Compensation mechanism for ecosystem services: Quiroz-Chira Water Fund

The mechanism of retribution for ecosystem services Quiroz-Chira Water Fund (FAQCH) has been created with the purpose of channeling economic resources from the users of the lower basin of the Quiroz, Macará and Chira system to implement conservation and sustainable development actions in the upper basin, being the community of Samanga one of the beneficiaries of the Fund since 2014.

For this, the community must annually prioritize up to two activities and develop a proposal that is reviewed and approved by the FAQCH, for which an agreement is signed with the community for the implementation of the proposal.

The FAQCH brings together five public institutions (municipalities of Ayabaca and Pacaipampa), irrigation boards (San Lorenzo and Chira) and NGOs (Naturaleza y Cultura Internacional), who contribute on an ongoing basis, in cash or in value, to finance the proposals from the communities of the upper watershed. The good governance characteristics of the fund give it the confidence of its members (participatory, transparent and accountable). This process has matured with the support of public and private organizations and successive cooperation contributions, and is now in a scaling-up phase.

  • Conditions of trust and transparency between all stakeholders: upper and lower basin.
  • Clear rules from the beginning for beneficiaries.
  • Formal agreements for the implementation of activities and conservation.
  • Long-term commitments by all involved.
  • Continuous monitoring and evaluation of activities.
  • It is possible to obtain the commitment of the actors directly involved (in water use) to finance conservation and development actions.
  • It is necessary to include in the proposal support for sustainable economic activities that ensure improved livelihoods for the population implementing the measures.
  • It is preferable to channel the use of economic resources to implement concrete actions and not to establish agreements for direct 'payment' for conservation because in time these can become a vicious circle or even a reason for blackmail (e.g. "if they don't pay me I don't conserve").
  • The evidence and interaction between beneficiaries and contributors of ecosystem services are favorable for maintaining the best relationships and commitments among all those involved.
  • It is important to maintain the financing of the Quiroz water fund to sustain actions in the long term.
Outdoor Education Opportunities

One of the focus points for the development of the Treverton Wildlife Area was to create opportunities for Outdoor Education. More and more research is pointing to the requirements to create opportunities for children, youth and adults to experience the outdoors. Focusing on the benefits to the people improves the motivation for the participation. Understanding the psychological, social, education and physical benefits of outdoor education to individuals allows for greater involvement and increased utilization by educators and the educational institution. The outdoor education facility allowed for the outdoor activities to be conducted (camping, hiking, picnicking, action based projects, exercising, educational projects, solitaire, etc.).   These outdoor educational opportunities, activities and projects were and are not the only outcomes achieved.  The outdoor education projects are planned with the specific intension of either improving the biodiversity or at the least not impacting on the biodiversity.

Explanations, backed with research findings, of the significant benefits of outdoor events, projects and activities encourages participation which in-turn facilitates the biodiversity related projects. It is imperative that appropriate planning prior to an event or educational programme is conducted.  This must include a risk analysis and procedures.  Information on these should be fed to the participants.  The more a programme/project is conducted the more the project can be duplicated for the benefit of biodiversity.

It takes time for some people in the 'chain' to comprehend the concepts presented and to understand the advantages of Outdoor Education projects.  For example, understanding how the outdoor activities have significant benefit to individuals who can then have an impact on the biodiversity by conducting specific projects in the protected area.  

Once one leader in a community of practice 'buys' into the concept, others will follow.  Once a project has been conducted and the advantages 'advertised' to others then the knock-on benefit is seen when the next project is developed. Reducing the barriers to participation is important.  This might include time allocation to the projects, transport availability and extra adult supervision where required.  Conducting a comprehensive Activity Risk Assessment and development of Protocols with Control Measures for Outdoor Education projects assists with the planning process removing some of the barriers to having learners participate in activities outdoors.

Education FOR Biodiversity (Action Learning)

The Treverton Wildlife Area was developed as an educational facility.  Action Learning, Learning by Doing, Outdoor Education and Capacity Building educational processes where implemented to develop a biodiversity improved and enriched area. The facility allowed/allows learners to participate directly with the environmental projects ‘at home’ with projects for biodiversity. 

Learners actively conduct action learning projects which are either teacher driven (lower grades) or learner driven (higher grades) or a combination thereof to perform specific outcomes related to biodiversity rehabilitation. The projects are conducted under guidance with the emphasis being on education processes, youth empowerment and capacity building.  The improved biodiversity is not the primary motivation for the activities but rather an outcomes.

Outdoor Education programmes are conducted in the TWA with the purpose of individual growth, environmental interaction, mental health, outdoor skills, improve communication and decrease stress levels.

Capacity Building projects are conducted with educators in the region.  The teachers participate in activities within skills development courses related to biodiversity.  Teachers are then able to implement these activities with their own learners and in their areas.

The Treverton management team's acceptance of the concept, their motivation and having the vision to implement the programme. This includes allocation of funds to the programme.

 

Obtaining support from the educators who see the potential and the importance of conducting educational activities which benefit the long-term biodiversity objectives while supporting good education.

 

Support from the local community, including the farmers, which encourages the process and contribute to the development in a variety of means (including donations).

The motivation for the implementation of projects is very important but not always understood by those who are not directly involved in either conservation or environmental education. That is, it is important to attempt to describe: the logic behind the concept, the advantages, the educational outputs and benefits, the proposed processes, the long-term conservation benefits, the methods to be implemented and the educational benefits.  However, the bottom line of financial implications or benefits is often still the driving factor.  Thus working on these factors and emphasising the social components does have an impact.

 

The development of educational activities which are related to the curriculum requirements which can be presented to the teachers with the teaching strategies can help the teachers to participate more readily for the first time.  Once a teacher has conducted one educational process in the conservation area, he/she is more likely develop future projects.  Suggestions of possible projects also encourages the teachers.

Resilience

A food forest is designed to be resilient towards environmental change in order to fulfill the goal of being sustainable. Resilience stresses the ability to 1) sustain the community when no external resource is accessible and 2) recover from disturbances such as climate change, destruction or vandalism.

 

The way resilience works is to a) maximize autonomy in water, nutrients, energy, and food and b) keep the environment and people healthy. The Beacon Food Forest is equipped with a rainwater collector and compost bins to store water and generate nutrients from onsite organic matters such as leaf litter, branches, and green manures. Although we do not have solar panels or wind turbines, our energy lies within the community who contributes their manpower. With the above, we can slowly accomplish food autonomy and sustain the local community.

 

Keeping the environment and people healthy is the key to allow for quick recovery. The Beacon Food Forest practices permaculture gardening to keep chemicals out of the land and the land productive at any time so that when faced with destructive events, plants may grow back within the shortest time frame.

1. Water autonomy using rainwater collector.

2. Nutrient autonomy using compost bins to compost onsite organic matter.

3. Make the plants collaborate and help each other through companion planting and tree guilds.

4. Maintain an active group of volunteers of all ages to ensure sufficient manpower.

Luckily, we have not experienced any destructive events that may test our resilience. Nevertheless, as the Beacon Food Forest is open to harvest by anyone who has the need, we were sometimes faced with similar situations, such as all ripe fruits of a tree gone in a single night. Although we have been educating ourselves that all harvest belongs to the public, most people still felt upset in such situations. Yet, people have also learned to mentally detach themselves from the harvest to minimize their sense of loss, knowing that the fruits would grow as long as the tree is alive. We happily see this as a realization of resilience.

 

It takes time for a food forest to mature and become fully resilient. As of 2018, we still rely partially on municipal water due to the insufficiency amount of rainwater collected. The full design map of the Beacon Food Forest is 7-acres large and we have only developed 2 acres. We hope that by developing the full 7-acres, we may raise our percentage of food autonomy to at least 5%, which would probably be more than that of any large city in the U.S.

Diversity

Ecologically, diversity allows for a balanced ecosystem where different species help to accelerate or inhibit the growth of one another. Socially, diversity allows for integrative consideration and equal participation in a public food forest. In either setting, diversity creates conflicts and a dynamic equilibrium to make sure that no species or a specific group of people occupy all the benefits by excluding the others.


Diversity may be in terms of sex, age, race, occupation, financial status and many more. As the Beacon Food Forest is located on a public land in Seattle, one of the most culturally diverse cities in the United States, we are advised by the City government at the initial stage of the project to showcase our design map of the Beacon Food Forest in communities of different cultures. It was a necessary step to gain diverse support and proof that this project is not only in the interest of one group but many different groups of people. By valuing these diverse cultures, we ended up getting vast emails of interest and even seeds and plants that are unique to these people’s homeland (foreign but not invasive), and of course the City government’s approval to proceed the project.

1. The awareness of being inclusive and respectful to diversity.

2. Different sectors (e.g. Seattle City government) that can provide insights that would not otherwise be thought of by just the community.

3. A universal value or interest that is shared by more than just one group of people. In our case, the Beacon Food Forest offers healthy and affordable food that is of common interest to people regardless of sex, age, culture, and financial status.

Going into communities with different cultural backgrounds was faced with two major challenges:

  1. Not everyone in the community understands English, especially the elderly, and so having an interpreter understands the project would help in the communication process.

  2. Cultural clash is something that is inevitable but can be seen as a positive process towards getting used to each other. We believe the way to accelerate the process is to just keep listening with respect. From our experience, the best way to minimize conflict during the communication is to stay inclusive and rational, and to remind ourselves with the ultimate goal and baseline principles of the project.

Diversity in sectors also means more resources. We are very lucky to have the City government as the third party and a legitimate voice in times when necessary. The University of Washington granted us a beautiful gathering patio as a result of the students’ project and we wouldn’t have educated hundreds of students each year if it weren’t for the support from local schools. Value diversity.

Community empowerment

A successful solution requires a strong community where all are given enough knowledge (aka. power) and trust to fully engage themselves. Beacon Food Forest is co-founded by two local residents but the active engagement from the wider community is the true reason why it is still growing and prospering after 6 years. Hence, building a strong community that is empowered with knowledge, skills, and trust is the key for the Beacon Food Forest to sustain.

 

Community empowerment allows each individual in the community to acquire knowledge and skills needed to participate in the decision-making process of Beacon Food Forest. By providing educational opportunities and by offering leadership opportunities whenever possible (e.g. during workshops, work parties, maintenance events, discussions, and meetings), we allow participants to gain confidence and trust, and then develop a passion and a sense of responsibility towards the land and people which Beacon Food Forest stewards. It is so essential that we do this because for any solution to be carried on, the solution has to be something in which everyone can and is willing to engage themselves in.

  1. Frequent events or interactions within the community that create opportunities for education, leadership and decision-making.

  2. Strong leaders to facilitate events/discussions with equity.

  3. Existing leaders’ willingness to detach from the leadership position.

 

  1. The food forest is a multi-disciplined and continuous learning process and so it is unlikely that anyone - even a skillful leader - is absolutely correct. Hence, it would be appropriate to always listen for different opinions from the community to promote empowerment.

  2. Trust is the key to successful empowerment. Do make sure that new leaders are given full support from existing leaders as well as other community members. For existing leaders, letting go of control is always difficult but is crucial for successful empowerment.

  3. In our effort to empower the community, we noticed that our leaders are mostly white people. Although we have tried hard to be inclusive to different ethnicities by holding events in other communities, planting cultural-specific species, having our bulletin board translated into more than 5 languages, it is obvious that exclusion still occurred. It would be important to gain more than a couple of leaders of different ethnicities so that the Beacon Food Forest may care for people from different backgrounds.

Local capacity building and knowledge management

An essential factor in the integration of key aspects of climate change and biodiversity into territorial planning at the municipal level was the strengthening of local capacities in territorial planning, ecosystem services and adaptation to climate change. This was done at the level of municipal administrations, personnel from Colombia's National Natural Parks and protected areas, and local communities. Equally important was knowledge management to provide inputs that facilitate the development of public policy proposals in this area. Such is the case of the preparation of diagnoses of the Basic Land Management Plans in the two municipalities, to analyze the degree of inclusion of PAs and generate recommendations for greater integration; the preparation of diagnoses and identification of ecosystem services, to make visible the importance of PAs in territorial development and in the quality of life of the surrounding population; and the identification of risks associated with climate change and adaptation strategies, based on local experiences, in order to contribute to the resilience of ecosystems in the context of land use planning.

  • Financial support for the implementation of consultancies to generate key baseline information.
  • Funding for the hiring of experts to support the work teams in both municipalities on land-use planning and the inclusion of protected areas in local planning.
  • Technical and academic enhancement of the public policy formulation process, due to the involvement of institutions from multiple levels and sectors, which generated meetings and contributions from local and foreign experts.

The implementation of a capacity building and knowledge management component, aimed at decision makers, technical staff and communities, provides a solid technical basis and promotes standardized knowledge that articulates the dialogue in the participatory public policy construction processes. This gives the process greater legitimacy.

In the municipalities, this strengthened their leadership and positioning as a development axis. For the PAs, their role in territorial development was evidenced, whether for the cultural value of the Los Colorados FFS in San Juan Nepomuceno, or for the generation of water resources in the case of Santa Rosa, which benefits the Department of Cauca.

As for the communities, this promoted their empowerment and participation in the construction of local public policy, and made it possible to recover knowledge related to climate change adaptation measures, such as reforestation of streams and rivers, rainwater collection wells, and the construction of elevated bridges on guadua.

Support from an International Organization in national processes for the formulation of public policy

In compliance with the goals established in the National Parks System's Institutional Action Plan and the SNAP Action Plan, Parks began the process of integrating PAs into national, regional and local technical instruments and public policy. With the issuance of Colombia's Organic Law of Territorial Planning by the Congress of the Republic and the creation of the Territorial Planning Commission (COT), made up of seven institutions, including the National Planning Department, which serves as Technical Secretary, the process of forming the Special Interinstitutional Committee (CEI) of the COT began. National Parks was included as one of the 6 institutions permanently invited to participate in the CEI, due to its efforts in public policy, the preparation of technical documents, and the development of 8 pilot cases in different regions of the country, with the aim of providing inputs for the formulation of the General Land Use Planning Policy, from a multilevel, interinstitutional and participatory approach. IUCN-South America proposes to be part of this national process by supporting the implementation of 2 of the pilot cases through the global project "Integrated Land Use Planning for Biodiversity".

  • Regulatory framework for land-use planning that emphasizes the importance of integrating protected areas into municipal land-use plans.
  • National public policy development process underway.
  • Creation of a Special Interinstitutional Committee within the COT, made up of national institutions from various sectors, including Colombia's National Natural Parks, with responsibilities for defining public policy on land-use planning.
  • Support from IUCN-South America in the process.

IUCN-South America's support to the public policy formulation process, which integrates protected areas into the territorial planning system, strengthened the results of the two case studies, leaving the following lessons. The integration of actors at multiple levels - local communities, the State and international cooperation - allowed for effective action at the community, administrative and legal levels for the elaboration of an effective public policy. This made it easier to make the leap from theory to practice, and to test the theory before transforming it into public policy. In addition, the support provided to the CEI was fundamental, with the facilitation of spaces for exchange and construction, made up of national and foreign experts. It is also important to recognize the relevance of the support to the institutional management of a governmental instance, such as the PNNC and the National Planning Department, with an impact on the TOC. This has undoubtedly allowed a scaling up of public policy from the local to the national level.

Competence development for forest tenants and staff of State Forest Enterprises

Competence development of forest tenants and of State Forest Enterprises (SFE) is likewise an important element of integrative forest management.

On the one hand, training on forest management techniques is required either directly for the forest tenants, who are often new to forest management, or for the local forester and other employees of the SFE. The training includes silvio-cultural techniques, such as grafting and pruning, and management of fruit tree species. On the other hand, training on the rights and responsibilities of the two contract parties, the forest tenant, and the SFE is needed.

Additionally, a modular training for forest tenants and foresters to encourage a landscape perspective when planning forest management activities has been developed. Within these training modules, the tenants identify threats and vulnerabilities of their communities and learn how re-and afforestation can be a suitable disaster risk reduction strategy. Further, land use conflicts on forest land are addressed and the training provides a platform to exchange and identify solutions, e.g. regulating if, when and how much livestock can graze on forest plots. Moreover, forest tenants learn about the benefits of diverse forest areas and the benefits of planting and grafting local tree species.

Increased capacities enable forest tenants to plan and manage their forest plots in a sustainable manner. The same training is given to male and female forest tenants separately, where the cultural setting holds women back in actively participating in the discussions and, consequently,  separate sessions become necessary. Giving separate training for women by women has empowered female forest tenants in Tajikistan.

The experience has shown that often it is not only limited knowledge of forest management that hinders the sustainable use of the resource but also a lack of communication and agreements between different land users. Especially, forest and pasture management compete for the limited land resources. In the past, the approach prohibited grazing on Joint Forest Management areas. However, monitoring visits have shown that this rule has frequently been violated. Therefore, rather than prohibiting grazing on forest plots, the aim is to address the problem openly together with the community. Understanding why and when they graze their livestock on forest plots and making them understand how and when it harms the forest the most. This has enabled forest tenants to find solutions, such as the implementation of a pasture rotation system, to reduce the negative impacts of free grazing and to address the problem together with their community.

Landscape perspective

By applying a landscape perspective to forest management, the ecosystem as a whole is considered. For this solution, a special focus has been given to biodiversity, climate change adaptation, and pasture management.

A diverse forest plot has multiple benefits for the forest tenant. Firstly, the tenant has a diverse harvest which contributes to food and nutation security. Secondly, species diversity reduces the risk of pests and increases the soil fertility. Thirdly, diverse forests provide a habitat for pollinators, which are crucial for fruit and nut trees.

Tajikistan is prone to disasters, further reinforced by overharvested natural resources and climate change having fierce impacts. Landslides and droughts are common phenomena but the frequency and intensity have increased significantly. Forest cover on slopes and along river banks are an important adaptation and disaster risk reduction strategy.

Further, livestock is frequently grazing on forest areas, as pastures are scarce and the limited land available overused and degraded. Forest grazing reduces ground cover, impedes the root system, and hinders natural forest regeneration. Therefore, grazing must be addressed together with the forest tenants and solutions identified that go beyond the prohibition of grazing in forests.

By applying a landscape perspective, a multitude of problems, difficulties, and risks to the community can be addressed. Consequently, the approach has gained in acceptance by the local communities as it takes environmental, economic and social challenges into account.

The experience has shown that political land delineations often do not correspond with ecosystem boundaries. Areas, assigned for re- and afforestation, do usually not cover a whole ecosystem but are part of a bigger ecosystem with which the forest area interacts and shares resources. Consequently, forest management needs to consider implications by and interactions with the wider ecosystem the forest plot is part of. As various land use types and land use rights interact in one ecosystem for which different ministerial bodies are responsible, the establishment of an inter-sectoral dialogue to foster coordination and cooperation of all involved actors at landscape level has proven to be successful. Within the JFM implementation in Tajikistan, a bi-annual exchange has been established, where practitioners, relevant ministries and local as well as international organizations exchange. This exchange platform is not only appreciated by partners but also helped to include the landscape perspective. Therefore, an exchange platform is highly recommendable.