Land tenure security for tree planters

A village based participatory approval process allocates individual reforestation sites to households, along with defined use-rights & obligations using the following steps:

  1. Application to local forest authorities by smallholders through voluntary user groups
  2. Consultation on village level to exclude disputed land upfront & for taking unanimous decision on the future reforestation sites allocation. Results: minutes & sketch plan
  3. Verification by communal decision makers & endorsement by a communal decree
  4. Assigning land to the village afforestation body based on a specification document
  5. Mapping of individual wood lots; plot owners receive individual map with GPS coordinates signed by the mayor of the community
  6. Registration of sites by the land office; official verification of the reforestation site based on sketch plan, the communal decree and the enrolment into the local tenure plan.

Forest authorities register the transfer of use rights for an indefinite period, including equal access and benefit sharing for the participants. Smallholder households involved in the afforestation scheme own ~3 ha. This enables them to produce about 2.6 t charcoal per year for 27 years without further investment.

  • Availability of barren land not suitable for other land uses
  • Involvement of the municipalities (municipal decree for the allocation of land for reforestation and decentralised land management)
  • Legal framework, in particular the 2005 land reform allowing land certification through the municipalities
  • Awarding individual long-term land-use rights marks a new and unprecedented level of tenure security, motivation and ownership
  • The number of bush fires in the afforestation zones decreased as forest owners have an interest in protecting their property
  • Incomes increased by ~40% compared to average income in rural areas. For the landless third of rural farming households the increase is significantly higher.
  • User groups are self-governed and operate self-reliantly, with training and organisational support (charters, administration, formation of committees, databases) provided by the project, NGOs and other local partners
  • Direct monetary support is not being provided
  • Land use planning helped to analyse, valuate and prioritise multiple land interests. It was the basis for a consultation process to exclude disputed land upfront, and enabled a consensus-based decision on site allocation and size
Long-term Commitments and Partnerships

The long-term plan of OMY is embodied not merely by one private developer but jointly initiated by a group of public-private stakeholders across the local business districts. Indeed, the Council for Area Development and Management of OMY, being comprised of 68 landowners, 12 observers, and 8 special members in 2016, established the Advisory Committee on OMY Area Development in 1996 together with the Tokyo Metropolitan Government, Chiyoda Ward, and East Japan Railway Company. As the first area management initiative in the country, the Committee regularly updates the guidelines for redevelopment activities since 1998. These guidelines set out 8 development goals, key functions of zones, axes, and hubs, district design standards, and local operation rules for coordinating cityscape, networking public open spaces, and transferring FARs. Furthermore, the committee has introduced a variety of area management and place-making initiatives such as free loop bus service, car-free public spaces, establishment of a district-level association, and various city events.

  • Council for Area Development and Management of OMY (comprised of 68 landowners, 12 observers, and 8 special members)
  • Coordination across the local govenrment, the ward government, and the railway company
  • Legalization of the Area Management Initiative

Large-scale redevelopment projects generally require the complex and painstaking coordination of property rights among various stakeholders. The long-term commitment of major developers and the establishment of horizontal partnerships are essential for intergenerational redevelopments and sustainable area management. Many details of urban design, operation, and place-making efforts must be initiated and guided in local specific ways.

Market Incentives for Social Capital Improvements

Accompanied by private redevelopment projects, the national government decided to restore the old redbrick building of Tokyo Station, initially built in 1912 and damaged by firebombing during World War II. While the symbolic building restoration was expected to have broader social and cultural benefits for the neighboring business districts, its project cost was estimated around JPY50 billion. In order to meet both social and commercial objectives, the site of Tokyo Station was extensively designated as a zone for the special FAR exemption and allowed to transfer the unused FARs from the historic redbrick building to the neighboring lots for new commercial tower developments. The station building restoration, partially financed by the FAR transfer revenues, was successfully completed in 2013 by a railway company, which also developed two 205-meter tall skyscrapers among the towers with extra FARs, and reinvested the increase in land value of the densified grade-A office buildings to cover the railway finance. To improve the district further, the current provision of a multimodal transportation square for regular bus and taxi services plans is to be completed by East Japan Railway Company in partnership with the Tokyo Metropolitan Government in 2017.

  • Legislative and institutional requirements met to apply bonus FAR schemes
  • Finance mechanism to cover a vast amount of capital improvement cost through land value capture

  • Sound approach for land and property value assessment

Private redevelopment projects could meet both commercial and social objectives if market incentives are properly given for public capital improvements. In particular, the exemption and transfers of extra FARs should be designed not merely to increase short-term business profitability but rather to raise public funds for life cycle asset management.  

Synthesizing New and Old Downtown by Coordinating Land and Transportation

The district can be conveniently accessed by a variety of transportation systems. The major model option is Minato Mirai Line opened in 2004 which is directly connected to central Tokyo. Two arterials and several link roads enhance transportation connectivity and business cohesiveness across the two central districts of Minato Mirai 21 and their neighboring areas extensively. With the high-quality transit infrastructure and services, a range of business persons, residents, and visitors can get smooth access to and from international and domestic hub facilities in Tokyo (e.g., Haneda and Narita Airports). Furthermore, footbridges, automated walkways, and underground paths form an integrated pedestrian network over the entire district, which is accompanied by intercity bus, water bus, and bicycle-sharing schemes.

  • Cross-cutting department within the city called the Planning and Coordination Department (PCD) which initiated participatory approaches, public-private partnerships, coordination across sectors and departments, and flexible and creative solutions to financial and other issues
  • Collaboration of the city and private companies (e.g., railway companies, bus and taxi operators, developers) for intra-city transportation connectivity

Intra-city transportation connectivity and land use coordination are essential to integrate individual business districts into one competitive economic cluster. To attract international and domestic business travelers, high-quality transit access services to and from airports and high-speed rail stations are vital. The intercity and intracity transit networks should be integrated with pedestrian and bicycle circulation systems across private properties and public facilities. The enlarged seamless transportation system should be supported by transit-oriented land use coordination and urban amenity provisions between new and old districts.

Public Initiative and Long-term Stewardship to Drive Waterfront Development

In Minato Mirai 21, the City of Yokohama in 1983 commenced three major development projects: land reclamation (73.9ha) by the city; land readjustment (101.8ha) by a semipublic agency for housing; and port facility improvement (77.9ha) by the city and the national government. The actual project delivery has taken much longer than the original schedule. Indeed, many sizable lots in Minato Mirai 21 have long been unfilled with private real estates, due to occasional market shocks and sequential economic downturns across Japan and Asia over the last few decades. To utilize the undeveloped land lots, the city as a project owner allows temporal land use for commercial activities with some fixed lease terms up to 10 years. As a result of this interim arrangement, private building development in the district has advanced, filling more than 80 percent of both permanent use and temporal use land.

  • Cross-cutting department within the city called the Planning and Coordination Department (PCD) which initiated participatory approaches, public-private partnerships, coordination across sectors and departments, and flexible and creative solutions to financial and other issues
  • Project ownership of the city leader and officials

  • Laws and regulations that allow to collectively arrange land for capital projects

Large-scale waterfront development generally calls for a vast amount of upfront investment in public infrastructure (e.g., land reclamation, new road development, subway construction on the soft ground), whereas the degree of private property investment and development depends on dynamic market climates in the long run. It is essential to establish the long-term stewardship between public and private partners. The city government especially as a major landholder needs to flexibly offer favorable lot sale and/or lease conditions and manage debt service payments during interim periods.

Going the extra mile

Once the creative process has started, ideas have turned into plans, and there are high expectations about what can be achieved, the Association faced the dilemma of fast profiting, by catching all product available (altought at lower price per unit), or long term profiting, establishing a catch-limit in order to ensure the availability of high quality product (better valued, and allowing black shell population to meet its life cycle).
Since the second alternative seemed more rational for members, the had to design the tool to manage the catch limit. The solution was to set the catch-size 2 millimeters above the legal limit to catch, and to adopt some several regulations into their rules of procedure. That is, to pass from some crazy ideas to a disciplinated implementation with strong sanctions ( monetary and suspension of the fishing rights of the members) aprooved by the total of the members.

Strong comunity and associative principles allowed to adopt mature decisions, even those perceived as too restrictive.

 

The certainty that in order to achieve a better future, changes in their way of living must be done.

To be confident into their propositions, and to not be afraid of the uncertainty of their decissions.

Disciplined implementation is a key factor.

Rotate the responsibility of administrative management allows most of them to understand the importance of control role and to respect eachother, reducing unrest potential.

Creative participation

Despite self-clousures are well known measures in order to preserve a biological resource, it has never been applied by the Association or the black shell resource in the area. Creative sessions have allowed members to propose ideas (self-clousures) to the plenary, and the creative participation on analyzing and discussing its benefits and consequences have helped to develop complementary measures (like zonification and a fattening area), obtaining a more robust and fruitful plan.

Trust environment for working sessions allow to talk in an open and confident way, and allow creativity outcrops.

Do not throw away ideas. Allow the discussion of all of them, enabling open participation.

Cooperative networking

Association Las Huacas has developed a Cooperative networking with different allies from private and public sectors. Partnership agreement with GEOGES C.Ltda. (environmental consultancy agency), wich has been interested into cooperate with ancient populations in order to preserve the culture and traditions, as well as to recover the optimal conditions for mangrove development and conservation.
The agreement brings to the association the technical capabilities of the Agency, in order to get the assistance to design- implement- and follow up of the management plan. The agreement has also served as a framework for cooperation at different levels – community, asociation – in order to enforce the organizational aspects of both institutions, as well as to propose and to develop alternative initiatives of production or self-employment, and the critical analysis of thrird parties cooperation initiatives.

To find the right partner, relative objectives and vision (apply to bothsides).

Total commitment to cooperation, with full involvement of the members into the planned activities.

Long-term follow-up, in order to create and to register data that will allow future decission making.

 

 

 

Active participation in identifiying issues and planning process will allow better understanding of the issues and more realistic paths to deal with it.

Try and failure process is also necessary in order to understand different dynamics working at the time, and to develop successful next steps.

Protection and sustainable management of forests

The protection and sustainable management of forests within the biosphere reserve was accompanied by the active promotion of Participatory Forest Management (PFM) and integration of PFM user groups into the trade with wild coffee and honey. The following activities were conducted:

  1. Implement Participatory Forest Management in the region with the help of local authorities
  2. Record data on activities of NGOs active in the environmental sector in the regions Kafa, Sheka, Bench Maji, Yayu. Identify possible partners for the upscaling of the coffee & honey value chain
  3. Establish cooperation with Biosphere reserve authorities to strengthen PFM support within BR boundaries
  4. Assess the existing PFM user groups, analysing and recording their potential to supply wild coffee and honey and their administrative structures.
  5. Select existing best performing PFM user groups in wild coffee collection and honey processing.

The conservation aspect through the PFM aims at the sustainable use of the natural resource base and contributes as such to the preservation of biodiversity in one of the 34 internationally identified “biodiversity hotspots”.

  • Forest establishment and conservation, sustainable forest management and landscape rehabilitation is a national priority
  • National guidelines on participatory forest management (PFM) have been put in place
  • Kafa and Sheka received biosphere reserve status in 2009, a legal basis for protecting & managing forests
  • Exchange visits between biosphere reserves to learn and identify PFM options
  • Partnerships with other projects (e.g. GIZ and FarmAfrica) supporting biosphere reserves and PFM
  • Participatory Forest Management was introduced and proofed to be a useful tool for collaboration, co-management and benefit sharing of forest resources
  • Participation and ownership of local people in sustainable, long-term management of forests has been remarkably demonstrated at field level; communities invested time and labour, they participated in the planning process leading to empowered, legalized and derived benefits from the intervention approaches
  • Members of other cooperatives, who are not members of PFM groups still access forest area in the reserves; as their access is traditionally secured through the hereditary system, working with and training these cooperatives also contributed to forest protection even if not under the umbrella of the PFM system
  • For multi-stakeholder commitment within sustainable forest management system, government institutions need further strengthening to facilitate administrative support and conflict resolutions 
Developing a honey export value chain

Honey export value chains have been developed according to the following stepwise approach:

  1. Selection of cooperatives
  2. Training model farmers in pre-and post-harvesting quality management, organic certification and internal controlling system, traceability system to fulfill EU-quality parameters
  3. Provision of food grade and quality improving equipment (packaging & processing equipment, solar lamps, food grade honey bags, presses etc.)
  4. Provide technical expertise from Germany to smallholders, their cooperatives and unions in honey processing and fulfilling the export requirements (e.g. honey water content control)
  5. Support the unions to acquire an export license, organic certificate and risk management certificate plus other necessary requirements from the Ethiopian government in order to implement the export process
  6. Communication to veterinarians and other inspection authorities on EU-level by German partners to allow future import of Ethiopian honey
  7. Constantly monitor and guide honey unions, laboratories and authorities during the export procedure
  8. Establish a contact to the shipping line by German partners and prepare honey export logistics
  • Trust between local farmer unions and international companies and advisors
  • Clear demand for high quality honey by business sector in Germany
  • Higher demand for organic honey in Europe due to lower export rates from Latin America & Asia as honey production is increasingly meeting domestic demands
  • Use restrictions of BR buffer zones according to UNESCO
  • Local smallholders engaged in participatory forest management (PFM) groups receive official forest user rights & direct access to products
  • The interplay between local expertise and international know how resulted in a successful set up of value chains. It was crucial to conduct very detailed trainings with producers especially on post-processing to achieve high quality honey
  • Local prices for honey are high which made the price negotiations difficult for the international buyer
  • The ownership of the whole “value-chain” from the grass root producer up to the loading the coffee bags onto a vessel for the overseas market is owned by the producers and their representative umbrella structures. This is a unique example where grass roots structures have become global business partners 
  • Meeting the EU quality standards needs constant checks of honey producing methods. Producers mostly achieved fulfilling the quality standards and delivered 42 Mt of honey. The rest of the honey has been sold to local traders for the local market or other purposes resulting in additional but lower revenues as exported honey