Capacity building in scuba diving for coastal communities

The purpose is to improve the local capacity to safely remove ghost fishing gear from the sea. The existence of a permanent diving center in the area is mandatory to provide security during all aquatic activities of the training and cleaning campaigns.

  • Social cohesion and environmental awareness in the local community.
  • A good relationship between the diving center and the native community.
  • Transparent communication with community leaders along the implementation process.

The response of the diving team should be rapid because currents change direction and can release and move the entangled fishing gear again. If the clean-up is delayed, the risk of not finding the gear increases.

 

Clear roles and efforts distribution among the diving and the on-land support team is essential to obtain the desired results and to communicate achievements back to the community, partners, and local authorities.

Agreement on management measures for ghost fishing

The purpose is to encourage fishers to actively prevent fishing gear loss and to report it when it happens. Fishers are invited to participate in interviews and workshops, where they share their experiences and ideas for solutions in the local context.

  • Fishers understand that their knowledge can help others fish more responsibly.
  • Fishers are listened to and their views are respected. 
  • Fishers are aware of the importance of maintaining marine ecosystems in good conditions to sustain artisanal fisheries.

The agreement must be based on a solid understanding of the causes and effects of ghost fishing in the local context.

Local leaders endorsement motivates fishers and the entire community to actively participate

Educating users about how to respect and behave responsibly in nature

As well as providing useful information about the surrounding natural area (e.g. trails, routes) and relevant information about this (e.g. routes’ terrain, length, degree of difficulty, changes in altitude), the trail centres also educate users on how to behave in nature. Codes of conduct educate users about how to respect nature while enjoying their sport/activity in a natural environment. For example, centres may provide information about how to respect nature when walking, running, or cycling on the local tracks, trails, and routes.

 

Some centres also provide information about the natural and cultural history on the routes, increasing users’ awareness of their natural environment.

  • Sharing information and best practice on how to behave responsibly and respectfully when in nature  
  • Clear information and explanations as to why it is important to behave responsibly and respectfully in nature 
  • Clear, effective, and easily accessibly communication channels through which information can be disseminated. The centres can act as hubs and physical spaces where information can be displayed (e.g. notice boards)
  • Establishing minimum criteria that required trail centres to provide users with information about the local area and activities that can be practiced there, encouraged trail centres to act as information hubs, informing users about the local natural environment, outdoor activities, and how to respect nature whilst enjoying outdoor sporting activities.
  • Providing information about activities such as walking, running, and cycling trails (i.e. length, difficulty, the type of terrain) encourages people to undertake activities in designated areas and limits encroachment into fragile or stressed natural areas.
  • Trail centres can signpost people less familiar with nature as to where to go, what to do, but also how to behave responsibly toward nature and why it is important to do so.
Increasing and improving access to natural spaces and outdoor sporting activities

The Trail Centres act as physical spaces that increase and improve access to physical activities in nature, contributing to physical and mental well-being.

 

Their carefully chosen locations in proximity to nature (forests, water, and trails) help establish freely accessible, round-the-clock meeting places and start-points for outdoor sporting activities. As some are located close to urban areas, they also provide a gateway from urban to natural environments. 

 

Their combination as an all-in-one clubhouse, provider of service facilities, and meeting and training space, makes them ideal sites for local sports associations to use, as well as un-affiliated groups or individuals. This provides a space for socialising within, and between, sports and promotes relationship-building amongst users and with local sports associations.

 

Providing access to service facilities participation in outdoor sports activities (e.g. bicycle pumps and cleaning stations; covered training space; functional training equipment (stairs, monkey bars, TRX, etc.); storage space for equipment; and changing rooms/showers/toilets). As sites for borrowing equipment (e.g. map and compass, roller skis, SUP boards, etc.), the centres also encourage people to try new activities in nature in an affordable manner. 

  • The choice of location: trail centres must be near natural environments conducive to outdoor activities. Building them on the outskirts of urban areas, yet still close to nature, provides ideal gateways to nature. Analysis of recreational opportunities, infrastructure, terrain, etc. helps determine ideal locations.
  • Correctly determining the functions and services to be provided by the trail centres to best-meet users’ needs.
  • Organising workshops with stakeholders allowed these to discuss and determine user needs as well as which functions trail centres needed to provide to accommodate these needs. This shaped the trail centres’ different designs and helped to determine the core facilities that centres had to provide, as well as the additional facilities specific to community needs or interests.
  • Participatory workshops also ensured that trail centres provided access to activities and areas that could be appealing to users – both to those practicing outdoor activities as well as to those who might be interested in discovering new nature-based outdoor activities. 
  • Choosing to locate some centres near urban areas was also important for improving urban populations’ access to nature.
  • Providing information about activities such as walking, running, and cycling trails (i.e. length, difficulty, the type of terrain, etc.) is helpful for encouraging people to undertake nature-based sporting activities, particularly those who may be less familiar with the local area or a specific activity.
Policy tools to improve local heritage management

The numerous buildings in need of repair or conservation create the need for clear guidelines. Local authorities lack the capacity to guide owners or translate urban regulations into decisions and the town’s historic landscape is threatened by new buildings, extensions and restorations which conflict with its specific character and natural landscape.

Following the rise in requests for professional advice, Studiogovora published a best practice guide for preserving valuable characteristics. The guide builds on a detailed analysis of the buildings, historic spa complex and public spaces. It describes each type of architectural element: facades, ornamentation, balconies and terraces, roofing etc., extending to the courtyard and its relationship with the landscape. It outlines a set of rules, identifies valuable elements, and puts them in a larger context, suggesting solutions for repairing elements, and contemporary interventions.

The Guide was developed in cooperation with heritage professionals and it has been adopted by local authorities as a set of official recommendations that will be supported and monitored by a newly established local planning commission. The guide is available for free online and it is also available to be purchased in physical format.

  • Existing need for capacity building within the local administration to better understand heritage requirements and manage requests for renovations and new constructions.
  • Cooperation with the Town Hall on architecture and heritage issues.
  • Existing network of heritage practitioners with diverse backgrounds and knowledge.
  • Existing funding options for developing best practice guidelines - The National Chamber of Architects finances such projects.
  • Best practice guidelines are still uncommon in Romania, where administrative and professional practice generally pays attention only to official documents - norms or laws - ignoring political, civic and administrative accountability for local policies.
  • Having local decision makers accept and implement advice from civil society takes trust and time.
  • Advice from civil society needs to be accompanied by institutional measures and support: financial incentives, better enforcement of construction regulations.
  • There is a significant shortage in craftsmen and contractors that have the knowledge and skills to work on historic buildings (both locally and nationally, as many construction workers left to work abroad). Training new ones requires long term thinking at a national level.
Developing a programme for interventions on historical buildings

With more than a third of historic structures in decay and disrepair, there is urgent need for conservation works. These need to be done taking into account the extent of physical damages, ownership, availability for funds, investment opportunities, as well as possible future uses and users.

Studiogovora is developing a program to assess and prioritise interventions on the historic buildings and has until now acted to secure one of the oldest historic villas in the resort, helped several residents with advice and small scale works, and has restored a gazebo dating back to the 1930s. The team has also started to recover and store valuable pieces such as doors or furniture until they can be restored.

At present a couple of interventions have already been completed, this include an emergency intervention, a full building restoration and repair intervention for a roof. Several restoration projects are in the planning phase and their implementation is dependent on the decisions made by owners.

  • Funding opportunities - either governmental or private
  • Stakeholder collaboration and capacity to support interventions
  • Professional network to support the team with necessary expertise
  • Contractors open to working with traditional techniques
  • Residents willing to ask for help in restoring their properties
  • Such activities require a work of continuous coordination and constant collaboration with owners, authorities, contractors, as well as with donors and funders.
  • Public funds are mainly available to public institutions and less to private ones. Also, public funds are only available to buildings that are officially recognized as heritage, thus are historical monuments. Buildings in protected areas or the ones that are important at local level are often not eligible.
Strengthening public-private-people partnerships for local heritage

The lack of shared local stewardship for heritage is rooted in the numerous changes of ownership and the highly centralized and bureaucratized national heritage protection framework of Romania.

 

The Govora Heritage Lab raises awareness on the need for shared responsibility in finding solutions to protect and reuse abandoned historic buildings. Through its projects, the team offers examples of how actions by any citizen or actors can benefit the local heritage and create new opportunities for people and heritage through a framework for public-private-people cooperation.

These actions include: site volunteering for restoration works, continuous collaboration with public and private stakeholders, advice on funding possibilities or needed interventions, cultural events in heritage buildings etc.

Historically, the resort always relied on public-private cooperation to function successfully, and today public-private partnerships have become a prerequisite of most funding programs dedicated to the rehabilitation of heritage.

Govora has a few restored historic buildings and public spaces which are under used, and owners need help from civil society to create events and attract audiences.

  • Funding opportunities often ask for public-private partnership but even in such cases the partnership is often not balanced, with top-down structures in which NGOs play minor roles and individual citizens being seen only as end users.
  • Public-private partnerships are highly dependent on the capacity and commitment of local authorities to implement them.
  • Public funding is still mostly available to public owners (town halls, municipality) and less to private ones
  • Public-private-people partnerships work generally well in high trust societies and are still challenging in low trust ones, such as Romania. In the absence of a clear legal framework that regulates public-private partnerships, these are still looked upon by authorities and citizens alike with distrust. Hence community participation in activities is essential to build trust on an individual- and community-basis.
  • The public-private partnership and the actions put in place to support local owners have led to an increased interest of citizens to participate in heritage related activities.
Awareness and environmental education actions

The work of sensitization and environmental education that the Sanctuary has been developing has been key in the contribution to the conservation of the páramo and its biodiversity. Thanks to these actions, nowadays the people of the surrounding villages and owners of properties and RNSC, for whom the Sanctuary has become a place that provides them with knowledge and where they can interact with others around learning and conservation, define it as an "open environmental classroom". Fabio Muñoz, current head of the Sanctuary and his team are working to consolidate the Training School for Paramo Conservation, a proposal that seeks to continue with environmental education and teaching actions on the Sanctuary's restoration exercise to any person or entity that wishes to learn and replicate it in other areas of the country. The National Army of the Silva Plazas Battalion and its military base in Peña Negra, for example, have participated in the training sessions.

-Constant relationship with the local community of the municipalities of Encino, Charalá and Gámbita (Santander) and Duitama (Boyacá), which has generated trust, closeness and interest in learning.

-Creativity to teach by the Sanctuary's team, everything related to the project of propagation of the species with which they work in the nursery.

- Articulation with the Natural Reserves of the Civil Society to develop joint activities that favor the restoration process.

Environmental education and awareness-raising are necessary in the art of conserving ecosystems and species of interest.

Research-monitoring

Guanentá has been characterized by its research work with different paramo and high mountain species, including three species endemic to the paramos of Colombia, Espeletia cachaluensis, E. chontalensis and E. laxiflora, as well as the Coloradito (Polylepis quadrijuga), these species are Conservation Object Values (VOC) of the protected area and of great value to local communities.

The research has been carried out hand in hand with educational institutions, which have had the opportunity to support the gathering of information on these and other species in the Sanctuary, generating information that has been complemented with the local knowledge of the inhabitants of the area of influence, which has been key in all phases of the project, from the collection of the seeds of each species, the propagation process, the maintenance of the seedlings in the nursery, and the subsequent planting of the individuals. In addition, Guanentá, being the PA with the greatest diversity of frailejones in the country, makes it an excellent scenario for research.

-Agreements with universities for the development of research on endemic species of the páramos.

-Local knowledge of farmers to complement the information generated.

Follow-up and monitoring of frailejon and high montane species that are propagated and planted.

- The information obtained with respect to effective propagation methods, timing and restoration strategy, product of the research, has been key for the generation of conservation actions and decision making.

- The frailejon baseline, monitoring and plots allow us to learn more about the biology and ecology of the species in order to implement actions that favor the conservation of the species.

-The effectiveness of planting is better when it is done with local personnel who have knowledge of the area than with external labor.

Participation of key stakeholders (financing, agreements, alliances, etc.)

The financing of productive alternatives and/or improvement of agricultural practices outside the Sanctuary for families with land inside the protected area has stimulated the liberation of areas that were used for cattle ranching; in this way, actions have focused on recovering the impacted zones. On the other hand, the management of technical and financial resources with public and private actors facilitates the development and long-term permanence of the restoration process, because in addition to the construction of the infrastructure and the operation of the nursery (technical equipment and supplies), planting, maintenance and care are also carried out.

Much of the restoration work carried out by PNNC is thanks to the participation and inter-institutional efforts of CAS, CORPOBOYACA, WWF Colombia, AGROSOLIDARIA Association, the National Army, the municipalities, private companies and other key actors, who have provided inputs, labor and infrastructure, mainly. Undoubtedly, the strategic alliances in favor of biodiversity conservation in the Sanctuary are key to continue with the arduous and important work that the area has been implementing with these key actors.

- Good and constant relationship between local communities and the PA.

- Compliance with the work plan among inter-institutional actors.

-Resource management by partners and allies.

Alliances and agreements with different institutions make it possible for far-reaching projects such as the one carried out by the SFF Guanentá to be maintained over time. Thanks to teamwork with NGOs and academia, the work of propagation, restoration and research of these important species continues today.