Key partnerships to share expertise and resources

In June 2019, RRFB started the first larval propagation project in Bonaire in collaboration with SECORE International. The goal of the partnership is to establish a technical cooperation in which RRFB provides local knowledge, manpower, field logistics, and a facility, and shares all field trial results, monitoring data, and qualitative feedback on methodologies and technologies provided by SECORE Int. In return, SECORE Int. provides techniques, methodologies, expertise and training sessions on larval propagation. This partnership's knowledge was crucial for successfully implementing larval propagation techniques in Bonaire. By consistently sharing results and lessons learned, the technique was improved, leading to greater success and scalability for future project replication.

  • The existence of a well developed and effective global network of scientists and practitioners willing to constructively share knowledge. 

  • A formalized partnership with well-defined roles and responsibilities.

  • The opportunity for and committment to scheduling regular virtual and in-person training sessions.

  • Having a shared vision and goals among partners.

  • Importance of scheduling regular meetings with partners before and after each major step of technique implementation to formalize results, feedback and lessons learnt.

Establish nurseries

We established 5 nurseries in the network of opened channels and raised 5600 propagules, mostly red mangroves but also black mangroves. Recently we have studied the white mangroves to assess their importance and have done a pilot on white mangrove propagation. Most of these propagules grew out into healthy saplings and have been outplanted in 5 events. Afterwards, the outplants have been monitored by interns. A successful nursery will increase mangrove plants available for reforestation efforts, emphasizing the need for an ecosystem-based approach to building resilience on the island.

 

  • Volunteers took charge of this part of the restoration work.

  • Propagules availability.

  • Availability and easy access to viable locations for nurseries.

  • Raising black mangroves would not survive prolonged inundation and effective adjustments could be taken.

  • Different seasons allowed for different availability of propagules per species - but propagules of red mangroves were available throughout the year. In the season of the black mangroves, we focused on this species to have a good stock of black mangrove saplings. White mangroves preferred a land bases nursery.

  • Pots and plastic planting bags were used initially. They were expensive and needed additional handling of the saplings. In a later stage, we started to use biodegradable bags that could be left in place when the saplings were planted.

Effective communication

An excellent communication plan/network with different stakeholders was initiated across different levels. From the inception of the project, the community and other stakeholders were constantly capacitated on how the project is going. A relay of relevant vulture conservation and policy issues was achieved to the target stakeholders within the communities and KAZA TFCA.

Through strong relations established, the project implementers were flexible to engage with different stakeholders at different levels. This would include the arrangement of informal meetings and the use of local language to target different audiences. Social media, distribution of communication material and the power of face-to-face meetings enabled the implementer to reach grassroots levels.

Take advantage of social media platforms and share your story and journey with the whole world.

Face-to-face meetings are a powerful tool for effective communication and enable the project implementers to relay the relevant vulture conservation and policy issues to the target stakeholders within the KAZA TFCA.

Restore water circulation in the mangrove forest.

The water in the mangrove forest needs to refresh and be of good quality (salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH) in order for the mangroves and the organisms that are part of the mangrove habitat to flourish, like fish, sponges, anemones and mangrove oysters. The force behind the water circulation is the tidal flow; there is no river feeding the mangroves. The water moves through the roots as sheet flow, the channels and the lagoons. The growth of roots and accumulation of sediments reduce the capacity of the system to bring water in a timely fashion to all parts of the mangrove forest - especially the part farthest removed from the open ocean is most under stress.

 

  • Knowledge from fishermen helped locate the historical channels.

  • Hydrological studies executed before and during the execution of the project helped decision-making on priority channels, setting their dimensions.

  • A good group of volunteers was able to assist in the work that was executed manually.

  • Use of mechanical equipment was not possible.
Implementation and fine-tuning of technologies and methods to propagate corals

Larval propagation is a restoration method that assists coral sexual reproduction to increase the genetic diversity of corals. This technique can be used with numerous coral species and morphologies and, because of the large production of gametes during spawning events, it has the potential to scale up the number of outplanted corals on the reef. RRFB uses innovative technologies to reduce the labor, and handling time and increase the survivorship of coral larvae at large scales. After assisting fertilization, recently formed embryos are poured into floating pools (CRIB, Coral rearing in-situ Basin) designed by SECORE Int., where larvae settlement is facilitated on specially designed substrates which are then outplanted on the reef.  

  • The presence of healthy spawning coral colonies in Bonaire provides gametes to kick-start larval propagation. 

  • The establishment of a strong partnership with SECORE International with a shared vision for coral reef restoration.

  • The support from the local diving community.

  • The involvement of a strong team of motivated and committed people.

  • The support from the local government and the non-governmental organization of STINAPA, allowing the restoration activities to take place within Bonaire National Marine Park boundaries.

  • Begin implementing techniques on a small scale to account for varying local environmental conditions and find the most suitable locations for application

  • Set-up first trials using predictable and “easy to work with” coral species

  • Adapt larval propagation techniques to local conditions, resources availability and priorities

Partnerships between key local actors and multi-sectorial, transboundary collaborations

The achieved results relied heavily on the collaboration and cooperation partnerships among various stakeholders, including government agencies, conservation organizations, scientists, and local communities. Collaboration with the Ministries/Government departments was key in sensitizing the communities on issues around human-wildlife conflict and suggested environmentally friendly ways to mitigate the conflict. The scientists were there to collect information related to wildlife poisoning and give feedback to the government ministries. The communities were the key stakeholder since they are the sole custodians of the environment.

The implementers connected with local communities was that we were already working with communities on some other projects, so this enabled our relations to be strengthened. By involving communities in decision-making, they were able to identify some stakeholders with whom we collaborated to share skills, knowledge, and experiences resulting in the project's success. The transboundary collaboration enabled the implementers to focus on tackling vulture poisoning across three countries separately but fighting for the same cause.

Partnering with other organizations trying to achieve the same goal makes the implementation of project results much easier and quicker without a scenario of duplicating the work on the ground. Ideas and possible solutions to a problem can be freely shared resulting in problems being addressed holistically.

Stakeholder Identification

IMET is an integrative tool. It requires input from people who are in charge of the protected area, and also those who have a recognizable interest in the area but are not directly in charge. Prior to implementation, we determined who the right stakeholders were, such as key Government agencies, including the Forestry Department, which was in charge of managing the forest reserve, and the office of the Surveyor General, who were not directly connected to the management of the reserve but were custodians of the reserve maps. Equally important among stakeholders are Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), local community groups, and traditional leaders. Government and CSOs were engaged in project design and implementation. We engaged the stakeholders first by writing official letters with simplified explanations of the IMET process. The letters outlined the information gaps specific to each stakeholder. That way, the stakeholders were able to provide relevant information and documents that would feed into the IMET evaluation. Secondly, the stakeholders were invited to attend two workshops; 1. data collection, and 2. data collection and validation. These workshops aimed to create ownership and validation of the results generated.

Stakeholders had been involved throughout the project's development, ensuring the accurate establishment of knowledge gaps. Our communication with the stakeholders was transparent and adapted to each stakeholder in the appropriate language. Through stakeholder involvement in project design, we were able to determine what tools were already being applied in Zambia and which tools would generate the type of information needed to measure management effectiveness in a protected forest area. 

When you do stakeholder mapping, do it well, look outside the box. Perform thorough stakeholder mapping and analysis. Decide where each stakeholder will be useful in your project cycle. Some stakeholders will be good starting points in the project design but may not be essential in implementation. For instance, in our project design, we touched base with the Department of National Parks and Wildlife (DNPW) to learn about Protected Area Management Evaluation (PAME) tools that Zambia was already implementing. We learned about various tools and their weaknesses. However, DNPW was not present in our project area and had very limited information about the Mafinga Hills Forest Reserve. Thus, although DNPW was essential in the design of the project, that is, informing the PAME tool to use, they would not be able to provide the relevant information needed in the assessment. That, however, does not mean such stakeholders should not be informed of project processes or results. It is always important to feed back to the stakeholders.

Raise awareness of the local community on indigenous species, threats and biosecurity measures

There were two training sessions of the local NGO Toromiki no Mangareva conducted by SOP Manu. The NGO was recently created to protect the fauna and flora of Mangareva and the surrounding uninhabited islets and to involve children of the island in the protection of the environment. The two training sessions with Toromiki no Mangareva were an opportunity to spread knowledge and talk about the Kamaka restoration project. Many members are primary and secondary school teachers from Mangareva, who were able to deliver key messages to children of the island about seabirds, their threats and biosecurity.

 

Several members of the NGO are active members of the Gambier community (employees of the town hall, the Air Tahiti office, school teachers, and firefighters), and therefore have a lot of influence on the local population. Their involvement through training will help protect Kamaka in the future – as they were asked to communicate about this project and biosecurity measures to the local community.

  • Involve the local community in relevant training.
  • Communicate and raise awareness effectively among the locals.
  • The theoretical interventions allowed the members to acquire knowledge of the different means of communication of biosecurity and the importance of birds to the community.
  • The development of Mock-ups for biosecurity, Information posters and information brochures signs in groups was very useful and made local people participate in their own way in the conservation project.
  • The visits on the field had allowed members to gain field experience in bird recognition and learn techniques for monitoring invasive species (via the use of rat snap-traps or chewing cards).
  • Barry Mamatui also participated in the training (essential local team member who participated in the Kamaka eradication project and has been trained by SOP Manu since 2015), which allowed Toromiki no Mangareva members to recognize the importance of having local people trained for this type of work. His presence was important as he shared his experience on the field and his knowledge of the sites and seabirds.

   

Protected Areas Management

Ya’axché employs an integrated landscape management approach which results in healthy ecosystems with high levels of biodiversity for protected areas under its care. Biodiversity monitoring has indicated that the populations of indicator species have remained comparable over the years. Because of the linkages between ecosystem health and human well-being, Ya’axché-through its conservation and sustainable development work positively impacts the lives of the people buffering the GSCP, securing watershed that provides important services and other forestry goods/services such as food, housing, medicinal plants, clean air, inter alia. 

Ya’axche’s Science Program is founded on robust science across protected areas and agricultural and community lands for effective management of the MGL. Long-term monitoring is conducted for birds, mammals, and vegetation. Acoustic bat surveys, camera traps surveys for wildlife, and freshwater invertebrate monitoring are conducted and indicating that the MGL is extremely rich in wildlife, providing protection for hundreds of species of birds (including the harpy eagle), 93 mammals, including five species of cats, and 81 reptile and amphibian species. 

The results of monitoring efforts should always be shared with community members to foster support for the conservation of forest and water ecosystems. This can be done via the education and outreach arm of the organization.

Good Relations with the Mandated Management Institution of the MPA

The management of the Kisite Mpunguti MPA is mandated to the Kenya Wildlife Service and the Wildlife Research and Training Institute. It was therefore critical to have buy-in from the managers of these institutions in the implementation of project activities including WIO-COMPAS. This ensured the endorsement of the WIO-COMPAS programme and its subsequent recognition for career development.

 

For this reason, the two institutions were included in the process from inception to completion. This ensured the MPA staff that this venture would add value, at individual levels, to their careers, and not just to the MPA management. This was crucial, as the WIO-COMPAS assessment preparation process is quite daunting, and a motivating factor is necessary to ensure their participation.

Long-standing history with the management institutions: WWF-Kenya has long-standing good relations with the two institutions, having worked closely together on multiple projects over decades. Additionally, a Memorandum of Understanding is in place with the institutions because of this, making interactions seamless and cooperative. However, where such a history is not in place, good relations can still be fostered by establishing goodwill and through open and transparent collaboration.

Identify a point-person: Though good relations may exist at higher management levels, it is necessary to have a point person at the MPA level to assist in overall planning and staff mobilization. It is an added bonus if that person has the expertise needed to assist in either the training phase, mentorship phase, or both. Where necessary, multiple point persons may be selected. For the case of the Kisite Mpunguti MPA, two staff were selected, including the warden from KWS and the Senior Researcher from WRTI, where both had expertise on the WIO-COMPAS programme.

 

Criteria for point-person selection: A criteria for the selection of the point person(s) is necessary to ensure smooth implementation. These include:

  • Availablility and accessibility throughout the planning, training, mentorship phases of this capacity building
  • Shown interest in the WIO-COMPAS programme
  • Willingness to assist throughout the process.

Other criteria may be established at this point based on the local context.