Co-production of adaptation intervention feasibility assessment
Mina Mahat showcases her beehives. She has now established herself as a small-scale beekeeper in her locality.
RECOFTC
Users of Bishnupur community forest and members of other nearby communities manage this nursery. They grow camphor trees and Indian bay trees for planting with technical assistance from RECOFTC and funding from Harrison Municipality.
RECOFTC
Chairperson of the Bishnupur community forest user group Ganga Mainali, right, hands over a beehive to group member Mina Mahat.
RECOFTC
A feasibility assessment uses input from community forest user group members and other stakeholders to identify adaptation interventions.
First, community forest user group members and facilitators review the climate vulnerability assessment and the identified intervention topics. The assessment identifies at least three topics based on detected climate threats, vulnerabilities and adaptive capacities. Each topic is a broad adaptation strategy with actions.
Then, facilitators use a template for evaluating topics to assist community forest user group members in seeking technical expertise, and collate information into a single ‘snapshot’ document to enable selection of a more detailed action. Facilitators can use the climate vulnerability assessment to draft information on existing livelihood assets in advance.
As a final step, facilitators work with community forest user group members to list expertise and experts for the intervention topics. Facilitators update the list, as needed, considering a broad range of stakeholders and service providers. Final matrices list response options under each topic, and are completed based on information target participants provide. This section may require gathering information from technical consultants and/or service providers.
While vulnerability assessments should be participatory, feasibility assessments require technical expertise to ascertain which options are practical and effective. This likely involves drawing upon engineering, hydrological, agricultural and other line agencies or consultants. Involving governmental and non-governmental organizations in a vulnerability assessment will reduce efforts needed for the feasibility assessment, by providing insights into potential measures already available or implemented, required technologies, costs and possible sources of support.
Community forest user groups can conduct feasibility assessments, with technical support provided by supporting agencies. Leadership by women ensures that the interventions sufficiently consider the impacts and benefits to them and other marginalized groups such as poor households and ethnic minorities.
Climate adaptation support is mandated to many local-level line agencies in Nepal. For this reason, identifying and engaging technical agencies is a valuable opportunity to develop plans for co-financing. Requests for technical inputs strengthen the case for financial support for interventions.