test

test

teesss

tttt

a bblock

test

Continuity in cooperation
  • Our transnational cooperation was largely based on personal contacts and larger efforts were dependent on external funding. The work for the preparation of the joint management plan has allowed us to structure the transnational cooperation and formalize it. All these measures will contribute to a more sustainable and long-term cooperation that isn´t so dependent on personal connections. 
  • Now we have a better explanation of the tasks and organization of the transnational cooperation group, and we also included all municipalities in the area in the group.  
  • An expert panel will help in management questions considering protection of World Heritage values and give valuable input to both site managers and the transnational cooperation group.
  • Personnel from different levels in the management authorities in both countries will meet regularly, and this is written into the management plan.   

The transnational cooperation group agreed to meet more frequently while working on the management plan. We had many discussions and workshops about the mission and constitution of the group, and we have also discussed the transnational management with organizations not directly involved in it. Transnational cooperation has to be important for the involved organizations and there has to be a will to invest in it. 

  • This kind of work takes time. By building cooperation over time, it is possible to move on from learning from each other to solving challenges together. 
  • Cooperation can be very vulnerable if it is based on specific persons and personal connections, for example when persons in our cooperation group have changed and a new representative from the same organization did not have the chance to learn about the work from their predecessors. That´s why it is important to form routines for transferring knowledge within the involved organizations. 
  • Another challenge is to find the right level of representation, to get persons involved who have both knowledge and right to make decisions. When involving many different organizations, it isn´t always possible to reach consensus in different matters, but the strength of the cooperation is in the discussions and in asking questions.
  • Another part of the success is that all work with the management plan (except the CVI project) was done as a part of our regular work. All things learned stays in the organizations when no short-time project staff have been participating. It took a long time, but it was worth it.
Linking SOUV, World Heritage values and attributes

To be able to write a joint management plan, we need to agree on what we have to manage. A shared understanding of the key values and attributes is crucial. An important step for us was to facilitate meetings that brought  the national geological surveys in both Sweden and Finland together so they could discuss land uplift and ice age traces and consider the site in its totality. These discussions gave important insight on the geological attributes of the site. 

To get a clear overview of the key values of the property, excerpts from the SOUV for High Coast/Kvarken Archipelago were analysed and grouped together as seven key values. Attributes were listed for each key heritage value. This process gave a clear connection between the SOUV in the everyday work with WH management. It makes the abstract concept of World Heritage more tangibly associated to its management.

The analysis of the SOUV required involving professionals from different disciplines and getting them to discuss about what makes the WHS special. 

This step was first explored in the Climate Vulnerability Index (CVI) Assessment that was carried out at the site. The work done in the CVI project was crucial to linking SOUV, values and attributes together and it has been described in a separate PANORAMA solution (link below)

  • As a part of the CVI process we assessed the current condition and recent trend for the excerpts from our SOUV. This was done in a workshop with participants from both countries. The assessment helps in prioritization in WH management. 
  • In a transnational or serial WHS is it important to get specialists from different fields and different parts of the property to work together. We´ve learned that it is of great value to assess current condition and recent trend for WH values together with other stakeholders and specialists, as controversial results may raise many questions and perhaps skepticism. It is good to be able to show that the results are based on systematic work taking different views into consideration. And because of this broad base we know we can trust our results and conclusions.
  • It was easy to list the most important attributes in the periodic reporting 2023, but that wouldn´t have been the case if the periodic reporting would have been prior to the work we´ve done with SOUV, values and attributes. A clear and structured overview of values and attributes, and a better understanding of our SOUV is also helpful in interpretation, communication, and monitoring. 
  • Accessible information is also beneficial for people working with planning and permits in the area.
Adaptive Management Focus

Adaptive management is the foundation of the MPA Network. Evaluation of ecological and socioeconomic outcomes is an ongoing, iterative process that is informing the allocation of resources across different management activities in real time. Centering adaptive management allows for regular community contribution and responsiveness to the needs of different types of ocean users. It also allows for greater responsiveness to threats like climate change, which pose a significant threat to the ecological benefits provided by the Network. 

Four Pillar Approach

The four pillars of the California MPA Network - 1); Research and Monitoring 2); Outreach and Education; 3) Policy and Permitting; 4) Enforcement and Compliance - create the basis for ongoing, adaptive management. As both a foundation for the design of the network and the assessment of its performance, the four pillars ensure that ecological and social goals are being pursued simultaneously. 

Baseline monitoring and research on ecological connectivity were essential in the design of the Network. Recent assessment has shown that ecological connectivity between sites within the network are strengthening the reproductive capacity of key fish species, validating the science-based approach to the design of the Network. Ocean users continue to be engaged through regional meetings where different community members have the opportunity to weigh in on proposed changes and raise specific concerns around management actions. Permits are granted to different groups to assess specific aspects of the MPA Network performance and fill in key knowledge gaps. Information from enforcement activities helps contextualize the human dimensions of the MPA network and reveal opportunities for targeted outreach to promote compliance with regulations. 

 

 

Comprehensive Community Engagement

Ocean users of all types were engaged in the design and implementation of the MPA network. While there were challenges in the early stages, the adaptive management framework that came out of the process is informing how current proposed changes to the Network are being addressed. In particular, engagement with California Native American tribes has been strengthened and is informing statewide progress towards meaningful co-management of coastal and marine areas. The commercial and recreational fishing communities continue to be key partners for the state in the ongoing management of the MPA Network. Understanding how these different groups are engaging with the MPA Network and surrounding waters (or "human dimensions") will be a key aspect of the next phase of MPA monitoring and assessment in California. 

Nature Restoration and Regeneration: Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA)

The Environmental and Climate Change Program, through its axes revegetation and rescue of rivers and water bodies, directly contemplates Ecosystem-based Adaptation (EbA) actions, since revegetation implies contributing to the regeneration of the city's own nature: revaluing and using native species, revegetation with different strata to regenerate resilient plant communities; rehabilitating, conserving and restoring water bodies and their associated biodiversity; restoring soil fertility and promoting technologies such as technosols that allow water infiltration, integrating the principles of circularity, since they are developed based on waste such as PET and silt from dredging; as well as promoting technologies that allow the integrated management of vegetation pests and diseases. This makes it possible to address the effects of climate change, since the recovery of vegetation cover and the presence of wetlands act as buffers against extreme weather. It also improves the connectivity of natural spaces in the city to increase the available habitat for flora and wildlife, reestablishing the components of ecosystems and their resilience.

  • Know the composition and function of the plant communities that originally inhabited the spaces.
  • Recognize the importance of water resilience and the factors that enable it, such as the conservation of ecosystems that recharge the aquifer, springs and rivers that provide water to the city, and maintain and improve the interconnection between the city's green and blue infrastructure.
  • To have the necessary management to make use of public spaces for the recreation of plant communities outside the areas that are in conservation land.
  • Environmental restoration and improvement of green areas adjacent to bodies of water.
  • Promote technologies that allow for the integrated management of vegetation pests and diseases.
  • Socialization and community awareness.

Before starting any intervention, it is important to carry out campaigns and dissemination strategies on sustainable urbanism to promote a vision of a regenerative city among the city's inhabitants, as well as to disseminate information on the importance of native plants within plant communities and the impact they have on the maintenance of biodiversity and interactions with other living beings, which has a direct positive impact on ecosystem services. Knowledge gives citizens a better understanding of nature and can contribute to biodiversity conservation.

Human rights and social justice approach

The programs integrate a vision of rights and environmental justice. This involves working to reduce inequalities, integrating nature in and around our city, for which we worked with a Nature-based Solutions (NBS) approach in different areas of the city, recovering natural spaces and restoring them for the benefit of the population, improving and increasing access to nature and ecosystem services.

In order to address social challenges and support human well-being, through the Altépetl Program, we support producers with economic aid, technical assistance and training to promote agroecological practices, sustainable production systems that integrate and protect biodiversity at the local level, and short marketing chains. On the other hand, by improving public spaces through the improvement or creation of green and blue areas, the public has been able to take ownership of public spaces, improving safety, mainly in areas of high marginalization and vulnerability. Additionally, through the Women Pollinators program, women have been trained as leaders in the creation of pollinator gardens, reinforcing the society-nature relationship and making visible the work of women as a pillar in the social structure; and through the Rainwater Harvesting program, rainwater harvesting systems are installed, distributing in a fairer and more equitable manner the work of water provision, which generally falls on women.

  • Through 'Peasant Learning Communities', 40 thousand people have been trained to improve productive schemes; the area of sustainable use has increased, using agroecological practices that protect biodiversity; and the commercialization of sustainable products is being promoted.
  • Capacity building for community organization in the establishment of pollinator gardens and rainwater harvesting systems.
  • The objective of the Rainwater Harvesting program is to reduce inequalities in access to water, increase resilience to occasional supply crises and contribute to closing gender gaps that affect women, who are often assigned the task of fetching water to cover basic household needs.

The excessive growth of the human population and uncontrolled urbanization have given rise to a myriad of serious environmental consequences, coupled with the climate crisis, and the only way to solve and stop the damage is to change the way we deal with it, taking into account the integration of social and economic aspects. Environmental damage contributes to the widening of the social gap, generating a vicious cycle of greater environmental damage, less available resources, greater scarcity, more poverty. Breaking this cycle requires the implementation of systemic solutions; there can be no conservation and restoration efforts with the long term in mind without considering the benefits to society and capacity building.

Strengthening the legal framework and public policy | Governance and cross-sectoral coordination

The perspective on how to address the environmental problems facing the city was modified, integrating the following principles:

  • Improve accessibility to natural spaces and the distribution of environmental benefits, prioritizing areas of the city with high marginalization and vulnerability.
  • Prioritize social participation and people whose livelihoods depend on nature.
  • Increase investment in environmental restoration.

As well as strengthening legal frameworks, such as in the Political Constitution of the CDMX where investment in conservation land is guaranteed; the modification to the Environmental Law for the Protection of the Land of Mexico City, where the term biodiversity is considered in its provisions; the adoption of the Law for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change and Sustainable Development of Mexico City and the Law of Circular Economy.In addition to the Environmental Climate Change Program, strategies and action plans were developed in a participatory manner to articulate public policies to address climate change and conserve biodiversity. The planning and execution of these instruments has involved the participation and coordination of multiple sectors in addition to the environmental sector and citizen participation, taking into account the generation of environmental, social and economic benefits.

Communication with other government agencies in sectors other than the environmental sector. This allows for inter-institutional collaboration, a broader and more comprehensive vision of the needs, knowledge and capabilities required, as well as support among those who collaborate according to their attributions.

It is important to be clear about the attributions of each institution, especially of sectors other than the environmental sector, in order to recognize their role in Mexico City and thus improve coordination actions in the implementation of comprehensive programs such as PERIVE, and to hold workshops or working groups to raise awareness and present the interests and points of view of each sector.