An original, complementary and motivated consortium

From the outset, the aim was to set up a consortium that would bring together all the local stakeholders involved in nature management on the archipelago, as well as French metropolitan colleagues with expertise in a number of complementary fields: geography, fish biology. Given that only one technician is employed by the fishing federation (all other members are volunteers) and that the project's scientific leader does not live on site, it was crucial to recruit someone who would be responsible for running the project on site. This person was key throughout the project. In addition, we recruited a Master's student to support the CDD in the second year of the project.

  • Recruitment of a one-year fixed-term contract for the project, who worked locally.
  • Frequent exchanges between those involved locally and the scientific manager in mainland France.
  • Strong logistical support and involvement of FTP SPM throughout the project.
  • Student recruited for the project.
  • Excellent interaction between the local project leader and the scientific project leader in mainland France.
  • Rapid response from local stakeholders.

It is essential to form a complementary consortium from the outset, including people who are motivated by the project. Working on islands requires a high degree of adaptability and reactivity to carry out the various field operations, particularly on Saint-Pierre and Miquelon, where climatic conditions can change rapidly.

Key partnerships to share expertise and resources

In June 2019, RRFB started the first larval propagation project in Bonaire in collaboration with SECORE International. The goal of the partnership is to establish a technical cooperation in which RRFB provides local knowledge, manpower, field logistics, and a facility, and shares all field trial results, monitoring data, and qualitative feedback on methodologies and technologies provided by SECORE Int. In return, SECORE Int. provides techniques, methodologies, expertise and training sessions on larval propagation. This partnership's knowledge was crucial for successfully implementing larval propagation techniques in Bonaire. By consistently sharing results and lessons learned, the technique was improved, leading to greater success and scalability for future project replication.

  • The existence of a well developed and effective global network of scientists and practitioners willing to constructively share knowledge. 

  • A formalized partnership with well-defined roles and responsibilities.

  • The opportunity for and committment to scheduling regular virtual and in-person training sessions.

  • Having a shared vision and goals among partners.

  • Importance of scheduling regular meetings with partners before and after each major step of technique implementation to formalize results, feedback and lessons learnt.

Identifying facilitators and Assistant facilitators and identification of stakeholders for both trainings
  • Sensitization of the Ministry Management on the project for endorsement of the activities as the PA is managed by the government.
  • Identifying facilitators who are knowledgeable about the tools with assistance from IUCN as this was the first time the training were conducted and there was no expertise in the country. 
  • Identifying  assistant facilitators from the Ministry to assist with logistics and interpretation. Assistant facilitators, especially youth should also come from members of the community for them to feel free to provide information and feel the need to implement the findings together.
  • Stakeholders identification for each workshop training was based on the type of data to be collected. The target participants for SAGE training were mostly the local authorities (Chiefs, local council) and other structures  involved in decision making in biodiversity conservation related matters. The target participants for IMET were mostly technical people involved in conservation related issues. Line Ministries were engaged in the training workshop to provide technical expertise on conservation related activities outside PCAs in their respective departments and to agree on the working relations to link conservation inside and outside the PCA
  • Good stakeholder map available allowing informed selection of the relevant people for the assessments
  • Endorsement by the Ministry and Park management for support of the processes
  • Identify possible obstacles and solutions prior to the workshop

  • There is need to invite stakeholders on time to diarise and create time for their participation

  • Sometimes there is need to identify specific people who are involved in projects because they have information that is needed for the process. Ministries sometimes send participants who do not have that information.

  • Considering motivation for participants to keep them throughout the entire period of the workshop (some participants especially community members and the local authorities) 

  • Considering interviewing of the decision makers who are not able to attend the workshop at another time to ensure their input is part of the process.

Establishing information centers in Mangabe Reserve

The IMET evaluation of Mangabe Reserve in 2020 revealed weaknesses in infrastructure, capacity and communication that hamper effectiveness of the Reserve. Sustainability of the Reserve depends entirely on the capacity of the local communities to manage it. This is compounded by poor education levels of the population and difficult access to the villages. Over the past years, we have been bringing technicians from the towns to inform and train community members. It is now time to make this knowledge available locally so that youth who are better educated can access and use them as needed. Our challenge until 2030 is to establish an information center at each of the ten villages within Mangabe Reserve. In 2021, we started the initiative to build three information centers in three villages (Mangabe, Andranomandry, and Avolo) within the Mangabe Reserve. At the center, all community members will be able to obtain information about the Reserve and the existing regulations from one place. They will also be able to learn about improved farming techniques and read documents on financial management, personal development, etc. The center will represent the permanent presence of the Reserve that people will know and respect. As a result, we expect annual forest cover loss to decrease below 250ha from 2022.

  • Consult and collect the needs of local communities
  • Local communities give act of land endowment to build the information centers
  • Involve community members during the process of the building of information centers

 

To run information centers, we planned monthly events involving staffs from Ministry representatives and other guests to cover relevant topics for the local communities (importance of Protected Area, sustainable agriculture, health and hygiene…). Due to the delay in the building of information centers, acquisition and transport of equipment, and fieldwork missions, this objective was not achieved as planned. This led us to design an annual planning of the use of information centers. In 2022, the information center in Mangabe village was used for sewing and embroidery course for the women group, the information center in Andranomandry was dedicated for alphabetization course for adult people, and the information center in Avolo village was mainly used for community meetings.

Local communities have acquired the skills needed to collect seeds and produce seedlings for the ecological restoration of degraded sites.

The guide was printed and distributed in pdf version online and in physical version, both free of charge, during public restitutions and meetings with partners identified during the interviews (block 1).

It was also used as the basis for training courses in seed harvesting and seedling production for ecological restoration, for people who had shown a willingness to take action. Training courses were therefore offered in existing community nurseries experiencing difficulties, and in vocational training institutes such as agricultural high schools or adult training centers.

Organized over one or two days, these training courses enabled participants to discover existing outlets in ecological restoration (harvesters, producers, planters, those responsible for ecological monitoring), as well as to acquire theoretical and technical knowledge through hands-on workshops. Participants learned how to recognize the plant species around them, observe fruiting, collect and store correctly, draw up follow-up sheets, start production (semi, transplanting, cultivation), and set up a plantation.

The involvement of local communities in the project from the outset has ensured the success of the training courses. In addition, word of mouth reached people throughout the region.

In addition, satisfaction questionnaires were distributed at the end of each training session, enabling continuous improvement.

Technical workshops in the environment in which the participants evolve and wish to work are essential in this type of training. It is therefore necessary to travel to the trainees' homes to give them hands-on training. It is also necessary to give importance to the empirical knowledge of trainees, so that it is valued and shared with all training participants. By co-designing the workbook with tribal members, we were able to observe that participants took to the tool more easily.

The most enthusiastic participants were women, who see nurseries as an activity they enjoy and a means of economic emancipation, and young people, who don't have many prospects and don't want to move to the city to work.

Nevertheless, the binder lacks an "economic" section to give an idea of investment and return on investment, as well as a governmental structuring of the sector.

Engaging key stakeholders to update the management plan of Mangabe Protected Area

After obtaining the permanent status of the Mangabe Protected Area in 2015, the first management plan was developed and implemented. In August – December 2019, we already ran community consultations on what should be included in the new management plan. In 2021, we ran three workshops to update the management plan. The first workshop involved MV team members and the regional representatives of the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development. The aim of this workshop was to write the updated management plan and to prepare the following workshops. Following the protected area management law, the updated management plan was presented, discussed and approved at regional level on 19-20th August 2021 involving regional and local authorities. In the end, Madagasikara Voakajy team made relevant changes according to the feedback received. Then, to comply with the law, the management plan was validated at the national level during a meeting of the protected area management committee on 22nd October 2021. The updated management plan includes the valorization of natural resources and improvement of human well-being. After doing relevant changes from participants ’feedbacks, the updated Mangabe management plan was ready to share with relevant authorities on January 2022.

To update the management plan, active participation of all stakeholders is the main key enabling factor for this building block. All communities and stakeholders (regional and national) were involved in developing the management plan. All their inputs and feedbacks were considered and included in the updated management plan.

The update of Mangabe management plan made us reflect on having sufficient data. For instance, regarding social data, we did not have the trends of the population numbers living around the Protected Area. We also did not monitor other social aspects including health and schools. Even though our teams go to the field regularly, there is a lack of data for mapping such as rivers, villages, and trails. This serves us as lessons to create a database on social, economic, and ecological aspects when the five year management plan is over. The management plan plays an important role when seeking funds to implement the activities and it is also a reference tool for assessment.

Establish nurseries

We established 5 nurseries in the network of opened channels and raised 5600 propagules, mostly red mangroves but also black mangroves. Recently we have studied the white mangroves to assess their importance and have done a pilot on white mangrove propagation. Most of these propagules grew out into healthy saplings and have been outplanted in 5 events. Afterwards, the outplants have been monitored by interns. A successful nursery will increase mangrove plants available for reforestation efforts, emphasizing the need for an ecosystem-based approach to building resilience on the island.

 

  • Volunteers took charge of this part of the restoration work.

  • Propagules availability.

  • Availability and easy access to viable locations for nurseries.

  • Raising black mangroves would not survive prolonged inundation and effective adjustments could be taken.

  • Different seasons allowed for different availability of propagules per species - but propagules of red mangroves were available throughout the year. In the season of the black mangroves, we focused on this species to have a good stock of black mangrove saplings. White mangroves preferred a land bases nursery.

  • Pots and plastic planting bags were used initially. They were expensive and needed additional handling of the saplings. In a later stage, we started to use biodegradable bags that could be left in place when the saplings were planted.

Effective communication

An excellent communication plan/network with different stakeholders was initiated across different levels. From the inception of the project, the community and other stakeholders were constantly capacitated on how the project is going. A relay of relevant vulture conservation and policy issues was achieved to the target stakeholders within the communities and KAZA TFCA.

Through strong relations established, the project implementers were flexible to engage with different stakeholders at different levels. This would include the arrangement of informal meetings and the use of local language to target different audiences. Social media, distribution of communication material and the power of face-to-face meetings enabled the implementer to reach grassroots levels.

Take advantage of social media platforms and share your story and journey with the whole world.

Face-to-face meetings are a powerful tool for effective communication and enable the project implementers to relay the relevant vulture conservation and policy issues to the target stakeholders within the KAZA TFCA.

A binder of technical data sheets adapted to local populations is created and distributed

Among the solutions identified, the data sheet guide was a priority tool, to bring together all the knowledge in a popularized, easy-to-use work that could be accessed by all. It was therefore necessary to collect all species data, images of each phenological stage and production data. It was also necessary to select a suitable range of species.

This guide was developed in collaboration with the tribal beneficiaries. Through workshops, participants contributed their user perspective on a first version of the product. These workshops provided an opportunity to discuss the format (modular binder), design (font and colors) and paper, as well as the content (vernacular names, choice of species, specific needs).

The final version was then circulated to the technical experts for review and validation before being sent to print.

Much of the information was available from the agronomy research institute and professional nurseries, who agreed to share their knowledge.

The involvement of beneficiaries on a voluntary basis was of paramount importance, in order to integrate their empirical knowledge of the field into the guide.

The availability of local experts capable of reviewing, correcting and validating all the information was also essential.

Gathering and reporting information is a very important and time-consuming task. This time should not be neglected when setting up a project.

In addition, local and empirical knowledge is often neglected, yet it contributes a great deal.

Finally, the workshops revealed that:

  • the guide must be in binder format, modular, with resistant, waterproof paper for outdoor use in the field;
  • species must be accessible close to homes, and be fast-growing so that satisfactory results can be observed over a short period;
  • specific needs must be taken into account, such as harvesting sheets, production sheets and sales sheets. If possible, a checkbox format should be used.

Finally, it can sometimes be difficult to get all the players to agree on plant production methods. Flexibility solutions should be proposed, such as modifying the sheets by hand if necessary.

Restore water circulation in the mangrove forest.

The water in the mangrove forest needs to refresh and be of good quality (salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH) in order for the mangroves and the organisms that are part of the mangrove habitat to flourish, like fish, sponges, anemones and mangrove oysters. The force behind the water circulation is the tidal flow; there is no river feeding the mangroves. The water moves through the roots as sheet flow, the channels and the lagoons. The growth of roots and accumulation of sediments reduce the capacity of the system to bring water in a timely fashion to all parts of the mangrove forest - especially the part farthest removed from the open ocean is most under stress.

 

  • Knowledge from fishermen helped locate the historical channels.

  • Hydrological studies executed before and during the execution of the project helped decision-making on priority channels, setting their dimensions.

  • A good group of volunteers was able to assist in the work that was executed manually.

  • Use of mechanical equipment was not possible.