Protecting Farmland

This block consists of providing farmers with the skills and resources needed to protect their Forest Garden sites. Farmers achieve this by planting green walls – an enhanced version of a living fence that TREES has developed – around the perimeters of their sites. They then plant fast-growing fertilizer trees throughout their sites, often in alleys among their crops, to further stabilize their soils and enhance land fertility. We decide which species to grow based on which species adapt best to the agro-ecological zones where we work. We consult with the farmers themselves on what they want to grow, eat, and sell and our technicians advise farmers on the best way to plant and plant, iterating year-on-year changes that may enhance their garden, sales, and production. For example in drier climates like Senegal and Singida, Tanzania, we train farmers on growing various acacia species, which do not require much rain. We also promote nitrogen-fixing trees and crops, such as gliricidia species, acacia species, pigeon peas, and fruit trees that have a shorter maturing period (3-5) years. We also grow species based on what is culturally popular, nutritious, and marketable, like bananas, a staple food in Uganda.

 

 

  • Fully trained technicians

  • Farmer’s land needs to be prepared and designed for FG implementation

Integrated pest management is crucial in early stages  of FGA as newly planted crops/trees can easily be hurt by diseases and pests

Mobilization of Farmers

We hire project staff and meet with relevant stakeholders (government representatives, community leaders, and potential local and international partners/donors) to solicit their support and formalize each new FG project. With the help of stakeholders we identify interested farmer groups, lead farmers, and participants, and host orientation workshops prior to pursuing training and extension activities. We contact farmers by working with local government and community leaders and using rural radio to promote TREES and the FGA. This process takes 1-2 months as we vet farmers to ensure that they are truly willing to participate in the program. We prepare our Monitoring and Evaluation process which consistently collects data over the 4-year period. The M&E process consists of collecting information on our farmers through a baseline survey before they start the program, on metrics such as household dietary diversity and food insecurity and resilience (based off of USAID indices), along with measurements of the species diversity, and the number of trees per hectare on FG land.  Lastly, we look into the number of food crops and marketable products our farmers grow. This information is followed up with an annual sample survey of farmers to see how these metrics change over the 4-year FGA.

 

  • Finding farmers who are able to commit to the four-year program

  • Finding appropriate stakeholders/funders

  • Ability to find appropriate staff members to serve as technicians to train farmers

We need to ensure that selection criteria includes a consultation with local leaders to be certain that farmers can dedicate secured, tenured (customary or statutory) land to the project

Local capacity building on protected area financing

On the other hand, the Monarch Fund (MF) strengthens the local capacities of 33 ejidos and communities to comply with the fiscal and banking conditions related to annual conservation payments under the concurrent funds' modality. In collaboration with Conafor, Conanp, FMCN and forest advisors, the FM supports the development of 29 Best Management Practices for Conservation Programs (BMPCP). The BMPCP is intended to be a document to guide the implementation of activities aimed at the conservation of forest ecosystems, in order to maintain or improve the provision of environmental services within areas under financial incentives. In addition, the BMPCP are intended to enable beneficiaries to obtain resources from other government programs to carry out the activities proposed in them.

In order to strengthen the MF strategy within the ejidos and communities, the MF Coordinator accompanied the design of dissemination materials with information on the new stage of the MF .

 

Finally, the FMCN, in coordination with the United States Forest Service and the Monarch Network, supports complementary conservation activities in the core areas in the areas of fire management, water monitoring, fire protection and restoration of degraded areas.

As proposed in the case study Funding for Forest and Biodiversity Conservation in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve: the Monarch Fund, in the future, we must maintain recognition that forests play an essential role in the generation of the environmental services provided by the MBBR, so that the conservation of core areas is a very important component. However, it must be made clear that "the maintenance of ecosystem services also requires ensuring the sustainable use of the territory throughout the protected natural area and its immediate area of influence"

Clear institutional framework through public-private partnership

Monarch Fund (MF) is part of FMCN´s Fund for Natural Protected Areas (FANP), a public-private initiative between FMCN, the Government of Mexico and the World Bank. The FANP consists of endowment resources, whose interests are channeled to 30 priority natural protected areas in the country.

 

FANP has a Technical Committee of the FANP (CTFANP) that oversees its operation, including the MF. This Committee is composed of seven members from different sectors, who are appointed by the National Council of Natural Protected Areas and ratified by the FMCN Board of Directors.

 

Another component of the MF is the Monarch Fund Trust Technical Committee (CTFMM), which approves annual payments to ejidos and communities that have complied with forest cover conservation in core areas. Six representatives of ejidos (agricultural and forestry properties for collective use), indigenous communities and private landowners participate in the CTFMM.

This achievement has been the result of the coordinated work of the federal environmental authority, the governments of the states of Mexico and Michoacan, FMCN, WWF, the ejidos, indigenous communities and owners of the core zones that supported the establishment of the Monarch Fund and leveraging Concurrent Funds to double the payment per hectare conserved in the core zones of the MBBR.

The MF sets a precedent in Mexico for being the first endowment fund whose interests directly support the owners of a federal protected natural area in the long term.

City Core Revitalization

The city applied a variety of capital improvement projects and urban operation schemes for city core revitalization. A centerpiece of the revitalization package is the development of Grand Plaza – a major social open space equipped with audio-visual amenities for various events and covered by a high-ceiling glass roof under all-weather conditions, in particular to deal with Toyama’s heavy snowfall climate. The city also established a 24-hour bicycle-sharing system by placing 17 bike stations with a private operator in the city core district. A central marketplace and local community facilities were constructed through the unique redevelopment schemes and incentive arrangement.

  • Development of a centric multifunctional facility to attract citizens and visitors (Grand Plaza)
  • Consideration to local climate and environment in the facility design

The key to the success of the city core revitalization is the wide variety of activity offerings suited for all generations, with due attention to the socially vulnerable, e.g. elderly, children, expecting mothers. The LRT supports this by providing direct and safe access from homes for this cohort of the population as well.

Promotion of New Township along the Public Transit Corridors

The city designated 436 hectares for an urban core district, 19 public transit corridors (including both light rail transit and bus lines), and 3,489 hectares for residential promotion areas along the corridors, for which special subsidies became available for qualified home builders, new housing owners, and multi-family apartment residents. Consequently, the number of new residential properties along the promoted transit lines increased 1.32 times for the period of 2004 to 2009.

  • Financial incentives for home owners along the public transit corridors
  • Commercial facilities, schools, hospitals etc. available within walking distance from public transit nodes and stations

Toyama's approach to attract development along the public transit corridors proved successful especially when this was backed by financial incentives. This in turn has led to indirectly disincentivising living in city fringe areas.

Reinvestment in Public Transit

The city introduced Japan’s first light rail transit (LRT), called PORTRAM, by utilizing the former JR Toyama-port line’s right of way accompanied by the extension of bullet train services to Toyama Station. The PORTRAM system with barrier-free stations and low-floor vehicles over the operation length of 7.6 km can smoothly carry elderly and disabled passengers to a variety of city destinations and bring wider environmental benefits, such as reduction in noise, air pollution, and CO2 emissions, to the whole city. Importantly, innovative project finance schemes were applied to split the roles of railway construction and system operation between public and private partners for the Toyama LRT. The public sector covers all the construction cost of the LRT system, including vehicles, railways, and depots, and the maintenance cost of these facilities, whereas the transit operator founded by several local governments and private companies recovers operation costs from fare revenues. The city filled the capital funding gap by arranging the national government’s road improvement programs and contributions from transit companies and by saving land acquisition costs with the former JR railway’s right of way.

  • Attention to universal accessibility for all
  • Innovative project finance schemes for public-private partnership
  • Sufficient funding support from the city

Caveat of applying this approach is that specifically for the Toyama case, the city had sufficient funds to cover construction cost of the LRT system, including vehicles, railways, and depots, and the maintenance cost of these facilities. Utilizing  right of ways of previous public transport systems can also be useful.

Availability of Data

Three types of data were particularly important in the design and promotion of the “Program for Earthquake-Resistant School Buildings”: school data, data on damages, and data on hazard risks. School data was collected by surveys and investigations conducted by FDMA and MEXT. A list of the surveys is indicated below.

  • School Basic Survey (annually since 1948) to collect basic data.
  • Public School Facilities Survey (annually since 1954) to collect building area and conditions of school facilities.
  • Status of Seismic Resistance of Public School Facilities (annually since 2002) to collect data on the seismic resistance of school structures as well as suspended ceilings of gymnasiums and other nonstructural elements of school buildings.

Earthquake Damage Investigation (after each mega-disaster such as the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake and the Great East Japan Earthquake) to collect damage to buildings, specifically the kind of damage suffered by various types of buildings, the location where the damage occurred and under what circumstances, and the kind of earthquake that caused the damage.

Continuous biodiversity monitoring

Ya’axché’s Protected Areas Management program conducts monitoring of bird and mammal species within the concession to track wildlife ecosystem health and inform decision making within the concession.

Through Ya’axché’s Protected Areas Management program, regular monitoring of bird/mammal species are conducted through camera trapping and point counts from Ya’axché rangers.

Monitoring is essential to determine whether the agroforestry concession is able to support wildlife and biodiversity. A short pilot study was conducted in 2016 as a first attempt at documenting biodiversity within cacao-based agro-forestry farms. Five cacao farms were chosen. Fifteen out of 31 species of indicator birds were documented within the farms. Fourteen species of mammals of which six species are considered indicator species were documented through the camera traps. This shows that agro-forestry supports a diverse array of wildlife species within the reserve.

Scaling-up and sustainability of adaptation measures

Promoting EbA measures with a high level of community involvement and binational ties was an effective way to achieve greater interaction between community, municipal and national actors, and also between peers (network of resilient producers; local government encounter). The results are, on the one hand, greater local empowerment, and on the other, scaling-up of EbA measures both vertically and horizontally. Thus, contributions are made towards institutionalizing EbA and creating conditions for its sustainability. The replication of the integral farm model arose from networking between producers, communities and local governments, and from a regional project with the Binational Commission of the Sixaola River Basin (CBCRS) that provided the financing. The Agrobiodiversity Fair, the work of producers as a network, and the Binational Reforestation Events, which are now all under the auspices of local and national institutions, were important mobilizing forces of change and spaces for exchange and learning. In the vertical sense, the scaling-up of EbA included working with the CBCRS to integrate EbA in the Strategic Plan for Transboundary Territorial Development (2017-2021), and with MINAE in the National Climate Change Adaptation Policy of Costa Rica.

  • Much of the work was accomplished thanks to the channelling and guiding role of the CBCRS (created in 2009) as a binational platform for governance and dialogue, and the ACBTC as a local development association. Both advocate for local and territorial interests and know the gaps and needs that exist in the area, and with this project were able to address the challenges that communities face and improve governance in the basin, promoting an ecosystem approach and a broad participation of actors.
  • Coordinating efforts through the CBCRS has shown that it is more cost-effective to work with existing structures and governance bodies, with powers and interests in the good management of natural resources and in achieving an appropriate representation of key actors, than to aim to create new groups or committees to deal with EbA issues.
  • Improving multilevel and multisectoral governance is a fundamental part of effective adaptation. Here, the role of subnational governments (such as municipalities) needs to be underscored, since they have a mandate in the management of the territory, but also responsibilities in the implementation of national adaptation policies and programs (e.g. NDCs and NAPs).
  • The identification of spokespersons and leaders (amongst men, women and youth) is an important factor in effectively fomenting the uptake and up-scaling of EbA.