Formation of community groups and training
Formation of community groups and training in resource management and alternative livelihoods. Under the project, herders formed community groups of 10 to 15 members. These groups were given training as well as financial support in the form of small loans and grants to support the groups’ sustainable management of resources and diversify herders’ livelihoods. 64 herder communities were officially registered and issued with community certificates.
Approach of the project to establish necessary systemic and institutional set up for supporting herder groups, rather than focusing only at site level support, including: National government level – policy and legal framework; Aimag level – political support and practical direction in implementing strategies; soum level – practical support of the community groups; local community level – embracement of the issues and eagerness to respond positively).
Behavioural and Attitudinal Change. The combined result of trainings, establishment of information centres, successful linkages with museums and local stakeholders, and the institution of social mobilisers, signboards, and field-monitoring visits has contributed significantly to changing people's mind set and behaviour. In order to promote gender balance, the project invited men and women in all events. Moreover, special trainings such as wool and felt production and dairy product making were organized for women. 12 different trainings were conducted such as CBNRM, community internal rights, and pasture management.
Participatory methodologies
The "Communication Collective Puja" was created through training workshops and laboratories to encourage community participation in land use planning processes of the municipality of Nuquí. During the Collective’s creation, formulation of the management plan in the region began, which was documented from the very beginning by the work of the Communication Collective. Young people from communities, having been previously trained, dedicated themselves to the video production process, interviews with participants and audios for the local radio. This made possible that the community participated in the process. The dissemination of the agreements of the process and the views of the community generated more interest, and people came to places where activities were being conducted and got involved in the dynamics. With camera, video and audio recorder in hand, the Collective made possible that opinions were shared and that the process was presented in a dynamic and participatory manner. A growing enthusiasm and community participation were the results of the process, which included other community issues, such as medical assistance and flooding.
The existence of a trained group of young people from the community made possible that the Collective had access to the community, without difficulties or reservations. Having an active process (the development of the management plan) that was of interest to the community helped the process of communication and the participation of a large number of people. The local radio station could reach all communities and disseminate notes and comments produced by the Collective.
The design of a community communication strategy relies heavily on the existence of a real scenario and context in which the strategy will be developed and implemented. When communication is focused only as a theoretical exercise, it loses its reason for being, loses its justification and usefulness. The Communication Collective has been a successful example because it has grown together with exercises of collective construction that the community identified as relevant (such as the Management Plan). The Collective is an effective way to promote community participation and disseminate the achievements of the process. It was a success factor that technical support teams and communities developed strategies, scenarios and dynamics of knowledge and experience exchange before starting the intervention
Community awareness of the impacts of poor waste management
An education and outreach programme (e.g. community theatre, radio campaign, community events) is implemented to raise awareness of waste management, stimulate initial dialogue and influence attitude and behaviour changes. Community theatre is a very successful tool to achieve this. Up to 5 members of the community are trained as data collectors and spend a week interviewing citizens and key stakeholders in order to collect ‘data’ on attitudes, behaviors and perceptions towards waste management Data are analyzed and translated into a series of storylines. A second group of citizens (up to 15) are trained as ‘artists’ and participate in a week of training (story-telling, role playing and scripting) and rehearsals. At the end of the week the theatre performance takes place. At critical points in the performance, an MC invites the audience to ask questions, exchange ideas and experiences, and debate solutions to waste management challenges. The community theatre is followed up with practical outreach activities such as beach clean-ups to introduce the concept of the four R’s (refuse, reduce, reuse, recycle). Village leaders are encouraged to take part in practical activities to promote good governance and strong leadership.
Community participation, support from village level government, financial resources
Storylines created in community theatre projects will often touch upon the issue of weak governance. It is important that the MC of the final performance is skilled in managing the debate otherwise it can lead to a situation where leaders feel their position is being undermined. Debates can also be quite divisive with many opposing views so a skilled MC should be able to provide a platform for citizens to speak out while facilitating constructive dialogue. The MC should maintain a neutral and balanced position so that the views of citizens are upheld rather than the views of the MC himself.
Conservation targets
All species, habitats, ecosystems and ecosystem services with conservation value (e.g. IUCN Red List, national biodiversity plans, etc.) are being listed. Then, a technical committee, ideally composed of Parks staff, NGOs, Universities and researchers, is formed. Gorgona National Park adopted as conservation targets 6 coastal and marine ecosystem, and 22 species; those targets are also fully considered in the climate smart conservation process, by including them into the technical assessments and climate adaptation planning.
• Close collaboration between different sectors.
The best way to start mainstreaming climate change into conservation planning was to select conservation targets in accordance with considerations in the climate adaptation planning. Conservation targets included habitats/species and ecosystem services from a conservation view point that are critical in the future because of their functionality and resilience in the face of increasing climate and non-climate pressures.
Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities
The PNNG has generated a close relationship with the communities living around the park where it has been promoted as the medium that makes possible not only the existence of protected areas in the country, but also “territories of life” for communities. We have been working to consolidate work spaces such as the Uramba Agreement, Mesa de Pesca, Agreement of Use. All of them with the intention to make possible the recognition of the importance of the area of influence. The partnership between the Park and the Guapi Community is articulated through a Local Board, created on the basis of the Yanaconas Agreement (2002); which was evaluated in 2009 and the Uramba Agreement was signed, reaffirming the strategy of engagement with black communities of the Pacific with the aim to unite efforts for the conservation of natural and cultural heritage of the Colombian Pacific. The Uramba agreement defines a common agenda; all levels of planning and implementation represented in sub-regional and regional work tables, including an operating crew formed with Park and communities representatives.
Resources to implement actions in the framework of agreements that contribute to the conservation ofSanquianga – Gorgona sub-region
It should be a limited number of stakeholders who can access the benefits, need for a consolidated of rules of use before signing the Agreement for entering into aspects of monitoring and commitments of the parties.
Engaging citizens to control the spread of invasive species
Invasive species in Amboseli, Tsavo and Nakuru NPs had covered large areas of wildlife habitat, displaced native biodiversity, reduced favorable forage, affected wildlife distribution and lessened visitor enjoyment. In each park, KWS staff worked with local people and other scientists to identify invasive species, their impact on wildlife, strategies for early detection, and mechanisms for control and eradication. Special focus was given to species that were growing fast, breeding profusely, dispersing widely and outgrowing native species. Areas of heavy infestation were mapped and divided into blocks to enable systematic control. Mechanical removal was preferred over chemical-based eradication to minimize risks to non-target species. KWS organized volunteer groups from local institutions and communities to mechanically uproot invasive plants from designated areas. In some cases local people were hired to work in difficult areas. The uprooted trash was either burnt in abandoned quarries or buried to prevent re-invasion. Plots were revisited for three growing seasons and regrowth removed.
• Many citizen groups showed willingness to participate in the eradication of invasive species • There was plenty of local labor for mechanical control, a labor intensive method. • A good understanding of the impact of invasive species existed at individual and community levels • Traditional and expert knowledge was available for identifying invasive species and their impacts • Sufficient funding was available to purchase the required implements, pay casual workers when necessary and to support logistics
• Re-invasion was observed and complete eradication was only possible after three consecutive mechanical removal sessions spanning several growing seasons. • Herbivores were immediately able to utilize cleared areas, but large predators were disadvantaged as stalking prey was more difficult in more open areas. • Disposal of uprooted biomass can pose a significant challenge and should be planned for in advance • Understanding the cause and mechanism of invasion can help in the eradication or containment of invasive species • Providing free park entry to volunteers can be an initial incentive for volunteers to participate in invasive species control • Communicating the success and challenges of invasive species control can attract additional support from stakeholders and donors.
Creating a Theory of Change Model with Your Team
Before creating the contracts, a conceptual model and results chain was created. This model clearly outlines how actions will result in addressing the identified threats, and what indicators will be used to monitor the progress towards goals. This is the fundamental step in creating a solid model that clearly addresses threats and identifies how the actions will affect change.
It was important to have a team with experience in creating conceptual models and who valued the importance of the conservation planning process. The team enjoyed the freedom to discuss and come up with a new model specific to the threats and context, without having to follow a rigid or prescriptive plan from the start. A collaborative work environment that enabled brainstorming and open discussion was a key enabling factor for this building block.
At the time of creating the model, the ideas were discussed but were not put into the conceptual model program (Miradi) or mapped out visually. However, it’s recommended that the model be discussed using visual cues, either paper placed walls to indicate different elements of the model or a computer-generated model. Visual cues can help people better understand and imagine the model and discuss the intricacies of the theory of change.
Education and awareness
The environmental education program promotes social awareness about the importance of ecosystems goods and environmental services.The educational project in the village school integrates an emphasis on ethno hydro-biological resources
Create cooperation opportunities between educational institutions and community groups to promote the environmental education strategy with emphasis on hydro-biological resources and its management. Generate communication tools to support the process
The cooperation between the park and the school has facilitated our conservation efforts and the recognition of the importance of maintaining the existing ecosystems
Restoration of degraded habitats
Restoring degraded habitats aimed to enhance ecosystem resilience in five key national parks that collectively provide ecosystem services to more than half of Kenya’s population and rank among the top ten tourist destinations in the country. Restoration focused on areas already earmarked for rehabilitation in park management plans. Exclosure blocks approximately 100 ha in degraded areas were fenced off using solar powered electric fences to exclude wildlife and allow regeneration. Fence structure and design were based on site-specific conditions and the level of risk of damage by large herbivores. Seedlings from native species were provided by KWS, the local communities or purchased from the Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI) and planted within the exclosures to supplement natural regeneration. At least one modern tree nursery was established within each park and where possible, in the neighboring community areas to support long-term supply of seedlings. Interpretive signs were displayed at restored sites for public information. Game viewing tracks were extended to some of such areas to showcase the benefits of restoration.
• Initiatives were supported by the Kenyan constitution and the country’s climate change strategy • Outcomes of various ecological restoration experiments were available in project areas • Funding was available for training, purchase of required facilities and to support project management • Diverse expertise was available to carry out specialized tasks • Communities and diverse sectors of the society, including the private sector were willing to participate in ecological restoration • KWS was able to reach out to and engage diverse community and citizen groups
• It is much easier to get support for ecological restoration when causes of degradation are well understood and the need for intervention incorporated in national park management plans • Ecological restoration can be an expensive undertaking requiring planning, diverse resources and specialized skills for extended periods • Some restoration methods such as those using electric fences may require specialized training for post project maintenance • Participating in ecological restoration can provide people with the opportunity to experience and connect with nature and to discover the many benefits of protected areas. • A champion to rally and inspire people to embrace ecological restoration may be necessary given the many competing societal priorities. • Communities can contribute specialized skills, resources, free labor and other support if they are made aware of the benefits of ecological restoration
Creating Simple Conservation Contracts with Communities
The project used one very simple and clear contract to lay out the benefits each community and family member would earn as a result of their conservation efforts. The contracts were about one page long and were written in an easy language for villagers to understand, with prices for wildlife sightings clearly written for everyone to see. Approval by the village chief alone—a convenient and traditional protocol—was avoided because of the underlying premise of the model that all potential hunters need to be included equally in sharing benefits and responsibilities. The contracts were, instead, signed by a representative from every family in each community to ensure that everyone understood their potential benefits and required commitment. The contract was also not simply read out loud in each community, but instead there was a question and answer session to gauge villagers’ understanding and help them visualize the system.
Protected area, district and provincial officials supported the concept and allowed the contract to be made in this non-traditional fashion because of their interest in conservation. Meetings with district and village officials were made prior to introducing the contracts to the communities in order to make the contracts understandable and fair from a local perspective, while making a more efficient process for approval in the villages.
Creating the concept required holding separate meetings with each different stakeholder group. The first step in creating the contracts was outlining the main points, which was done internally with key project staff who understood the situation and were committed to the overall goals of the project. Once the outline was created, a more detailed draft contract was presented to government counterparts who worked closely with the project. After that, it was presented to other government and village officials who worked with the project, but not as closely, for their input. It was important to start like this rather than including all stakeholders together in one meeting because of the newness of the concept and the need to present a solid and comprehensible draft to those less familiar with the project.