Conservation fund

As a strategy of connection and contribution of the citizenship, because in the first edition (2013) We were able to finance all expenses, a conservation fund was generated from the collection of the cost of the registration of the event, the fund was delivered to the Promoter Group CPY and it was invested in conservation actions and sustainable use of the territory, with the fund was bought trap cameras for monitoring biodiversity.
This proposal was not sustainable for following editions, due to the considerable increase of the participation and the associated costs, currently we use the fee of the registrations to complete the event financing.

Have an emblematic conservation project in the region.
Having achieved the total financing of the initiative in its first year.
To have a permanent governance space (Cooperation System and CPY promoter group)

It is necessary to devote greater effort to the raising of economic resources to maintain the conservation fund.
To allocate the money raised in local projects, helps to strengthen the relationship between the promoter group and the community.
Having an external institution that helps finance 100% of the event, allows the creation of the conservation fund.

Governance and management practices through participatory planning and delivery

Governance
Over the years, Lewa has set up an elaborate and effective governance and management structure, which has greatly contributed to the organisation's effectiveness and efficiency. The Conservancy is headed by a board of directors with a well stipulated mandate, which is to drive Lewa's strategy through the management team. This has ensured that Lewa has the right strategic direction and practices accountability to stakeholders and beneficiaries. The communities working with Lewa are clustered within their geographic locations, and each one has a development committee, a platform for the communities to identify, discuss and agree on their needs, which then, together with the Lewa team, are prioritised.  

 

Management

Lewa's management is informed by its Strategic Plan updated every 5 years. The Plan is aligned to national and local conservation and livehood goals. It is prepared consultatively with our stakeholders through participatory planning. Implementation is through various departments, supported by a Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning framework. Additionally, we have the Lewa Standard, a set of ethos and principles that ensures the Conservancy is managed to the highest standards in the context of defined objectives.

Participation and inclusiveness of all stakeholders, mainly Lewa's neighbouring communities. 

 

Practising financial transparency and setting up accountability processes.  

 

Investing in establishing a highly effective, motivated and efficient team, which is then best placed to drive the strategic plan. 

 

 

The importance of planning for the longterm, and establishing how to execute a strategy in phases. 

 

Recognition and understanding of the immediate context in matters relating to conservation and development, and ensuring relevancy of our work.

 

Working with the government in power, and not having any political affiliation. 

 

The value of having a robust Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning framework, which then helps to ensure that our work is having positive impacts.

 

The importance of having a strong board of directors with varied experiences and skills sets to drive the organisation's strategy. 

 

Supporting the communities to form their own governance structures, which helps to set up platforms to articulate their needs in a formalised fashion.

Establishing broad partnerships with national and county governments, and other conservation agencies and local communities

Most conservation organisations cannot flourish in isolation. For us, we recognise the importance of establishing mutually beneficial partnerships that cut across national and county governments, local and international conservation and research agencies, as well as individual and institutional philanthropic organisations. In our landscape, partnerships have enabled us to scale the impact of our work across northern Kenya and beyond. Together with our partners, we have been able to connect wildlife landscapes previously isolated by human activities, protect wildlife beyond our borders, as well as participate in the formulation and implementation of strategies for the conservation of key species. We mainly establish partnerships that wil directly feed into our strategic goals or where we find we will add the greatest value. However, for the local and national government partnships, these are a must institutions as our work feeds directli into the national goals. Among others, our partnerships are maintained through implementing joint action plans, joint planning and implementation meetings, face to face meetings, publicacations etc.

Shared values for wildlife and community development. 

 

An existing state agency responsible for wildlife conservation in Kenya, that collaborates and works with private and community stakeholders. 

 

Dialogue and regular communications with partners and stakeholders involved.

There is tremendous value in participatory conservation efforts, which enables the scaling of work across larger landscapes. 

 

Every working partner has significant input in the realisation of conservation and development goals across northern Kenya. 

 

There is a need to continuously cultivate partners who are aligned with our vision, mission and approaches to various components of our work. 

 

Community-focused Conservation Approach

We work with local communities to make our conservation efforts inclusive, participatory and beneficial to their livelihoods. This is in recognition that conservation can only be successful and sustainable if there is participation from the local people, where their views and thoughts are integrated into the planning and execution process.

 

Each community surrounding Lewa has a development committee that is linked to the community development programme here on Lewa. Through these committees, we are able to establish what the communities' greatest needs are, how we can help to best address them, and how conservation can generally uplift their livelihoods. As a result, we continue to enjoy a close working relationship with our neighbours, in recognition that the future for both people and wildlife in this ecosystem are intertwined.

Regular and prompt communications between Lewa and the neighbouring communities, including an open door policy.

 

Establishment of grass root based platforms for community engagement and participation. 

 

Planning - alignment of communities' needs to organisational goals through consultations via the development committees and other channels.

 

Recognition of the importance of community engagement and participation in Lewa's strategies and philosophy. 

Community involvement, beyond tokenism, remains critical in conservation to ensure sustainability and longterm viability of the efforts. 

 

Shared responsibility from project planning, implementation and operations, which creates a sense of ownership amongst the communities, which eliminates the ‘dependency syndrome.’

 

The importance of involving other development partners in the community development initiatives.

 

It is important to create good governance structures among the development committees and ensure representation from both genders, and the various age structures. This ensures that all demographics are represented. 

 

Prioritisation of the communities' needs, and focus on what affects most members of the society.

 

The value of not aligning to any political party, and creating a working relationship with any government that is in power. 

Multidimensional governance for adaptation of water resources

Multilevel and multisectorial governance for adaptation implies working at multiple levels and with differente sectors. It requires creating connections for better articulation between territorial actors.

 

In the upper part of the Sumpul River sub-basin, this entailed working closely with grassroots (community-based) organizations to develop bottom up water resource management. This was done supporting the conformation of  Water Committees linked with Community Development Associations (ADESCOs), the Municipalities and the Binational Community Committee.

 

The capacities of 4 Water Committees and their supply systems were strengthened and were thereafter formalized under municipal governance.

 

Moreover, and following the multilevel governance approach, the Binational Community Committe was strengthened throught restructuring advice, trainings, new management tools, and greater links with municipal governments. This Committee is now leading community water issues to prevent conflicts around water use.

  • Honduras legal framework (General Water Law) that defines different water basin governance structures; and in El Salvador the regulation of the ADESCO Water Committees, with a public health mandate.
  • The existence of the Binational Committee was key, since work did not start from scratch, but rather focused on their strengthening and restructuring, respectively. 
  • The articulation of project and organization efforts across a territory is fundamental (e.g. between IUCN and Plan Trifinio)
  • The strengthening of existing local and community structures is vital, as these have the ability to sustain the progress and changes achieved in the territory, despite the alternation of local authorities.
  • The ADESCOs and the Binational Community Committee undertake important mediation tasks, since the management of water resources can generate conflicts due to the diversity of interests that converge on this issue.
  • The articulation of project efforts across a territory is fundamental (e.g. between the AVE and BRIDGE projects) to achieve greater impacts and efficiencies, through coordinated project agendas.
  • The BRIDGE project in the Goascorán River basin (El Salvador-Honduras) left the following lesson learnt that is also relevant in this case: "Water diplomacy does not necessarily follow a straight path. Effective strategies need to incorporate multiple dimensions and a phased approach, interconnecting existing and emerging structures in the basin."
Strong partnerships and open communication

The private sector is commonly described as being blind to environmental issues. The reality, however, is that the private sector is heavily invested in biodiversity. The project was an opportunity for companies to deepen their understanding of environmental issues and to develop the corporate habit of thinking beyond the bottom line. Less obviously, it is an opportunity for environmental specialists to deepen their understanding of business and development dynamics and to learn to include bottom line analysis in their own evaluations.

Robust communication practices went hand in hand with the partnership. Because of the sensitivity around the issue among environmental organizations and other sectors, the approach toward the project was to make information transparent and publicly available. The partners described very clearly what they was doing and what they were not doing – and why. Information was made available through fact sheets and the project website, and by engaging in public discussions and meetings.

A number of other efforts were made to ensure information was flowing freely between the key stakeholders. For example, in early 2009, IUCN held a Consultative Technical Workshop on Dhamra Port in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, followed by a trip to the port site. The interactive forum brought together a diverse mix of government representatives, the private sector, leading local and international scientists, technical experts, academics and local community representatives. Work with the press ensured that messages were disseminated at a national level. These efforts encouraged participation and helped to dispel confusion.

Incentives to conserve and restore mangroves through organic shrimp certification

The Naturland standard requires each farm to have at least 50% mangrove cover while other organic standards require strict compliance with forest policy. Farmers who can demonstrate compliance then have the option of selling their certified shrimp to the Minh Phu Seafood Corporation, Viet Nam’s largest shrimp exporter.

 

The project also successfully supported Cà Mau in piloting a Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) system. This system provides an incentive for mangrove conservation and restoration by paying farmers an additional 500,000 VND (£17.77) per hectare of mangrove for providing ecosystem services.

 

Besides payments for farmers, Minh Phu also invested in its own ICS team, a supply chain from farm to factory, and financial incentives for collectors, collecting stations, and payments to support the FMB with monitoring.

 

In this PES system, the processor pays the farmers for the ecosystem goods and services they provide, and mangrove cover is monitored by a third-party. This direct payment approach has been accepted by Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.

 

The project has also encouraged other processing companies to establish their organic farming area with different payment schemes, these companies include Seanamico, Seaprimexco in Ca Mau.

  • Existence of international certification standards
  • Market demand for certified products
  • Multi-sector collaboration
  • Investment and funding
  • Experience in PES concepts
  • Policy support from local government
  • Support from other projects of IUCN and SNV, technically and financially to fill in some gaps of the project
  • Commitment of Minh Phu seafood Corp without upfront turnover from the organic shrimp
  • A Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) works when the processor and ultimately the international consumer of organic shrimp are the buyers of the ecosystem services. The farmers themselves cannot be the purchasers of the services, as they would be both buyer and seller of the same services;
  • A PES based on organic certification with a direct payment system between the shrimp processor and the farmer and an independent third-party auditor is more efficient than a proposed alternative indirect payment system of shrimp processors paying into a forest development fund;
  • Although scientific calculations have shown that the PES value of mangroves is 10 times higher than the current amount being paid to farmer, the actual incentive must be set at the level that is viable for the seafood processor and consumer. This is balanced against the profit-based incentive for the farmer to maintain the forest cover.
  • The distribution of incentive payments must be clear and transparent, and carefully supervised, thus the participation of local government is critical.
Building community understanding of the value of the ocean

Community buy in to the concept of transforming savings and loan groups into social infrastructures actively supporting conservation initiatives is built on their understanding of their role in the conservation of their resources. Generally, community members should gain knowledge on the current state of the marine environment, the urgent need to protect and conserve the marine resources, the gaps and challenges of existing conservation efforts, and the importance of strong and consistent community support.

- platform and venue for conservation education

- community facilitators with capacity to impart conservation messages

- manuals and materials to facilitate learning

Building the communication skills of local community champions can effectively support education campaigns in the community. They ensure regular and sustained conduct of outreach and education activities, and they have the capacity to make discussions brief and simple. 

A dedicated unit for mangrove conservation

The provincial government of the state of Maharashtra in India, acting on the orders of the court, created a dedicated body in January 2012, to protect and conserve mangrove forests in the state. The dedicated unit, called the Mangrove Cell, started functioning as a part of the state level administrative body responsible for conservation of forests and wildlife. Considering the high level of encroachment in the mangrove areas, pressures of land conversion for real estate and industrial projects, and other anthropogenic factors, the government accorded the highest level of protection to mangrove forests by declaring them as “Reserved Forests”. Further, the Cell was empowered as per the statutory laws governing the management of forest resources in the country. Provisions were also made to engage field level personnel to safeguard these forests. With almost a third of the mangrove forests in the state falling within one of the most populated metropolises of the world, Mumbai¸ a specialised unit was formed to check and prevent incidences of encroachment and mangrove destruction within and around the city. Along with protection of mangrove forests, the Mangrove Cell is also responsible for conservation of coastal and marine ecosystems in the state of Maharashtra.

  • A judiciary framework that enabled the court to address an administrative gap and dictate the formation of a specialised unit for mangrove conservation.
  • Laws and regulations that ensure conservation of forests in the country.

In the past, conservation of mangrove, coastal and marine biodiversity was not one of the topics of focus in the conventional framework of managing forests in the country. Since management of these ecosystems require specialised knowledge and expertise, the formation of the Mangrove there has led to a more effective management of mangroves and marine ecosystem.

Forests for Live Movement (Network Building)

Forests For Life is an environmental conservation movement/network that envisions the restoration of Philippine rainforests using native tree species with support from various sectors. It began as a movement called ROAD to 2020, which worked with communities, local government units, indigenous peoples, academe, like-minded groups and the youth to bring back the lost forests. Through the movement, Haribon was able to empower local communities, build native tree nurseries, provide guidance in establishing conservation areas, influence policies, organize tree planting drives and encourage the public to take part in citizen science. To date, 13,416 Volunteers and 14 community partners in 30 Municipalities have been mobilized, which significantly shows raised awareness on biodiversity.

A Rain Forest Restoration Initiative (RFRI) Network was formed during the National Consultation on Rainforest Restoration in November 2005, which has initiated forest restoration efforts since 2006; Government Policy-Memorandum Circular 2004- 06; Executive Order 23 and 26; Support from Local Government Units, Peoples Organizations; Corporate and Individual donations

The clear targets of sustaining the ecological goods and services of our forests for the present and succeeding generations can only be achieved if we restore our forests using native trees. Engagement from the different sectors of the society is vital. This can be achieved if stakeholders share the same vision, and understand how biodiversity is interconnected and affects their everyday lives. It is important that the corporate sector and local government units understand their big role in providing assistance to the different stakeholders, which in return favors the sustainability not only of the local communities, but of the bigger population. Government priorities and policies that favor the improvement of livelihood and capacities of the communities will help in attaining success of restoration initiatives