Participatory digital resource mapping

This building block builds on perception mapping, combining it with digital data and spatial tech to produce detailed and useful county and ward resource maps, documenting community knowledge of resources and attributes. The participatory mapping process allows traditional knowledge to enhance digital national-level data and vice versa.

 

Workshops introduced the project; Open Street maps satellite imagery was projected onto a wall alongside paper perception maps, and participants worked to transfer points of interest from the paper maps into GIS using coordinates to pinpoint locations in a way that could be verified and shared. Qualitative data on key resource points was then embedded into the spatial data. The maps were shared with participants and other stakeholders for feedback, before the process was repeated to refine. 

 

Locally-grounded, scientifically-sound maps are useful in dryland contexts, where pastoralists must be able to utilize different resources at different times of year. Such maps also demonstrate– in a format understood by planners and others –where key resources are located, and how poorly planned/non-participatory development projects may restrict pastoralists’ access to resources. 

This building block was relevant to county planning processes and was an integral component of the CCCF mechanism. Being part of the CCCF mechanism meant that the process would have a tangible outcome, for example for guiding investments, and were available to other partners for technical support.

Where necessary, e.g. when locations were covered by clouds in the satellite imagery, participants made quick ground-truthing visits by motorbike, using GPRS-enabled mobile devices to identify locations of important resources. Therefore, there is a need to make contingency plans for ground-truthing that would work in your context.

 

Identifying the appropiate scale is key; it isn’t always appropriate to stick to administrative boundaries when mapping, especially in pastoralists areas where administrative boundaries are frequently crossed to access resources. It’s important to think about which scale is suitable in your context. 

 

Returning the maps to those who helped build them is critical, but technology could be a barrier. Leaving maps with communities usually means having to print them out. 

 

Uptake and use of Open Maps was very quick, even among those with no prior experience of using digital technology – the 3D terrain model, which provided side-on views of familiar features was helpful here. 

Broom grass cultivation

Plantation of broom grass (thysanolaena maxima) was promoted at roadsides, barren areas and farmlands. Due to its strong web-like rooting system, broom grass helped prevent soil erosion, and stabilize slopes. Broom grass can regenerate quickly even in degraded land, and does not require much maintenance. It can be used to make brooms, the leaves can feed livestock, and the stems and roots provide fuel wood. As such, broom grass planting provides multiple livelihood opportunities, as well as ecosystem services.

For such a planting scheme to work there must be demand, not only for the products that the plant species offers (in this case brooms, fuel and fodder), but also for the livelihood diversification offered. In this case, out-migration by young men created both demand for an income-generating activity from women, and opportunity for such an activity due to land being abandoned.

Broom grass planting works well in this situation because it offers both ecological and social benefits; planting programmes would have to select suitable plant species accordingly. In addition, the low labour-intensity and short growing time means there is minimal additional demand placed on women (the primary beneficiaries of this scheme). 

Community pond restoration

Community ponds in Panchase, located in forests and near settlements, are an example of important green infrastructure. Healthy ponds increase water infiltration by reducing water run-off, can reduce water-induced disasters like landslides, and can help with the storage of rainwater; rainwater storage is particularly important in this mountainous region as it helps protect agricultural land and downstream areas from erosion, flooding and landslides. It also helps ensure year-round availability of water. Restoration activities for this building block included water source protection, repair and maintenance of old ponds, and development of water supply arrangements. First, IUCN helped communities to map ponds, after which some were prioritized based on extent of damage, potential for restoring groundwater, and level of dependency of surrounding communities. Locally available materials were used for repairs, to construct basic irrigation infrastructure, and to channel water from nearby sources to try to maintain water supply for as much of the year as possible. More than 60 community ponds were restored, covering three different sub-watersheds in Panchase. 

Use of local and traditional knowledge at all stages – mapping, pond prioritization, and restoration activities – is essential. Drawing on such knowledge enables the use of local materials, which also keeps the cost of implementation low.

While water availability has increased, there is poor integration with economic activities such as agriculture. In addition, unplanned infrastructure such as road construction and repair can impact negatively on ponds. Better planning and community sensitization would help to address such lack of integration. Note that ecosystem maintenance and management works most effectively at sub-watershed level, but administrative boundaries usually don’t adhere to this, meaning that collaborating with multiple administrative units (e.g. villages) will be necessary. 

 

Workshops and training-of-trainers events, held at the village level, have helped to promote pond restoration through different villages and community conservation groups.

 

A high level of community participation in implementing the pond restoration activities facilitated the revival of indigenous knowledge and its transfer to younger people. It also fostered understanding between the different stakeholders.

Integrated on-farm soil nutrient management

This building block entails the use of animal dung and urine as organic soil nutrients for improving soil health and farm productivity. Integrated on-farm soil management comprises different elements, such as livestock shed improvement, urine collection and use, compost-making, improved compost pits, bio gas promotion, use of kitchen waste water, seed distribution, Farmer Field School, soil testing and treatment, and organic farming training and practice. Thus this building block allows for a holistic approach for addressing soil degradation, maintaining soil nutrient and moisture content, adapting to rainfall variability, and coping with increased pest and disease.

Activities were mostly implemented at the household and community level. Careful consideration of beneficiaries is key for activities operating at this small scale. Sites for programme implementation were identified through consultation with local communities and stakeholders, after which a detailed activity plan was developed, considering local conditions, and the interests and skills of the community. Beneficiaries were selected according to specific vulnerability situations, and willingness and interest to participate. 

  • Communities should be sensitized to the ecosystem benefits resulting from the integrated soil-management activities; this would provide added impetus to implement, alongside the economic benefits which are already well-understood
  • Activities are implemented at a small scale, and the costs and benefits would be very difficult to quantify if the building-block activities were to be scaled up; this may impact replication and/or sustainability of the activities
  • The small scale and scattered distribution of the activities also makes their impact less obvious or visible – a comprehensive ecosystem-level vulnerability assessment, developed in conjunction with the relevant local administrative authorities, would help inform a broader adaptation strategy into which integrated soil-management activities could fit
Formation of Civil Society Nature Reserves and other conservation strategies

The Civil Society Nature Reserves (RNSC) for the Galeras Flora and Fauna Sanctuary is a very important management strategy within the framework of the environmental management of its buffer zone. This process has been carried out since the 1990s in the Municipality of Pasto (Mapachico), and in 2000 with the Social Participation Policy through the ECOANDINO sustainable development project and sustainable systems for conservation.

This resulted in a direct incidence of the peasant civil society in the voluntary conservation and liberation of areas projected to be expanded for productive processes.

At present, this voluntary conservation strategy has more than 200 RNSC and conserves more than 600 ha of high Andean and Andean forest ecosystems in the context of microfundios in the department of Nariño, representing in the area, with a buffer function, an alternative for the continuity of the values under conservation.It has also become a strategy of social fabric where spaces are promoted for the exchange of knowledge, traditional knowledge, products, seeds, creation of bonds of trust, dialogues, where the main actors are the families who are friends of the Galeras Flora and Fauna Sanctuary.

  • Voluntary conservation and release of projected areas to be expanded for productive processes by rural communities.
  • Sensitization of the communities on conservation and ecosystem services.
  • Family participation in the environmental planning of their properties.
  • The financing of projects that allowed to leverage the strategy of conformation of the RNSC.
  • The credibility of the communities in the institution (PNN-SFF Galeras).

Community conservation processes are successful in proportion to the degree of commitment and awareness of the families involved.

The CSER for the Galeras Flora and Fauna Sanctuary is a very important management strategy in the framework of the environmental management of its buffer zone.

Proposed Buffer Zone of the Galeras FFS

It is very important for the Galeras FFS to have environmental management of the buffer zone. This process began in 2005, achieving significant results such as the proposed delimitation, zoning, and regulation of 10,615 h as a buffer zone, 38.2% of which correspond to protection zones. The High Andean and Andean Forest Sanctuary is cited here as a precedent for strategic conservation connectivity. Through this, a technical committee was formed where a dynamic and management process materialized, in which the active participation of all stakeholders has been encouraged, in addition to the incorporation of all conservation strategies under different social, technical, political and environmental work schemes of the territory.This practice generated an integral management, which has represented a challenge in the conservation of the Galeras FFS and its area of influence, but also an opportunity for the management and articulation of efforts around conservation, something that has allowed to generate trust among the actors, greater technical coordination, joint planning and sustainable co-responsibility over time.

  • Existence of the sustainable development project Ecoandino World Food Program. In this regard, the participation of 23 villages in the area of influence of the Galeras FFS and the signing of 900 socio-environmental pacts are noteworthy.
  • Construction spaces with community and institutional actors appropriate for the development of the proposed delimitation and zoning of the area.
  • Implementation of projects of cooperating agencies such as AECID, GEF, World Bank and Patrimonio Natural.

The environmental territorial planning of the buffer zone was a participatory process in which public entities, the environmental authority (CORPONARIÑO), the municipal administrations that have jurisdiction over the protected area, other state entities, and the community in general with interests in the surrounding areas worked harmoniously and jointly with the objective of conserving and preserving the supply of ecosystem goods and services provided by the Sanctuary.

Cofinancing from international cooperation projects such as: AECID, GEF-World Bank Natural Heritage Project, implemented in the protected area and its zone of influence, allowed the Sanctuary to obtain a higher degree of credibility and governance over the territory, achieving recognition of the protected area at different scales. These contributions were reflected in the area's management effectiveness.

The Forest Protection Fund

The Forest Protection Fund (FoProF) is a community-based conservation trust fund established to support village level conservation Initiatives of Village Conservation Committeees such as law enforcement, forest surveillance and eco-development projects (portable water, education and etc). Its funds essentially come from Biodiversity Community Trust( local micro-finance institution established by ERuDeF), Pass-on gifts and profits from the Silver Back Company (Social business for the marketing of Cooperative produce). 

  1. Management committee set up
  2. Collaboration of community members
  3. Readiness and willingness of Local rangers to engage forest surveillance
  1. Constant collaboration with committee members yield more results
  2. More training and capacity building needs to be carried out so as to build the capacity of the management committee in exercising their duties.
Forming alternative livelihood out of cheap resources

There are 26,426 municipal fishers that reside in the Verde Island Passage. However, the scope of the water is unable to support more than 50% of them.  Hence, fisher's organizations need to help the fishers find alternative means of income. 


SMARTSeas, along with other funding organizations, was able to provide an alternative livelihood that can support the community while practicing sustainability. Training activities, such as weaving and soapmaking classes, were provided to the members of SMST and SMBB. The purpose of this building block is to empower the citizens and reduce illegal fishing, by establishing other sources of income for family sustenance.

A strong relationship among the fisher's organizations and the implementing agencies is critical to enable the success of this building block. Aside from communication, trust must be developed among the members and stakeholders since they will be working closely toward a sustainable livelihood and healthy marine ecosystem. Furthermore, it is essential that the threats (e.g. plastics and overfishing) and opportunities (e.g. rich resources in coconuts) in the passage are recognized to formulate a strategic plan that fit the circumstance of VIP.

Introducing alternative livelihoods to local communities are better welcomed if the investment is economical for the target community. Single-use plastics are pervasive in San Teodoro, which is why SMST was able to acclimatize themselves in upcycling plastics to bags for a living. On the other hand, coconuts are also widespread in Barangay Bagalangit and throughout VIP; hence, SMBB was able to produce coconut-based hygiene and aesthetic products. 

Lastly, it is paramount that the fisher's organizations or other small local groups are involved throughout the whole process and that they can contribute to the planning. With this, they can initiate sustainable projects by themselves in the future. 

Establishing partnerships with local government units

In the Philippines, every city and municipality is composed of various barangays, which is the smallest local government unit (LGU). SMARTSeas formed connections with the LGUs of Verde Island Passage to ensure that the implementation of fishing ordinances are observed among communities and the livelihood initiatives can be administered directly. Among the LGUs are Samahan ng mga Mangingisda ng San Teodoro (SMST; Fisher's Organization of San Teodoro) and Samahan ng mga Mangingisda ng Barangay Bagalangit (SMBB; Fisher's Organization of Barangay Bagalangit).

This building block requires close communication between the implementing agencies and the fisher's organizations. The members of these organizations are engaged in awareness building meetings to educate them on the threats plastic impose on the ocean. Commodity development training is also given to the members for them to successfully create and design products that can be sold.

 

Primarily, the majority of the citizens that depend on fishing as their livelihood are still unaware of the dangers plastic can contribute to the marine wildlife and ecosystem. These people are willing to learn and move toward a sustainable fishery operation, but they need the guidance of higher authorities that are experts on the subject matter to initiate the strategies that need to be executed.

Communicating the climate smart GMP to stakeholder

The purpose of this block is to raise the awareness of stakeholders on the climate smart GMP through communication by means adapted especially to the realities of the park area. The media to use depends on the level of intervention. For example, community radio and posters can be used to educate local people; online platforms are useful for a wide audience at the national and international level; and brochures are useful for visitors etc

Appropriate communication strategies that take into account the literacy levels, linguistic knowledge and other socio-cultural factors.

Early lessons learned include:

 

  1. Communicating the climate smart GMP ensures that stakeholders are aware of the climate change aspects and that their interest is generated and their commitment is secured to participate in the implementation and respect of the GMP as a Park Management tool.
  2. Communicating the climate change strategy will enable stakeholders to provide feedback, via mornitoring and evaluation, on the effective of the strategy in delivering the intended resilience objectives.