Community assessment

Preliminary diagnostics are carried out with communities to assess their perception of the state of marine resources, the need for management and their motivation to take responsibility for management. To ensure adequate community ownership, it is critical that the support organisation (e.g. an NGO), does not pressure the community into agreeing to management measures that they are not necessarily motivated to enforce. If adequate recognition of a need for management and community motivation exists, the support organisation can move on to the next step.

- Established relationship between community and support organization - Community recognizes a need for management and is motivated - Support organization is flexible enough to adapt to community needs and/or lack of interest - Support organization is familiar with basic diagnostic exercises, such as problem trees, concept models, etc.

This first step is critical, and if carried out properly results in a community that is motivated to manage their marine resources and feels a strong sense of ownership over the initiative: - The support organization should refrain from proposing, or pressure the community from agreeing to, management measures (such as a marine reserve) before the need for management and community motivation (for management and enforcement) has been established. Otherwise the proposed action may always be perceived as an “outsider” initiative, and suffer from poor community ownership. - If adequate recognition of a need for management and community motivation exists, the support organization can move on to the next step. - The support organization must also be ready to walk away if the community expresses that it does not recognize a need for management, or is not motivated to take responsibility.

Sponge aquaculture as an alternative means of income

The cultivation of seaweed for the production of carrageenan, a thickener widely used in foods, has been a major source of income for Zanzibari women for more than 20 years. An analysis of the local conditions revealed that the cultivation of seaweed is subject to a sharp decline in production due to increasing occurrences of diseases and pests, and a low world-market price. Consequently, unmarried women with kids are no longer able to make a living from seaweed farming.

When searching for alternative means of income many aspects such as the know-how of the parties involved, eco friendliness, market-opportunities, investment requirements, general acceptance of the method, scalability, and availability of resources need to be considered. Aquaculture of sponges was identified to be a suitable alternative to seaweed farming promising substantially higher incomes.

  • The methods for cultivating sponges and seaweed share many aspects which made it easier to set-up sponge farms and train the women.
  • The shallow coastal waters are organised as common property and dedicated sites for sponge farms could be negotiated with the local fishers and communities.

It was difficult to find women pioneering as sponge farmers willing to learn how to swim and to try something completely novel – a challenging task in Zanzibar’s traditional society.

 

Certification tools and instruments

Identifying the most appropriate means of assessing the different competences requires the development of a number of assessment ‘instruments’ to provide varied opportunities for competences to be demonstrated. The instruments should be appropriate both for the type of skill or understanding being assessed, and to the level at which the assessment is taking place. The instruments used by WIO-COMPAS are:

  • Application form for initial screening (all Levels)
  • Portfolio of evidence comprising documents produced in the workplace (all Levels)
  • Core Activity Document/Case study (all Levels)
  • Practical demonstration through scenarios (Level 1)
  • Written quiz, based on projected images of key species (Level 1); Written test (Level 2)
  • Face to face interview (Levels 1 and 2); Panel interview (Level 3)

To develop a system and associated ‘tools’ by which the assessed competences can be marked or ‘scored’. In WIO-COMPAS the most important competences carry a weighting of a possible score of 4 points, with the others weighted at 2 points. A score sheet is used for each instrument, and the scores are transferred to an Excel based ‘Candidate Scoring Package’.

  • Developed by team with strong ‘tacit’ understanding of the field at all levels
  • Inclusion of education and assessment specialist
  • Establishment of clear criteria for achievement of certification
  • Recognition of process as essentially a capacity development and enhancement process – for everyone, including those achieving certification

It is critical to recognize the differences in the roles and activities performed at the different levels, and the varying requirements for written and/or oral communication skills at these levels. The instruments must therefore be appropriate to the daily work functions at the various levels. Adequate opportunities must be provided for certification candidates to provide evidence of their competences. One instrument is not enough as this can favour some candidates over others. The key concept is that of ‘evidence’, which the instruments are designed to elicit from candidates. A scoring system is essential, as it provides a rigorous measure of the assessments and of the strength of evidence presented through the various instruments by the candidates. The range statements associated with each competence are vital to ensure consistency in assessment and in scoring of evidence between assessors.

Critical competence requirements

The purpose is to identify the critical competence requirements for effective functioning at all levels. The levels are closely linked having the same competence areas (see below) and with many of the competences within these demonstrating progression in skills and understandings through the levels. Some competences are specific to particular levels. The competences are then used to:

  • Establish benchmarks for operations at the three levels
  • Provide rigorous criteria for professional certification
  • Inform assessment of existing competence and identify competence gaps
  • Inform training and other capacity development intervention needs
  • Certify MPA personnel who meet the competence requirements as MPA–PROs.
  • Inform recruitment, performance review, and promotion processes
  • Establish a career path for MPA personnel
  • Shape the training provided for MPA personnel

The competences are grouped into 7 ‘Competence Areas’:

  1. Policy, Legislation and Compliance
  2. MPA Concept and Establishment
  3. Communication and Stakeholder Engagement
  4. Financial Management and Fundraising
  5. Management Operations
  6. Biophysical and Sociocultural Environment
  7. Leadership, Ethics and Innovation
  • Initial focus on one level
  • Competence lists developed collaboratively involving a range of perspectives: (M)PA management; science; education and assessment
  • Competences grouped into Competence Areas
  • Competences sufficiently generic to be widely applicable
  • Competences at a fairly broad level with each competence encompassing a range of specific skills
  • Competences limited to less than 80 (absolute maximum) to facilitate effective assessment
  • Competences supported by Range Statements indicating the level required and evidence relevant to their assessment

The main lesson is that the identification of the competences must be a collaborative and iterative process. They do not appear overnight, and require consistent focus over a considerable time. The different perspectives are essential, but will pull the process in different directions, with the ultimate outcome inevitably representing something of a compromise. The starting point should probably be the Competence Areas (see the WIO-COMPAS competence lists in the Handbook). The initial focus on one level was a strong feature of the process, avoiding the complication of trying to work at all levels at once. It cannot be stressed too hard that the process of identification of the competences is absolutely central to the whole process, and the competences are the foundation for everything that follows.

The Dinabe: A social convention between local communities

The dina is a traditional social convention that helps regulate life in Madagascar communities. It enables local communities to develop a set of rules and regulations to govern a particular set of circumstances and is commonly used in relation to natural resource management. Dinas are developed in a participatory manner and given legal weight through their homologation in local courts. Their enforcement lies with the local community. In the case of Antongil Bay, 26 dinas were created – one for each fishers association in each locally managed marine reserve. The dinas encompass:

  1. a set of regulations for the principal infractions (destructive gear, fish minimum size, etc.),
  2. a set of regulations in accordance with the local context (taboos, night fishing regulations, etc.), and
  3. a set of sanctions.

In addition to the local dinas, the local communities of the 26 marine reserves agreed to create a “dinabe”, which aims to federate the individual dinas and provides an overall framework for sustainable use of the marine resources and coastal areas in the bay in a complementary manner to the Bay-wide management plan.

  • A process of information dissemination and education was essential to ensure communities had the knowledge necessary to make decisions about the content of the dinas.
  • While maintaining community leadership of the process, the involvement from the outset of the Government was important to minimize the risk that obstacles are encountered later in the process.
  • Legal recognition of the social conventions is essential for their legitimacy in both the eyes of the community and the Government.
  • While difficult to achieve due to a lack of a recognized spokesperson, the involvement of migrant or external fishers in the process of elaboration of the Bay-wide management plan (which establishes the principles of exclusive fishing rights for local communities) would have helped to mitigate their negative influence on the homologation process of the dinabe.
  • Not all parties are going to be supportive of local management of fishing rights and unexpected situations or opposition can arise – as was the case with a group of external fishers who blocked homologation of the final dinabe.
  • The relationships built during the process between all stakeholders are an equally important outcome as the management plan and dinabe and provide a strong base on which to overcome problems. The management plan and dinabe development process created a network of partners that did not previously exist and is now working together to resolve the issue of homologation of the dinabe.
Data request form

Scientific results and data are often published in formats that managers cannot access or find challenging to process and extract directly useful information (e.g. scientific publications). Once managers know what data they need to inform management (have thought through objectives and indicators), they can create a data request form asking researchers for the specific data most relevant to MPA management and in the format managers are using to allow rapid understanding and integration into existing databases.

Training in understanding marine and coastal ecosystems. Managers know what data they need for management. Scientists are willing to share data (may require memorandum of understanding – as part of data request form – specifying how data will be used).

Managers are frequently frustrated by lack of access to data collected in their MPAs. Scientists often do provide data, but in formats not preferred by managers. We surveyed MPA managers from 8 nations to determine how they would like to receive data from managers, then helped them develop data request forms reflecting their needs, and in the units that they understand. Researchers have expressed willingness to complete these forms, especially when they contain an memorandum of understanding indicating that data will be used for management and not in publications or presentations without prior consent and acknowledgements. This has increased access of data by managers.

Regular MPA monitoring

Managers and community members often have little training in marine and coastal ecological and social systems. Conducting monthly monitoring provides data about the system, but also provides a mechanism for managers to understand and witness changes in the system. Engaging community members in this process helps promote collaborative problem solving. Finally, this process helps managers better understand data they receive from scientists because they know what is involved in collecting data.

  • Training in understanding marine and coastal ecosystems.
  • Participatory process with managers, scientists, and community members.
  • Agency support for use of boats and equipment for monthly monitoring.
  • Scientific oversight of monitoring methods and data entry/analysis.

Collaborative monitoring of marine systems has been the single most effective component of the SAM program because it builds excitement for the marine system. Previously, many MPA managers and community members had few swimming skills and little knowledge of marine systems. Introducing them to monitoring has engaged many to dramatically increase swimming ability and participate. Further, the firsthand knowledge gained by doing the monitoring has increased understanding of challenges and willingness to find management solutions. However, data management is an on-going issue that needs scientific support and potentially data entry forms to help prevent mistakes.

Development of national SMART objectives

Managing without targeted objectives is like driving a car blindfolded. Objectives help determine how effective the current management is, which areas need active management, and whether actions taken contribute to moving the system toward objective targets. We develop a comprehensive suite of ecological and social indicators, have these prioritized by regional social and ecological scientists, and work with managers to independently prioritize indicators and develop objectives focused around each management goal. The final list includes manager and scientist priorities and is peer reviewed by stakeholders and regional scientists. Lists of objectives are flexible and updated often. Due to the lack of data or analytical capacity, we help them conduct a literature review, and establish ecological targets using baseline data (e.g., historical status or status within reference areas of long protected MPAs), non-linearity in large datasets (i.e., threshold levels at which ecosystem state changes), or established target levels (e.g., levels set by governments). For social state targets, we work with managers and stakeholders and use reference directions (improvement from existing state), or normative (value-based) targets.

  • Training in understanding marine and coastal ecosystems.
  • Participatory process with managers, scientists, and community members.
  • Agency support for use of objectives to guide management.

Managers find the process of selecting objectives highly valuable and the targets help them understand status and guide decision making. However, the objectives need to be embraced by the agency, managers, and community to be effective and should be incorporated into national MPA management policy. Selecting management objectives requires that the managers and community understand the social-ecological system, so training may be required first.

Ecotourism as a model for a private, not-for-profit MPA

From 1991-1994 Chumbe Island Coral Park Limited (CHICOP) successfully negotiated with the semi-autonomous government of Zanzibar, Tanzania for the western coral reef and forest of Chumbe Island to be gazetted as an MPA, with management of the MPA entrusted to CHICOP. The company was specifically established for the purpose of developing and managing the MPA financially self-sustainably, utilizing ecotourism to generate revenue for all MPA operational costs and associated conservation, research and education activities. Through this Chumbe became the first managed marine park in Tanzania, the first privately managed MPA in the world, and to date is one of the only financially self-sustainable MPAs globally. The company objectives are not-for-profit, implementing conservation and education initiatives over more than 20 years under the framework of two management plan iterations that were developed with wide stakeholder participation (1995-2005 and 2006-2016). Ecotourism business operations follow commercial principles for maximizing revenue and promoting cost-effectiveness to ensure a sustainable revenue stream for MPA activities, exemplifying a successful business-oriented approach to sustainable and effective MPA management.

  • Adoption of a liberalization policy allowing foreign investment back into the country, in particular in the tourism sector
  • Investment Protection Act passed in 1989, and the Zanzibar Investment Agency established in 1991 to screen investment proposals
  • Investor's commitment, determination, project management experiences in Tanzania and private capital to launch the initiative
  • Availability of professional & committed volunteers
  • Availability of donor funds for non-commercial project components
  • Private management of an MPA can be effective and economically viable, even in a challenging political environment
  • There is a clear market in the tourism industry for state-of-the-art eco-destinations that support strict conservation and sustainability principles
  • No need for compromise! Private management has strong incentives to achieve tangible on-ground conservation goals, co-operate with local resource users, generate income, be cost-effective and keep overheads down
  • Investment in conservation, environmental technologies & the employment of operational staff for park management and education programs, raises costs considerably, making it more difficult to compete with other tourist destinations. Favorable tax treatment could encourage such investments, but is not granted in Tanzania
  • Investment security is limited by land tenure being available only through leasehold, while land leases can be revoked by the State with relative ease, thus weakening long-term security of tenure
Study on healthy ecological conditions

A study provides information about the ecological structure of healthy mangrove stands and the original conditions of hydrological flow at the site.

tba

tba