Strategic alliances with different partners

The regent in Ambiente is the Ministry of Environment and we have been working with them since 1998, but in 2017 we signed a cooperation agreement to minimize the jaguar-human conflict through a preventive management project to seek solutions. We have also achieved an alliance with USFWS to work farm management plans, anti-predation measures, monitoring with cameras and collars with the jaguar. We work with the Small Grants Program/UNDP/GEF and are working on a camera trap monitoring project in Darien and support/advice to community-based organizations, so that communities know how to solve and take to another level what is happening in their areas. Nat Geo supports us in the most extensive camera trap monitoring project in Panama in Darien, in addition to helping us in outreach and communications at the international level. With the Howard Huge Medical Institute (HHMI) we work in scientific research with camera traps, in addition to disseminating, communicating and educating through their digital platforms what we find in the Darien National Park. Other important alliances are the Ministry of Tourism, ANAGAN, ISA, University of Panama, UNEP. We work with some indigenous groups and more than 10 community-based organizations distributed throughout the country.

Each and every one of the alliances are important, since some of them work on similar but not the same topics, and all of them are intertwined so that these projects are medium and long term, and those that involve the communities can be very long term projects, and we are talking about a minimum of 6 years. And for this to happen, the alliances with people, communities, decision makers and the executing agency, donors, there must be trust and be able to work as a team and we have achieved this with everyone. Never belittle a person who wants to help.

Each and every one of the alliances are important, since some of them work on similar but not the same topics, and all of them are intertwined so that these projects are medium and long term, and those that involve the communities can be very long term projects, and we are talking about a minimum of 6 to 10 years of duration. And for this to happen, the alliances with the people, communities, decision-makers and executing agency, donors, must have trust and be able to work as a team, and we have achieved this with everyone. Never underestimate a person in the community who wants to help and always listen and then look for ways to move forward.

Improved information management and use capabilities

Through various trainings, exercises and case studies, local stakeholders such as technicians, firefighters, secretaries of agriculture and planning were guided in developing skills for the management and use of information built through Geographic Information Systems - GIS. For this purpose, we illustrated and practiced with free access and digital tools such as Q-Gis, to strengthen the analysis of information and cartographic graphic outputs for processes such as land use, water network, planning, zoning and municipal ordinance. In addition, brochures were prepared with the information obtained at the technical-cartographic level to facilitate the information to the stakeholders.

  • Identify the technical and management knowledge of territorial stakeholders in cartographic and numerical information, as well as planning and management concepts.
  • Facilitate capacity building in GIS management for specialists, technicians and decision makers at the municipal level for the use and analysis of information.
  • Present the information elaborated to local, regional and national organizations so that it can be used in the future construction of plans and instruments in other organizations.
  • It is important to strengthen the planning spaces and skills of decision-makers and their technicians in GIS and the reading of information on environmental and production issues.
  • The information elaborated as input for the EEP is dynamic and therefore requires monitoring, updating and systematization according to the progress made by the municipalities.
  • Appropriating the EEP at the municipal level can improve the adoption of elements in municipal systems such as protected areas, land-use planning schemes, and other environmental issues.
Researcher developed visions & space for reflexivity

This building block has two phases. In Phase 1 of the solution researchers involved in the project identify visions of desired futures for this landscape from data obtained in previous two blocks. Initial visions developed for our study area can be found in this Deliverable (see link below). These visions are never fully final, they are further improved / developed when new information is available. They provide lay of the land so-to-speak for decision-makers on different levels and stakeholders themselves of various interests in the landscape and how they collide or align together.

Second phase of this building block focuses on reflexivity – both among researcher team members who have developed these visions and ideally also a few stakeholders. For the former such reflexivity is needed to identify and be aware of all possible biases and preconceptions that they have introduced in visions while analysing data and developing them. For example, often if a researcher has worked in the area for a long time, they might rely on knowledge that was obtained outside this data collection and this needs to be acknowledged. Reflexivity among stakeholders on the other hand is needed in order to 1) validate developed visions, 2) foster a deliberation process during which new / modified visions representing shared or joint ideas could emerge.

Development of visions for the landscape is an iterative process that is never fully complete, any changes in the landscape or arrival of new information can set another circle of re-evaluating and development of visions. With changes constantly occurring in the landscape, policies, stakeholders this presents a suitable tool of taking stock every so often in order to better guide decision-making. This solution presents a set of approaches that can be used to develop visions from data, that is often anyways collected.

N/A

Establishing the international network for safeguarding stone tidal weirs

The cross-cultural and multi-disciplinary study of stone tidal weirs and efforts to raise awareness require the establishment of an international network.

The academic core consists of the three member universities, part of the UNESCO UNITWIN Network for Underwater Archaeology: the Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, the University of Guam, and the University of Warsaw. The network enhances the protection and research efforts on underwater cultural heritage by connecting universities and professional training institutions, and acting as a bridge between academia, civil society, local communities, and policy makers. 

On the other hand, local NGO or NPO organizations play a central role in safeguarding or reviving stone tidal weirs. As an intermediary the academic core builds relationship between coastal community stakeholders, including NGOs or NPOs, and international organizations, including the UN, UNESCO, ICOMOS, plus local and national governments.

The UNESCO UNITWIN Network for Underwater Archaeology offers a formal platform to connect member universities and training institutions.  The academic core mediates between the local and international worlds, focusing on recognizing the importance of stone tidal weirs as underwater cultural heritage. 

Local communities are not always aware of the global and iconic relevance of stone tidal weirs as heritage assets. Academics act as mediators and provide good advice and appropriate information on stone tidal weirs to coastal communities.  

Each coastal community having stone tidal weirs seems to face similar difficulties, as well as similar environmental and social problems.

The international network provides local communities the opportunity for examining and solving them on the global base. 

Conferences and workshops organized by universities, some of which belong to the UNESCO UNITWIN Network for Underwater Archaeology, involve not only academics but also representatives of coastal communities and stakeholders, policy makers, or governmental officials.

 

 

A healthy ocean

Marine habitats sustain critical biodiversity and fish stocks that support the livelihoods of coastal communities across Honduras and the world. Healthy oceans and well managed fisheries ensure continuous benefits for those who depend on them during good times and bad.

These crises brought a heightened recognition that well-managed fish stocks and thriving ecosystems can be an effective way to secure food and income for communities and prevent further migration—a worsening phenomenon in Central America. This understanding of the ocean as a safety net has been promoted among fishers and resulted in increased recognition by the government and greater support for the declaration of new protected areas. Increased demand for protection enables actions that ensure healthy oceans and thriving coastal communities.

Effective ocean protection and fisheries management are complex endeavors that require diverse interventions and strategies. Community-driven action, however, always needs to be a core component. Having communities as stewards of their marine resources, fishing responsibly, and participating in management and surveillance, is essential for effective conservation and management.

Access to savings and affordable credit through Saving Clubs

Saving clubs provide economic safety nets against crises and shocks by serving as mechanisms for families to save and borrow in the absence of formal financial services. During COVID-19 and after the hurricanes, saving clubs provided an immediate safety net for many families.

Savings clubs are the most successful in communities or sectors where informality and reliance on cash and predatory loans is high, that is where financial services are non-existent or tough to access.

Access to savings and credit serve as safety nets not during extreme events like pandemics or disasters, but during bad fishing seasons too where catches and income are low. Furthermore, savings clubs not only provide safety nets but can also serve as mechanisms to invest. Many savings clubs in Honduras have started to invest their savings in productive assets or entrepreneurial endeavors, making their funds grow faster.

Social Cohesion

Fish Forever’s overarching community-driven approach and concrete elements within it, like savings clubs, have strengthened bonds between community members and built social capital across fishing communities. Stronger social cohesion and greater social capital—through shared savings and joint participation in natural resource management— proved essential in times of crises and resulted in families and communities supporting each other with food and other essentials.

A community-driven approach that places people at the center of the solution is essential. Savings clubs (SC) build community cohesion, increase trust & improve communication and coordination. Members come together to save weekly, making it a shared, transparent process. In addition to a savings fund, SC also includes a social fund that can be used for emergencies or community projects, serving as shared capital in times of need.

Promoting social cohesion takes time and requires continuous engagement with local communities to earn their trust and improve communications. Savings clubs can help fast-track this process. It is critical to follow saving clubs methodology but provide groups with some flexibility to make it their own. Having clubs set their own rules is also essential for building trust.

Linkage to fair markets and synergies

Building Block 3 (BB3) was based on establishing links with fair trade for small coffee growers, inserting them in training programs and permanent training in coffee growing and environmental education, and guaranteeing them technical assistance from local cooperatives and coffee beneficiaries.

Given that the territory is recognized as a tourist destination, the opportunity to strengthen the agrotourism value chain between coffee and tourism was promoted so that the farms could be planned and managed for this purpose, thus diversifying and increasing income.

On the other hand, synergies were identified with other initiatives and private organizations to continue working with the people benefited by the project, in order to take advantage of the leadership and awareness to expand the restoration actions, replicate the knowledge acquired and insert the beneficiaries in the commercialization link of the production chain.

For the success of this Building Block it was favorable to have:

  • The project intervention territory has previous experiences of successful ventures that are positioning the coffee sector linked to ecotourism, which generated ease in making approaches with the private sector and with the beneficiaries of the project, since there is knowledge of the social, environmental and economic impacts that this generates.
  • In order for the project to be successful, it is necessary to take up local planning instruments during project planning, which synthesizes the interests of the territory and allows for a clearer analysis of the actors involved and the challenges of the project.
  • It is recommended to actively involve the private sector for the sustainability of the actions.
  • It is essential to understand the context of the territory in order to successfully articulate the efforts related to the value chains that can be implemented.
Peer-to-peer exchange of experiences

One of AESAC's first objectives as an organization was to promote the replicability of its sustainable production model by supporting the training of other producer groups in the Bajío region. The workshops provided by its members had a very important multiplier effect when other producers in the region felt identified and felt more confident in sharing their experiences and asking their questions. The members' plots functioned as demonstration plots, where they could show the results of the practices implemented and thus motivate other producers to initiate processes of improvement and conditioning of their productive areas.

  • The trainings are held in nearby communities, which provides an atmosphere of trust and cordiality.
  • AESAC redesigned a manual prepared by INIFAP on the 5 axes of sustainability, which allowed us to have a simpler manual, with less text and more graphics, which was more understandable and attractive to producers.
  • The fact that the training and exchange of experiences is conducted by producers greatly facilitates communication and confidence to experiment with new practices in their fields.
  • The type of best practice examples used by AESAC producers seem clear and logical to the producers being trained.
  • The project also taught AESAC partners how to document and formalize training sessions with their peers as part of their management capacity building.
Promotion of farmer experimentation

INIFAP technicians and other organizations have accompanied Apaseo el Grande producers for many years, training them and encouraging them to seek their own solutions to the particular problems of their plots.

Over time, the growers learned that their plots have particular needs depending on their location, soil type, climate conditions, among other things, and that the "recipes" they sometimes find in books do not always work the same for everyone. This motivated them to continue experimenting with different practices within the five axes of sustainability they had learned, and to write down the combinations that gave them better production yields at lower cost. This has been at the heart of the AESAC experience.

They also learned to share their experiences and give recommendations to other producers who were resistant to change, and were able to organize training workshops even in other communities.

  • The good relationship of the producers with the technicians who accompany them, together with their openness to allow them to seek their own solutions instead of pigeonholing them into orthodoxy.
  • The courage of the producers to try methods not previously known to them, at the risk of reducing their profits when the results were not as expected.
  • The demonstration that the method works: in a year of severe drought, AESAC members obtained higher yields than their neighbors, which soon attracted more interested producers.
  • Being able to demonstrate that everyone has much to contribute to the process of sustainable axes gives a great value of self-esteem to AESAC producers.
  • It is important to understand that environmental conditions, soils and management are very different among all producers, which results in different production data.