Standardized country methodology for regular habitat mapping

Czechia has developed tailor-made methodology on habitat mapping that is carried out as a field inventory in the whole country. Only trained experts are involved in the process, and all results are verified. 

The result is a country-wide habitat layer giving fine information about each natural and seminatural habitat occuring in the country. That is now one of the most important datasets on which the national nature conservation builds its strategy and plans measures both inside and outside of protected areas.

The whole approach was developed as a part of the EU accession process. Therefore, the whole task was supported only from the national budget which allowed successful implementation. Such a large task would have not been possible to manage with a project restricted budget. 

When the process started, one of the challenges was to change the mindset of national experts and agree on an innovative approach that was significantly different from the traditional one (unsystematic field research activities). In that case, a legal obligation to establish Natura 2000 following a text of the EU Nature Directives helped. Experts understood the Directives and proactively took advantage of this process (not to perceive it as a burden only).

Mainstreaming integrative forest management

For the successful application of the approach, sustainable and integrative forest management needs not only to be piloted and practiced on the ground but also integrated into national strategies, development plans, and long-term forest management planning and monitoring. Consequently, it is equally important to work with forest tenants on the local level as to mainstream the approach on the national level.

The Join Forest Management approach has been anchored in the Forest Code of Tajikistan in 2011. This builds the legal basis of the implementation and accelerates the further dissemination to other parts of the country. Since 2016, a more integrative forest management is practiced for which an inter-sectoral dialogue has been established. This inter-sectoral dialogue facilitates to address environmental, economic and social challenges beyond the mandate of the forest agency. Forest monitoring and management planning are being strengthened through support to the forest inspection unit. Only if a forest management planning system and a forest monitoring structure are in place, an approach such as the integrative forest approach can be out scaled throughout the country and mismanagement, corruption, and wide-scale violations of regulations (e.g. grazing on forest plots) prevented. 

The JFM approach follows a multilevel approach, targeting national, regional and local level which has proven to be necessary and consequently successful.

A theoretically sound solution can only be as good in practice as its underlying management planning and monitoring system as well as its political support.

Awareness raising and information for local and foreign visitors

The project’s communication strategy was aimed at the local population through press and social media. It was important to produce press releases and invite journalists to report on the project, as was communication through the internet and social media.

A regular programme of activities aimed at the general public, including volunteering activities, was developed. These activities allowed locals (and sometimes visitors) to participate in and learn about conservation activities taking place in the protected area, as well as learning about Azorean biodiversity.

In the end of 2007 the Priolo's Interpretation Centre was opened. Its mission is to raise awareness for the “Priolo” and its habitat, the Laurel Forest. It contains an exhibition that tells the story of Azores bullfinch, explains the conservation actions developed on the ground and talks about the biodiversity of the protected area and of the Azores archipelago. The Priolo’s Interpretation Centre increased the communication capability of the project. This centre provides information for visitors to the protected area and promotes educational activities for schools and the local population. This centre also has a small souvenir shop and donation box, gathering some funding for the implementation of the project.

  • Available funding through European Union Rural Development Funds (LEADER);
  • European Commission funding through LIFE Programme;
  • Partnership between regional government and an NGO in order to build the centre.

 

  • Creation of promotion materials and awareness campaigns are of great significance for the dissemination of the project and to increase the knowledge of the general population about biodiversity and its main threats, allowing the continued involvement of the population, which is crucial to ensure the preservation of natural resources in the long term;
  • Improving public opinion about the project has also proved useful in gathering volunteers and donations that are of great help to the project;
  • No matter how good media communication is, the best awareness raising and communication strategy is engaging the local population and word of mouth. The visitors' centre is of great help to achieve this engagement;
  • We don´t charge entry fees, but ask for donations from our visitors, this promotes the entry of local population that sometimes repeat visits, and we still get some funding from foreign visitors. However, economic sustainability of the visitors’ centre is still a matter we are struggling with.
Environmental Education Programme

A comprehensive environmental education program was developed for all levels of basic education, from pre-school to 12th year and including professional training. It includes activities adapted to the learning curriculum of each year. This way, school children would get information about nature conservation and its benefits while learning relevant concepts for their education. These activities are also offered to non-formal educational groups during the school holidays. More than 20,000 students have participated in a programme that has reached all the schools on the island.

The environmental education programme was designed with the contribution of teachers through several workshops that led to the definition of an education strategy. It includes a set of activities to be developed in the schools, ranging from lectures and practical classroom activities to more recreational activities and educational games. It also comprises some school visits to the Priolo’s Interpretation Centre, the Nurseries of Azorean Plants and the protected area.

Teaching tools and child-friendly materials were prepared for the programme and for teachers’ independent use. A certified teacher education program has been developed with 150 teachers trained so far.

  • European Commission funding through LIFE Programme;
  • Interest from schools in participating in the programme;
  • Restored areas available for visits by school children;
  • The existence of a visitor's centre was useful although it was not essential.
  • After 10 years of implementing this environmental educational programme, we could verify the importance of this type of approach not only for the children and teachers involved but also as a dissemination tool for the community.
  • Providing an opportunity for outdoor educational activities and providing activities that contributed to teaching curriculum subjects was a good way of improving adherence of teachers to the programme.
  • Teachers’ training and teacher’s involvement in preparing the school programme was also useful to increase school adherence to the programme.
  • Including more educational and more leisure activities is a good way to ensure the adherence of different types of education groups.
  • In order to increase participation of teacher and students and promote multidiciplinarity of environmental issues it was important to propose activities for subjects like Portuguese, English, Social Sciences, etc. But, of course, science and citizenship were the subjects in which most of the activities were conducted.
Stakeholder Collaboration

Natural Resources management and community mobilization requires an interplay of stakeholders who are very critical to success of community conservancy model. There are those involved in advocacy and community education and their input is very important in creating awareness and facilitating information exchange. This makes it possible for community to develop trust and appreciate their contribution to environmental conservation and ultimately to economic development. The NGOs play an important role in information sharing data and drumming up for international support in research and education. Other important collaborators include the local and national governments which develop framework of collaboration with communities and set guidelines on administration and management of wildlife in areas outside the conventional national parks and reserves. The government land office is very crucial as all land adjudication matters are vested in them and they set guide lines for leases and laws that govern them. Most important all sectors of the community, including youth and women, must be involved in conservancy management and benefits sharing to ensure they mainstreamed in conservation and guarantee sustainability of the initiative

There is need for shared vision among the stakeholders who are motivated by overriding desire to conserve the environment, including the large mammals mostly affected by habitat degradation. The communities must have a unity of purpose based on shared desire for better livelihoods and regard for wildlife. The conservancy requires continuous engagement with the communities so that they can appreciate their contribution individually and collectively

Resource management and community issues are complex and cooperation of all stakeholders is important. Communities are very sensitive to patronising approach to issues affecting them and need to be engaged with great patience and finesse. One important approach is to use community leaders and sensitize them and then enable them to discuss the issues with fellow community members and address their fears, hopes and ambitions. Different stakeholders have different approaches and viewpoints and there is always need to have a core team that takes divergent views and tries to harmonise them with key objectives.

Finally government is cardinal stakeholder and success of conservation efforts largely depend on goodwill and support from national governments. Clearly spelt out goals makes it easy to win support when the government appreciates contribution of private sector and the communities in solving environmental problems and availing more land for conservation

Community Partnerships

The communities are at the heart of the solution. They own the land and have the property rights on the land. The challenge is that the land in individual parcels is not economically productive in the rangelands bordering national parks. When communities join their individual parcels of land and form a large conservancy unit, it becomes ecologically viable for conservation and can support large populations of wildlife and their habitat requirements. These wildlife populations can then support tourism activities by attracting visitors on safari and nature expeditions at a premium fee since its more exclusive than the typical national parks. This in turn generates revenue that can pay the landowners the cost of not using their land, while creating other livelihood opportunities like employment and support with other community projects like education. The primary objective is to endear the communities to the concept and get them to accept that collectively they stand to earn more long term benefits by not fencing or developing their individual lands and instead forsaking it as a wildlife habitat together with the other parcels of other community members

There must be goodwill and trust between the community and their leadership on one hand and the community and the proponents of the conservancy on the other. The legal framework must be able to support lease arrangements that guarantee the land owners that there is a legal recourse should there be any dispute.

Indigenous communities have regard for wildlife and would take initiative for their conservation as long as there is tangible benefit. The people also support genuine investments based on natural resources that support conservation and give solutions to poverty and environmental degradation.

National laws that support registration of titles and leases are important as they decentralise decision making from the national governments to individual land owners who can freely get into negotiations with the conservancies. This makes it easy to make decisions and empowers the communities to make decisions that affect them

Coordination: Capacity development and governance

This building block´s approach is reflected in various activities ranging from training measures, spaces for exchange and dialogue between stakeholders and between institutions as well as support in the development of agreements. One example is the agreement between the Ministry of Environment, the protected area management unit and the university with regard to participatory monitoring and evaluation of nurseries and restoration trials. Strengthening of the protected area management committee is another key measure that aims to improve the area's governance.

In addition, the appropriation and integration of the national climate change policy in meso-level actions, such as the development of climate change plans, the implementation of adaptation measures in productive sectors and in the management of ecosystems, are reflected.

  • Will and trust among stakeholders to cooperate and share responsibilities.

  • Articulation and implementation of public climate policy at the local level.

  • Broad and participatory dialogue spaces are key to achieving lasting agreements with local populations and actors, when there is a real participation in decision-making (MAE and GIZ 2016).
  • The establishment of local governance spaces (e.g. protected area management committee) facilitates the design, implementation and ownership of ecosystem-based adaptation actions.
  • Improved coordination between the different state institutions that have jurisdiction over the area from the areas of their competence will allow a sustainable and integral management of the mangrove protected area located in the urban perimeter (MAE and GIZ 2016).
An Open and Participatory Process

Hsinchu Food Forest is a result of an open and participatory process between the municipality and several stakeholders of the city, like local residents, community groups, city agencies, schools, and even those that might not initially like the idea of an urban food forest. In order to assure public participation and support, it is essential to make every step of building the food forest an open and participatory process. We held over 30 hours of talks to educate local and surrounding communities the idea of a food forest, we even invited the co-founders of the Beacon Food Forest to share their experience with the municipal government and communities, which was a big help in getting the official to say yes. We also held a competition to collect people’s idea on the design of the site, and later asked a landscape designer to combine the ideas of the winning groups. We kept a close relationship with the managing official and local communities (and media) to make sure that the stakeholders would be informed of the latest progress of the food forest, and to modify the design in a timely manner when someone came up with concerns that had been neglected, such as people might trip and fall into the pond at night. We added a short hedgerow and lighting to prevent such possibilities.

1. A group with strong incentives to carry out the project that can negotiate with different stakeholders and take the responsibility.

2. An open and positive attitude when facing obstacles and different opinions.

3. Full and clear understanding of the project, potential obstacles and other information by every stakeholder.

4. Support from every stakeholder/community member. This is critical when the project is on public land.

5. Participatory design: the community must be also consulted and engaged in the design of the site.

The support of the landowner, especially when it is the municipal government, is very important in making this project is sustainable, as it helps face many challenges and bring legitimacy to the project. During the process, one will definitely face different opinions or stumble upon behavioral problems, sometimes reasonable and sometimes not. For example, many of the suggestions brought out by the local elders were against the “care for the earth” or “fair share” concept, such as wanting to use pesticides to alleviate pest problems, or keeping people they don’t like from participating in the food forest. While keeping an open and positive attitude and trying to make everyone equal and happy, we found it hard to enforce the code of conduct as we are not officials nor local residents. This is when the municipal government could play their part in coordinating conflicts and making the final judgment. Note that this might not be the case if the project is happening in other cultural settings.

Co-management of Soariake MPA

Soariake is an IUCN category VI MPA, that aims at protecting natural ecosystems while allowing the sustainable use of natural resources. It is currently co-managed by WCS and local community gathered in Soariake Association.

Local communities are at the same time actors and victims of overfishing.  As MPA co-manager, WCS  is in charge of scientific research and monitoring to assess the value of the site, communicate, raise awareness and support local communities to identify and implement suitable conservation measures, identifying alternatives to better manage natural resources, and identifying key partners if needed. WCS also provides capacity building in terms of project management, social organization and fishing regulation; thus ensuring the integrity of the MPA and the livelihoods of the communities.

WCS also supports the local community to define different zoning of the MPA, local conventions on resource management, ensure patrolling through Community Control and Surveillance, collect  fish catch data, and promote alternatives that are environmental friendly.

Community involvement in the management of the MPA is key to build a local ownership, one pillar to warrant sustainability of on ground activities.

  • Building a long term partnership between WCS and the local community to seek for sustainability: a project approach will raise an opportunistic feelings among local community which does not help achieving conservation and development objectives;

 

  • Maintaining support while ensuring the local community would not become dependent on WCS: capacity building, technical support during the implementation of the activities aim ensuring that in the future local community will be able to implement the activities by themselves;
  • Once the industry is developed in a village and the farmers increase, organizational support is also crucial to help farmers organize production, maintain quality standards, negotiate with the private sector, managing the community equipment, ensuring socio-economic monitoring among farmers, and supporting households in managing their income so as to make sure that the benefit from the aquaculture brings advantages to the family;

 

  • Fighting illiteracy should be part of the activity to consider while promoting co-management so as to facilitate the implementation of regulation, the negotiation with partners, to better involved in rural entrepreneurship
Partinership building block

Our partinership building block includes IFOAM-organics international, German development aid, Rural Development Administration of South Korea. These two organizations organized the Organic Farming innovation Award for which I won the science prize award 2014.

Enabling conditions that are important for success of this building block are:

  • Facilitation of communication for interaction required for information between partners.
  • Financial assistance to faciltate meeting the costs incurred in the building blocks.
  • Media outscaling of innovation's building blocks news spreading to the society.
  1. Building block partnership created a learning of the innovation for beneficiaries to grow tamarillo for food and income.
  2. Building block partnership's OFIA continues to hold innovation competition after every three years.
  3. Regional benefit resulting from innovation's building blocks.