Intergovernmental Collaboration at the Groundwater Basin Level

Even though the national law does not cover the groundwater system, the groundwater management has been governed through a series of ordinances, comprehensive plans, and action plans for more than 40 years. Groundwater Preservation Ordinances was established in 1977 for Kumamoto City and in 2001 for Kumamoto Prefecture. The city and prefecture governments jointly developed a comprehensive plan to control groundwater in 1996, incorporating collective input from 17 municipalities in the catchment area into the plan. Later, a second version of the plan in 2008 was developed by the group of 15 municipalities in the catchment, identifying four prioritized areas: 1) improvement of the balance of inflow and outflow of groundwater, 2) protection and improvement the quality of groundwater, 3) raising awareness of citizens for the conservation of groundwater, and 4) establishment of a common goal among stakeholders. A detailed five-year action plan was also developed the following year in order to implement mitigation measures in a timely manner. 

  • Intergovernmental collaboration at the basin level for groundwater management

Given the characteristics of groundwater, governance of groundwater management system requires intergovernmental cooperation at the basin level and their long-term commitment to the conservation activities. Moreover, region-wide plans should cover multifaceted aspects of groundwater management, including flood management, water utilization, environmental and ecosystem protection, culture and education, and economics while meeting various local needs and mobilizing diverse expertise.

Conducting ecological monitoring

Monitoring was first put in place by ZSL, WWF and finally IUCN. The UniLúrio supported with different roles until now that it became the leading institution for monitoring and sharing of the results. “Against facts, there are no arguments” is a Portuguese saying, but better than facts are when people can see in fisheries and in diving the result of their efforts . Certainly seeing more and bigger fish coming out in their nets is the best argument for LMMA support.

Progressively the community saw the results and became more supportive of the LMMA. Local government became proud of the LMMA which is now a show case.

Results need to be discussed with everyone. Failures need to be addressed and fully discussed between all partners.

Locally-based organization providing sustainable technical support

The active engagement of UniLúrio in all the phases of the process, especially in the education and monitoring, was essential to keep the community involved. The local people don’t know reading or writing, and few know how to speak Portuguese (national language). Unilúrio obviously is the one keeping records and publishing the most important information related to the LMMA.

Local University (UniLúrio) involved from the beginning with the LMMA monitoring, turtle conservation, fisheries monitoring and shark education.

International organizations normally come and go. Unless the support is given through a local organization (UniLúrio) there is no stability to the technical support.

Sustainable financing for LMMA operations through tourism fee

Without sustained support, enforcement and prevention of the transgressions into the LMMA would have been impossible. The more famous the Vamizi LMMA was, the more pressure was increasing from people accessing the area. The continuous support in gasoline for the patrols and the maintenance of the CCP boat was crucial to the success of the LMMA. The fee collected from the tourist users of the LMMA is an extra reward for the maintenance of the LMMA and to the persons doing the patrols belonging to the CCP’s.

Top tourism destination operating near the village, responsible and supportive of conservation and community actions

Communication, communication and communication. Good actions can be badly interpreted. Communication in all phases of the project and with all of the intervenients is the key to good partnerships.

Defining Roles with Shared Responsibilities among Stakeholders

The G30 Plan aimed to reduce waste based on the principles of “polluter pays” and “extended producer responsibility (EPR).” Polluter pays principle is a practice whereby those who produce pollution should bear the costs of managing the impacts of pollution to prevent damage to the environment. The EPR principle makes manufacturers responsible for the entire lifecycle of the products and packaging they produce. The city succeeded in achieving the goals of G30 Plan by defining the roles of stakeholders based on the above principles. The role of the citizen is to change their lifestyle to be environmentally-friendly and sort garbage properly. The business sector is expected to create products that would generate less waste and is also required to collect and recycle their discarded products under the concept of EPR. Finally, the government’s role is to create systems for 3Rs, raise the awareness of citizens, and provide information on the 3Rs.

  • Public initiative to involve citizens and private companies in solid waste management
  • Various community-based approaches done by the city to reduce solid waste

Citizens, companies, and governments have own roles to play with shared responsibilities in solid waste management. Defining these roles pushes all the stakeholders to take voluntary actions in order to achieve the common goal of waste reduction. Community-based approaches to raise public awareness by local governments and non-profit organizations also encourage citizens and companies to change their life-style to more environmentally-friendly.

Enhancing Waste Separation by Enforcing Strict Rules and Raising Public Awareness

The G30 Plan promoted a proper separation of garbage and recyclables. Before the plan, there was a waste separation scheme comprised of seven items under five categories. The G30 plan introduced source separation for 15 items under ten categories, which required residents to properly separate waste into these 15 categories and dispose of them at designated collection places and times. The collection system was strict in a sense that it required the residents to use designated transparent bags for disposal so that collectors could easily identify unsorted waste. As an enforcement of these strict rules, the city government conducted environmental education to raise public awareness of waste management. More than 1,000 seminars on how to reduce and segregate waste were organized for residents. Moreover, about 600 campaigns were held at railway stations while over 3,300 awareness campaigns were organized at local waste collection sites. Citizen volunteers, called “garbage guardians,” also helped the enforcement of the rule by promoting proper sorting measures.

  • Environmental education conducted by the city government helped to raise public awareness of waste management.
  • Citizen volunteers, called “garbage guardians,” also helped the enforcement of the rule by promoting proper sorting measures.

Sorting out waste before disposing is the primal step to reduce the total amount of waste. However, setting strict and complicated rules of garbage sorting means to force citizens and companies to bear not a small cost of time and effort to follow. Effective garbage sorting system could not function without government’s efforts to raise public awareness of waste management through, but not limited to, environmental education and public campaigns. 

Varied Financial Arrangement

Kadokawa Care Prevention Center was established by Toyama City using donations from citizens and the city budget. One citizen donated hundreds of millions of JPY, or around millions of USD, to the city for the improvement of social welfare services for elderly citizens, and the city decided to build a special center for preventive care on the site of a demolished elementary school. The city also received valuable and useful assets (i.e., hot spring facilities and special apparatus for exercise) donated by several citizens before it began operating. While the property is owned by the city, the facility is operated and managed by a joint venture of private companies.

The city’s unique financial arrangement for the project by utilizing unused sites for projects, granting a concession to private operators, and asking for a variety of contributions from citizens and/or private companies.

As public spending on social welfare programs continues to grow in the recent aging trend, it is hard to expect further public resource allocations to long-term care projects for the elderly. Under severe budget constraints, local governments must make great efforts to raise capital funds from diverse resources. The government might be able to utilize unused sites for projects, grant a concession to private operators, and ask for a variety of contributions from citizens and/or private companies (e.g., cash donation, land parcels, related apparatus, etc.).

Proactively Repurposing Public Assets

In aging rural cities, the population aging rate is higher in the city center, and therefore it is important to make the city center more elderly-friendly. This means making the area safe, habitable and accessible to the elderly. Toyama City demolished and integrated several schools due to the shrinking and aging demographic context and utilized one of them for the site of the Prevention Care Center. The location in the downtown area is highly accessible by public transportation such as bus, light rail transit, and community bus from the central station.

  • Governments’ initiative to utilize unused land and facilities due to the shrinking and aging demographic context
  • Availability of a large land lot easily accessible by public transportations

In the context of an aging downtown area, unused sites or old facilities (e.g., abandoned schools) can be utilized for projects that enhance the quality of life of the elderly, like the Kadokawa Preventive Care Center. Proactive repurposing of unused land and old facilities can reduce the initial cost of such projects.

Promoting Integrated and Inclusive Care Services through Community-based Approaches

Toyama City is promoting integrated and inclusive care services for the elderly population, and local networks play a key role. The city has 32 community general support centers as contact points for the elderly people in each community, where experts (e.g. nurses, certified social workers, welfare caretakers) monitor and guide the health of the elderly people and advise them to attend the Kadokawa Care Prevention Center, when necessary. The city also works together with a city-based voluntary club which 36% of all the elderly citizens of the city have joined. The city asks several members in the club to take a leadership role in promoting community-based activities for preventive care and communicating with the support centers and the City of Toyama. This community-based approach also helps members become more aware of their own health, and it enhances self-reliance and encourages mutual help among communities.

  • Utilizing local networks to promote care services for the elderly population
  • Membership Scheme for Promoting Preventive Care

Preventive care is one of the critical concepts to be applied in a rapidly aging society, which could enhance the well-being of the elderly, and reduce the financial burden of individuals and pubic services. It can support elderly people to have a self-reliant life and decrease the number of frail elderly citizens who need careful long-term nursing. Integrating preventive care services with other nursing and health care services provided by other public services and networking with local communities can provide higher quality of services more effectively and efficiently.

Marketing and building business relationships

This building block is crucial in ensuring R2R is successful in the long term future.

 

A variety of marketing strategies are used to market R2R. These include a website, social media platforms, merchandise, printed flyers and brochures, attendance at national and international travel trade events and educational travel shows, email marketing, marketing through TIDE, and hosting familiarization tours. 

 

Initially, it was thought that R2R would attract mainly students wanting to enhance their resume. However, it was found that marketing costs associated with finding each individual participant were high. Now, the primary focus is on partnering with universities and travel planners who organize group trips.

 

R2R seeks to work with partners who may be initially costly to acquire, but who then provide a regular stream of participants. This includes universities who send one large group per year, and travel agents who may send five groups a year to take part in the program. Over time, building these relationships will mean that marketing costs will be reduced, and the focus will be on retaining those partnerships.

 

To date, R2R has formed excellent relationships with its partner agents, and continually strives to improve the services provided to ensure long term commitments from them.

 

An important thing has been to actively invest in marketing materials and events, from printing brochures to attending international trade events – in order to engage the audience, it is crucial to have professional materials that promote the quality of service that is provided.

 

Another important condition is to have someone whose focus it is to develop and market R2R programs. TIDE identified the need to have a full time member of staff for R2R in 2014, and invested accordingly, to ensure the responsibility did not fall on existing staff.

Since 2014, marketing efforts were shifted, from focusing on university students, to focusing on study abroad planners, and travel agents. This was due to the costly nature of recruiting individual students, compared to the better return on investment generated from forming long term partnerships.

 

This has had its own consequences on the programming offered to participants. Universities and travel agents require much more structured schedules than individual students, so now R2R has less flexibility when it comes to programming. It is unable to go to the assistance of TIDE, should a last-minute priority project present itself. It does, however, allow for longer term projects to be facilitated through R2R. For example, R2R is now doing ongoing research on the manatee population in the Port Honduras Marine Reserve, with 3 – 5 groups per year ensuring that this continues.

 

For others wishing to replicate this program, it is advised that you carefully plan who your target market is, and devise the best strategy to reach them effectively, as early as possible.