Inspiring pilots: school reforestation as a climate change adaptation measure

Once the areas with the greatest need for urban reforestation had been identified, schools with the potential to develop school reforestation interventions were selected. Subsequently, the project was shared with the corresponding Ministry of Education to verify the viability of the chosen schools. Thus, the Alfonso Arroyo Flores elementary school, located in the municipality of Boca del Río, was selected for this activity. A visit was made to the institute to present and socialize the initiative before the school authorities, ensuring their collaboration and support in the implementation of the reforestation activities.

The next step was the preparation of a diagnostic study of the intervention area to analyze soil fertility, complemented by a drone flight to generate the design of the interventions. This design, validated by the school community, was based on the Miyawaki Method, a high diversity and density afforestation approach that accelerates the development of vegetation and other ecological processes.

The implementation of the reforestation activities was divided into two stages. The first stage focused on environmental awareness and education. An explanation was given to the student community, including children, youth and teachers, about the importance of trees in urban environments and the principles of Miyawaki forests, as well as the critical points in the reforestation process. The language used was accessible and appropriate for the age group, promoting active participation to facilitate meaningful learning. In the second stage, the knowledge acquired during the previous stage was put into practice and the school reforestation was carried out together with the children.

This experience not only allowed for the tangible improvement of the green infrastructure, but also provided the opportunity to raise awareness among the students and allow them to experience the reforestation process in a sensory way.

  • The collaboration and support of the Ministry of Education and school authorities were fundamental to ensure the viability of the interventions.
  • The active involvement of the school community, including students, teachers and parents, fostered a sense of ownership and responsibility for the project.
  • Consider the opinion of children as the main users and beneficiaries of the school space.
  • Involving the entire school community from the beginning of the project increases the sense of ownership and responsibility towards green spaces.
  • Using school reforestation as a pedagogical tool is essential to ensure the long-term sustainability of these projects. The practical activities of planting and caring for trees provide valuable lessons in ecology, sustainability and environmental responsibility.
Green infrastructure and children toolkit: a tool for informed decision making on urban greening needs.

The objective of this phase was to generate a compendium of tools to guide informed decision making on urban reforestation needs in five Mexican coastal cities (Boca del Rio, Veracruz; Merida, Yucatan; San Mateo del Mar, Oaxaca; Tepic, Nayarit; Tijuana, Baja California).

  1. A compendium of landscape-scale tools was prepared with the products:
  • Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by urban trees.
  • Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) map.
  • Green View Index Map (GVI)
  • Fixed Pollution Sources Map (FFC)
  • Children's Access to Nature Equity Index Map.
  • Urban Heat Islands (UHI) Map.
  1. The baseline for the efficient management of urban trees was elaborated through the street-by-street detail component of a high-resolution digital inventory, representative of the axes and road islands of each city. This inventory not only recorded the existing trees and their maintenance needs, but also identified plantable spaces, identified and catalogued the available plantable spaces, specifying the appropriate characteristics of each area, as well as the type of tree that can be planted in each site. This integrated approach ensures more accurate and sustainable planning, optimizing species selection and improving the health and biodiversity of the urban tree stock.

  2. In addition, educational and design tools were prepared. A practical guide for urban reforestation and two plant palettes for climate-smart reforestation were developed.
  • Availability of accurate geospatial and statistical data.
  • Openness of local governments to receive and use the information.
  • The tools and data provided complement current urban planning strategies.
  • Collaboration between various fields of study, such as ecology, urban planning and climate change, is crucial to address the complex challenges of urban reforestation in a comprehensive manner.
  • It is important not only to identify problems, but also to propose concrete and viable solutions. Recommendations should be practical and focused on solving the challenges posed.
Data collection using racing yachts for onboard sampling and deployment of drifter buoys

Beyond facilitating access to hard-to-reach locations, sailboats also provide useful modes of transport for deploying scientific instrumentation. The boats can carry scientific equipment, both for deployment in the ocean, but also for continual measurement by sensors that are permanently onboard. The race boats’ speed means that data from different locations can be captured across short timespans, something which is not achievable by most research vessels. Yachts can also be used to pilot and test new research technology and techniques, such as technology that allows results to be shared in real-time, and the OceanPack – a device which records essential ocean data from aboard the yachts. 

 

In a racing context, carrying devices that take meteorological measurements is not only beneficial for science partners, but also for the race participants themselves, as it helps to inform and improve weather forecasts that will impact their own decision-making and performances throughout the race. 

 

Using racing yachts for data collection paves the way for the installation and deployment of measuring devices on other vessels such as fishing or commercial boats, as well as other sailing boats. 

 

 

  • Sensors and scientific instrumentation can be installed on sailing boats.
  • The high speeds that are achievable by sailing yachts enable the collection of data across short time spans.
  • Boats can reach specific locations to deploy drifter buoys or Argo floats.

Scientific devices were originally designed for use on large research or commercial vessels. This presented some technical challenges regarding their use and installation aboard racing yachts which falls beyond the scope of their intended applications. As the boats are racing yachts the devices needed to be resilient and also light.

Challenges included operating sampling devices in an environment where there is fluctuating power supply, constant exposure to corrosive humidity, and where operators (i.e. teams and athletes) face immense physical (and psychological) stresses. This meant the devices needed to be user-friendly and simple to operate so that individuals with little specialised training could use them effectively and efficiently under stressful and pressurised conditions. The Ocean Race is collaborating with manufacturers to advance the technology and enhance its reliability for future uses.

Capacity building, Knowledge sharing and awareness raising on CBEMR with Stakeholders

This building block empowers local communities, government agencies, and other stakeholders with the knowledge, skills, and tools needed to implement and sustain effective mangrove restoration initiatives. Through strategic engagement and capacity-building efforts, stakeholders are equipped with the technical expertise and resources required for Community-Based Ecological Mangrove Restoration (CBEMR). These efforts include identifying and training CBEMR champions to act as catalysts for knowledge dissemination and practical restoration activities within their communities and institutions.

Wetlands International initiated capacity-building activities by engaging local communities in Lamu and Tana through CBOs, CFAs, and key government agencies, including KFS, KEFRI, KMFRI, the Lamu County Government, as well as CSOs such as WWF and the Northern Rangelands Trust. Women comprised 50% of the participants, taking a leading role in hands-on mangrove restoration efforts. Training sessions included sound restoration techniques based on the CBEMR approach, conducted in English and translated into Swahili for greater accessibility. These sessions integrated practical, relatable mangrove science with indigenous knowledge, fostering inclusivity and community ownership.

In addition, stakeholders were provided with simple tools such as refractometers and pH strips to conduct salinity and acidity tests, along with resources to support monitoring and adaptive management. 

CBEMR champions, nominated from CFAs, BMUs, youth groups, women groups, and government agencies, further amplified these efforts. These champions assist in mobilising communities, raising awareness, conducting restoration activities, monitoring progress, and performing ecological and social assessments. Government agency champions also serve as Trainers of Trainers (ToTs) to ensure continuous capacity building within their institutions and communities.

Based on the success of the initial trainings in Lamu and other sites, Lamu KFS officials together with Wetlands International identified the need to spread this knowledge mainly at the policy and management levels within KFS among other key stakeholders. In partnership with KFS and MAP, we organised a CBEMR managerial training for the senior managers and coastal forest managers at KFS, Directors of Environment Department from the Kwale, Kilifi, Mombasa, Tana River, and Lamu counties, academia from Kenya School of Forestry and Kenyatta University, partner organisations in Global Mangrove Alliance namely IUCN, WWF and TNC, and representatives from the Western Indian Ocean Mangrove Network and local journalists with specialisation in environmental issues. 

Collaboration with CSOs, the Global Mangrove Alliance, and other partners enhanced the initiative’s reach and impact, enabling regular training and knowledge-sharing activities across the mangrove regions.

 

 

Participatory and Holistic Approaches: CBEMR’s participatory design connects resource users with research institutions, local governments, conservation agencies, and civil society, leveraging their local and expert knowledge. This approach ensures holistic engagement and integration of diverse perspectives.

Strategic Selection and Empowerment of Champions: Champions were chosen based on leadership qualities, communication skills, and interest in mangrove conservation. Ensuring diverse representation, including women, youth, and community leaders, enhanced inclusivity. Champions were empowered with knowledge, skills, resources, and ongoing mentorship, ensuring effective community mobilisation and knowledge transfer. Clearly defined roles and responsibilities help to ensure that champions understand their contributions and can effectively advocate for mangrove conservation within their communities and agencies. Wetlands International helped create a system for communication and coordination, feedback mechanisms through regular meetings, and opportunities for knowledge sharing and joint problem-solving. Other than training, empowering champions has been key to the success of the initiative. This involves providing them with the necessary resources, including tools and financial support to ensure they can effectively carry out their tasks. Equally important is recognising and valuing their contributions, offering incentives that motivate them and providing opportunities for personal and professional growth. This approach not only strengthens their commitment but also inspires others to actively participate in mangrove conservation efforts.

Strong Partnerships: Collaboration between Wetlands International, KFS, KEFRI, KMFRI, local communities, and CSOs facilitated effective knowledge sharing, resource mobilisation, and policy influence.

Gender Roles and Social Groupings: Recognising women’s central role in mangrove restoration activities and the relatively well-established CBOs in Lamu fostered greater engagement and ownership among stakeholders. Gender-sensitive planning ensured that initiatives were inclusive and impactful.

Access to Information and Resources: Training materials in English and Swahili, simple-to-use tools, and practical workshops enhanced knowledge transfer, enabling stakeholders to implement CBEMR effectively.

Supportive Policy Environment: Training efforts influenced KFS and other government agencies to integrate CBEMR principles into national guidelines and management strategies, fostering a conducive policy framework for sustainable mangrove restoration. Working with KFS and KEFRI on the use and application of the CBEMR approach provided for review of the national restoration guidelines which take into consideration the information on CBEMR.

Adaptive Management Approach: Regular monitoring of restoration activities allowed stakeholders to adapt strategies, learn from experiences, and improve outcomes over time, ensuring long-term success.

Knowledge Sharing is Critical: Disseminating information and best practices in local languages ensures inclusivity, promoting wider adoption of the CBEMR approach. Making information accessible facilitates understanding, contribution, and participation across diverse communities.

Champions are Powerful Agents of Change: Investing in targeted champions with influence and networks amplifies the reach and impact of mangrove restoration efforts. Empowering them with skills, resources, and incentives strengthens their commitment and inspires broader community engagement.

Diversity and Representation Matter: Selecting champions from diverse backgrounds ensures that restoration initiatives are inclusive and responsive to varying community needs.

Collaboration Enhances Effectiveness: Facilitating collaboration among champions and stakeholders promotes cross-learning, knowledge sharing, and collective action, boosting the effectiveness of restoration efforts.

Policies Must Be Adaptive: Flexible policies informed by monitoring data and lessons learned are essential for addressing emerging challenges and improving restoration practices. For this National-level forest managers should be engaged in local and sub-national based restoration initiatives to aid in the development of mangrove forest policies. For instance, based on the success of the first CBEMR training in Lamu, area KFS officers identified the need to spread this knowledge to the KFS managerial team and senior policy-level managers, and other key stakeholders. 

Empowerment Drives Success: Providing champions with tools, financial support, and opportunities for personal and professional growth inspires commitment and fosters sustainable community-driven conservation.

Establishing a set of race regulations that places science at the centre of racing activities

The Ocean Race Teams Sustainability Charter and Code of Conduct was co-created with the teams to express a fleet-wide commitment to sustainable operations and supporting a healthy ocean. The charter includes themes of Advocacy, Science, Learning and Operations. It seeks to get all teams, staff, and sailors to stand up for the ocean through sustainable sailing, team, and personal actions. 

 

On the science front, teams must pledge to agree to:

 

  • Supporting science-based decision making.
  • Participating in increasing knowledge and understanding of our ocean.
  • Hosting scientific equipment onboard.
  • Participating in sailor and citizen science programmes.
  • Contributing to the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science in collaboration with The Ocean Race.

 

Including science within a charter and requiring stakeholders to undertake various science-related activities whilst competing in a sailing race embeds science, as a core value, into race practices. This is unique in the sporting world as it requires teams and athletes to take on environmental responsibilities as well as their existing sporting responsibilities.

 

  • Awareness of climate change and the importance, and fragility, of oceans. 
  • Desire to protect oceans and sailing’s ‘racetrack’.
  • Understanding the importance of data collection for climate and ocean science.
  • Desire to use sailing and racing beyond sporting objectives, as a platform for scientific research.

Collaboration is key, everyone needs to take part and be responsible for a better future for all. 

 

Engagement with the teams, partners and host cities  needs to be early on and there is a need to support them in their journey - not as an afterthought or last minute addition. There needs to be someone within each team that is dedicated to Sustainability and maintaining the Sustainability Charter within their team and department. It is important not to underestimate the amount of work needed to maintain the Sustainability Charter and our sustainability goals - assign enough resources!

 

In an event like The Ocean Race, there are also challenges due to unpredictable circumstances like boat repairs from dismasting or collisions which can increase the footprint and environmental impact of the team and the Race. It is important to have some extra capacity and contingencies to offset unforeseen circumstances like these. 

A unique racecourse that provides access to geographically extreme and data-sparse areas across the planet’s oceans

The underlying premise for The Ocean Race – racing to circumnavigate the world – means that the race naturally takes competitors to some of the most remote areas in the world. This makes it a unique platform for undertaking scientific research as it gives scientists access to remote areas, such as the Southern Ocean around Antarctica, that would otherwise rarely be accessible. Ships sailing outside of regular shipping routes play an essential role in the ability to deploy scientific instrumentation, such as the drifter buoys and Argo floats that are deployed during the race, across under-sampled locations. This affords rare opportunities for gathering data from parts of the planet where little information has been recorded, making the Race a crucial platform for collecting data that is otherwise unattainable and filling data gaps, contributing to furthering our understanding of our oceans. 

 

  • The underlying premise for The Ocean Race – circumnavigating the world as fast as possible – means that the race will invariably take boats to areas that are infrequently sailed. 
  • The design of the race route (race legs, race stopovers, etc.) will determine where boats go.
  • Sailing race boats allow access to some of the planet’s most remote seas as well as areas outside common shipping and research routes.

The race’s route, with stopovers in different countries, presented logistical challenges regarding the transportation of scientific equipment to stopover ports as well as the shipment of samples, material, and instruments back to scientific partners. For example, shipments were subject to varying import conditions and customs duties depending on their country of origin and destination. 

 

Working with local scientific institutions helped with equipment, transporting the equipment on person and working diligently with customs before, during and after transport. Logistics for an international science experiment needs to be well planned out in advance and all admin done in advance regarding shipment of equipment and samples etc.

Marine Management

Much support was given to improve fisher capacity to manage their access to and use of Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs). The programme recognised that the establishment of marine managed and protected areas as a method of marine management has resulted in increased reliance on Fish Aggregating Devices installed outside the marine managed and protected areas, for sustenance of the fishery sector.  Fishers within the Carriacou Fisher Folks Inc also recognised this and the need for attention to be paid to the monitoring and management of this resource.  This beckoned the implementation of FAD Data Management training for fishers of Carriacou and Petit Martinique.  The training was facilitated through the Fisheries Department of the Government of Grenada, and included information sharing on, but not limited to data on marine conservation, history of FADs in the region, the importance of data collection, legislation, its challenges, development of informal protocols and rules, identifying fish species as well as data collection methodology and post data collection analysis.  The workshop also realised the commitment of fishers to establish GrenFAD, which will take the leading role in the management of the FADs.  The fishers agreed and signed off on the soft rules for FAD Fishing, membership and FAD fees, data collection, data collection templates and protocols for data collection and management.  Actors in the fishery sector and marine management/protection were also trained in the use of underwater drones for remote sensing. The Programme provided support for construction of at least 6 FADS for the St. Marks fishers in Dominica. In the case of Saint Lucia, the provision of navigational tools to assist in accessing the FAD locations, which are often many miles offshore, and generally speaking to assist with safety at sea.

With increased application of marine management strategies, there has been increased use of FADS to supplement the loss of access to fishing grounds which have been redesignated as protected areas, managed areas or reserves.  Thus, the CATS interventions to improve capacity to manage these FADS were quite opportune in timing, and the fishers were keen on participating in the interventions related to them.  In the case of the ROV’s this improved capacity enabled the beneficiaries to be ready to improve their monitoring efficiency and quality. 

The Programme recognised the need for practical, user-guided solutions and implementations as critical elements for success and long term and far reaching benefits from the same.  With regard to the FAD management and trainings, this process was smoothly executed with fishers taking ownership of this and taking the lead to put arrangements in place to better manage their FADs.

Planificación participativo e interinstitucional de humedales urbanos costeros

Posterior al análisis rápido se dio el paso de analizar las acciones que los actores locales (Municipios, ONG, Universidades) realizan en favor de la gestión de los humedales urbanos costeros. Para esto, se generó un panorama de respuestas por medio de entrevistas y talleres. 

Se evidencio un amplio panorama de respuestas, pero la mayoría con desafíos por la factibilidad legal (por ejemplo,  la presencia de asentamientos irregulares dificulta el acceso a servicios públicos, como limpia pública y drenaje de aguas residuales), desafíos financieras (por ejemplo, el Estero de los Cabos se contamina por el servicio deficiente de la planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales, pero para corregirlo, se requiere inversiones grandes), desafíos técnico-ambientales (por ejemplo, retirar el lirio acuático sin atender la contaminación por materia orgánica y fertilizantes, pues esto estimula el crecimiento excesivo y la factibilidad ambiental es baja) etc., origina dificultad y complejidad para poder dilucidar y encontrar respuestas adecuadas para cada humedal. 

Además de depender de dichos factores, también influye la voluntad y el interés político y técnico de asumir el reto de iniciar procesos complejos relacionados con los humedales. 

Finalmente se planificaron acciones vinculado a: 

  • Fortalecimiento de capacidades para la gestión mancomunado de humedales urbanos costeros
  • Gestión participativa de acciones de limpieza y protección de bordes de los humedales
  • Concientización ambiental sobre humedales urbanos costeros
  • Integración de humedales urbanos costeros en políticas publicas
  • La planificación participativa con actores públicos, privados, comunitarios, ONG y Universidades para enmarcar las acciones en las necesidades locales, no duplicar esfuerzos, y garantizar la sostenibilidad de las acciones en el tiempo 
  • Si los intereses de los actores son diferentes y diversos es necesario priorizar. Esto puede llevar a que algunos actores no quedaran satisfechos con la selección de las acciones y no continúan participando en la fase de implementación. 
  • El gran panorama de acciones y las limitaciones de recursos (presupuesto, tiempo de personal de contrapartes) causo que la fase de planificación tomo más tiempo que lo esperado. 
  • El marco normativo ambiental, con las Manifestaciones de Impacto Ambiental (MIA), en el cual para cada obra o actividad tanto de personas físicas o morales, incluyendo entes públicos, se requiere evaluar los impactos potenciales al ambiente (incluyendo humedales) no ha podido evitar que el desarrollo urbano ha llevado a la degradación de los humedales urbanos costeros. Durante el proyecto se evidencio el interés de los actores en el cuidado de los humedales, pero al haber los intereses contrapuestos del desarrollo urbano versus la gestión urbana, combinado con recursos limitados se vio priorizado más la gestión urbana que el cuidado de humedales. 
  • El marco normativo para los humedales urbanos costeros requiere que se realiza también para casi todas las acciones de conservación una Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental (MIA) lo cual no estaba contemplado (en tiempo y recursos) por lo que se limitó la selección de acciones que no requería MIA. 
  • Es importante realizar un detallado análisis de viabilidad a las acciones que salieron seleccionados del proceso de planificación participativa para corroborar su viabilidad en el tiempo y con los recursos disponibles (MIA)
  • Desde el inicio del proceso de planificación participativa de haber claridad sobre el alcance (recursos) para evitar generar expectativas que luego no se puede cumplir
Planificación participativo e interinstitucional de humedales urbanos costeros

Posterior al análisis rápido se dio el paso de analizar las acciones que los actores locales (Municipios, ONG, Universidades) realizan en favor de la gestión de los humedales urbanos costeros. Para esto, se generó un panorama de respuestas por medio de entrevistas y talleres. 

Se evidencio un amplio panorama de respuestas, pero la mayoría con desafíos por la factibilidad legal (por ejemplo,  la presencia de asentamientos irregulares dificulta el acceso a servicios públicos, como limpia pública y drenaje de aguas residuales), desafíos financieras (por ejemplo, el Estero de los Cabos se contamina por el servicio deficiente de la planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales, pero para corregirlo, se requiere inversiones grandes), desafíos técnico-ambientales (por ejemplo, retirar el lirio acuático sin atender la contaminación por materia orgánica y fertilizantes, pues esto estimula el crecimiento excesivo y la factibilidad ambiental es baja) etc., origina dificultad y complejidad para poder dilucidar y encontrar respuestas adecuadas para cada humedal. 

Además de depender de dichos factores, también influye la voluntad y el interés político y técnico de asumir el reto de iniciar procesos complejos relacionados con los humedales. 

Finalmente se planificaron acciones vinculado a: 

  • Fortalecimiento de capacidades para la gestión mancomunado de humedales urbanos costeros
  • Gestión participativa de acciones de limpieza y protección de bordes de los humedales
  • Concientización ambiental sobre humedales urbanos costeros

Integración de humedales urbanos costeros en políticas publicas

  • La planificación participativa con actores públicos, privados, comunitarios, ONG y Universidades para enmarcar las acciones en las necesidades locales, no duplicar esfuerzos, y garantizar la sostenibilidad de las acciones en el tiempo 
  • Si los intereses de los actores son diferentes y diversos es necesario priorizar. Esto puede llevar a que algunos actores no quedaran satisfechos con la selección de las acciones y no continúan participando en la fase de implementación. 
  • El gran panorama de acciones y las limitaciones de recursos (presupuesto, tiempo de personal de contrapartes) causo que la fase de planificación tomo más tiempo que lo esperado. 
  • El marco normativo ambiental, con las Manifestaciones de Impacto Ambiental (MIA), en el cual para cada obra o actividad tanto de personas físicas o morales, incluyendo entes públicos, se requiere evaluar los impactos potenciales al ambiente (incluyendo humedales) no ha podido evitar que el desarrollo urbano ha llevado a la degradación de los humedales urbanos costeros. Durante el proyecto se evidencio el interés de los actores en el cuidado de los humedales, pero al haber los intereses contrapuestos del desarrollo urbano versus la gestión urbana, combinado con recursos limitados se vio priorizado más la gestión urbana que el cuidado de humedales. 
  • El marco normativo para los humedales urbanos costeros requiere que se realiza también para casi todas las acciones de conservación una Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental (MIA) lo cual no estaba contemplado (en tiempo y recursos) por lo que se limitó la selección de acciones que no requería MIA. 
  • Es importante realizar un detallado análisis de viabilidad a las acciones que salieron seleccionados del proceso de planificación participativa para corroborar su viabilidad en el tiempo y con los recursos disponibles (MIA)
  • Desde el inicio del proceso de planificación participativa de haber claridad sobre el alcance (recursos) para evitar generar expectativas que luego no se puede cumplir
Business and Technical Capacity Development

Building resilience of the agricultural sector against the effects of meteorological variations includes building the resilience of small businesses along the value chains which use the produce from agricultural production.  Through the Business Capacity Development measure, two women-only local agro-processing groups which process local produce for the local and national market, benefitted from theoretical lectures and hands-on exercises on crucial business aspects (costs, revenues, new product ideas, design, marketing and the management of their business) so they could apply the knowledge gained to improve the quality of their decision making.  The core topics addressed during the training were:  Entrepreneurship Essentials, Introduction to Marketing; Basic Book-Keeping Principles; Essential Costing Practices; Office Administration, financial education, business management and investment-driven market expansion and borrowing.

Both groups acknowledged that they did need to improve their operations to achieve business success as their ability to improve sales relies on their being able to overcome hindrances in their daily operations. The capacity building exercise was therefore an opportunity for them to gain skills to help overcome these challenges.   

While these activities assisted the partners in facing, in a practical manner, technical and implementation challenges they would face in their operations there is also need for training in interpersonal engagement eg. Effective communication, conflict resolution, management and other soft skills critical for effectively managing the interpersonal components of business management.