Partnerships for conservation

Additional manpower was provided by students from two institutions - the Seychelles Maritime and Seychelles Tourism Academies - on work-based attachments. A total of 10 students came to the island. They were extremely useful, taking the place of paying volunteers from the Conservation Boot Camp, which also collapsed in the wake of Covid-19 restrictions for travel. One of the students was eventually employed. Another budding partnership was formed with the Seychelles Coast Guard to whom the staff reported illegal fishing boats. And finally, once the government allowed for a resumption of ecotourism, partnering tour operators began to bring visitors back to Cousin Island.

  • Nature Seychelles’ training program already in place known as the “EnvironMentor” and a long-term relationship with the placing schools. Most of the staff on the island have come from these institutions
  • A long-term relationship with tour operators who have been bringing visitors to the island for decades

Trust built with tour operators over the years played an important role in the resumption of ecotourism, but new tour practitioners (small scale) have begun to come to the island probably as a result of diversifying incomes during and after the pandemic.

Availability of donor funding for salaries

Staff retention was made possible through the availability of the Rapid Response Grant to fund salaries. Cousin Island has been self-sustaining for many years before the pandemic. The donor funding helped to rectify the shortfall in financing experienced by the reserve due to the collapse of the tourism industry in Seychelles

  • A donor willing to fund salaries
  • Dedicated staff
  • The traditional sources of funding and other kinds of support dried out during Covid-19. This crisis was a red alert for the conservation of biodiversity. Conservationists must look for innovative kinds of support, learn many new things and do more with less, particularly by using disruptive technologies such as AI and drones or monetising virtual tourism experiences
  • We need to look for avenues for unrestricted income for recurrent conservation budgets outside of tourism. Notably in 2021, we worked with IUCN and Porini Foundation to launch the Seychelles Magpie Robin as the first nature collectible, an NFT for conservation to raise funds to conserve the species
Management planning (informed by assessments)

In the case of Sehlabathebe National Park, the analysis of the data and the priority actions for improvement  identified during the processes are feeding directly into the management plan for the area. This gives the outputs from the assessment more legitimacy, as they are 1) jointly identified by all relevant stakehodlers and 2) embedded in the formal government processes of managemen planning. The management plan can be used as a tool for resource mobilisation amongst donors and priority actions can then also be monitored through the monitoring of the management plan implementation.

  • Relevant data becomes available through the assessment process 
  • Analysis of the results can be completed during the workshop
  • EXisting planning processes allow formal uptake of results of the assessments
  • Communities expect immediate implementation of the plan, once they ahve shared their views and a joint analysis ahs identified priorities
  • The action plan needs resource mobilization for implementation and this should already be considered in the planning of the assessment - to at least implement the first few priorities.
PA Effectively manned - "The last band on the titanic"

The effective management of the Reserve depended on the willingness of core staff - 8 wardens and 1 science officer - to remain on the nature reserve despite the countrywide lockdown and restrictions. This staff chose to stay on the island to carry out MPA activities instead of being at home with their families. For context, Cousin Island is relatively remote. Staff live on the island without partners or families, and have the opportunity to get off the island over the weekend. However, during the Covid-19 lockdowns, their limited movement was further curtailed by restrictions.

  • Available donor funding to retain core staff
  • Committed staff
  • A committed team that goes beyond the call of duty is required to run an MPA. However, they must also be remunerated for their work
  • Management effectiveness can plummet depending on capacities to cope with extended periods of financial difficulties
  • We need to continue to safeguard strategic natural assets and the essential services they provide so that resilience is maintained to help us bounce back from crises
Data collection (IMET and SAGE)

The purpose was to  enhance knowledge on the assessment tools and to collect data for informed decisions. For the Intergrated Management Effectiveness Tool (IMET), this involves collecting comprehensive data on the ecological and management attributes of the park and for the Site Assessment on Governance and Equity (SAGE), it involves collecting data on the views and needs of all the stakeholders to facilitate a joint understanding of the governance and the key issues faced in governance of the site. This data is then collectively analysed and provides transparency for all stakeholders present as they have contributed to the data and the analysis. 

  • Description of the assessment tools at the start of the workshop, simplifying terminology into the local language 

  • Ensuring that participants understand the type of information required

  • Ensuring active participation from everybody

  • Duration of the workshop - long days discourage people to attend

  • Participants knowledge and active participation 

  • Participants availability for all sessions

  • Lack of data as a result of participants who did not show  up can hamper prorgess

  • IMET tool has some challenges when working offline and there is a need to cater for this in remote areas

  • Most participants were not familiar with biodiversity conservation terminologies and some time needs to be added to allow for some explanations first. 

  • Close integration with community members is vital - they feel important and provide all the information

  • There is need to probe some participants to get information

  • The tools need coaches knowledgeable about conducting the assessment

  • The assessment tools are giving insight information for improvement of the park management and identifies capacity building needs

Establish a scientific protocol based on the knowledge of local fishermen

When drawing up the study protocol, it is essential to make the most of local experience. Working in partnership with former holothurian fishermen facilitated site selection. Fishermen's testimonies were used to help organize the dives and determine the risks, so as to better anticipate them.

  • Contact with key players (fishermen, scientific experts, local authorities, etc.).

  • Open-mindedness and recognition of each player's expertise.

  • Networking to organize teams of licensed professional divers according to availability.

  • Mastering the organization of professional scuba dives at great depths (35 m - 45 m).

  • Build a protocol in line with the project and diver safety.

  • Be a good listener.

  • Reassure the fishermen of our intentions by clearly explaining the interest of our study in their lagoon.

  • Valuing the skills and knowledge of these elders.

  • Establish a relationship of respect and trust between all those involved in the project.

  • Try our best to provide scientific answers to their questions about past observations of the animal's behavior (migration according to lunar phase, etc.).

Identification of appropriate technology

Data collection is digitised using technological applications often selected to meet the needs of a particular project. In wildlife monitoring and protection, SMART for Conservation was identified as a suitable software for it provides a quick form to record incidents while tracking the distance covered by each team. Further, data collected in this manner needs to be used alongside other datasets for well informed decision making. To achieve this, an integration with Earthranger (an online visualization platform) was instituted to allow visual analysis of incidents and patrol coverage against other components such as tagged animals, live streaming images from security cameras, points of interest and environmental hazard reports.

  • Landscape-level collaboration - Learning from other players in the field to select technologies that have worked and can help in collaboration and sharing

  • Conservation Technology Laboratory - Existence of a technology development and trialing facility at the project site enhanced consultations with developers and other users. It was essential for conducting training, software configurations and system integration.

  • Knowledge of existing gaps - There was a clear understanding of gaps in data submission (time, geolocations and inconsistencies)

  • Team participation - Deliberate involvement of key staff members who have knowledge in the fieldwork designs, management needs and existing gaps is useful in pointing out technological needs.

  • Engagement of other organizations and people - It is important to learn from others who will indicate successful parts of the solution and associated shortfalls. These engagements would often help identify training needs, appropriate equipment and sustainability of the project

  • There is probably no fit-for-all solution - Application of identified technology/solution for data collection and/or analysis may need to be implemented together with other applications to enhance information management and sharing

  • Piloting before implementation - At the point of identification, it is useful to undertake a pilot rollout with a trial group if resources allow to gauge applicability and highlight potential pitfalls

Awareness and community outreach

The purpose of this building block is to ensure that the broader communities are involved in the conservation efforts through activities that they are passionate about i.e youth through sports, school children through reading programmes. This helps to improve the connectedness that the local people have with the rhinos and they value the rhino more. 

  • Organized youth groups and structures

  • Willing and welcoming community

  • Strong partner co-operation

Feedback meetings attended by conservancy leadership have proven to be an important communication tool to discuss objectives, challenges and ways to improve the monitoring programme. We have also implemented various projects to engage local communities through sports, reading programmes and youth clubs. Through awareness campaigns local people feel and realize the important role they play towards the conservation of rhinos.

Engaging and mobilizing local communities

IMET and SAPA assessments are community-based, participatory processes that require the involvement of local communities to ensure the quality of the assessment. To this end, prior to the start of the evaluation workshops and meetings, we worked with the site managers to identify all the stakeholders likely to hold information essential to the evaluation. All these stakeholders were informed from the outset of the planned action, of the various evaluation phases, the objectives pursued and expected results, and finally of the future use to be made of the results obtained. This information and involvement stage ensured that the local communities were fully on board and participated effectively in all stages of the evaluation.

Workshops and field meetings were planned and organized in collaboration with local village authorities.

All stakeholders were represented during the activities in order to gather their opinions.

Community workshops were facilitated in a lucrative approach in the local language to enable the effective participation of as many stakeholders as possible.

Evaluation questions were translated into expressive drawings to enhance community understanding.

The inclusion of local communities as key players in the assessment provided a true and faithful assessment of the protected area's management situation and the well-being of the communities.

Facilitating community workshops in the field in local languages attracted a high level of participation. This enabled all participants to clearly express their feelings about the management mechanism in place, the consequences for their well-being, and to propose approaches to alleviate their difficulties.

Several evaluation questions were translated into images to enable the local communities taking part in the community workshops, most of whom were illiterate, to understand the evaluation questions and respond appropriately.

Logistics and materials

Before responding to the call for projects, it is very important to draw up a list of the equipment available within the structure, and to check that it is in good working order. Then, a list of additional equipment needed to carry out the various activities must be discussed with the relevant people in the project. It is important to check whether the new equipment is available locally or externally, and in the latter case to take into account delivery times (sometimes several weeks or months) and additional costs. Next, it's very important to plan field activities according to weather conditions, and above all to adapt schedules very quickly.

  • Many items of equipment were already present and operational
  • New equipment had been purchased for other projects
  • Sufficient cash flow to be able to advance the cost of some equipment
  • logistical help from a number of local volunteers

As anticipated, it is not possible to carry out field work on the Saint-Pierre and Miquelon archipelago for several months (frozen ponds, for example). Consequently, it is essential to plan outdoor activities taking into account this major constraint, and to adapt the entire project accordingly. Once fieldwork is possible (6-7 months a year), you need to be ready and hyper-reactive to obtain the maximum amount of data.