Establishment and Training of a Change Makers Group

The Change Makers Group at the business partner Aquapesca was formed by seven individuals from different departments. The identification of key individuals for this group was made possible through collaboration between MUVA and Aquapesca's leadership. The rapid assessment of the organizational culture of Aquapesca enabled the team to map those potential champions to participate in the Change Makers Groups. The selected team members were then listed for the approach.

Training and capacity building for the change makers group took place intending to equip the Aquapesca team with the MUVA facilitation methodology, which is grounded in participatory popular education techniques. The training program with the Change Makers Group at Aquapesca had specific objectives designed to empower the group and equip them with necessary skills and knowledge, including a significant component on the gender perspective. This involved a comprehensive review of the concept of gender and an examination of societal norms that shape gender roles and expectations. By understanding these dynamics, participants were better equipped to address gender-related issues in their training and community engagement efforts. 

  • Schedule a good time for the training as many staff members have busy schedules and time constraints, making it difficult to dedicate time for participation in gender training.
  • Senior facilitators leading the training to guarantee relevant discussions and takeaways to start the design of action plans collaboratively.
  • Intense face-to-face training with the Change Makers Group and continuous online and periodic mentoring to monitor development.
  • Be flexible in the training program, offering scheduling and format options that accommodate staff members’ availability.
  • Highlight the personal and professional benefits of participating in the training, showcasing how it can contribute to individual well-being and development.
  • It is important to invest in the development and empowerment of change agents within the company. By equipping the change makers group with the knowledge and skills necessary to lead internal processes, we established a foundation for sustained change. Their active involvement and commitment catalyze the long-term adoption of gender-inclusive practices and policies.
Create awareness and engage the Aquapesca staff in establishing a more gender-inclusive environment

A rapid assessment enabled us to intricately outline the methodological workflow for our collaboration with the company Aquapesca. This workflow began with the formation of the Change Makers Group, working in close tandem with the MUVA team to grasp the methodologies necessary for ensuring the sustainability of our approach within the organization. The Change Makers Group was entrusted with the responsibility of spearheading processes within the organization, ultimately becoming champions of inclusion and gender equality, working in conjunction with colleagues and leadership. Following the group's inception, leadership training was conducted to create awareness and generate initial ideas regarding the areas of focus for action plans with new practices and policies for the company. Subsequently, the Change Makers Group was trained, building capacity for them to facilitate the approval of these plans and mobilize working groups dedicated to each area of work. 

  • Engagement of the CEO and other executive leadership members
  • Motivation of young people selected to participate in the Change Makers Groups and to lead the process as part of their skills development in career progression
  • The time of staff engagement should be well forecasted at the beginning of the project to guarantee availability and to not overburden them.
  • Communicate the needs of the company leadership about the team’s availability and resources.
Financial sustainability assessment

The purpose of this block is to propose financial mechanisms to sustain ghost fishing gear surveillance and improve fishers' compliance with the management agreement. This is an economic analysis that helps to build a shared view of how the problem could be managed, how much that would cost in a certain period, and which funding options are available to the community, including potential income generation from the upcycling of ghost fishing gear and other marine debris.

  • The existence of active local groups in areas other than diving, like communication, recycling, and tourism. They can play a role in the functioning of the ghost fishing strategy.
  • It is important to approach a variety of potential allies in the public and private sectors to increase the chances of finding adequate support and commitment from stakeholders.
Ecological and social-ecological impact assessment

The purpose of this building block is to identify the impacts of ghost fishing both on the ecosystems and the people.

 

Rapid ecological assessments are used to establish a baseline of the impacts observed in two ecosystems: mangroves and rocky reefs, identified as key conservation priorities in the management plan of the regional protected area.

 

The social-ecological aspects of the problem require more time for data collection. Surveys of perception, in-depth interviews, and workshops are used to obtain information from the fishing and diving community about how the problem is happening in the area and its social and economic implications. The goal is to gain a deep understanding of the situations that lead to fishing gear abandonment, loss, or discard.

  • Community groups and individuals provide information, participate in data collection, and motivate others to participate.
  • The data collection team spends enough time on data collection and triangulation of results.
  • There is trust between the data collection team and the community, and the prior informed consent that protects personal information is discussed and observed.

Rapid ecological assessments done by external experts must include:

  • enough time for data collection
  • time and commitment to return information to the community and participants
Capacity building in scuba diving for coastal communities

The purpose is to improve the local capacity to safely remove ghost fishing gear from the sea. The existence of a permanent diving center in the area is mandatory to provide security during all aquatic activities of the training and cleaning campaigns.

  • Social cohesion and environmental awareness in the local community.
  • A good relationship between the diving center and the native community.
  • Transparent communication with community leaders along the implementation process.

The response of the diving team should be rapid because currents change direction and can release and move the entangled fishing gear again. If the clean-up is delayed, the risk of not finding the gear increases.

 

Clear roles and efforts distribution among the diving and the on-land support team is essential to obtain the desired results and to communicate achievements back to the community, partners, and local authorities.

Agreement on management measures for ghost fishing

The purpose is to encourage fishers to actively prevent fishing gear loss and to report it when it happens. Fishers are invited to participate in interviews and workshops, where they share their experiences and ideas for solutions in the local context.

  • Fishers understand that their knowledge can help others fish more responsibly.
  • Fishers are listened to and their views are respected. 
  • Fishers are aware of the importance of maintaining marine ecosystems in good conditions to sustain artisanal fisheries.

The agreement must be based on a solid understanding of the causes and effects of ghost fishing in the local context.

Local leaders endorsement motivates fishers and the entire community to actively participate

Educating users about how to respect and behave responsibly in nature

As well as providing useful information about the surrounding natural area (e.g. trails, routes) and relevant information about this (e.g. routes’ terrain, length, degree of difficulty, changes in altitude), the trail centres also educate users on how to behave in nature. Codes of conduct educate users about how to respect nature while enjoying their sport/activity in a natural environment. For example, centres may provide information about how to respect nature when walking, running, or cycling on the local tracks, trails, and routes.

 

Some centres also provide information about the natural and cultural history on the routes, increasing users’ awareness of their natural environment.

  • Sharing information and best practice on how to behave responsibly and respectfully when in nature  
  • Clear information and explanations as to why it is important to behave responsibly and respectfully in nature 
  • Clear, effective, and easily accessibly communication channels through which information can be disseminated. The centres can act as hubs and physical spaces where information can be displayed (e.g. notice boards)
  • Establishing minimum criteria that required trail centres to provide users with information about the local area and activities that can be practiced there, encouraged trail centres to act as information hubs, informing users about the local natural environment, outdoor activities, and how to respect nature whilst enjoying outdoor sporting activities.
  • Providing information about activities such as walking, running, and cycling trails (i.e. length, difficulty, the type of terrain) encourages people to undertake activities in designated areas and limits encroachment into fragile or stressed natural areas.
  • Trail centres can signpost people less familiar with nature as to where to go, what to do, but also how to behave responsibly toward nature and why it is important to do so.
Increasing and improving access to natural spaces and outdoor sporting activities

The Trail Centres act as physical spaces that increase and improve access to physical activities in nature, contributing to physical and mental well-being.

 

Their carefully chosen locations in proximity to nature (forests, water, and trails) help establish freely accessible, round-the-clock meeting places and start-points for outdoor sporting activities. As some are located close to urban areas, they also provide a gateway from urban to natural environments. 

 

Their combination as an all-in-one clubhouse, provider of service facilities, and meeting and training space, makes them ideal sites for local sports associations to use, as well as un-affiliated groups or individuals. This provides a space for socialising within, and between, sports and promotes relationship-building amongst users and with local sports associations.

 

Providing access to service facilities participation in outdoor sports activities (e.g. bicycle pumps and cleaning stations; covered training space; functional training equipment (stairs, monkey bars, TRX, etc.); storage space for equipment; and changing rooms/showers/toilets). As sites for borrowing equipment (e.g. map and compass, roller skis, SUP boards, etc.), the centres also encourage people to try new activities in nature in an affordable manner. 

  • The choice of location: trail centres must be near natural environments conducive to outdoor activities. Building them on the outskirts of urban areas, yet still close to nature, provides ideal gateways to nature. Analysis of recreational opportunities, infrastructure, terrain, etc. helps determine ideal locations.
  • Correctly determining the functions and services to be provided by the trail centres to best-meet users’ needs.
  • Organising workshops with stakeholders allowed these to discuss and determine user needs as well as which functions trail centres needed to provide to accommodate these needs. This shaped the trail centres’ different designs and helped to determine the core facilities that centres had to provide, as well as the additional facilities specific to community needs or interests.
  • Participatory workshops also ensured that trail centres provided access to activities and areas that could be appealing to users – both to those practicing outdoor activities as well as to those who might be interested in discovering new nature-based outdoor activities. 
  • Choosing to locate some centres near urban areas was also important for improving urban populations’ access to nature.
  • Providing information about activities such as walking, running, and cycling trails (i.e. length, difficulty, the type of terrain, etc.) is helpful for encouraging people to undertake nature-based sporting activities, particularly those who may be less familiar with the local area or a specific activity.
Policy tools to improve local heritage management

The numerous buildings in need of repair or conservation create the need for clear guidelines. Local authorities lack the capacity to guide owners or translate urban regulations into decisions and the town’s historic landscape is threatened by new buildings, extensions and restorations which conflict with its specific character and natural landscape.

Following the rise in requests for professional advice, Studiogovora published a best practice guide for preserving valuable characteristics. The guide builds on a detailed analysis of the buildings, historic spa complex and public spaces. It describes each type of architectural element: facades, ornamentation, balconies and terraces, roofing etc., extending to the courtyard and its relationship with the landscape. It outlines a set of rules, identifies valuable elements, and puts them in a larger context, suggesting solutions for repairing elements, and contemporary interventions.

The Guide was developed in cooperation with heritage professionals and it has been adopted by local authorities as a set of official recommendations that will be supported and monitored by a newly established local planning commission. The guide is available for free online and it is also available to be purchased in physical format.

  • Existing need for capacity building within the local administration to better understand heritage requirements and manage requests for renovations and new constructions.
  • Cooperation with the Town Hall on architecture and heritage issues.
  • Existing network of heritage practitioners with diverse backgrounds and knowledge.
  • Existing funding options for developing best practice guidelines - The National Chamber of Architects finances such projects.
  • Best practice guidelines are still uncommon in Romania, where administrative and professional practice generally pays attention only to official documents - norms or laws - ignoring political, civic and administrative accountability for local policies.
  • Having local decision makers accept and implement advice from civil society takes trust and time.
  • Advice from civil society needs to be accompanied by institutional measures and support: financial incentives, better enforcement of construction regulations.
  • There is a significant shortage in craftsmen and contractors that have the knowledge and skills to work on historic buildings (both locally and nationally, as many construction workers left to work abroad). Training new ones requires long term thinking at a national level.
Developing a programme for interventions on historical buildings

With more than a third of historic structures in decay and disrepair, there is urgent need for conservation works. These need to be done taking into account the extent of physical damages, ownership, availability for funds, investment opportunities, as well as possible future uses and users.

Studiogovora is developing a program to assess and prioritise interventions on the historic buildings and has until now acted to secure one of the oldest historic villas in the resort, helped several residents with advice and small scale works, and has restored a gazebo dating back to the 1930s. The team has also started to recover and store valuable pieces such as doors or furniture until they can be restored.

At present a couple of interventions have already been completed, this include an emergency intervention, a full building restoration and repair intervention for a roof. Several restoration projects are in the planning phase and their implementation is dependent on the decisions made by owners.

  • Funding opportunities - either governmental or private
  • Stakeholder collaboration and capacity to support interventions
  • Professional network to support the team with necessary expertise
  • Contractors open to working with traditional techniques
  • Residents willing to ask for help in restoring their properties
  • Such activities require a work of continuous coordination and constant collaboration with owners, authorities, contractors, as well as with donors and funders.
  • Public funds are mainly available to public institutions and less to private ones. Also, public funds are only available to buildings that are officially recognized as heritage, thus are historical monuments. Buildings in protected areas or the ones that are important at local level are often not eligible.