Awareness Raising
The importance of nature conservation is brought out to the local community - including the tourist sector. Awareness raising campaigns are conducted to transform knowledge, values, skills and attitudes towards sustainable tourism development. Information is disseminated via videos, brochures, press releases and organised flash mobs.
Community participation of the community, resources for public relations in the alliances, formulation of clear messages.
Because the efforts have been achieved with the participation of very diverse sectors and institutions it is necessary that all the members have similar understanding regarding the terms used; all the messages communicated have to contain the same information, no matter who is communicating.
Monitoring and evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are vital components of every Pride campaign, without which assessment of the effectiveness of the intervention cannot be conducted. M&E takes place in every component of the Theory of Change (please refer to the building block 'Theory of Change' for a brief description of each component). Monitoring keeps score on how effectively capacities are built, how effectively social marketing efforts lead to changes in behavior, and if those behavior changes lead to desired conservation outcomes. Monitoring basically tracks every component of the ToC. M&E of knowledge, attitude, interpersonal communications and behavior change is based on pre and post campaign surveys of the fishers, while threat reduction and conservation results use specific protocols validated by experts.
• Having a local monitoring partner or consultant is key to develop timely baseline data and monitor threat reduction and conservation results. • As with any project or program, having adequate and sufficient funding is key. Teams may rely on existing human, equipment, facilities, and financial capacities to reduce costs. • Sites with long term tradition of monitoring are better suited to produce a solid baseline of biological monitoring indicators.
An important lesson related to biological monitoring is when there is the possibility of having a two person team for each campaign, a Campaign Manager (CM) and a Fisheries Fellow (FF). This arrangement allows for one person to concentrate on the fisheries technical aspects, including the necessary time for biological monitoring. The level of involvement of the FF in the monitoring component depends on his/her personal inclination towards science. There are examples where the FF devoted a considerable amount of time and effort to conducting monitoring and analyzing data, while others did not participate at all. This could improve with a clearer definition of the FF’s role in regards to biological monitoring. Having a person dedicated to monitoring in Rare’s team ensured all fisheries campaigns had baseline and post campaign impact data.
Informed behavior change
After the first full year of data gathering, Trident Systems, the company that developed the observation tool, was asked to produce data sets based on the SNA1 Agreement including how many vessels moved on because they were catching undersized snapper and what volumes of small snapper were being caught by each fishing method. Specific information is confidential to each fisher, but an overall analysis is made public. This is the first time in New Zealand that inshore fin fishers can see the effect of their fishing practices on collective industry catching allocations. They start to recognize how they personally can contribute to sustainability of the snapper stock by changing their practices. New Zealand fisheries are data rich yet it is rarely used to build awareness and facilitate discussions between fishers to bring about change. Fishers involved in science projects are keener to understand the results of the work, are reviewing data and asking questions in a way that scientists are not used to. This review process is challenging and most often face-to-face. Scientists are reporting data to other scientists, but they are also bringing together fishers and providing advice and learnings on how to change fishing practices.
• the government supported this initiative by being open to considering cameras as a cost effective substitute to human observers • local fisher leaders were willing to support and defend decisions such as installing cameras on vessels • both the scientists and the software innovators were prepared to look at what fishers wanted rather than just improving the products already available
Maintaining the confidentiality of fisher’s information and data is crucial.
Climate impact hypotheses
Stakeholders were consulted to obtain feedback on relative vulnerabilities. Other related information was also sourced via desktop research and review of journal articles. Three sectors that directly benefit from ecosystem service/function were considered in the modeling: the tourism industry (recreation); the spiny lobster fishing industry (food); and coastal property owners (protection). Climate impacts of concern to those stakeholder groups were discussed. Analysis of the direct and indirect influence of climate factors on ecosystem services/habitats was conducted.
• Effective stakeholder dialogues and outreach initiatives • Partnerships provided the support needed for effective implementation of the project’s activities
The scenarios helped us to effectively communicate climate influence and impacts as well as the scientific thinking behind the process and approach for addressing impacts to inform policy and decision-making on climate change. Scenarios played a critical role in raising awareness on climate change and in engaging organizations and stakeholders in the need to adapt. As thought about moving forward in replicating this type of effort, we have realized that it is not enough to simply make climate change scenarios available. Their provision must be accompanied by ongoing guidance and support to ensure widespread and appropriate uptake. Second, on-going dialogue between those providing scenarios and the communities using them is fundamental to constructively meet the challenges associated with delivering credible scenarios that balance user requirements and expectations with what the science can deliver.
Multi-stakeholder Workshops
In participatory workshops, common objectives as well as individual roles and responsibilities are identified. This helps to strengthen coordination and cooperation among the key stakeholder groups including government officials, representatives of private enterprise, academia, civil society organisations and tourism service providers.
• Community participation • Government committment • Strategic alliances • Reformed legislation
A cross-sectoral, transparent and constant communicationis of key importance.
Compatibilities in the marine environment
To examine the way in which the different uses are incorporated in the marine space, two compatibility matrices have been developed to guide the proposed policy measures and spatial structure of this plan. These two matrices analyze: 1. Compatibility and conflict among the different uses 2. Compatibility and conflict between the different uses and the natural resources and heritage and cultural values The two matrices were based on a list of uses in and values of the marine space – and a summary of the environmental impacts of each use, their significance and range. On the basis of the information collected, the relationships were categorized, cross-referencing the different uses, and relating to the degree of possible or desirable synergy between them.
Sound and comprehensive data basis
The time needed to map compatibilities is quite lengthy. A significant amount of time and resources are needed for mapping compatibilities. Resources include finding the right people and the right information to make well founding assumptions about impacts. Lastly, there will always be those stakeholders who don't agree with some information presented in the compatibilities matrices. They should be presented as "draft" and open to revisions over time.
Electronic Observation Tool
Fishers and vessel managers worked with fisheries scientists and innovative software technicians in collaboration with government officials to design an electronic observation tool that could be installed like lego building blocks on vessels as money becomes available or needs change. The tool meets multiple needs - fishers (safety), business (history of effort and catch), government (compliance), public (transparency). When the snapper fishers began to realise that video cameras could provide the transparency they sought, they went out to providers around the world and invited people to show their products. After off-the-shelf commercial offerings for Vessel Monitoring Systems (VMS) and video monitoring (EM) were discounted because they didn’t have the required functionality (from a commercial perspective) or were too expensive, a decision was made to design and build a fully integrated suite of electronic monitors. Fishers wanted a system that used smart technology like automatic WIFI downloads, encrypted footage and ability for the viewer retrospectively to focus the camera on 3600 views.
• The shareholders of Trident Systems, an independent fisheries research provider, were looking for alternatives to human observers • SnapIT, a small start-up company had an exciting product and were looking to step up commercially • NZ government provided critical opportunities for the Trident EM system to be trialed against human observers • Financial support from government innovation and science seed funds • Willingness for Trident shareholders to invest in developing the technology
• Combining the expertise of fishers, fishery scientists and innovators • Working with government officials • Scientists are working alongside marine engineers and vessel managers to talk through ways to optimise the design of vessel rebuilds and on-board fish handling procedures so to better conduct research • To support fishers prepare for 24/7 video coverage on their vessels local leaders of the Federation of Commercial Fishers and the Ministry hosted fisher compliance training workshops
Mentoring national park staff
Local practitioners are equipped with technical expertise in project design and leadership skills: individually tailored trainings and mentoring are customised to fellows’ needs and ambitions, while group workshops focus on effective communication strategies, public speaking, negotiation and conflict resolution, advocacy and personal development.
NA
NA
Setting up a long-term research project
This collaboration between the Far East Russia Orca Project (FEROP) of Whale and Dolphin Conservation (WDC), the Russian Academy of Science and researchers from Moscow State and St. Petersburg State universities has focussed on the following research areas: Abundance and distribution, behavioural ecology of whales, dolphins and porpoises in Russian Far East waters, and how they inform conservation of these species.The funding for a multi-year study was obtained to train and enlist young Russian researchers in the study and conservation of these species.
The work in the various research areas has been presented in papers and popular articles, and other media. Building links with various local and national institutions in Russia through key researchers has been vital to our success.
It takes more years than originally envisioned to do the baseline studies and to get the quantity of data needed to progress to thinking about protection. Part of this is due to the logistics of working in the unpredictable conditions of the Russian Far East, but it's also because results from photo-ID and acoustic research techniques to indicate habitat require multiple years.
Submitting idea for a protected area to the CBD
Working with other species groups, sea turtles, sharks, seabirds; interviewing experts on the Dome and oceanography of the region; converting raw data on blue whales and other species into usable maps
We presented the work at European Cetacean Society and other conferences to gain feedback and support. We submitted it formally as a case study for a propose ecologically or biologically significant area (EBSA) to the CBD in 2009.
Once researchers understand the importance of their data, they are happier to share it, even if it is raw or unpublished data.