Co-production and building trust

It is not straight-forward to build trust. It can take time, skill, and resources, particularly finance and personnel. Nekton ensured that early engagement with the Government of Seychelles and Seychellois stakeholders began a year prior to the actual start of the Seychelles-Nekton field expedition. This allowed ample time to start building connections and relationships with the stakeholders and partners based in Seychelles. The Government of Seychelles gathered other locally based partners and stakeholders to build and frame a joint agenda of needs that would inform the research during the Seychelles-Nekton Expedition which took place in 2019. Co-production of the expedition included organising workshops to identify research locations, defining the pertinent research questions along with determining the stakeholders’ interest in leading specific projects.

  • Trust
  • Mutual respect
  • Flexibility in timelines
  • Time
  • Resources
  • Relationships are not easily created or maintained
  • Ample resources need to be allocated to effective and fruitful engagement
Workflow analysis, Partnership building, and Overall planning

Years of research and conservation practices have not only stressed the importance of biodiversity data but also revealed the flaws of current workflow, ranging from inefficient data management, lack of data integration, to limited public-accessible data applications. Moreover, such workflow is mainly man-powered and often involves a lot of repetitive work, taking up huge amount of conservationists’ time.

 

Following the rapid development of technology, we have gradually realized the potential of technology to bring solutions to our “pain points” for long. In order to utilize technology tools in places in most needs, a systematic review and analysis of the current workflow was conducted to identify bottlenecks with high priorities and the possible solutions. The contemplation began in May 2018 and was materialized starting from Jun 2019 after potential technical partners emerged. Based on the systematic workflow analysis and close partnership, we made a step-by-step plan, aiming at developing modules one by one, considering our limited resource and manpower (e.g., from community-based camera trap monitoring assistant app, to BiA tool, to citizen science data visualization platform, to camera trap data management system).    

  • A systematic review of current workflow and gap analysis that indicates where technology tools can help
  • Reliable and supportive technical partners (through trial and error)
  • An ambitious yet practical plan
  • Engaging various colleagues in the discussion of workflow and technical solutions is helpful to collect more valuable ideas.
  • Different technical companies have different work styles. Choose the ones that suit your work style and values. 
Biodiversity Impact Assessment Tool (BiA)

To enable automatic and instant biodiversity impact assessment enquiry, the BiA tool has been developed to facilitate enquiry services for land planners and other interested parties via Azure platform. The BiA tool works by overlaying the enquiry site or region (or existing construction projects) with multiple geographic layers including species distribution and protected area range to investigate if the site or region is within certain distance (e.g., 3 km, 5 km) from and may cause impact on endangered species habitat and/or protected areas. The assessment reports illustrate ecological and environmental risks of construction projects for decision-makers and could hopefully promotes them to take biodiversity into consideration.

 

A brief timeline of the BiA tool:

  • Apr-Jun 2020: team formation, requirement communication, system development plan
  • Jul-Sept 2020: tool development
  • Oct 2020: trial test, application and dissemination
  • (in preparation) Apr-Sept 2022: system upgrade
  • Years of data collection accumulation and constant thinking of data application approaches.
  • Theoretical & technical basis accumulated from long-term research and conservation practice.
  • Promotion of the BiA tool to its potential users, like governments, investors, and enterprise.
  • Keeping track of tool operation and user feedback to devise further upgrade of the tool.
  • Data application is the foremost step in the whole data workflow, where the data turns into valuable information for stakeholders. Effective data application reports should bear the audience in mind (e.g., being concise and focused).   
  • The complete of development and releasing is not the last step for a tool. Finding potential users and persuading them to use the tool is also very important. A tool has to be used to provide the most value.
Designing and Deploying Workflows

ArcGIS Online provides a secure and flexible framework for both deploying useful applications and integrating other conservation technology to holistically support workflows related to each initiative that is being implemented by a protected area. The foundation of all workflows includes tools for data collection such as mobile survey forms (Survey123), data visualisation (dashboards or web applications), analyses, and reporting. Additionally, the ArcGIS Living Atlas of the World gives you access to the foremost collection of geographic information from around the world to support your workflows, this includes the latest satellite imagery and products such as forest loss.

 

There are several pre-configured workflows for initiatives that can be unpacked and implemented immediately. These initiatives include:

  • Track Illegal Activity.
  • Monitor Wildlife.
  • Mitigate Wildlife Conflict.
  • Maintain Park Infrastructure.

The workflows are configurable and allows users to customise them based on their needs. Alternatively, organisations have access to all the necessary building blocks to develop entirely new workflows for their own initiatives e.g., a community outreach or public participation initiatives.

  • Listen to and work with the frontline practitioners to understand the problem and define the requirements before designing and deploying the workflow.
  • There are several configurable applications available on ArcGIS Online, understanding how they work and how they can link with each other is crucial in developing effective workflows.
  • Follow the design, deploy, operate, and review strategy to develop a workflow and maximise its impact.
  • Prototype and test before rolling out.
  • Establish essential procedures and guidelines.
  • Follow the best practices and trends.
  • Experience in ArcGIS is hugely beneficial, alternatively use implementation partners to make the process easier and effective.
  • Take advantage of the ArcGIS Community and online training resources.
ArcGIS Online

The Protected Area Management Solution and workflows are built using ArcGIS Online as the foundation. ArcGIS Online is a cloud-based mapping and analysis solution. It gives users access to workflow-specific apps, maps, and data from around the globe, and tools for being mobile in the field. Users can use it to make maps, analyse data, and to share and collaborate. Your data and maps are stored in a secure and private infrastructure and can be configured to meet your mapping and IT requirements.

 

  • Organisations can apply for low-cost access to ArcGIS Online through the Esri Conservation Program by filling out the Technology assistance application. Alternatively, licencing can be purchased through a local Esri Distributer.
  • ArcGIS Online is software-as-a-service (SaaS) cloud-based offering that requires an internet connection. However, tools are designed to work offline by default. Once surveys are downloaded, captured data will be saved in the device so it can be later synchronized.
  • ArcGIS Online allows you to create a great central destination for all your organisations monitoring data.
  • ArcGIS Online can be daunting to configure if you are unfamiliar with GIS.
  • There are rich resources for learning about ArcGIS Online, use them, especially the free Esri Training.
  • Great Esri Community Forum for ArcGIS Online where you can post questions.
  • There are several user types available based on the members’ needs and requirements. The user type determines the privileges that can be granted to the member. It is important to have a good understanding of which and how many user types your organisation needs.
  • Organise your members into well defined groups to organise activities and data access.
Establishing partnerships between research institutions and management authorities

The World Heritage Leadership Programme (WHLP) released an open call for applications for Research-Practice Teams interested in working on World Heritage management issues collaboratively in the experimental Heritage Place Lab. The Research-Practice Teams had to be composed of a group of researchers (2-4), and a  group of site managers (2-4). The research group could include faculty members, post-doctoral and graduate students, based in one or more research institutions, covering cultural heritage and/or natural heritage fields. The group of site managers could include 2-4 members involved in the management of one World Heritage property, which could belong to one or more institutions (managing authorities, municipality, community among others), and who were part of the World Heritage site management system. The WHLP encouraged Research-Practice Teams to work cross-regionally and in multi and interdisciplinary groups, including considering gender and intergenerational balance as priorities. Research-Practice Teams had to commit to working together for the duration of the Heritage Place Lab pilot phase and its follow-up activities, (including in between the 6 incubator online workshops).

- Existing World Heritage research and practice networks, particularly those connected to the WHLP, including those of Advisory Bodies to the World Heritage Convention: UNESCO Chairs, Universities Fora, ICOMOS International Scientific Committees, IUCN Commissions and Specialists Groups, and initiatives, like the ICOMOS-IUCN Connecting Practice Project, and the World Heritage Site Managers Forum; 

- Interest in applied research by site managers and researchers;

- Interest of heritage practitioners to connect intersectorally and internationally.

In the process of calling and consultations with potential Research-Practice Teams it became evident that the commitment to such a project would require:

- Institutional support from the side of research institutions and management authorities;

- Potential financial support for ensuring the commitment of both groups in a Team;

- Produce special incentives for researchers beyond financial, such as scientific publications;

- Produce concrete results that would be useful for the management authorities, such as the development of a research agenda that could be used in conjunction with management plans.

 

Regulatory Assurances

Before the critically endangered Pahrump poolfish could be translocated to an active groundwater well field in the heart of Las Vegas, the Las Vegas Valley Water District required regulatory assurances that normal operations would continue. Consequently, it took three years to ratify a-15 year Pahrump Poolfish Safe Harbor Agreement and associated Enhancement of Survival Permit with the US Fish and Wildlife Service.

Communication was the key enabling factor that served to alleviate fears from the several internal and external stakeholders.  Once the project was approved by the internal executive team, the regulatory portion of the project revolved around drafting a comprehensive legal document that listed in detail the covered activities, beneficial management activities, avoidance and mitigation measures, and responsibilities of both parties.

Although it took just three months to draft the Pahrump poolfish Safe Harbor Agreement, it took an additional three years for internal and external review by biologists, management, legal teams, and to receive unanimous approval from the Las Vegas Valley water District Board before the document was ratifed by both parties. 

Rewilding for restoring key species and their ecological roles in a degraded ecosystem

We developed the Iberá Rewilding Program, aimed at
re-establishing sustainable populations of all locally extirpated
fauna. These reintroductions are mainly aimed to advance ecological restoration instead of individual species endangered recovery. Also, focusing in the restoration of key species which effect in the ecosystem is stronger, we guarantee the restoration of their role and the recovery of a healthy and balanced ecosystem
 

- Planning, feasibility assessments and permits

-Source of animals

- Quarantine phase and hand-rearing 

 -Pre-release phase

-Release of individuals

- Individuals monitoring

- Reintroduced population monitoring and demographic evaluation

- Demographic assessment

- Communication and program evaluation
 

We recognize two main organizational strengths that have
helped us to achieve our rewilding results in Iberá: the availability of large areas of high-quality and well-protected habitat for
released animals (some of which were owned and managed by us),
and the existence of long-term funding that allowed us to work
for more than 10 years. These advantages are not always available
to reintroduction projects, which usually face difficulties in habitat
and funding availability.
 

One Health Assessment

To fully capture the intersecting health risks that the residential development of the land surrounding the cave would result in, a One Health assessment, an in-depth look at the intrinsic connections between the health of humans, animals, and the environment in the area, was carried out. Lead by EcoHealth Alliance, it highlighted the bats’ ecology and interactions with their environment, calling attention to the uniqueness of this colony and the various ways in which they would overlap with human residences. This report was utilized to mobilize a large coalition of concerned stakeholders – by shining a light on the risks humans would be facing, previously uninvested individuals were now joining the effort to prevent the development from moving forward. A One Health approach expanded the potential audience, generating more attention and funds, leading to success where a siloed approach would have failed.

A successful One Health Assessment was made possible by the expansion of concern beyond the issues captured in the standard assessment carried out for development. Siloed stakeholders were focused on human, animal, or environmental safety, but the recognition that these issues were stronger when considered together allowed a more comprehensive evaluation to take place.

Expanding the traditional impact assessment to include a One Health lens allows a more comprehensive understanding of both the potential risks a development poses, and the potential gains of preserving the land. When a natural system (and the wildlife it is home to) does not have enough social or financial value in and of itself to prevent human encroachment, highlighting the human health protections it provides may grant it the additional value needed to gain protection. The One Health approach calls attention to ecosystem services that have previously gone unrecognized such as disease regulation and spillover risk reduction. Additional services bats provide, such as pollination, seed dispersal, and vector control, provide further human health benefits that can also be factored into future assessments. A larger and more diverse group of stakeholders invested in protecting nature makes conservation efforts more achievable and successful.

Partnership Across Sectors

When it was announced that the Galo tract would be developed into a residential area it concerned parties from multiple sectors. Conservationists and bat scientists saw this plan as creating a human-wildlife conflict where there was not one previously, presenting threats to the health and wellbeing of both nature and the human populations. Local government, in particular City Council member Ron Nirenberg, had expressed concerns about the plan mainly focused on the nearby aquifer and the region’s drinking water. To fully assess the major trade-offs of the residential development plan, local government took the step of unifying diverse partners and their cross-cutting interests. By finding common ground in the end goal of preserving the area surrounding the Bracken Bat Cave, stakeholders from diverse sectors were able to transform their individual concerns into a large-scale mutual interest.

Though the group of stakeholders that came together to purchase the Galo tract, including groups with previously conflicting interests, had separate motivations, their openness to collaboration allowed them to find common ground. By recognizing their mutual interest and identifying where their concerns intersected a partnership was developed and a shared goal was achieved.

All stakeholders involved in this project had their own individual concerns with the residential development planned for the area surrounding the Bracken Bat Cave. While each issue, including but not limited to water safety, wildlife conservation, and human health risks, was troubling in and of itself, no lone stakeholder could create a strong enough case to prevent the development from moving forward. The local government recognized the value in collaboration and created a space for previously siloed sectors to come together. By developing partnerships where there were previously gaps, particularly between the environmental and human health sectors, the larger solution of purchasing the land and creating a preservation was made possible.