Community Education and Engagement

Through the Tunas Scholarship program and conservation education initiatives, HARPA builds long-term community support for conservation. This approach connects conservation with education and local development, ensuring sustainable impact through community involvement.

Enabling factors:

  • Structured education programs
  • Local community partnerships
  • School network collaboration
  • Scholarship program framework
  • Regular community engagement activities

Lessons learned:

  • Education programs are most effective when combined with direct community benefits
  • Long-term engagement proves more impactful than one-off activities
  • Local wisdom and cultural sensitivity are crucial for program success
  • Scholarship programs effectively build next generation of conservation advocates
Strategic NGO Partnership Framework

HARPA collaborates with specialized conservation NGOs who serve as expert implementers in their respective fields. Each NGO partner is carefully selected based on their expertise and track record. This framework enables effective program implementation while ensuring professional conservation standards are met.

Enabling factors:

  • Network of verified conservation NGOs
  • Clear partnership agreements
  • Defined roles and responsibilities
  • Regular coordination meetings
  • Standardized reporting protocols

Lessons learned:

  • Clear roles and responsibilities must be established at partnership initiation
  • NGO partners need autonomy in technical implementation within their expertise
  • Regular coordination and standardized reporting are essential for quality maintenance
  • Proper credit and recognition sharing is vital for successful partnerships
Multi-Stakeholder Resource Mobilization

HARPA leverages Kitabisa.org's digital platform to connect multiple funding sources (public donors and corporate partners) with conservation NGOs. The system enables transparent fund distribution, real-time tracking, and impact reporting. This approach ensures sustainable funding for conservation programs while maintaining accountability to all stakeholders.

Enabling factors:

  • Kitabisa.org's trusted digital infrastructure
  • Established corporate partnership network
  • Strong public crowdfunding community
  • Transparent reporting system
  • Efficient fund distribution mechanism

Lessons learned:

  • Transparency in fund allocation and impact reporting is crucial for building long-term donor trust
  • Combining crowdfunding with corporate funding creates more stable resource streams
  • Personalized programs for corporate partners significantly increase engagement
  • Regular progress updates to donors improve retention rates
Building Block 1. Assessment using the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI)

The methodology of the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI) was applied to assess the risks and threats posed by climate impacts like wave action, sea level rise, erosion, and precipitation, informing the actions taken. The application was carried out in combination with a regional training that took place in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, together with other site managers and heritage practitioners from Tanzania, Nigeria and Uganda. The training and application was supported by the James Cook University, Australia. 

The application of CVI was made possible thanks to the support of institutions such as the James Cook University of Australia, ICOMOS and ICCROM. Though the participation to the CVI project in Africa, site managers and heritage practitioners from Tanzania, Nigeria and Uganda were also invited to join the 27th annual United Nations meeting on climate (COP27) in Egypt to share their experience and knowledge. 

This Building Block shows the importance of connecting with other practitioners in monitoring and assessing our sites for any climate change induced effects. But it also highlights the significant value of connecting with other site managers and heritage practitioners from around the world, particularly when it came to exchanging knowledge about our heritage sites, the methods we use to care for them, and our perspectives on their preservation.


 

Planning Phase

Phase 1: The project commenced with a comprehensive planning phase involving requirement analysis, market research, and site preparation for the hydroponic systems. 

The concept of using hydroponics for fodder production was born out of the urgent need for sustainable and efficient farming practices to combat ongoing challenges such as changing weather patterns and limited agricultural infrastructure in Tajikistan. Traditional farming methods have struggled to meet the growing demand for fodder, especially as these environmental and structural constraints intensify. Extensive research into innovative agricultural methods led to the discovery of hydroponics—a solution that offers enhanced productivity while minimizing the use of vital resources like water and land.

Piloting

In collaboration with local partners, we identified vulnerable areas and conducted a survey in Matondoni village, Lamu, where traditional cookstoves are common. The survey assessed cooking needs and methods while raising awareness about the benefits of ICS for both mangroves and human wellbeing. Two cookstoves were initially set up to gather feedback from end-users over two months on their experiences, benefits, and challenges. Following this pilot, an additional 51 cookstoves were built to inform scaling efforts in other areas of Lamu.

Scoping for community needs-based intervention

A scoping survey was conducted along Kenya’s coast to identify efficient cookstove models, assess their sustainability, and recommend the best options for adoption. This survey provided insights into the need for cookstoves, suitable designs, and market considerations for effective community interventions.

City renewal strategy

Three-levels of a Co-living community

By implementing a three-level urban renewal strategy of shared neighborhood, shared courtyard, and shared building, the scattered and limited spaces in the Fayuan Temple area are organized.A top-down communal living system is established to solve the difficulties of residents' relocation, outdated infrastructure, and the protection and utilization of historical buildings. 

Shared Neighborhood

We analyzed the activity paths of different groups of people in the Fayuansi neighborhoods. The clear functional division of different areas leads to lack of intersection among various groups, which invisibly forms social barriers and is not conducive to long-term development of the city.

In the shared neighborhood, the entire block is taken as a shared space and considered as a whole, with a management center as the core to lead the co-living system. By dispersing the public functions throughout the block, the daily life of the local residents in the block has been transformed into a distinctive experiential tourism product. Overlapping activities are happening in composite physical spaces, which generates continuous energy for the neighborhood.

Shared Courtyard

The current living condition inside the courtyards is barely acceptable. Illegal construction such as kitchens and bathrooms has become a common phenomenon and the importance of public spaces are severely downgraded. There is hardly any public spaces left other than basic transportation space. 

Most of the young generations have moved out. Among the remaining residents , elderly and young children are the majority as well as some short-term tenants. The continuous reduction of vitality among the neiborhood has become an attention-grabbing problem.

While improving the overall courtyard environment, priority is given to ensuring the basic living needs of residents. This project adopts a four-step (evaluation, repair, demolition, and addition) measure of courtyard renovation. As the number of vacated households increases, existing illegal buildings will be demolished and public service facilities such as shared kitchens and shared laundry rooms will be added. These facilities will be integrated with internal courtyards and public green spaces to form a pubic core for the neighborhood.

Shared House

The vacant houses in the Fayuan Temple district are all made up with "rooms" with various ownerships. Using "room" as a basic unit for renovation is an effective way to reduce the risk of conflicts regarding property ownerships, and also flexible units can better adapt to the living needs of different types of people. By analyzing the dimensions of the courtyards, a 10-12 square-meter room unit was determined as a standard renewal module. The combination of dual and multiple units enables the possibilities for various functions such as long-term apartment, youth hostel, and Café etc.

 

Public participation

During the 2019 Beijing International Design Week, we invited the local citizens from the nearby neighborhoods to participate in the workshop of "urban additions and subtractions" in order to collect public opinions and expectations for the renovation of Fayuan Temple district.

The followings are the conclusions that we drawn from the interviews and questionnaires collected from the workshop.

  • For the multiple choice question of “What do you want to add to the district?” , pocket parks were selected the most by 19.78% of the participants.
  • Many of the citizens complained that the space within Hutong (the Alley) was cramped and lack of greenery.
  • The inhabitants of Hutong complained that the public restrooms and markets were relatively far, it can hardly meet the daily needs.
  • Many of the inhabitants expected more communication and social space within the neighborhood.
  • A majority of the inhabitants deemed that the amusement facilities for children and fitness equipment for the public were not sufficient.

The visitors of Hutong claimed that the hotels and recreational facilities were not sufficient to support the basic tourism needs.

District Pasture Commission-platform for involving stakeholders to discuss pasture issues

In the framework of the project, in terms of achieving sustainable management of forest pastures, a District Pasture Commission (DPC) was established to discuss and make necessary decisions at the level of the administrative territory of Bazar-Korgon district. The Commission consists of directors of forestry services, heads of pasture committees, representatives of the district state administration, district department of agrarian development, and members of the district association of pasture committees.

The main task of the committee is to regulate the sustainable management of pasture resources at the level of one district. 

Meetings of the District Pasture Commission(DPC) are held as needed, but at least three times a year.

In the meetings of the District Pasture Commission at the district level, there are discussed urgent issues on pasture use, interaction between forest services, pasture committees and rural municipalities.

Decisions of the district pasture commission are recorded in the protocols and are required for all members of the commission.

Since the existence of the district pasture commission, many issues were discussed and decisions were made. The agenda of the DPC meeting mainly includes such pressing issues on pastures as:

The main issues of discussion at the DPC were the following:

  • Information on pasture capacity and grazing rates
  • Access to new pastures
  • Timing of moving cattle to SLF pastures
  • DPC's contribution to infrastructure development
  • Provision of information on pasture users by pasture committees
  • Allocation of pastures within forestry farms
  • Procedures for issuing pasture tickets
  • Collection and payment for pasture use
  • Control of animal diseases
  • Organization of resting places for livestock when moving to pastures
  • Review of the implementation of the tasks to identify problems

All decisions of the District Pasture Commission are accompanied by relevant orders from the District State Administration, which gives the activities legal status and efficiency in the implementation of the decisions. 

Formally, the legal status of commission decisions is that of a ‘recommendation’, but the District Administration can issue an order to implement the DPC decisions, and that order is legally binding. The DPC therefore plays a consultative role, involving diverse stakeholders to (a) facilitate the flow of information among stakeholders, (b) represent stakeholders’ interests in consultations on the allocation of grazing rights to different communities and on pasture management plans, (c) generate consensus on allocation of grazing rights and pasture management plans, (d) resolve disputes, and (e) enable stakeholders to have oversight of the management of SFF pasture resources by the FMUs and PCs.

The District pasture commission also has limitations. First and foremost, the commission cannot significantly reduce demand for pastures in the forest areas. This is because livestock numbers and increases in livestock overall are driven by economic factors that cannot be addressed by the DPC, and there is limited opportunity to increase the supply of pastures. 

At national level, there is agreement that the DPC should be effective in conflict management, demonstrate ability to make and implement decisions, and have added value in comparison to existing institutions or mechanisms. Based on the expectations of national partners for the DPC, as well as feedback from the local stakeholders, the commission has added value because:

(1) The DPC is able to convene multiple stakeholders to coordinate, negotiate, generate consensus and make decisions, whereas no other actor has the same convening power;

(2) The decisions of the DPC and orders of the district administration are mandatory for all actors to implement on district level;

(3) The DPC is able to make decisions on numerous aspects of the annual grazing cycle that require coordinated action among stakeholders.