In all of our endeavors, we deploy our signature ACTIVE™ (Access, Connect, Team, Implement, Verify, Evolve) Community Engagement approach. Guided by this community-driven and adaptive approach, we prioritize a deep, holistic understanding of the political, economic, ecological, and cultural factors that shape how each community interacts with and manages its natural resources. This ensures that our conservation efforts are tailored to the specific needs and aspirations of the community, creating a strong foundation for sustainable, inclusive, and innovative solutions. We begin with preparatory activities, including a pastoral livelihoods and rangeland management dialogue, which fosters open communication and builds trust. Focusing on understanding the unique governance structures and rangeland management practices already in place, we conduct a participatory mapping exercise to identify critical pastures used by the community and wildlife alike. A plot ID – coded with both indigenous and scientific names – is designated for each pasture and baseline quality data are collected using a customized Survey123 form for site selection and assessment. The data include both ecological metrics (e.g., grass height, soil type) and social factors (e.g., cultural significance, accessibility).
It is necessary to have an established relationship of mutual trust with the community and a thorough understanding of existing governance structures before engaging in monitoring efforts. APW seeks to recognize how different governance structures function and which decisions are made by which governing bodies. For instance, in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area, traditional leaders make pasture management decisions through the Ilaigwanak structure, while the village government often focuses more on political decision-making. As is customary in this region, pastoralists have tremendous respect for the traditional leadership and their decisions. Abiding by decisions made by the Ilaigwanak is deeply rooted in the local culture and way of life. Support from traditional leaders is critical for the uptake and implementation of data-driven rangeland management decisions.
Prior to making any effort to effect change, APW clarifies the decision-making process and seeks inclusive participation for project implementation. Conducting stakeholder analyses is key in contextualizing natural resource management efforts. This requires flexibility, adjusting as needed to ensure data are culturally and ecologically relevant and in the service of the community. To foster support and participation from traditional leaders, APW advises the leadership on the use of routine monitoring data.