Awareness creation on the importance of Green Spaces.

For many, the concept of protected area has not yet been fully understood  in Nigeria and Lagos in particular. In this wise, LUFASI has taken a full responsibility in educating the public, especially the locals on the importance of protected areas and their ecological benefits for the  overall environmental sustainability of humanity. To this end, LUFASI develops creative tools for teaching about Climate Change (CC), Forest Conservation (FC), Plastic Pollution and engage in Community Outreach using the PA as a living laboratory where students and group visitors can learn. The CC workshop is an interactive learning, which informs students and group visitors of the critical challenges facing our Earth’s climate (caused by unsustainable practices such as the destruction of forests) and empowers them to take local action for global change. Forest conservation programme focuses on bridging the knowledge gap in our forest biodiversity and importance for ecosystem balance, and expanding green cover and natural habitats across Lagos state. Plastic Pollution practical workshops focus on reducing plastic use that has put the world under threat including commemorating global environment days to further enlighten and advocate for a healthy natural environment with focus on protected areas.

  • Increased participatory engagement with local communities and the public.

  • Increased collaboration with government and its relevant agencies such as the Ministry of Environment, Lagos State leading to an increased awareness on the benefits of Pas for the overall of the environment.

  • Support from grants such as the GreenFund Grant, which awarded LUFASI with $3000 that was channelled towards the creation of relevant education materials including LUFASI’s Climate Change Animated Video and colourful booklets.

Protection and conservation of green spaces are ineffective without the effective engagement of environmental awareness measures. When people are enlightened, they are able to make informed decisions. In this light, those who went through our workshops have been stirred up to think critically on how the state of our rapidly deteriorating environment can be salvaged. As a result, many have been challenged to develop and engage in innovative solutions that can solve environmental problems at the school and community levels. Furthermore, our various workshops have inspired a small lifestyle change that influence them to pursue responsible environmental stewardship and leadership in their various endeavours towards environment. However, lack of increased funding to develop more educating materials to reach out to more people within the local communities and the public has been a major challenge.

Spatial multi-criteria analysis for prioritizing landscapes for restoration

The approach focused on 3 essential ecosystem functions: water, biodiversity and soil. The following steps were used to define criteria for each group:

  1. Identification of ecosystem service relevant parameters and criteria (> 100 criteria)
  2. Pre-screening: spatialization of parameters at national, regional and local scale (41 spatially available criteria)
  3. Consultation: selection of final criteria based on 3 groups (water, biodiversity, soil) during group work, direct consultations; prioritization, indicator weighting and determination of criteria values (28 prioritzed criteria). Criteria examples: rainfall, hydrological resources, population density, land use, soil carbon and productivity 
  4. Multicriteria analysis based on quantitative and qualitative values; preparation of 14 scenario maps, combining different groups (water, biodiversity and soil) with four priority levels; identification of priority area of 11,122,540 ha
  5. Verification of results based on data from the national restoration opportunities assessment method (ROAM) study and other sources
  6. Validation of results by the national FLR committee & platform and selection of 8 priority watersheds
  • Existing policy and planning documents defining general FLR opportunities
  • Analysis of financing options and opportunities for private sector engagement in FLR (completed 05/2017)
  • FLR dialogue platform and high interest and mobilization of actors
  • Moving from a forest ecosystem focused to an ecosystem approach at landscape level integrating erosion prevention and water provision
  • Business as usual land use was not an option anymore as ecosystems were highly degraded
  • Identifying 3 distinct ecosystem function groups (water, biodiversity, soil) helped stakeholders from different sectors and institutions to understand their own role and action space in this process
  • Thorough consultation & involving 38 different organizations was key to prioritize restoration areas in a transparent and participatory manner and to create consensus on the final decision
  • It was crucial to find a political consensus on the most balanced geographical distribution of priority areas of 4 M ha
  • The process helped to install an official definition of catchment basins distinguishing 159 watersheds
  • The process was very technical, but triggered an intensive political re-flection because a holistic landscape approach was used for planning and decision-making and revealed a huge potential for FLR.
  • Decisions were also guided by the current policies in the energy and environmental sector to ensure coherence
Development of national forest landscape restoration strategy

The national strategy for forest landscape restoration and green infrastructure was developed in a participatory manner during 8 months at various stages:

1) scope definition at committee level & drafting of terms of references, selection of advisors

2) validation of methodology,

3) consultation of government, civil society and private sector at regional level (10 of 22 regions),

4) 2 validation workshops at national level for committee & platform,

5) communication of the strategy at the level of the Council of Ministers (meeting of all Ministers and Prime Ministers)

6) dissemination on the website of the Ministry of Environment and Forests.

 

The strategy takes stock of the current situation and framework conditions in Madagascar, analyses the main challenges to reach the 4 M ha goal by 2030 and gives strategic advice on how to overcome them and mobilize key actors.

The strategy recommends priorities covering good governance, coherent spatial planning, technical restoration measures and resource mobilization. Priorities are broken down into 12 objectives and concrete activities.

  • A study on FLR opportunities – following the IUCN Restoration Opportunity Mapping methodology - from 2015 served as a technical basis
  • Strategy development coincided with the revision of the "new Forestry Policy" of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. FLR is a key priority for this new forest policy
  • A new national energy policy supports the implementation of FLR strategy by a restoration of 40,000 ha forests and forest plantations per year for domestic rural energy supply
  • It was crucial that the strategy openly names challenges and potential for improvement, also including the issues of land (tenure) rights the current lack of cross-sectorial cooperation and weak governance, reflecting the awareness of existing problems
  • For its acceptance and legitimacy, it was crucial to develop the key elements of the strategy in a participative process together with the FLR committee
  • It was ideal that strategy was validated officially by an inter-ministerial decree involving key sectors; but this was not sufficient and additionally a long process of lobbying inside the powerful key ministries concerned was required. Integrating the secretaries general of the Ministries of Agriculture and Regional Planning into the RPF Committee was the solution for mainstreaming the strategy
Crowdfunding

Crowdfunding is a relatively new way of funding projects, the goal being to inspire individuals to want to help you achieve the project goals by donating to the project budget. There are several online crowdfunding platforms that work in different ways, some of which require a fee whilst others are free. We used a site that requires us to meet a set amount of our budget before funds were extracted from donors, if we didn’t reach that amount then the project would not go ahead. The crowdfunding site was easy to set up but requires you to write project details into sections. This should be easy because of already writing the project proposals and pitch packs. We were also able to embed the campaign video into this site. Once the site was set-up we shared it on all our social media sites and through our personal networks.

It is extremely straightforward to achieve this step, once the necessary research and preparations are in place. It is a matter of 'just do it'. Once the crowdfunding begins, and gains momentum, it creeaetes a sense of excitement and energy among project team members and contributors alike, as we watch targets being met and the portfolio of supporters grow. Access to the totals and ability to track contributions is an important enabling factor.

The important lesson we learnt during the crowdfunding stage is that it is better to set up the crowdfunding page for a smaller portion of your project budget and therefore better to wait to see if your receive any cooperate sponsors before initiating this phase. It was also useful that SIF had committed £20,000 pounds to the project. This encouraged public and corporate sponsorship as it was used to match the first £20,000 that was raised. People are also more likely to sponsor a project target that looks achievable especially bearing in mind these will be smaller donations. The crowdfunding page must also portray the project clearly and appeal to a wide variety of people. It is therefore important to set up the reward system for donations, ranging from small rewards to substantial rewards for large donations. For example, we rewarded small donations with a high quality digital photograph by a wildlife photographer who spent time on Aldabra and large donations with an invitation to the post-expedition events, hosted in Queen’s College.

Funder Pitch Pack Design & Project Launch

It is necessary to develop a strong, concise and attractive pitch pack, which is professional and clearly shows the project’s importance and budget. It is extremely important to make a clear pitch on how, by funding the project, the organisation or company will benefit. For example, for X amount of money the funder logo will be used on project t-shirts and the funder will be mentioned in all media coverage.  The pitch pack should include the project logo, and use visual aids to bring the point across. In this case we used images of Aldabra, it’s wildlife and the impact of the plastic pollution. Since we were distributing these packs in the UK and Seychelles it was vital to create each pack with the local context in mind, whether it was currency conversions or the use of particular quotes from recognisable figures. Alongside the pitch pack we created a campaign video which introduces the problem and the solution using strong imagery and a voiceover. With these steps completed, we could then plan the project launch. The aim of the launch was to garner a maximum amount of media coverage and engage as many individuals and companies as possible via a face-to-face event. We therefore organised events both in UK and in Seychelles, in which potential donors and supporters were invited.

Team members skilled in visual design were key to ensure the pitch-pack was professional. The campaign video required basic video-editing skills, footage of the site and impact of plastic pollution. Advice on the pack’s design and how to approach companies from fundraising professionals was useful. ACUP’s launches took place in prominent locations, the Royal Society of London’s headquarters and the Seychelles State House. SIF’s Patron, Mr Danny Faure, President of Seychelles gave a video speech making ACUP as a project of national significance.

We found that the most likely success in pitching our project was to companies with some connection, either to a team member of the project or to the project itself via an interest in either Seychelles or Aldabra specifically. It is important to take time in ensuring that if you are emailing companies that you email the appropriate person to deal with your request. It is also a very good idea to make as many face-to-face connections as possible during the launch event and answer queries about the project to ensure there are no misunderstandings regarding project objectives and outputs. It is also a lot easier to gain the attention of funders if you already have some sponsorship and even better if you have a media partner for the project e.g. a local or international news agency.

Project Design & Initiation

Before beginning to approach potential funders it was necessarily to carefully plan and design the project and anticipate all the information that funders would wish to know. This includes the project aims and outputs, the team involved, the logistical plan and the budget. It is also important to clearly think about how the project will have a lasting legacy beyond the clean-up expedition. This should be developed into a full written project proposal.

 

Following completion of the project design it is necessary to set-up project media sites, this also required developing a project logo, title and tag line. We also set-up specific project email addresses. The media sites (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram & project website) all required initial content and therefore a photo library was compiled and content text established. Before launching the project we also completed team recruitment (12 team volunteers in total) and allocated specific team roles for the duration of the project, for example, social media officer, outreach officer, science officer. With this now in place it was possible to plan a fundraising strategy.

The project design required high levels of communication between the team In Oxford, The Seychelles Islands Foundation and the staff on Aldabra Atoll. This was to ensure the project fulfilled the overall aims and was financially and logistically feasible. 

Having multiple persons working on the project development is beneficial but to ensure cohesion of ideas it is necessary to have regular meetings and to review the project development at each stage thus reducing the likelihood that key considerations will be missed.

Balancing Water Sources through Multi-stakeholder Collaboration

The ordinances and the master plan stipulate collaboration among relevant local stakeholders to establish a common system for conservation management. In line with the city ordinance, private companies that withdraw more than 30,000 m3 of groundwater annually are requested to form, implement and monitor a conservation plan. They also submit a report on the recharge of groundwater to follow the prefectural ordinance. Through this collaboration system, the governments have achieved multiple projects to recharge groundwater with involvement of different stakeholders. The prefectural government, for instance, took the lead in recharging groundwater by filling fallow paddy fields full of water in collaboration with farmland owners in upper basin region, agricultural cooperatives, and neighboring towns and villages. Furthermore, there are some companies participating in the projects as part of their Corporate Social Responsibility. Farmers are requested to use fertilizers and treat animal excrement properly in order to decrease the concentration of nitrate.

  • Multi-stakeholders collaboration among relevant stakeholders are stipulated in ordinances and a master plan

Groundwater tend to be higher water quality but lower water quantity as a water source, compared to surface water source. Since the groundwater volume is limited, collaboration among various experts and stakeholders such as local citizens, academia, the private sector, NGOs, and local municipalities, has been effective particularly for properly managing withdrawal of ground water.

Intergovernmental Collaboration at the Groundwater Basin Level

Even though the national law does not cover the groundwater system, the groundwater management has been governed through a series of ordinances, comprehensive plans, and action plans for more than 40 years. Groundwater Preservation Ordinances was established in 1977 for Kumamoto City and in 2001 for Kumamoto Prefecture. The city and prefecture governments jointly developed a comprehensive plan to control groundwater in 1996, incorporating collective input from 17 municipalities in the catchment area into the plan. Later, a second version of the plan in 2008 was developed by the group of 15 municipalities in the catchment, identifying four prioritized areas: 1) improvement of the balance of inflow and outflow of groundwater, 2) protection and improvement the quality of groundwater, 3) raising awareness of citizens for the conservation of groundwater, and 4) establishment of a common goal among stakeholders. A detailed five-year action plan was also developed the following year in order to implement mitigation measures in a timely manner. 

  • Intergovernmental collaboration at the basin level for groundwater management

Given the characteristics of groundwater, governance of groundwater management system requires intergovernmental cooperation at the basin level and their long-term commitment to the conservation activities. Moreover, region-wide plans should cover multifaceted aspects of groundwater management, including flood management, water utilization, environmental and ecosystem protection, culture and education, and economics while meeting various local needs and mobilizing diverse expertise.

Developing basic education and health facilities

Vamizi island in 2006 was more than 2 days away from the provincial hospital, a sailing trip of 6-12h from either of the district hospitals and 3-6h from the nearest health center. Obviously, health care was a major issue for the population. The health center with medical support and the patrol CCP boat used as an ambulance came to solve part of the basic health needs. There was no school in Vamizi when the tourism company started operating in 2003. First they supported the request of a teacher from the education department to Vamizi. Following that, the company raised the funds for the construction of a school in 2008. This was a major improvement to the children’s lives.

These two events, spearheaded by the tourism company, and later supported by the UniLúrio, were the foundation for the support of the communities to the LMMA.

Donors interested in working together with the communities; willing to give a health center and a school in exchange of creating a protection zone provided with scientific support.

All health& education efforts need to be coordinated with government to integrate the private efforts into the larger program of the government, to avoid that the village receives less or more than the government plans (notoriously better health& education can attract people to the area, and excess population can jeopardize the conservation effort and LMMA).

Varied Financial Arrangement

Kadokawa Care Prevention Center was established by Toyama City using donations from citizens and the city budget. One citizen donated hundreds of millions of JPY, or around millions of USD, to the city for the improvement of social welfare services for elderly citizens, and the city decided to build a special center for preventive care on the site of a demolished elementary school. The city also received valuable and useful assets (i.e., hot spring facilities and special apparatus for exercise) donated by several citizens before it began operating. While the property is owned by the city, the facility is operated and managed by a joint venture of private companies.

The city’s unique financial arrangement for the project by utilizing unused sites for projects, granting a concession to private operators, and asking for a variety of contributions from citizens and/or private companies.

As public spending on social welfare programs continues to grow in the recent aging trend, it is hard to expect further public resource allocations to long-term care projects for the elderly. Under severe budget constraints, local governments must make great efforts to raise capital funds from diverse resources. The government might be able to utilize unused sites for projects, grant a concession to private operators, and ask for a variety of contributions from citizens and/or private companies (e.g., cash donation, land parcels, related apparatus, etc.).