Review current laws & policies and stakeholder mapping

Stakeholder mapping involves reviewing the diverse interests of stakeholders across various sectors at both local and national levels. This process should be as comprehensive as possible, mapping out existing influence and power structures to determine who to engage directly or indirectly. Prior to stakeholder mapping, a thorough analysis of existing policies is conducted to fully understand the issues and why they matter to the community. This understanding then informs the stakeholder mapping activity, making it clearer who to engage with.

  • A clear understanding of relevant laws and policies related to the issue
  • Identification of specific policy gaps that need addressing
  • Accurate identification of target government organizations and officers
  • Proper selection of partners and civil society organizations
  • Ensuring community support and representation in the process
  • Understanding stakeholder interests and the impact of legal changes on those interests is crucial for effective engagement
  • It’s important to identify ongoing processes related to specific laws and policies to ensure inclusive and thorough mapping
  • Consolidating efforts through coalitions is essential to avoid parallel efforts and enhance impact
  • National coalitions can align efforts for greater policy influence
  • Building and strengthening networks should be prioritized over individual program objectives to achieve broader policy goals
Participatory research to identify local environmental challenges

The first step involves identifying local environmental challenges at the community level, such as water shortages, diminishing grazing areas, food scarcity, soil erosion, landslides, or flooding. NACOFA gathers community input on possible solutions and explores the links between these challenges and forest or environmental degradation.

Next, NACOFA studies the existing laws and policies that could address these issues, identifying any gaps, or determining if enhanced implementation or enforcement is needed. This process allows NACOFA to pinpoint the responsible government institutions, key officials, CSOs, partners, and community groups to collaborate with.

  • Clear understanding of the local or national issue and its impact on people and the environment.
  • Centering community and environmental well-being in the research approach.
  • Engaging with local leaders to ensure full community participation.
  • Collaborating with research organizations to align with current research policies.
  • This approach fosters informed policy development that centers on community needs.
  • Broad stakeholder engagement is crucial for policy advocacy success and enhances government accountability in service delivery.
  • Community ownership of the process is vital, leading to higher participation and long-term success.
Technical, financial and administrative support

In order for the producers to successfully implement their projects, various regional figures were called upon to provide them with the necessary support and accompaniment. The Local Technical Assistance teams, Local Community Promoters and Regional Operational Liaisons provided the groups with technical support to develop their proposals, collect evidence of implementation and prepare subproject reports. In the area of procurement, contracting and finance, the Regional Administrative Liaisons provided support and advice for the completion of procurement, contracting and verification procedures, through financial reports. For groups that were not legally constituted, the National Executing Agency (Rainforest Alliance Mexico) was in charge of administration, direct preparation of all procurement procedures, execution of allocated resources and the corresponding verifications. This shared responsibility with the beneficiaries made it possible to reduce the gap that exists for the groups and to fully comply with the highest standards in the execution of procurement, contracting and financial management during the implementation of the subprojects.

  1. Creation of regional figures for permanent technical and financial support/advice.
  2. Designation of a focal point within the working group to promote good communication.
  3. Establishment of rules, procedures, methods, guidelines and standard documents for project execution in the Project Operating Manual.
  4. Providing technical, administrative and financial training to the working groups.
  1. The designation of young people from ejidos or communities in the MDE Mexico intervention regions as Local Community Promoters facilitated the accompaniment and communication with subproject beneficiaries at the local level, particularly in those cases in which they acted as interlocutors or interpreters, facilitating the obtaining of key information in indigenous languages.
  2. Financial support to working groups with no legal status and little experience in managing productive projects required the design of specific collaboration schemes to ensure adequate technical and administrative support.
  3. The strengthening of administrative and financial management skills increased the beneficiaries' possibilities of accessing new sources of financing and investment in productive community projects.
Capacity building for the implementation of sustainable productive projects in forest landscapes.

The objective of the MDE Mexico was to strengthen the capacities of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities that depend on forests and jungles through participatory and inclusive processes for the consolidation of productive projects in forest landscapes. The training began to take shape as soon as the subprojects were selected by the Evaluation Committee, whose members received training to facilitate analysis and dialogue on the proposals received to guide the evaluation and selection process.

On the other hand, the Local Technical Assistance provided the beneficiaries with accompaniment and specialized advice for the participatory construction of the technical proposals and the planning and monitoring instruments, which ensured the development of capacities and the appropriation of the instruments in each Working Group.

In addition, in order to provide technical support to the beneficiaries in the execution, monitoring and evaluation of the subprojects, a training program for change agents (Local Community Promoters) was implemented for community productive projects with a REDD+ approach.

Likewise, Knowledge Exchange Workshops were implemented among beneficiaries to strengthen their capacities with the knowledge of other more experienced groups.

  1. Training at all levels and on various topics (project evaluation, technical, financial, administrative and organizational support and strengthening).
  2. Development of training materials and didactic activities adapted to the local context.
  3. Use of remote tools to provide beneficiaries with distance training in the context of the pandemic for groups with little or no previous experience in planning and monitoring activities for productive projects.
  4. Involvement of producers in training delivery.
  1. The design of specific materials to guide producers facilitated the standardization of knowledge and coordination among actors.
  2. The appropriation of productive initiatives was favored by participatory processes, supported by culturally appropriate methodologies, materials and didactic resources.
  3. The use of digital platforms favored the dynamics of coordination and capacity building of Local Community Promoters (LCPs) and producers, particularly during the confinement imposed by COVID-19. The online modules and didactic resources allowed for self-directed learning.
  4. The PCLs' trajectory in MDE Mexico contributed to their personal growth and professional development, which is reflected in their initiatives and recognitions obtained, related to sustainable rural development, research and governance.
  5. The exchange of knowledge among communities promoted the creation of synergies among beneficiaries and the adoption of better production and governance practices in models that are in the early stages of consolidation.
Capacity building through biodiversity survey training workshop

The biodiversity survey training took place for one month from Janury to February 2024 at the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment in Boa Vista. 11 participants from 3 different NGOs completed the training led by Dr Dario Cesarini which was further enforced by Professor Andrea Brusaferro who provided technical support and training in GIS. They provided extensive training on: 

  • The monitoring of protected areas
  • Behavior and abundance of ravens 
  • Fisheries Biology of Goat whelk
  • Tracking of introduced and potentially invasive plant species
  • Study of the population of Phoenix Atlantica and Ficus Sycomorus
  • Recording of human pressures and impacts
  • Collection of atmospheric climate data in communities
  • Use of GIS
  • Sharing and managing data

 

Encouraging young national Cabo Verdeans to actively participate in workshops and lead sessions and presentations

Selecting a biodiversity consultant who had extensive knowledge of the country including the local language (Cabo Verdean Criole)

Adapting the original plan to conduct training for only one week. In the end, the training was given over one month, as advised by the consultant to ensure that sufficient time was dedicated to both theoretical and practical training, and allowing for time to troubleshoot in the field. 

Cooperation with the local PA management authority 

Trust and confidence in the trainer is very important.

Communication is the key to a successful workshop.

Enterprise development through value chain enhancement to sustain tree cultivation and improve livelihoods

The tree farmers are encouraged to participate in different value chains/enterprises developed for alternative income sources rather than depending on tree and land sale cutting for income.

  • Access to arable land on farmers' private properties and within the central forest reserve enables farmers to cultivate various crops, raise poultry, and rear small ruminants, all of which are in high demand and have readily available markets.
  • Technical support from FAO on value chains development and the accelerator programs to support with making the farmers business ready and youth upskilling. In partnership with Rural Communities in Development(RUCID) designed skilling program for girls and women in the following enterprises; Bakery, Juice, wine, roots and cereal processing, Banana, coffee and organic input production  and briquattes making for fuel energy all aimed at income generation for the women and girls.
  • Agribusiness practices that integrate mixed farming with tree growing offer a sustainable approach to restoration. This method enhances plant, crop, and soil health by leveraging the natural benefits that different species provide to each other. In turn, crops can support tree health by preventing soil erosion and enhancing soil structure. This complementary relationship promotes a more resilient and productive agricultural system, fostering long-term ecological balance and sustainability.
  • Farmers practicing mixed agriculture within an agribusiness framework benefit from diversified sources of income and food. This approach mitigates the risks associated with climate change, such as prolonged droughts or floods, by not relying on a single crop or enterprise. Diversified farming systems ensure that if one crop fails due to adverse weather conditions, other crops or agricultural activities can provide income and sustenance. This reduces vulnerability and enhances food security, allowing farmers to sustain their livelihoods despite environmental challenges.
  • For long-term sustainability, farmers must align their expenditures with various income sources. It is crucial to have a daily income source to cover ongoing expenses and manage financial risks effectively. Diversified income streams from mixed farming, including crops, livestock, and tree products, provide a steady cash flow that can support daily needs and unexpected expenses. This financial resilience enables farmers to invest in their land and resources continuously, promoting sustainable agricultural practices and improving overall economic stability.
Restoration of degraded land in both forest reserve and on individual private land

The communities living adjacent to the degraded Atigo and Angutawele Central Forest reserves were mobilized to participate in the restoration of parts of the forest under Collaborative Forestry Management approach in partnership with the National Forestry Authority and the community.

  • Degraded forests and privately owned lands that urgently require restoration to mitigate severe climate change impacts.
  • Farmers' enthusiasm to participate in tree planting and management as part of the restoration efforts.
  • Supportive government policies that encourage community involvement in restoration activities, backed by technical leaders from Alwa and Kaberamaido Sub-Counties in Kaberamaido District.
  • Technical assistance from the Food and Agriculture Organization through the Saw Log Production Grant III, which facilitated the creation of a 5-hectare community demonstration woodlot.
  • The community needed extensive sensitization and education to understand the importance of restoration.
  • We established a tree nursery to supply seedlings to farmers locally, reducing the costs associated with sourcing seedlings from distant locations.
  • Initially, we planted exotic species like pine and eucalyptus, but have now shifted our focus to promoting indigenous trees and avoiding monoculture.
  • When we integrated crops that provided short-term income and demonstrated cash flow for farmers, our pitch decks attracted significantly more attention, as evidenced by projects like the NSSF Hi Innovator Project and Land Accelerator.
Case Study

In Eastern Province, Zambia, a significant transformation of fishing practices in small waterbodies was achieved under the Fish for Food Security (F4F) project. This change involved reducing the use of illegal fishing gear among local fishers, aligning their activities with the FAO’s Guidelines for Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries.

Initially, the management of these fishing practices faced challenges, including a lack of baseline data on fish stocks and the use of harmful small-meshed nets (mosquito nets) or poison. To address these challenges, the F4F project adopted a multi-stakeholder approach, partnering with entities like the Aquatic Ecosystems Services Consultancy for fish stock assessments. Likewise, they worked on restructuring the Dam Management Committees (DMCs) in collaboration with the World-Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and Zambia Governance Foundation (ZGF), ensuring the inclusion of fisherfolk representatives.

The F4F further developed a training manual on sustain-able fisheries management of small waterbodies and rolled out the trainings to the DMCs, fisherfolk and traditional leaders with support from the Department of Fisheries (DoF). Among others the topics varied from ‘Leadership’ and ‘Financial Management’ up to ‘Fishing Practices’, which attracted a lot of discussions especially from fishers. 

Later, the community and DoF set up regulations on restricting the use of illegal fishing gear and encouraged the use of wide-meshed cotton nets. The involvement of the fisherfolk has helped curb illegal and unregulated fishing, as they understand the adverse effects on the fish stocks, the environment, and the sustainability of their business.

Community Public Participation and Sensitization

Engaging and educating community members to ensure they understood the project, its benefits, and actively supported its implementation. This involved clear communication of project goals, addressing concerns, and fostering a sense of ownership among the community. Public participation was facilitated through monthly meetings in Kamungi Conservancy (KC) to create awareness on the benefits of the 10% Fence Plan, hazards, and overall project objectives. These meetings served as a platform for open dialogue, where community members could voice their concerns, ask questions, and provide input. Additionally, the meetings were designed to disseminate crucial information about the project, including how the fences would mitigate human-wildlife conflict, protect crops and livestock, and improve overall community safety. Educational sessions within these meetings focused on practical aspects of the 10% Fence Plan, such as maintenance and repair techniques, as well as broader conservation principles. This consistent engagement ensured that the community remained informed, involved, and supportive of the project's goals.

  • Community Meetings and Educational Workshops: Regular meetings were organized in Kamungi Conservancy to discuss the project, gather input, and build consensus. Workshops on the importance of conservation, human-wildlife conflict mitigation, and the specific benefits of the 10% Fence Plan were conducted, using visual aids and local languages to enhance understanding.
  • Stakeholder Involvement: Local leaders, traditional elders, conservation groups, and government officials were involved to endorse the project and build trust within the community.
  • Inclusive Participation: Special efforts were made to include marginalized groups such as women and youth in the meetings and decision-making processes, ensuring that the entire community's perspectives and needs were considered.
  • Feedback Mechanisms: Channels were established for community members to provide feedback and report issues related to the fences, ensuring ongoing dialogue and responsiveness to community concerns.
  • Local Champions: Local champions were identified and supported, who advocated for the project within the community, helping to sustain momentum and community engagement. The local champions incuded past beneficiaries of the 10% Fence plans.
  • Effective communication and transparency were key to gaining community trust and support.
  • Addressing community concerns promptly helped build trust and fostered a cooperative spirit.
  • Continuous engagement and feedback mechanisms helped address ongoing concerns and improve project implementation.
  • Involving local leaders and champions fostered a sense of ownership and responsibility within the community, enhancing long-term support for the project.
  • Inclusivity in participation ensured that the needs and perspectives of all community members, including marginalized groups, were addressed, leading to more comprehensive and sustainable outcomes.
  • Regular monitoring and adapting strategies based on community feedback allowed for more effective and responsive project management.
  • Empowering local champions provided ongoing advocacy and support for the project, ensuring sustainability beyond initial implementation.
  • Organizing HWC educational workshops not only increased awareness but also equipped the community with practical skills for fence maintenance and wildlife conflict mitigation.
Local Community engagement

The local community was consulted into the spatial planning process. The process involved holding big workshops for local community and inviting several interest groups, especially those of livestock owners, tourism workers, and hunting enthusiasts. The purpose was 2 main things; 1) to collect local data and knowledge into the planning product and more importantly to build a sense of ownership and belonging of the local community to the potential planning product.

Data from various sources were collectively integrated and put into a spatial prioritization and optimization algorithm based on targets stemming out from the Primary Management objectives of the Reser. This Algorithm is known as MARXAN working under a process termed as simulated annealing.  

The resulting planning product is then shared back to the local community and other stakeholders including governmental and non governmental entities to collect thier feedback to further tweak the product for maximum sustainability.