Use of Information and Communications Technology (ICT)
ICT allows for communications channels, such as cellular phone and internet services, to facilitate collective planning and fisherfolk meetings. These are relevant and effective in situations where participants are from different areas and countries, and where opportunities for face to face meetings are limited. The Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organisations (CNFO) uses phone features such as calls and text to communicate as well as email, VOIP services and website.
• Cell phone technology and widespread usage. • Widespread internet access. • Communications tools that are free, including Skype and Google hangouts.
• ICT presents a low cost way of communicating. • Current technology can facilitate many activities. • Fishers most readily respond to cell phone. • Collaboration with ICT partners required to derive greater benefits.
Theory of Change (ToC)
A Theory of Change (ToC) is a road map that plots the journey from where we are now to where we want to be. The ToC serves to create a common vision of long-term goals, how they will be reached, and how progress will be measured along the way. A ToC forms the basis for strategic planning, and it clearly articulates how shifting behaviors and social norms will reduce threats to biodiversity. There are seven elements of a Pride campaign ToC: Conservation Result points to the conservation target (ecosystem or species) the campaign is trying to conserve, and what the expected long-term result is. Threat Reduction points to the main threats to the conservation target that can be reduced. Behavior Change focus on the human behavior that must change in order to reduce the identified threat. Barrier Removal identifies the barriers to adoption of the new behavior and how can they be removed. Interpersonal Communication describes what conversations are needed to encourage people to adopt the new behavior. Attitude identifies what attitudes must shift for these conversations to happen. Knowledge is the cognition needed to increase awareness and help shift these attitudes.
• Campaign site and thematic knowledge and experience • A prior analysis of site conditions including geographic scope, conservations targets, threats and contributing factors. • Clear long-term goals of implementing partner
Some of the key elements of success related to the ToC include, a clear, unequivocal connection between the expected conservation result, and the threat the campaign is trying to reduce. Even though the selected threat may not always be the most important menace to the conservation target, it has to be one that can be mitigated through human behavior change. Likewise, identifying a specific behavior change that is directly linked to the selected threat is vital.
Control of lionfish populations
Lionfish management requires the involvement of all affected parties, coupled with tailored strategies to reflect ecological, cultural and social differences within the region. Legal policies regulate the aquarium trade of lionfish, as well as conditions and gear for lionfish removal.
Committment to cooperate and share knowledge and experiences.
Strategies and tools for control differ depending on local variables and the spatial scale at which control is enacted. Sharing knowledge on removal tools and techniques can ensure the use of best practices in the Region. Partnerships with reef-reliant industries such as the fishery and tourism sector enhance resources available for removal.
Gaining buy-in from Costa Rica government & other countries
This building block covers meeting with local and regional officials to discuss adoption of the proposal and how to go forward toward an MPA. It is important to ensure the buy-in of other countries because the marine boundaries overlap Nicaragua and Costa Rica, as well as sometimes other countries as the CR Dome is moving from year to year. Central American countries share these waters for transport, fishing, etc. Strategy is one on one and then group meetings.
Having a local and regional NGO, MarViva, with connections to government lead the work, as well as careful coordination with the Latin American office of Whale and Dolphin Conservation which has numerous political contacts in the region.
Reach out and gain support and partners at local levels even if you are working on an international initiative. Work hard to make it happen.
Establishment of fisherfolk organisations
Fisherfolk organisations are initiated and developed from collaborative efforts of fishers, existing fisherfolk organisations, academia, NGOs, donors and fisheries management entities. These fisherfolk organisations facilitate participatory representation of fisherfolk in fisheries governance and management by bringing fishers concerns, interests, knowledge and experience into the management considerations. Being linked at national, regional and global levels allow for these organisations to effectively participate in fisheries governance, facilitates communications, capacity building and representation.
• Access to information. • Communication channels such as cell phone, internet and print media. • Strong and motivated leadership. • Committed fisheries management regimes. • Existing policy/ legal framework.
• Multiple communications tools/channels required to reach fishers. • Building fishers leadership abilities is important. • Consistent and ongoing effort required. • Global climate of stakeholder participation important. • Capacity development is a long term undertaking and requires solid partnerships. • Representation requires funding and a seat at the table. • Small-scale fishers and their organisations are unable to support required activities and need dedicated partners. • Challenges faced by Caribbean small-scale fishers are varied and numerous with powerful interest groups advocating for other interest.
Monitoring and evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are vital components of every Pride campaign, without which assessment of the effectiveness of the intervention cannot be conducted. M&E takes place in every component of the Theory of Change (please refer to the building block 'Theory of Change' for a brief description of each component). Monitoring keeps score on how effectively capacities are built, how effectively social marketing efforts lead to changes in behavior, and if those behavior changes lead to desired conservation outcomes. Monitoring basically tracks every component of the ToC. M&E of knowledge, attitude, interpersonal communications and behavior change is based on pre and post campaign surveys of the fishers, while threat reduction and conservation results use specific protocols validated by experts.
• Having a local monitoring partner or consultant is key to develop timely baseline data and monitor threat reduction and conservation results. • As with any project or program, having adequate and sufficient funding is key. Teams may rely on existing human, equipment, facilities, and financial capacities to reduce costs. • Sites with long term tradition of monitoring are better suited to produce a solid baseline of biological monitoring indicators.
An important lesson related to biological monitoring is when there is the possibility of having a two person team for each campaign, a Campaign Manager (CM) and a Fisheries Fellow (FF). This arrangement allows for one person to concentrate on the fisheries technical aspects, including the necessary time for biological monitoring. The level of involvement of the FF in the monitoring component depends on his/her personal inclination towards science. There are examples where the FF devoted a considerable amount of time and effort to conducting monitoring and analyzing data, while others did not participate at all. This could improve with a clearer definition of the FF’s role in regards to biological monitoring. Having a person dedicated to monitoring in Rare’s team ensured all fisheries campaigns had baseline and post campaign impact data.
Identify activities contributing to MEA implementation
After a preliminary assessment by the researcher, a workshop with the PA management is being held. The length is dependent on the number of MEAs as well as the number of active discussants. Tables were already prepared with implementation steps known to the researcher and drafts for recommendations. The content of the tables, as well as missing information, were discussed in detail. Discussion should take place in a spirit of openness and trust. The discussants from the PA management should be aware that results might be published (if planned).
n.a.
Engaged PA-managers can make a difference, but continued evaluation is necessary to ensure that recommendations developed are fully implemented. • In case of transboundary PAs, all management authorities should be involved in those aspects and issues of a Convention Check that require transboundary cooperation in their later implementation. • In case of multilevel-governance systems, some recommendations are developed that can only be implemented at other levels than the PA management agency. In case these levels are not involved in the implementation of a Convention-Check, they can be quite reluctant to implement the recommendations developed if these levels were not participating in the development. • However, sometimes it is better to just implement a Convention Check as when higher levels would get informed about the planned Check in advance, they might intervene which can lead to its non-implementation.
Research and monitoring
Scientific baseline data of species behavior and environmental impact is used to design appropriate tools for control. The use of these tools is continuously monitored, enabling their assessment and adjustment in an adaptive management process.
NA
NA
Presenting at international meetings
With the researchers gaining their MSc degrees and PhD degrees over the first 3 years of the study, we were then able to start publishing papers and to entertain the idea of attending and presenting at international meetings. Meeting at a national venue (Russian biennial conference) led to European Cetacean Society conference presentations which then opened up the main Society for Marine Mammalogy Biennial as a platform for presentation.
Hard work by the young researchers; funds raised from multiple sources within and outside Russia.
It takes time and practice to be able to make the best presentations.
Working with regional NGO to get idea accepted as an EBSA
Meeting MarViva staff and president at meetings and making a plan to work together. Agreeing to send someone to the regional EBSA workshop. Helping to prepare the submission to the workshop. Gaining acceptance for the area proposed as an EBSA.
Conferences and meetings that would give us a chance to plan the action on a more personable basis, at least initially; then ease and cost of using skype and meeting software; being able to contribute to getting a grant for the work at the local level.
Reach out and gain support and partners at local levels even if you are working on an international initiative. Work hard to make it happen.