: Ensures transparency, traceability, and credibility of every planted tree.
  • Transferability: Can be adapted to monitor other nature-based solutions (wetlands, grasslands, mangroves, etc.).

2. Blockchain-Verified Tree Registry & Certificates

  • What it is: Each planted tree is assigned a digital ID and certificate stored on blockchain.
  • Why it matters: Builds trust with funders, companies, and individuals by proving tree ownership and survival.
  • Transferability: Applicable to carbon markets, biodiversity credits, or ecosystem services accounting.

3. Youth Volunteer Engagement Model

  • What it is: Mobilization of students and local youth (e.g., “Green Volunteers”) for tree planting, maintenance, and awareness-building.
  • Why it matters: Builds long-term stewardship and community ownership of restored areas.
  • Transferability: Can be replicated for climate education, waste management, or community energy projects.

4. Corporate Partnership & CSR Integration

  • What it is: Businesses (telecom, finance, events, resorts, etc.) co-finance tree groves as part of CSR/ESG strategies.
  • Why it matters: Provides sustainable funding for reforestation while aligning with companies’ branding and SDG goals.
  • Transferability: Can be applied to other green initiatives (renewables, circular economy, eco-labels).

5. Three-Year Maintenance & Survival Guarantee

  • What it is: Each planting project includes watering, fencing, and maintenance for at least 3 years.
  • Why it matters: Addresses high mortality rates in tree planting, ensuring long-term carbon sequestration.
  • Transferability: Maintenance-first approach can be adopted in agriculture, conservation, or infrastructure projects.

6. Community Education & Reward System

  • What it is: Local residents and households (e.g., ger districts) participate and receive recognition, small rewards, or utility discounts.
  • Why it matters: Incentivizes grassroots climate action and strengthens community buy-in.
  • Transferability: Rewards model can support recycling, clean cooking, or water conservation programs.

Digital MRV (Measurement–Reporting–Verification) System

Purpose:
To ensure that every tree planted is measurable, reportable, and verifiable in a transparent way. It solves the credibility gap in reforestation projects, where funders often cannot confirm survival or carbon impact.

How it works:
Treelings deploys drones and satellites to capture high-resolution imagery. AI algorithms detect tree survival, growth, and canopy cover. These data points are stored and shared through a user dashboard. The system reduces manual error, provides near-real-time monitoring, and can be adapted to other ecosystems.

Digital MRV (Measurement–Reporting–Verification) System

Enabling Conditions:

  • Reliable internet and cloud infrastructure for data transfer and storage.
  • Access to drones, satellite imagery, and AI/remote sensing expertise.
  • Technical capacity for system calibration and algorithm training.
  • Open collaboration with local authorities for field data validation.

2. Blockchain-Verified Tree Registry & Certificates

Enabling Conditions:

  • A functioning blockchain environment and smart contract platform.
  • Partnerships with IT developers and registry operators.
  • Clear project metadata (species, GPS coordinates, planting date).
  • Stakeholder willingness to adopt digital certification instead of traditional paperwork.

3. Youth Volunteer Engagement Model

Enabling Conditions:

  • Strong partnerships with schools, universities, and youth NGOs.
  • Training and safety guidelines for fieldwork.
  • Incentive structures (certificates, recognition, or small stipends).
  • Community support to integrate youth efforts into broader reforestation projects.

4. Corporate Partnership & CSR Integration

Enabling Conditions:

  • Corporate buy-in and alignment with ESG/SDG reporting frameworks.
  • Transparent communication of impact metrics (e.g., survival rates, CO₂ captured).
  • Marketing/branding benefits clearly outlined for partners.
  • Legal agreements covering co-branding, funding flows, and monitoring obligations.

5. Three-Year Maintenance & Survival Guarantee

Enabling Conditions:

  • Upfront financing that includes maintenance costs, not just planting.
  • Reliable local partners to execute watering, fencing, and replanting.
  • Monitoring protocols (app reports, drone flights, survival surveys).
  • Community involvement to reduce risks of neglect or damage.

6. Community Education & Reward System

Enabling Conditions:

  • Collaboration with local authorities and utilities to provide rewards (discounts, recognition).
  • Simple, accessible communication materials (visuals, local language).
  • Mechanisms for households to record participation (e.g., app, QR codes).
  • Ongoing awareness campaigns to maintain motivation.