Manual removal of invasive plants instead of using heavy machinery

Using manual labour allows for selective removal of invasive plants. This protects the other native vegetation in the area, allowing for the native vegetation and grasses to grow back in the following months whereas when using heavy machinery, the top layer of soil in addition to the grass and native vegetation are removed. Using heavy machinery also removes vital seed banks of native plants, which further facilitates the spread of invasive plants.

 

It is critical to remove the IAS before the seeds mature and disperse. Through this project, we aim to remove as much IAS growth as possible manually (inclusive of roots), before they shed seeds. The remaining plants, which are more difficult to uproot, will be removed via a ‘slasher’ and the roots will be removed manually, at a later stage, when the soil is moist and plants may be easily uprooted. FEO has observed regrowth of grass after a couple weeks of IAS removal and the growth of native vegetation inhibits the regrowth of invasive species in the cleared areas.

  • Collaboration with Sabaragamuwa University to research on the most effective methods of removal and obtain scientific data on the prevalance, growth, and regeneration of invasive species.
  • Previous experience of removal of other invasive species in other National Parks in Sri Lanka.
  • Process of identifying the advantages of using manual removal - has a much higher percentage of regrowth of native species as opposed to using heavy machinery.
  • Observed through our camera traps and research that the grass grows back within a few weeks and we have noticed that elephants, deer, and other herbivores are already grazing on cleared areas.
Partnerships with Department of Wildlife Conservation and Partnerships with the local community

Federation of Environmental Organisations partnered with the Department of Wildlife Conservation (DWC), the governmental department which oversees maintaince of national parks, nature reserves, and wildlife in wilderness areas in Sri Lanka. Lunugamvehera National Park is directly under their management, therefore granting of permission from the DWC was essential. Removal of the focal invasive plants was conducted under the supervision and security of the DWC.

 

In addition to our invasive species removal programme, part of the project focuses on developing sustainable livelihoods of the local communities. The hired labour was drawn from local communities who have lost their income sources due to the COVID-19 pandemic from local farming communities, and many of which were daily wage workers. This new partnership between the Park and the local community also fosters an attitudinal shift from one of conflict with the Park to one where they can financially benefit from and being involved in the protection of the Park. Local community members involved in the project were also given awareness training on invasive species control.

  • Past interactions of FEO with DWC and completion of successful projects for the DWC
  • Trust gained with the local communities due to providing them with employment over time.
  • Willingness to work together with the community to improve their livelihoods.
  • Ensure that you have adequate funding before the commencement of the project in order to ensure continuous employment
  • Commence processes to obtain necessary approvals from government agencies like the DWC early on as there can be long delays to obtain them.

 

 

"Wildlife-friendly Community: Community-based wildlife tourism"

With wildlife appearance as a result of the relocation of communities from the encroached area, the opportunity of wildlife ecotourism is enabling. Wildlife becomes the assets of the communities from its value of alternative livelihoods. Communities become the wildlife guardians instead of attackers.

Wildlife Eco Tourism must be based on technical support from wildlife professionals, ecosystem specialists and environmental-friendly architect in establishing the Master Plan for further investment.

Collaboration among relevant agencies is the key. With common understanding on the joint benefit and credibility if succeeded, each stakeholder can find the proper role in an orchestrated way.

Very important is the preparedness for well-managed planning and financial resources to maintain the momentum of interest of all parties. Otherwise, when the enthusiasm dried out, the effort will have to start all over again.

Biodiversity in land use planning instruments

in order to be feasible, planning of protected areas and socio-ecosystems must have an impact on land use planning instruments.

The inclusion of land use planning in nature conservation management, risk management and public health has already been mentioned.

They are not synonyms: 1) ecosystem planning with land use planning, 2) ecosystem is not equal to territory.

All land use planning should be environmental.

In order to integrate protected areas into land use planning, it is necessary to have an integral vision and analysis of the territory, therefore they must be identified and contribute to the management of ecosystem articulation, CBD programs, UNESCO and of course the aspirations, visions and own forms of conception and regulation of the territories of the ethnic and local communities.

Synergy and complementarity between approaches for effective territorial management of biodiversity

In order to address the challenges faced by society in social, economic, environmental and cultural terms, commitments have been adopted at the global level and subscribed to by States in different agendas, each with particular intervention approaches (rights, ecosystemic, urban-regional, disaster prevention and risk management and/or climate change). which of these approaches is appropriate for effective territorial management of biodiversity and social inclusion? All. The reality of the territories is diverse, complex and has very specific problems and potentials, which require cooperative, concurrent, complementary and multi-scale work of social and institutional actors to harmonize and implement the actions proposed in the planning instruments, in such a way that they respond to the identified needs, in order to prevent and manage socio-environmental conflicts, advance in the conservation of nature and human wellbeing.Combining rights, ecosystemic, urban-rural, risk management and climate change approaches is necessary to manage territories in an integral and pertinent manner.

Ratification, compliance with commitments Sendai Framework, Convention on Biological Diversity, Climate Change Convention, New Urban Agenda, ILO Convention 169. Sound Institutionality and Systems of: Disaster Prevention and Attention and Risk Management, National Environmental, Protected Areas, Climate Change, Cities. Knowledgeable and experienced personnel. Existence of Special Inter-Institutional Committee of Colombia's Land Management Commission since 2012. There are agreements between National Parks, environmental authorities, ethnic communities and sectors.

Colombia is a multi-territory, where different concepts of territory coexist: national state (unitary republic, decentralized in territorial entities, where it exercises sovereignty); indigenous ethnic (there are 115 ethnic groups, each one amalgamates ancestry, origin, cosmovision, relationship with mother earth); ethnic black, Afro-Colombian, Palenquero and Raizal communities where ancestors, nature, the river, the sea determine solidarity behavior; border territory where ecosystems and culture transcend the political administrative boundaries of nations. Territorial governance requires dialogue between governance (protected areas, water, natural resources and food), towards legitimacy, synergy between processes, governance, public policy relevance, participation, dialogue of knowledge and good living. Environmental, ethnic, peasant, urban and rural planning should dialogue to achieve viable territories. Co-leadership, alliances, cooperative work between environmental authorities, researchers, academia, territorial entities, community leaders, institutional sectors.

An innovative partnership

New forms of civil society are emerging in Cambodia including more informal social movements that are at the forefront of delivering change. New ways of communicating are explored by these groups who use a variety of new technologies, most notably mobile phones, Facebook, and Youtube. This is the case with PLCN as well.

Until recently, patrolling and documenting illegal logging was difficult and expensive due to the vast area with little infrastructure and lack of communication. To address this problem, an innovative partnership “Prey Lang: It’s Our Forest Too” was formed between PLCN, a social movement Community Peacebuilding Network (CPN), a peacebuilding organization Peace Bridges Organisation (PBO), the University of Copenhagen (KU), a Danish development organization (Danmission), and a local IT company (Web Essentials) in 2014. At a later stage, more organizations joined the initiative: The Cambodian Youth Network (CYN) as a youth activities support group and the Forest & Peoples Organization, an organization to support the data collection and dissemination as well as the communication of the results of the forest monitoring.  

- The core of the initiative being the communities themselves with a number of local supporting organizations

- The support from international organizations

- Capacity development 

- Peaceful conflict resolution 

- Citizen science approach 

- Intersection of science and conservation (forest monitoring for conservation AND scientific outputs

- Data ownership promotes community empowerment

- Local network of organizations important for community mobilization and capacity building

- International organizations important for networking, data dissemination, and raising awareness of the issues at the global level. 

- Non-violent approach

Village Saving and Loan Scheme and External Partnerships

The Village Savings and Loan Scheme is an IPaCoPA's sustainability strategy where members in their self-manage Groups meet regularly to save their money in a safe space and access small loans from the money collected among themselves to invest in livelihood projects at household level such as Agriculture and Solar energy. Because most individual members lack prerequisites to access loans from financial institutions, the VSLA scheme helps members to easily access finances and secure soft loans under group guarantorship. This supplements TUA's efforts to implement various aspects of the IPaCoPA initiative and to sustain the TUA's already supported projects such as looking after the trees planted and setting up kitchen gardens by households. With our external partners,  key of them who include the District Local Government, UNDP, SAI Group UK, and Jade Products Ltd, we have been able to get endorsements, Capacity trainings, Digital Platforms such as Project Management systems and access to e-commerce, Funding (forexample from UNDP-Y4BF to support 500 youth in commercial farming of Chilli), and other resources which makes IPaCoPA operate in complete ecosystem. 

  1. Existence of clear objectives aligned to the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that interest other organisations/Firms with similar or related objectives, and or philanthropic about what we intend to achieve through our objectives. 
  2.  The zeal and enthusiasm by the team leader and the board to search for relevant partners and express interest for partnership. 
  3. Access to and ability to use internet enhanced with an organisational website “www.treeugandaacademy.com
  4. Upholding the organisational principles and values.
  1. Building trust with partners and also determining the trustworthiness of those whom you partner with is paramount to sustain relevant and lasting partnerships. Concisely it’s important to develop clear agreements, be flexible and understand your partner’s language.   
  2. Partnership is a learning process therefore you need to be open order to learn from other partners, particularly local partners in areas where project activities are being implemented. Local partners have a lot to teach about the community needs and local context and how to develop and create more sustainable results.
  3. Failures on some partnerships is inevitable, in case partnership fails, it is important to assess why the partnership failed, share and learn from those failures, reiterate and incorporate the lessons learned into the next partnership.  
  4. The success of our organisation and the IPaCoPA solution ain particular relies on strong partnerships. Developing a partnership mindset based on relationships is far important because even when the funded activities end, the relationship continues and there is an opportunity for sustainable support.
The fight against poaching, illegal trade and killing of wild animals.

Poaching poses serious threats to wildlife conservation and efforts at preserving wildlife through the establishment of protected areas are under threat by poaching of wildlife in the central High Atlas of Morocco.  The enforcement of the existing law against illegal capturing, empoisoning and killing of wild encouraged the authorities to participate actively in the protection of wild species and to enforce the law in certain cases. Raising awareness among residents and creating jobs in ecotourism and geotourism also participate in the fight against poaching. For example, in the Ouzoud site, the fight against poaching and the trade of macaques was one of the main factors responsible for the Barbary macaque population increase. We have actively participated since 2008 in collaboration with local authorities in the fight against illegal work (poaching, tree felling, etc.). We worked with some residents to obtain the necessary information on this work. in this context, we took part in stopping certain wild animal capture operations and we released a large number of animals in their original habitats.

In recent years, local people have actively participated in the fight against poaching and the wildlife trade. The ecological and economical roles of wildlife in ecosystems have been more widely appreciated among local people in the central High Atlas of Morocco. The creation of employment in ecotourism and in the field of medicinal plants has encouraged the inhabitants to participate in the fight against work with a negative impact on ecosystems.

Poaching and trade in wild animals is practiced mainly by young habitats who have no work and who have no ideas about the consequences of these activities on wild populations. Integrating these people into development projects can transform them into protectors of wildlife. Helping people find jobs and helping them improve their ecological knowledge will help conserve habitats.

Scientific research benefits wildlife conservation

Conduction of scientific research on the effects of human activities on wildlife allowed us to better understand the effects of humans on wild animal populations. Today, we are the only who carry out scientific studies on biodiversity in the central High Atlas. The solutions proposed consist in encouraging research institutions to participate in these scientific studies and to study other zoological groups.

Scientific research is essential for conservation as it helps establish solutions based on scientific results. For example, we have shown that hunting currently used in Morocco to limit the growth of wild boar populations has, on the contrary, a postive impact on wild boars and that the conservation of wild boar predators is the best method to regulate wild boar populations. We have also shown that poaching affects populations of the Barbary macaque, Cuvier's gazelle, and of other species. The prohibition of poaching and the sensitization of habitats were the main causes for the increase in  the Barbary macaque population in the site of Ouzoud, Morocco.

The central High Atlas Mountains have a great diversity of habitats and of plant and animal species . This area is home to a variety of animal species, especially mammals with more than 24 wild mammal species and more than 120 birds.

Scientific studies allow us to understand the factors responsible for species declines and to develop appropriate solutions.

Encouraging development projects to conserve biodiversity

Encouraging development projects promote the local economy and participate in increasing the income of residents. We participated in the training of tourist guides to work in tourist places, especially in the Ouzoud site. Some locals who previously worked as poachers have become good tour guides. They acquired information on the local fauna, in particular the Barbary macaque. The training of guides was carried out in collaboration with associations and local and regional authorities. Other people were trained in the field of medicinal plants and they improved their income.

The three protected areas contain many sites of ecological (6) and geological (22) interest which can be exploited to encourage ecotourism and geotourism. They also have a great diversity of habitats and of plant and animal species with existence of many local products with a strong territorial link and a real potential for economic development.

By promoting the local economy and education, local inhabitants actively participate in the conservation of biodiversity. Poachers and people who work in the forests have other opportunities to increase their income without having a negative effect on biodiversity.