Governance Beyond Borders

The Amazonian border integration initiative known as the Tri-National Program, was promoted by the Administrators of three protected areas (The La Paya National Park-Colombia, the Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve-Ecuador, and the Güeppí National Park-Peru), enabling a management optimization under a regionally coordinated model.

It all started in 2005 as a result of the dialogue efforts carried on by the representatives of the three Protected Areas. In 2006 the initiative was consolidated as the Tri-National Program, since then it has continuously been strengthened over time.

The first important decision towards financial support for the initiative, was sought trough an agreement among the environmental funds available in each of the three participating countries. Afterwards, additional financial support was pursued through several projects that could cover the expenses of priority lines such as protected and buffer area’s management, social participation, organizational capacity improvement and the conservation corridor´s enhancement.

In this context, the Goverments united to seek operational, technical and financial mechanisms to ensure the conservation and sustainable development of the Corridor, with the ambition of becoming a successful pilot experience of transboundary management.

  • A shared vision among the three protected areas to solve similar issues in the border region.
  • Well defined structure of the Program under specific management guidelines, with a Coordinating Committee (three national authorities representing each of the Protected Areas National Systems) a Technical Committee (Head Managers of the three Protected Areas,) and a Technical Secretariat (rotating headquarters every two years among the three environmental authorities).
  • Procurement of technical and financial support from cooperation agencies.

The program’s institutional background was strengthened thanks to a strong structure comprised of: The Coordinating Committee; The Technical Committee; and, The Technical Secretariat. Furthermore, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed by the parties which provided a clear guideline for the job ahead.

Thanks to the technical and financial support gained, several coordinated actions were carried out to increase the functionality and management capabilities of the three areas. In Cuyabeno, guarding posts were repaired and equipped, and the Monitoring and Vigilance Program was consolidated as part of the Area’s Management Plan; later this was articulated with the park ranger’s work in all three Areas to effectively monitor strategic conservation spots inside the protected areas, buffer zones, and borders.

In regards of social participation for sustainable management, the work was aimed to strengthen the organic coffee and fine aromatic cocoa productivity chain and communitarian tourism innitiatives.

Co-Management Between Indigenous Communities and the Government

One of the great challenges for the Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve was the consolidation of its boundaries and securing management agreements with the local populations and indigenous organizations. Under the previous logic of integrating cultural variables in the national preservation process, the project “Delimitation of the lower region, conflict resolution, and awareness of the communities about the resource management and use in the Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve” was successfully created.

The project main goal was to preserve the biological and cultural integrity of the Reserve under a strong alliance between the MAE and the indigenous communities that inhabit and coexisted in the territory: Siona, Secoya, Cofán, Kicwa, and Shuar.

As a result, in 1995 began the process of establishing Natural Resources Use and Management Agreements with most of the communities in these five indigenous nations. Such efforts promoted local participation and the recognition of the Protected Area for shared management.

The agreements became formal documents that legitimized the communities’ right to live in the Reserve and use the natural resources within under special conditions.

 

  • Empowering the indigenous organizations to actively participate in the protected area.
  • Negotiation strategies between the indigenous organizations and the Government, in order to establish the Use and Management Agreements.
  • MAE’s openness to participatory planning processes.
  • Promotion of the sustainable use of natural resources within the protected area.
  • Acknowledgment by the local communities of the protected area’s relevance: environmental, cultural, social, and economic importance.

The Use and Management Agreements include the following: Community Management Plans, Operational Plans and a Compliance Monitoring System. The Community Management Plans are valid for ten years and can be renewed.

The Community Management Plans were built as internal agreements by and for the community in accordance with: The regulations for natural resources use in communal spaces issued by the Reserve; The current status of use of such resources; and the rights of the indigenous communities. As a result of the previous, the boundaries of the Protected Area and the communities territories were consolidated.

Furthermore, spaces for discussion have been created in order to deal with convergent and divergent points of view that include the indigenous and governmental visions about the territory, its conservation, and sustainable management.

The co-management of the area between the MAE and indigenous organizations, achieved an important result: The ending of new settler’s arrivals to indigenous territories as well as the colonization/expansion of the local communities into the Reserve.

Law on Urban Agriculture for the city of São Paulo

CITIES WITHOUT HUNGER contributed to the passage of a bill on urban agriculture in São Paulo in 2004 (Lei 13.727, de 12 de Janeiro de 2004). By this law, the institutional and legal framework for urban agriculture in São Paulo was created. 

Hans Dieter Temp, founder of CITIES WITHOUT HUNGER, made an effort to push for the implementation of that law, i. a. going to Brasília to support his case. 

The key lesson learnt here is that a well-functioning and transparent communicative connection with governmental institutions is crucial for achieving far-reaching goals of urban planning. The need for urban agriculture projects, though, was recognised by citizens at a local level, whereas the city administration had not realised such action on their own account. 

Stakeholder participation and partnership

Partnerships and collaboration between different public bodies is necessary for the development and implementation of activities.

Furthermore, public participation is required for the development of a Land Use Plan and is also part of the implementation of green strategies aimed at improving air quality and buffering heat stress. For example, a scheme has been in place since 1992 for Stuttgart residents to  adopt a tree, for which they are also responsible for.

Having a mayor who supports green activities, relevant legislation and strategies, and in-house research facilities can help ensure cross-sectional collaboration.

Partnerships between the City of Stuttgart and the Verband Region Stuttgart (the association of regional cities and municipalities) enabled the creation of the 2008 Climate Atlas.

Furthermore, thanks to close collaboration between the Office for Environmental Protection (analysis of information, provision of recommendations) and the City Planning and Renewal team, the recommended green infrastructure solutions are being implemented through spatial planning and development control.

Advocacy for EbA/Eco-DRR in marine protected areas

Designing Marine protected areas help protect ecosystems so that they can provide their multiple services such as coastal protection and food sources.

 

The project supported the case for the declaration of Port Salut as one of the MPAs, by making baseline data available on the diversity and status of coastal and marine ecosystems in the area and emphasizing the multiple benefits of protecting these ecosystems, in particular for disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. The protected area of managed resources of Port Salut/Aquin now covers 87,422 hectares of the coastal zone of Port Salut Municipality.

Having field activities serve as an entry point to promote ecosystem-based activities within the framework of marine protected areas and coastal governance at the national level and raise national awareness of coastal and marine issues.

Before 2013, Haiti was the only Caribbean country without Marine Protected Areas (MPA). UNEP leveraged on initial governmental discussions that had taken place while the project was being conceptualised and supported the Government of Haiti to finalize the designation of marine protected areas in Haiti, and provided technical assistance to the Government to draft the MPA declaration. In 2013 the Government of Haiti declared the country’s first nine marine protected areas including the coastal zone of Port Salut - with the objective to “maintain biodiversity, while responding to the needs of the communities that depend on these natural systems”.

Capacity building for improved coastal management

Capacity building activities included:

  • Awareness raising
  • Trainings and workshops
  • Hands-on learning activities at the field sites
  • Supporting improved municipal coordination
  • field visits and study tours with government and other partners

 

 The project focused on re-enforcing the capacities of actors on the ground (local community-based organizations as well as capacities of the Municipal Government), to implement ecosystem-based interventions and therefore much was "learning-by-doing".

 

The project also aimed to strengthen coastal governance at the municipal level and capacity for sustainable coastal zone management through the creation of a Municipal Coordination Roundtable, trainings and support.

 

At the national level capacity building efforts were directed at raising national awareness of the importance of the ridge-to-reef approach to disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation and need for sustainable coastal zone management.

Working with community-based organizations cements on the ground training in these practical field interventions and their maintenance.

 

Furthermore, having field activities serve as an entry point to promote ecosystem-based activities within the framework coastal governance at the national level and raise national awareness of coastal and marine issues.

The limited technical capacities and resources at the municipal level was a challenge. Introducing participatory dialogue through the Municipal Coordination Roundtable, was helpful, especially for civil society organizations, which gained a more direct access and involvement in municipal planning and decision-making. It also enabled the Municipal Government to take on a more visible role in coastal zone management. However, absences and turnovers in Municipal Government also made it difficult to anchor training efforts and build long-lasting capacity within local government institutions. One lesson learned from the project was to work closely with the more permanent, technical Municipal Government staff and strengthen their capacities and ownership of the project. In addition, UNEP built partnerships and agreements with different Government entities to manage local political instability and lack of continuity.

Local and national capacity building

The project invested significantly in capacity building at the local and nation level through awareness raising on EbA/Eco-DRR, hands on field learning activities and training workshops. The project ensured that women were among those trained in all activities.

Local capacity building targeted mainly the five villages where the interventions took place but also involved representatives from villages who were involved in up-scaling the project interventions to a larger area of the wadi in the upstream section.  Awareness raising promote dialogue on dryland ecosystems and disaster risk management issues. 

 

Farm extension agents (2 in each village) were trained due to limited presence of the Government in the villages to provide agricultural extension support services. Moreover, eight community animal health workers also referred to as “paravets”, were trained on animal husbandry, treatment, animal drugs, feeding, and vaccination, through theoretical and practical sessions. The "paravets" also monitored the re-seeded pasture areas.

 

A national and a state-level training on Eco-DRR were also undertaken.

The major portion of capacity building took place in the field, as part of “learning by doing” through implementation of field interventions such as nursery establishment and management, rangeland re-seeding, and reforestation.

Local capacity-building trainings provided to communities improve the chances of continuity in the management of field interventions.

 

The State-level workshop initiated a series of dialogues in North Darfur on the importance of establishing a forum that serves as a platform for natural resource management that is both inclusive and conscious of water-related hazards.  Undertaking such trainings at the national and state-level, help mainstream ecosystem-based measures in national policies and programmes. Indeed IWRM was identified as a key measure to reducing disaster risks and adapting to climate change and weather extremes, which was reflected in the National Agenda for Action which was the main output of the national training.

Building partnerships and community engagement

Building strong partnerships at the local and national level and working with the local community is essential for the implementation and overall success and sustainability of the project.

Furthermore it was essential to connect the local communities to government bodies and ensure the state takes joint ownership of the activities so that any future support that is needed can be sought from the government.

UNEP had strong longstanding partnerships (with local stakeholders and local and national implementing partners)  in place in the project area. 

In a fragile context like in Sudan, having long standing partnerships are vital for the success of the project. 

 

During implementation of community based activities it was learned that community level projects must make it least demanding of time and energy from community members, and ensure the right timing of activities to match communities’ schedule, as project activities generally require voluntary work.

Moreover, when communities see clear evidence of the benefits of the interventions, they then become more willing to implement and continue with similar activities on their own in the future. Interventions that show less direct livelihood benefits require good dialogue and awareness raising campaigns.

 

 

 

Supporting national advocacy on ecosystem-based measures

To support the Government of DRC in its national transition towards IWRM a Roadmap was developed to guide the development of a National Water Policy. The Roadmap outlines the principal orientation and necessary steps in the elaboration of the National Water Policy, the principal stakeholders involved, an initial work plan, and a fund mobilization strategy. DRR is also highlighted in the Roadmap as a priority theme along with capacity building and cross-sectoral coordination. This Roadmap is influenced by the IWRM experience in Lukaya and makes specific reference to DRR and the role of local communities in IWRM.

 

A National working group on Eco-DRR was also formed at the demand of the Government, who had interest in establishing a National Platform on DRR.

National dialogue was sparked on Eco-DRR through the field demonstrations, the workshops and trainings.

The project’s success in raising awareness on Eco-DRR in the country was evidenced when the Government of DRC took the initiative to promote ecosystem-based approaches during preparatory discussions on the post-2015 global framework on DRR, now the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030). The Government of DRC has taken full ownership of promoting Eco-DRR approaches through IWRM.

Capacity building

As this was DRC’s first experience in applying both the Eco-DRR, as well as IWRM approach, it was critically important to progressively develop and strengthen capacities over time, which involved:

 

  • Awareness-raising;
  • training and workshops;
  • Hands-on learning activities in the field demonstration sites;
  • Field visits and study tours both in the country and in the region.

 

There was a total of 71 trainings and workshops. These covered general meetings (inception and presentation); national awareness raising workshops on Eco-DRR and IWRM; workshops related to IWRM, the role of Eco-DRR in IWRM and action planning; trainings on hydro-meteorological monitoring, soil erosion monitoring and flood risk modelling; training on agroforestry and value chain production; and trainings on soil loss monitoring and bioengineering to reduce soil erosion.

The project emphasized the importance of linking the local group AUBR/L with the relevant National Government ministries and other partners, whose capacity was also built so that the work is sustainable over time.

 

The project also created new partnerships, which facilitated study tours in the country and in the region.

A major portion of capacity building took place in the field, as part of “learning-by-doing” through implementation of the field interventions. While these were intended to support field interventions, they were also designed to establish locally-managed systems that would be long lasting. Therefore, trainings were added also according to needs identified during the implementation of the project. For example, it was identified that capacity needed to be established also on how to sell produce from agroforestry (not just on how to implement agroforestry) and on bushfire management after a fire destroyed a reforestation site.