Strengthening early career potential

We select participants who are at the beginning stages of their careers, such as those who have completed their bachelor’s degrees and are entering the NGO or conservation workforce or embarking on higher education.The goal is to identify participants whose careers would benefit the most from the type and amount of training, funding, mentorship, and support we provide. Over the past two years, we’ve recruited at least one participant from a non-academic background who nevertheless possesses extensive on-the-ground experience. These individuals have thrived in the program, highlighting an opportunity to further cater to this audience in future iterations.

  • Strong networks with local academic institutions and regional NGOs help us attract a large pool of qualified applicants (~200 applications per year)
  • Tailored educational materials that align with the needs of early-career participants
  • Community of same-stage participants form strong and enduring connections 
  • Initially, we included participants at various career stages, but we found that older, more experienced individuals have different needs and require a distinct program tailored to their experience level
  • Our entry-level training materials were less useful for women with more experience in the field
Developing core adaptable training materials

To build technical capacity across diverse conservation contexts, we have created a modular portfolio of standardized training materials that teach foundational competencies in conservation technology. These materials are organized into themed modules, such as wildlife monitoring, wildlife protection, and human-wildlife conflict, and are designed to be flexible and adaptable based on regional needs.

In collaboration with local host institutions and regionally recruited trainers, we tailor the curriculum to align with local ecological conditions, institutional priorities, regulatory frameworks, and learning styles. For example, because drone use is permitted in Kenya but restricted in Tanzania, modules are adjusted accordingly to ensure all content is actionable within the participant's home context. This approach ensures the training is both locally relevant and practically applicable, maximizing its long-term impact.

Examples of our core training portfolio include:

  • Wildlife monitoring: Camera traps, biologgers, acoustic sensors, GPS tracking
  • Wildlife protection: SMART, EarthRanger, infrared cameras, radios, K9 units, drones
  • Human-wildlife conflict mitigation: Electric fencing, networked sensors, deterrent systems
  • Cross-cutting tools: GIS and remote sensing, artificial intelligence, and introductory coding and electronics
  • Core materials are developed by world leading conservation technology experts 
  • Multiple years of programming have allowed us to refine and improve our training materials
  • Annual participant feedback helps guide refinement of content and development of new topics 
  • Host institutions and local partners provide valuable input on the most relevant training needs
  • Educational systems vary significantly, even across countries in the same region. For example, certain types of trainings or activities - such as active learning approaches - may be more difficult for students from countries where education is centered on rote memorization. Understanding local learning preferences and adapting teaching methods accordingly can support deeper engagement. 
  • Certain technologies or methodologies, such as drones or cloud-based data storage, may be prohibited or prohibitively expensive in some regions. Partnering with local conservation technology experts ensures that we focus on accessible, actionable technologies for our participants.
  • Asking local trainers develop their own materials often exceeds their time and capacity 
  • Using standardized materials ensures consistency and reduces variability in the type and depth of content delivered. 
Identifying impactful mentors, trainers, and allies

Our standardized training curriculum is delivered by female experts (academics, practitioners, and government professionals) working in conservation and conservation technology within the local region. These women serve not only as instructors, but also mentors and collaborators. By centering local female role models, we help participants envision pathways for their own careers while strengthening their ties to regional research and conservation communities. We strive to foster an inclusive environment for honest dialogue around challenges of being a woman in conservation technology and encourage lasting mentorship relationships beyond the formal training period.

However, the gender gap we seek to address can make it difficult to identify and recruit female trainers in certain technical fields. In response, we have defined three distinct roles to broaden the support system for participants:

  • Mentors: Local female role models who lead sessions and provide ongoing mentorship.
  • Allies: Male trainers and facilitators who actively support our commitment to gender equity and inclusive training spaces.
  • Trainers: Members of the international organizing team who provide additional instruction and logistical support.

Together, these individuals play a critical role in delivering content, fostering participant growth, and modeling diverse forms of leadership across the conservation technology landscape.

  • Keen interest from female leaders to foster the next generation of conservationists, including willingness to engage honestly in vulnerable conversations and provide career advice
  • Growing interest from allies to support development of women in their field and organizations
  • Funding to support attendance and honorarium for high-quality mentors and allies  
  • We have established a code of conduct and set clear expectations up-front on how mentors and allies should engage with students during and after the program 
  • Mentors and allies with a background in training as well as expertise in conservation tech are preferred 
  • Wherever possible, we seek a combination of mid-career and established mentors, who can speak to participants about different stages of the conservation career journey 
  • Male allies need to be carefully selected to create a supportive, safe environment 
  • We maintain and cultivate female-only spaces at the workshop where male allies and trainers are not allowed
Verify

The village grazing committee and interested community members then come together at a Conservation Technology Center (CTC) for Rangeland Data Feedback Meetings facilitated jointly by an APW team member and the habitat monitors. While the dashboards are available on any mobile device, the CTCs allow for the community to convene for information sharing and participatory decision-making based on the data visually displayed on large screens. Oftentimes, the village grazing committee will review existing land use plans and verify their effectiveness with the data collected each month, adjusting pasture resource allocation accordingly. Finally, where the dashboards show rangeland degradation or proliferation of invasive species, the committee can use the data as justification to apply for financial support from APW for rangeland restoration interventions such as invasive species removal, reseeding, or soil erosion control projects. Through these data-informed, participatory mechanisms, community members play an active role in the stewardship and sustainable use of their natural resources. This model contributes to GBF Target 2 and 22 by empowering Indigenous Peoples and local communities to take leadership in habitat restoration, ensuring that their knowledge, rights, and participation are integral to conservation planning and implementation.

Trust and established relationships with the community are required for successful implementation. As with the previous steps, it is essential to work within existing cultural governance structures. While community members traditionally convene for collective decision-making, having a dedicated meeting space and equipment to analyze and visualize data enables evidence-based decision-making for natural resource management. 

While the establishment of CTCs was a big step forward, there is a need for further capacity building within communities to ensure village grazing committee members accurately interpret the data and understand how it can be used to inform resource management interventions. To address this need, a trained community data liaison will be embedded at each CTC, serving as a vital bridge between technology and traditional governance. By providing this liaison with robust training in data analytics, interpretation, and the operation and maintenance of CTC technology. This investment in local capacity is key to sustainability—enabling communities to independently utilize data for adaptive resource management, even in the absence of APW staff.

Monitoring and evaluation for evidence-based practice and sustainability

This building block emphasises community participation in monitoring, utilising citizen science and accessible data platforms to ensure local knowledge informs adaptive management and contributes to the long-term success of mangrove restoration.

Effective monitoring and evaluation is necessary for adaptive management and long-term success in mangrove restoration. In implementing CBEMR, Wetlands International developed a restoration plan with clearly defined goals and objectives aligned with measurable and relevant indicators.

To ensure accurate and consistent data collection, a variety of methods were employed, including surveys, field observations, remote sensing, and the use of the Mangrove Restoration Tracker Tool. This tool, integrated with the Global Mangrove Watch platform, provided a standardised framework for documenting and tracking restoration progress, facilitating learning and information exchange among practitioners. 

Strengthening the capacities of mangrove champions from Lamu and Tana counties through standardised CBEMR trainings and tools provided for the integration of citizen science initiatives in mangrove restoration monitoring.  

Creating platforms for community feedback and input such as the national and sub-national mangrove management committees ensures that local knowledge and perspectives are incorporated into adaptive management strategies. By using monitoring data to inform decision-making and adapt project strategies, restoration efforts such as those in Kitangani and Pate restoration sites have been continuously improved to maximise effectiveness and achieve long-term success.

In implementing the CBEMR approach in Kenya, we have learned the following: 

  • Adaptive management is key: Monitoring data has allowed for ongoing learning and adaptation of restoration strategies based on observed outcomes.
  • Community involvement is necessary: Engaging communities who interact with the ecosystem on a daily basis in monitoring restoration efforts strengthens ownership and ensures that local knowledge informs decision-making.
  • Data accessibility and transparency are essential: Sharing monitoring results with stakeholders promotes accountability and facilitates collaboration and cross-learning. 
  • Long-term monitoring is necessary: Tracking progress over time provides valuable insights into the long-term impacts of restoration efforts.
NoArk's Building Blocks

The building blocks of NoArk's solution are interconnected to create a comprehensive, efficient system for conservation and environmental management. Bio-acoustic and chemical sensors collect critical ecological data, while Edge AI processing ensures rapid, on-site analysis, enabling immediate detection and response. These components are supported by LoRaWAN connectivity, which facilitates reliable, long-range communication in remote areas. The processed data is centralized on the PAMS dashboard, where it is visualized and analyzed for actionable insights, fostering better decision-making.

This system is strengthened by hyperlocal climate data, which enhances precision in risk assessments and planning. Finally, community and stakeholder engagement ensures the data and tools are effectively utilized, promoting collaboration and adaptability. Together, these elements form an integrated solution that empowers conservation efforts, addresses ecological threats, and supports sustainable development.

The purpose of the building blocks in NoArk’s solution is to create an integrated and scalable system for addressing ecological, social, and economic challenges. Each building block plays a unique role and works in harmony with the others to deliver impactful outcomes.

How Each Building Block Works  

1. Bio-Acoustic and Chemical Sensors
  - Purpose: To monitor ecological and environmental health.  
  - How it Works: These sensors detect specific sounds (chainsaws, wildlife movement) and measure air and water quality, providing real-time data on biodiversity and pollution levels.  

2. Edge AI and IoT Integration
  - Purpose: To process data locally for faster decision-making.  
  - How it Works: Edge AI analyzes data directly on the devices, reducing reliance on cloud processing. IoT connectivity ensures data is transmitted securely and efficiently.  

3. LoraWAN Connectivity
  - Purpose: To enable cost-efficient, long-range communication.  
  - How it Works: LoraWAN ensures sensor data is transmitted over long distances with minimal power consumption, making it suitable for remote deployment.  

4. PAMS Dashboard
  - Purpose: To centralize and visualize data for actionable insights.  
  - How it Works: The dashboard aggregates data from all devices, providing tools for predictive analytics, real-time monitoring, and decision support.  

5. Hyperlocal Climate Data
  - Purpose: To support precise, localized interventions.  
  - How it Works: Sensors generate accurate, auditable data that informs risk assessments, conservation planning, and disaster management.  

6. Community and Stakeholder Engagement
  - Purpose: To ensure effective implementation and adoption of the system.  
  - How it Works: Partnerships with local communities, researchers, and decision-makers foster collaboration, capacity-building, and long-term sustainability.

Enabling Factors


- Technological Infrastructure: Reliable sensors, robust AI, and IoT technologies enable seamless data collection and processing.  
- Partnerships and Collaboration: Engagement with local communities, governments, and research organizations ensures the system is tailored to specific needs.  
- Scalability: LoraWAN and modular design allow deployment in diverse ecosystems and scaling to larger projects.  
- Sustainability: The system’s low power requirements and stakeholder involvement ensure long-term functionality and impact.  

These enabling factors ensure the building blocks work cohesively to deliver a holistic, impactful solution for conservation and environmental management.

Conditions Important for Success  

1. Reliable Technological Infrastructure  
  - High-quality sensors, robust Edge AI, and IoT systems are essential for accurate and timely data collection and processing.  

2. Strong Connectivity
  - LoraWAN or similar long-range, low-power communication systems are critical to ensure seamless data transmission in remote or challenging environments.  

3. Stakeholder Engagement  
  - Collaboration with local communities, governments, and researchers ensures the solution is contextually relevant, widely accepted, and effectively implemented.  

4. Scalability and Modularity
  - Designing systems that can scale and adapt to various ecosystems and environmental challenges is key to broader impact and replication.  

5. Sustainability Planning  
  - Developing low-power solutions, clear funding strategies, and community-driven maintenance plans ensures long-term functionality.  

6. Capacity Building
  - Training stakeholders, including local communities and enforcement agencies, to utilize and interpret the system’s data enhances the effectiveness of the solution.  

Lessons Learned

1. Adaptability is Critical
  - Each deployment requires customization to address local ecological, social, and economic conditions effectively.  

2. Community Involvement Drives Success
  - Engaging local stakeholders early fosters ownership, increases trust, and enhances adoption.  

3. Robust Data Systems Improve Decision-Making
  - Providing accurate, auditable, and traceable data builds credibility with decision-makers and supports informed interventions.  

4. Connectivity Challenges Must Be Addressed
  - Remote deployments need reliable communication systems like LoraWAN to ensure uninterrupted data flow.  

5. Integration of Multi-Sensor Inputs Enhances Impact
  - Combining bio-acoustic and chemical sensors with climate data creates a comprehensive understanding of ecological challenges, enabling holistic solutions.  

6. Continuous Feedback Loops Improve Performance  
  - Iterative updates based on field experience and stakeholder feedback optimize system performance and impact.  

By meeting these conditions and applying lessons learned, NoArk’s solution ensures effective implementation and significant positive outcomes for conservation and environmental management.

Community Education and Engagement

Through the Tunas Scholarship program and conservation education initiatives, HARPA builds long-term community support for conservation. This approach connects conservation with education and local development, ensuring sustainable impact through community involvement.

Enabling factors:

  • Structured education programs
  • Local community partnerships
  • School network collaboration
  • Scholarship program framework
  • Regular community engagement activities

Lessons learned:

  • Education programs are most effective when combined with direct community benefits
  • Long-term engagement proves more impactful than one-off activities
  • Local wisdom and cultural sensitivity are crucial for program success
  • Scholarship programs effectively build next generation of conservation advocates
Strategic NGO Partnership Framework

HARPA collaborates with specialized conservation NGOs who serve as expert implementers in their respective fields. Each NGO partner is carefully selected based on their expertise and track record. This framework enables effective program implementation while ensuring professional conservation standards are met.

Enabling factors:

  • Network of verified conservation NGOs
  • Clear partnership agreements
  • Defined roles and responsibilities
  • Regular coordination meetings
  • Standardized reporting protocols

Lessons learned:

  • Clear roles and responsibilities must be established at partnership initiation
  • NGO partners need autonomy in technical implementation within their expertise
  • Regular coordination and standardized reporting are essential for quality maintenance
  • Proper credit and recognition sharing is vital for successful partnerships
Multi-Stakeholder Resource Mobilization

HARPA leverages Kitabisa.org's digital platform to connect multiple funding sources (public donors and corporate partners) with conservation NGOs. The system enables transparent fund distribution, real-time tracking, and impact reporting. This approach ensures sustainable funding for conservation programs while maintaining accountability to all stakeholders.

Enabling factors:

  • Kitabisa.org's trusted digital infrastructure
  • Established corporate partnership network
  • Strong public crowdfunding community
  • Transparent reporting system
  • Efficient fund distribution mechanism

Lessons learned:

  • Transparency in fund allocation and impact reporting is crucial for building long-term donor trust
  • Combining crowdfunding with corporate funding creates more stable resource streams
  • Personalized programs for corporate partners significantly increase engagement
  • Regular progress updates to donors improve retention rates
Building Block 1. Assessment using the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI)

The methodology of the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI) was applied to assess the risks and threats posed by climate impacts like wave action, sea level rise, erosion, and precipitation, informing the actions taken. The application was carried out in combination with a regional training that took place in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, together with other site managers and heritage practitioners from Tanzania, Nigeria and Uganda. The training and application was supported by the James Cook University, Australia. 

The application of CVI was made possible thanks to the support of institutions such as the James Cook University of Australia, ICOMOS and ICCROM. Though the participation to the CVI project in Africa, site managers and heritage practitioners from Tanzania, Nigeria and Uganda were also invited to join the 27th annual United Nations meeting on climate (COP27) in Egypt to share their experience and knowledge. 

This Building Block shows the importance of connecting with other practitioners in monitoring and assessing our sites for any climate change induced effects. But it also highlights the significant value of connecting with other site managers and heritage practitioners from around the world, particularly when it came to exchanging knowledge about our heritage sites, the methods we use to care for them, and our perspectives on their preservation.