A management plan built with the scientific community to ensure the scientific robustness of the Nature Reserve management

Aware of the vulnerability of the French Southern Lands’ (TAF) ecosystems, the scientific community advocated for their enhanced protection, leading to the creation of the nature reserve in 2006. The first management plan (2011-2015) defined 90 conservation and research actions to be conducted on the territory (mostly terrestrial), of which 35% of applied research actions. The second management plan (2018-2027) applies to the entire EEZ of TAF (mostly marine), in accordance with the extension decree and protection perimeter regulation around the nature reserve. In this context and given the knowledge gap on marine ecosystems, in particular for deep and offshore ecosystems, a whole new set of marine research and conservation actions were identified in close collaboration with scientists. While more than 40% of the actions defined by the management plan address knowledge improvement, 60% of them address specifically marine ecosystems. The extension of the nature reserve and the elaboration of this new management plan create new research dynamics and synergy opportunities for science and conservation actions. New international scientific collaborations are also sought in order to strengthen the socio-ecological network of the TAF.

- The experience of a first management plan

- Historical partnerships with scientific organizations

- An ecoregionalization process leading to spatial conservation planning and management recommendations

- Innovative science and conservation opportunities arising from setting up one of the largest MPAs in the world.

- Stakeholders’ involvement in the development of the management plan is essential to ensure the robustness and the ownership of actions to be conducted.

- The prioritization of actions to be conducted in a very large MPA is a complex matter in a context of a territory difficult to access and with limited financial, human and technical resources.

Selection of adaptation measures

The process of selection of adaptation measures is one of the pillars of building block 1 (Building trust with the community and local partners), but is an important building block itself to be developed with the community. The approach that has been taken is to base the selection of measures on the local knowledge and preferences of the population. This means that they decide which activity (or activities) is / are the most appropriate for them. They have a sound knowledge of local reality in terms of opportunities and challenges and it is sufficient to ask guiding questions in order to determine with them the conditions to implement a certain adaptation measure. There are tools designed to do this such as the CARE “Climate Vulnerability and Capacity Analysis” and CRiSTAL (Toolkit for Integrating Climate Change Adaptation into Development Project).

  • Openness of the workshop facilitators to accept proposals and guide the population in their decision-making on adaptation measures to be implemented in the community.
  • It is essential that workshop facilitators have knowledge in rural development, adaptation to climate change and facilitation techniques.

There should be no technical barriers for a population or other agents of change to implement a productive activity as a measure of adaptation to climate change. The technical support that the project should provide is to search for all possible adaptation alternatives and to adapt the existing forms of production to the expected impacts according to the climate models.

An ecoregionalization process leading to the creation of one of the largest MPA in the world

Since 2011, the scientific community has engaged an ecoregionalization work, leading to the identification of important marine areas in the French Southern Lands (TAF) and neighbouring high sea. In this frame, Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas have been designated by the CBD that include a large part of TAF waters. In 2016, the outcomes of the CROMEBA program (Crozet Marine Ecosystem Based Approach) and a workshop on Kerguelen marine ecosystems informed the spatial conservation planning of the enlarged TAF nature reserve. Scientific inputs allowed designating more than 128 000 km2 of strict protection area (Cat. Ia. IUCN) and identifying priorities for actions for the new management plan. In a context of major knowledge gaps on marine ecosystems, the strengthening of research programs in poorly documented areas, in particular on deep-sea and offshore ecosystems, contribute to the regular update of the management objectives, regulations and protection status of the nature reserve. This work will also contribute to the development of the CCAMLR MPA network in Antarctica and the promotion of the creation of high sea MPAs.

- A strong involvement of the scientific community with whom the territory and the extension process raised a strong interest

- A favourable political context, with the implementation of the “Biodiversity Law” in France, allowing the development of MPAs in the French EEZ, and the CCAMLR initiatives towards the establishment of an MPA network in the Southern Ocean

- Uninhabited territories, scientists and fishermen being the only users of the nature reserve, which reduces the possible use conflicts

- Scientific expertise is essential to fill data gaps and deal with uncertainty.

- Ecoregionalization process is a key tool toward building effective spatial conservation planning

- Political support and international conventions are decisive for an MPA implementation

Vulnerability assessment of the protected area

This building block is an essential part of the EbA approach and was carried out prior to the implementation of EbA measures in the Nor Yauyos-Cochas Landscape Reserve. It was considered important to understand the vulnerability to climate change of ecosystems and of populations living in the reserve and whose livelihoods depend directly on the reserve´s ecosystem services.

The objective was to determine the level of sensitivity and the ability to cope with the adverse effects of climate change and extreme events using present observations and future scenarios. Based on the results of these vulnerability and impact studies, the districts with higher vulnerability of ecosystems and ecosystem services -if current management practices would be continued – were identified.

This information served not only to select pilot areas but also to confirm that previously identified EbA measures were adequate to increase resilience of ecosystems to climate change.

  • Availability and access to necessary information, both scientific (climatic, hydrological, etc.) and field information.
  • Time: the study required time for data collection and analysis.
  • Coordinated work of the actors: SERNANP and Communities
  • Knowing and understanding how vulnerable ecosystems and populations are to climate change is absolutely necessary in order to identify the most appropriate measures to reduce this vulnerability in the future.
  • There is no single way to measure vulnerability. The main lesson is that not only a scientific study is required, but a complete and agile and participatory process that generates the quantitative and qualitative information that is needed.
  • If the study is very expensive or very complex, it is not replicable. It is necessary to evaluate in advance to what extent the study should be carried out.
Incubating co-ops to rescue the value of their catch

Based on the results of the diagnostic evaluation conducted by our Impact team, SmartFish designs an improvement plan to ready the group and its products for preferential markets. After thorough review with fisher partners and any outside partners (eg facilitating NGO), SmartFish and the fishing group sign a formal contract that defines the terms of the intervention. 

 

Subsequently, SmartFish incubates the fishing group to improve their fishing, handling, processing and other business practices to produce premium quality seafood that is independently verifiable as socially and environmentally responsible or improving.

 

To bring their seafood to preferential markets, SmartFish helps partner fishers achieve the following:

 

  • independent evaluation or certification of environmental sustainability (eg MSC, Seafood Watch, or FIP)
  • independent evaluation of social sustainability (eg FairTrade)
  • optimization of catch, handling, processing, packaging, transport, and other technical aspects
  • optimization of general business practices
  • incorporation of traceability system
  • leveraging of local infrastructure to retain as much value locally as possible locally, including opportunities for women and other community members

 

  • Willingness and capcity of partner fishers
  • Expertise of SmartFish's production and enterprise departments (composed of fisheries engineers, commercial/finance specialists, and business consultants) 

Take care not to accelerate the vicious cycle of overfishing. The elements of the aforementioned Value Rescue intervention will help fishers earn more for their fish. If fishers are not commited to sustainability or if strong management is not in place this could contribute to overfishing.

 

 

Participatory land use planning

In order to properly monitor the participatory implementation of the programme a “Community Management Group” (CMG) has been established. Members of the group were selected via an open voting involving all municipality members. The CMG members represent all economic and social groups that depend on natural resources (e.g. cattle breeders, beekeepers, gardeners…) including women and youth. During the planning and implementation phase of the erosion control measures, the CMG meets regularly, informs on the current situation, discusses challenges and decides on further steps. The CMG presents its proposal and comments on the management of public land (communal land) to relevant stakeholders of the District Administration, the Property Committee, the Rayon Agriculture Department and the regional department of the Ministry of Ecology. After incorporating the feedback from different stakeholders the CMG approves the implementation of the programme activities. Moreover the CMG is a mechanism to negotiate diverging interests and solve occurring conflicts.  

  • Mapping of ecosystem services and understanding of its contribution to human well-being.
  • Existence of traditional knowledge and skills regarding the collective use of natural resources.
  • Existence of a relevant legal bases (environment) and willingness of corresponding authorities to participate in the planning process.

Plan and organize regular meetings

  • The benefit of the applied measures for land users should be clearly explained to the decision makers.
  • The involvement of all relevant stakeholders is mandatory to prevent exclusion and conflicts that would otherwise negatively impact the programme.
  • Moderators can facilitate the decision making process (e.g. conflict mitigation).
  • External experts will contribute to planning and implementation (technical, institutional advice).
  • Inviting relevant ministry representatives to community meetings may create conflicts if the community is not aware of corresponding laws and regulations. It is recommended to explain current laws and regulations to the community members beforehand.
  • Women, as main users of natural resources, are not always involved in decision making. Involving women will highly affect the sustainable use of natural resources.
  • Participatory land use planning should use traditional knowledge and skills of the target group to maintain long-term gains.
Human Capacity Development for erosion control measures

To support the participatory approach and achieve sustainable outcomes, local capacities are continuously developed. Therefore, international and local experts have been invited to train local communities on implementing and maintaining erosion control measures, e.g.: afforestation, maintenance of tree nurseries, orchard management or beekeeping. Local and regional meetings among communities are used to promote activities and enhance knowledge exchange. Trainings on integrating ecosystem services into development planning are also provided to local authorities and representatives of partners.

To enable national and regional exchange, an erosion control handbook that reflects showcases of implemented ECM in pilot regions was developed and will be distributed among relevant ministries, research and training institutions, NGOs, construction companies and experts.

  • Decision makers are aware of erosion processes and future negative impacts
  • Local communities trust the programme and are motivated to participate in the implementation process
  • Capacity building agenda of the programme fits with (development) agenda of district administration and municipalities
  • Organize hands-on trainings in the field rather than in class.
  • On the job trainings and learning by doing make complex topics accessible
  • Translate the trainings into the reality of local communities (e.g. with tangible examples)
  • Respect local knowledge and practice in erosion control
  • Incorporate local and traditional knowledge into the trainings and reflect possible enhancements of applied measures
  • Exchange with other international institutions that deal with similar topics
  • Be sensitive to upcoming conflicts of interests during trainings and exchanges between stakeholders and partners
  • Ensure involvement of all relevant stakeholders in capacity building
Erosion control measures

Implemented erosion control measures contribute to the conservation of biodiversity through the protection of natural resources from anthropogenic induced erosion processes and through the rehabilitation of degraded areas. Special attention is paid to the causes and underlying drivers of erosion in order to develop strategies to improve erosion control at local level. Together with national partners Ismayilli district of Azerbaijan was selected as a pilot region.

Different erosion control measures are conceptualized and implemented through the cooperation of national and local partners, involving relevant stakeholders, international and local experts and local villagers. In order to rehabilitate the eroded lands and avoid further land degradation locally applicable erosion control measures are introduced to the land users. Measures include ‘grey’ measures (terraces, fences) as well as ‘green’ measures (afforestation, orchard management) and are combined with alternative income generating practices.

Socio-economic and ecological benefits of better land management and erosion control measures are monitored, documented and demonstrated to surrounding communities.

  • Understanding and ownership of the problems by land users are an essential part of successful implementation of erosion control.
  • Strong exchange between land user and relevant scientist.
  • Capacity development for land users.
  • Demonstrate economic value of erosion control measures.
  • A strong understanding of the social structure of the community as well as the local environment is key for the development of an erosion control concept.
  • Measures should be locally applicable and tangible for the farmers.
  • Reliable results are necessary to convince farmers (shown on the pilot sites and monitoring plots of the project).
  • It is vital to test and demonstrate different erosion control measures to showcase what measures have the most impact on which erosion situations and foster understanding for the solutions.
  • Involvement of local communities in the construction of the measures (manpower and material).
  • Develop an upscaling concept, making local experiences sustainable, e.g. an erosion control handbook for the South Caucasus region.
Solar power plant installation

The old diesel powered generator on Cousin Island Special reserve was replaced by a modern and robust Photovoltaic Solar Power system. Research was required to procure equipment that could withstand the high salinity, heat and humidity on a tropical island. Once located in the United States, the different components had to be imported by the NGO Nature Seychelles (who manages teh Special Reserve) itself. All the equipment including the stands that had to be fabricated using high quality stainless steel had to be shipped to the island - Cousin island Special Reserve has no dock, harbor or quay and the landing of the equipment was fraught with difficulties. The stand-alone 5 kw photovoltaic energy system was installed in July 2015. Since then 2 controllers have had to be replaced because of corrosion.

  • National enabling environment for renewable energy -no tax imposed on solar equipment in the country.
  • Existence of company – ClimateCaring that had the knowledge and willingness to help design and set up the robust, off-grid PV installation.
  • Assistance on and off the island by the institution’s staff.
  • Large enough area for secure siting of and easy access to the installation.
  • Robust technology is required to withstand the harsh climate
  • Staff have to trained in use and maintenance of the system
  • Regular maintenance schedules need to be set up and adhered to
  • Budget has to be secured for maintenance and purchase of defective/damaged parts
Continuous Aftercare

The removal of some or all of the woody plants creates a vacuum that will invariably be re-populated by woody plants, sometimes by more aggressive species. Natural defences against this phenomenon include a healthy and strongly competitive grass layer, and large bushes that are able to suppress the re-establishment and survival of new bush seedlings.

 

Despite these natural allies in the fight against re-infestation of aggressive woody species, an aftercare programme is absolutely essential to keep a thinned area open. This can be done in several ways such as mechanical slashing of new seedlings, localised (selective) chemical treatments of new growth, or even applying less popular management options such as controlled burning in combination with browsers. An efficient grazing management system that will ensure the maintenance of a healthy grass layer is also essential.

 

The most important aspect of an aftercare programme is that it should not be viewed as a once-off operation, but should become a permanent component of the day-to-day management of the farm.

 

  • Knowledge of the importance of aftercare and appropriate methodologies
  • Documented best practices, showing the long-term affect of aftercare as compared to no aftercare
  • Financial means for aftercare activities
  • Aftercare is often not implemented, since the there is little awareness of the negative consequences that occur when no aftercare is implemented
  • Bush control and aftercare are a continuous process, not a once-off intervention