The start towards the recovery of the micro-watershed

The process of empowerment of the actors began with exchange tours organized by the Puca Community Foundation, the Forest Conservation Institute (ICF) and the municipality of Las Flores with advice from the PROCAMBIO project, implemented by GIZ.

These exchanges took place in the micro-watersheds of Las Balanzas (in the Güisayote Biological Reserve) and Río Hondo (in the municipality of San Marcos), both in the department of Ocotepeque, where a green fund and the Compensation Mechanism for Ecosystem-Water Services (MCSEH) have been implemented.

  • The communities were aware that it was necessary to start protecting the micro-watershed if they wanted to guarantee water supply.
  • Communication between the grassroots organizations and the municipal authorities and institutions present in the territory allowed for adequate coordination.
  • Knowing the experience of the water boards of the Las Balanzas and Rio Hondo micro-watersheds allowed us to identify how to solve the main challenges at the time of implementing the compensation mechanism and the green fund.
  • Inter-institutional coordination is key to ensure the participation of all organizations and actors involved in the process.
Collaboration

Blue Parks relies heavily on collaborations with other conservation NGOs, communications and marketing professionals, government leaders, MPA managers, scientists, and local ocean champions. Growing the network of Blue Parks and amplifying the Blue Park standard for conservation effectiveness requires many partners.

Blue Parks has benefitted from the contributions of many partners. These collaborations have been made possible by a growing awareness that MPA coverage alone is not sufficient to safeguard biodiversity -- that we need to fully implement high quality MPAs in order to see conservation outcomes, and most MPAs are not yet well implemented.

 

These collaborations have also grown out of Marine Conservation Institute's long-standing history as a trusted partner among marine scientists, conservation organizations, and governments.

Nurturing collaborations across multiple sectors (government, NGO, academia) requires clear communication. We have found that regular, though not too frequent, outreach and communication with these partners keeps the collaborations active, and that these communications are most effective when they are designed for the audience, so we often send separate communications to partners in different sectors.

No blue print

A ‘local community’ represents a heterogeneous group of people, characterized by their ethnic origin, political orientation and shared history, defining (dynamic) power relationships between it`s members.

Each community possesses therefore a ‘social capital’ that can be described as its capacity to respond to an external intervention (e.g. a project).

A blue print approach would therefore not be suitable.

 

No ´One solution` for all approach on different sites. 

From the project teams` perspective, it means that the same approach used to engage and work with different communities will not produce the same results and that a good understanding of the local power relationships and governance systems will help in adapting the approach to the local context.

Time & resources

Donors need to change the way they fund project and project implementers should not accept anymore 3-years projects that address complex systems.

Complex systems need time and resources to have a chance to be successful (an inception phase of 6 months is far too short to understand a new network of stakeholders).

Time & resources

Speficic skills (e.g., social sciences and humanities)

 

Time, specific skills and well sequenced application of mixed methodologies and dedicated means are necessary to build trust and mutual respect with local stakeholders before any concrete intervention can take place, but should not take too long to compromise stakeholders’ expectations.

Skipping the first steps, usually to respect a project timeline, is counterproductive and compromises outcomes (i.e. positive results beyond the lifetime of the project). This ‘inception phase’ is therefore necessary and needs to be negotiated with the donor, the consortium members and the final beneficiaries.

Multi-Stakeholder Partnership (MSP)

In multi-stakeholder partnerships (MSPs), stakeholders from the state, the private sector, civil society and  academia plan, coordinate and implement joint activities to tackle the challenges of sustainable development. They use an agreed steering structure that enables them to function strategically and operationally. Smoothly functioning decision-making mechanisms are, among other things, crucial to cooperate across  organisation. Yet, depending on the complexity of the issues involved, decision-making can be a challenging process. The AOHSM is based on the principle of collegial leadership, i.e. non-hierarchical and self-organised cooperation, proceeding on the basis of solution focussed action. The exchange amongst the AOHSM working groups is facilitated by rotating moderators. Currently, a governance structure for the AOHSM is being developed taking into consideration the opinions, ideas and experiences of key members of all working groups. 

Cooperation, open communication, a clear understanding of the joint objectives, formally signed expressions of interest, official declarations of membership by institutions' authorities, voluntary dedication of time and efforts to the groups. Creative and participatory capacity building on the tool MSP and the One Health approach helped to convice and motivate the members. 

The One Health approach requires constant and continuous explication using evidence and concrete examples on how it can be a solution to the region's environmental problems. Creative introduction to the topic as well as the identification of One Health champions in the three countries, and giving them international visibility at seminars and webinars, is useful to make the abstract approach implementable. 

Planning as a basic tool for organization and adaptation

Parallel to the implementation of the school, the organization's strategic planning process was carried out by incorporating the EbA approach, which included aspects related to climate change and the use of ecosystems. In both organisations, strategic and prospective visions were built, which took into account the scenarios that global warming will generate on the coast.

It was essential to connect three concepts: ecosystem, women's fabric and markets. This connection is a multidimensional interrelationship that articulates the care of nature (wetland), the safeguarding of culture (women's weaving) and the use of economic opportunities (markets). This interrelationship would not be possible without the protection of the environment through good wetland behavior. This means, good wetland management practices, based on the project's capacity building.

Improved adaptation through capacity building, can turn climate change into an opportunity and open up a wider range of new alternatives for women. In order to achieve this understanding, it was important to produce didactic support materials and use panels in the training centers of both groups. This also included trips to the wetland to identify the key services that make the reed crafts possible. Adaptation to climate change is a dynamic process that involves a lot of memory, understanding and action.

Strengthening self-esteem

Strengthening women's self-esteem was used as a strategy to reach an understanding in the importance of climate change adaptation from the sustainable use of wetland ecosystem services. For that reason, it was necessary to keep the process of stregthening self-esteem in progress.

A strong self-esteem enables the development of self-confidence. Once self-confidence has been obtained, the process of trust building in others, continues. This is the basis for partnerships in the context of climate change. The strategy of promoting associativity and organizational strengthening took place at three levels: a) training, b) marketing, and c) adaptation.

Important conditions for the success of the strategy were:

  • Deepening trust-building towards each other
  • Working on building trust towards institutions
  • Fostering associativity among communities
  • Strengthen capacities for the sustainable use of ecosystem services, and thereby achieve ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change.

One lesson learned is that, difficulties in accessing services, that enable better living conditions, limit participation, associativity and the understanding of climate change as a threat and opportunity. In other words, the greater the poverty, the greater the difficulty in understanding climate change. For this reason, permanent face-to-face work was required. The strategy employed was: living with coastal communities of artisan women, strengthening their self-esteem through various workshops in the school.

Community integration and co-creation process

The integration of the local community into the entire process of transforming the park from early planning stages onward was a key action. Different mechanisms can be applied to reach out to the neighborhood, including: WhatsApp groups, Facebook groups, distributing flyers, virtual meetings that lead up to the actual physical planning and implementation meetings. It is also recommendable to reach out to already existing groups and organizations, in the case of the Park Pedro Sánchez, groups of scouts, local schools and a neighborhood committee that was formed as part of the outreach process. 

 

During a co-design workshop in the park, the community described the current use of the park and expressed their vision, ideas and desires for a transformation of the park. Maps and post-its with happy and sad emoticons were used to visually express the perspective of the community with regards to specific sites within the park and the current use. In order to make collective decision about the future use of every site, people voted on each option. The final map represents the decisions of the co-design workshop. 

  • Transparency about the available budget and the type of measures that can be financed (management of expectations): if participants propose measures that go beyond the available funding, it is recommended to list them apart for potential future activities. 
  • Inviting representatives of the municipality to the co-design workshops: in this way, they can engage directly with the community, answer questions and establish a more direct link. At the same time, the municipality is well informed about the advances of the process and can support next steps. 
  • It is recommended to create a space for participants to socialize and connect, for example during a meal after the workshop. 
  • It is important to share the final map and next steps with the community, and make sure that the information also reaches those who were not able to participate in the design workshop
Strong sense of community

A benefit sharing mechanism and the cooperation can only happen when the villagers have a strong sense of community and trust one another. 

    • Tour operators and travel agencies tend to send guests to 1-2 particular homestays and/or using the same service providers to ensure the consistent service quality throughout all bookings. A task force allows its members to work together to improve the quality of homestay and other services for consistency in the delivery of services and products.

    • A local coordinator is needed in case of a tourism task force, for communication and for booking allocation among homestays. This coordinator must be trusted and transparently elected among the members. Together with booking allocation, a  benefit sharing mechanism should also be deployed to make sure that the community also gets the indirect benefits from community tourism. For instance, a community fund takes 5-10% of revenue to support common affairs in the village.

Cooperation at the grassroot level may only work without a formal structure when it is organised within a community with a strong connectedness among its members. The bonding among community members enables a trusted relationship and supportive environment. It also allows amicable settlements in case of disputes or conflicts. The local coordinator should also be trusted in the community as (s)he is perceived to inherently have an advantage of knowing the booking information first-hand and being able to assign the service providers.

Despite the difference in the result of this activity, people in both PAs tend to be positive that it still contributes to the ongoing process of establishing community tourism. As pointed out throughout two workshops, the biggest concern of the local members is still the formality of such institutions, be it a network at the inter-regional level like Ecotourism Cluster Network or an association at the grassroots level like Community Task Force.

Participatory Bottom-up Approach

In order for the initiative to harness community members’ participation and reflect their opinions, it needs to start at the grassroots or village’s level by forming a “task force” consisting of key local ‘champions’. Instead of a meeting at the high level (with local authorities and PA management boards and only a few representatives from the villages), small workshops at the local level were organised to facilitate the visioning of tourism at the early stage. Once the community has a clear vision of how they want tourism to look within their village, they would have a direction to move forward. With this approach, having a Tourism Task Force at the community level is crucial to continue the sustainability and the momentum built during the project to enhance nature conservation and promote local well-being through tourism.

Through the workshops, the following points have been discussed and determined:

  • Mobilising resource persons (key ‘champions’) in each village involving in the tourism development in each PA

  • Identifying a representative / coordinator of the Task Force 

  • Clarifying the expected roles and responsibilities of the Tourism Task Force 

  • Identifying the action plan with key actions to carry out for 2023

The participatory approach encourages local members’ participation but it can also demotivate them in case there is one strong negative feedback. In this exercise, two workshops were organised, only one was considered successful. It was observed that during the ‘unsuccessful’ workshop, the voice of one Village Head was very strong, making other members hesitant with the initiative although they seemed supportive in the beginning. At the community where the successful workshop took place, people have the same level of understanding about tourism and are bonding over the joint benefits of their community.