Strengthening local capacities and knowledge

The main goal of the capacity building and local knowledge component was to provide technical knowledge for managing and conserving water, natural pastures, and livestock. Our focus was on informing community members and park rangers through evaluation workshops and training sessions on topics such as pasture fencing, water management and water distribution. A 3-D model of the Miraflores community was developed in a participatory way to facilitate planning for managing pastures and water in the communal territory. Information was gathered during participatory rural appraisals. These appraisals include specific studies focused on water, pastures, archeology, social organization, agricultural and livestock productivity.

  • Use of communication tools to increase local awareness and understanding of the project
  • Local, traditional knowledge and dialogue with outside experts: local participation and positive interactions between locals and external experts have led to effective communications between them
  • Participatory approach and participatory action-research methodology
  • Local researchers served as a bridge between the project and the whole community
  • It is essential that the field team be trained in applying the participatory approach, using participatory tools and facilitating collective learning.
  • Diversifying work with local partners - combining workshops with other methods, practical tools and field work ("learning by doing").
  • Develop activities that involve women, youth and other groups within the community.
  • Maintain a high level of presence in the field and share the day-to-day work with the community.
  • Provide more practical training during fieldwork.
  • Communication strategies helped disseminate the project’s ongoing achievements and progress. These updates were well received and had good impact. Examples are the participatory videos and the "Night of Art” theater.
Steps towards effectively communicating EbA solutions and trade-offs to stakeholders

It is important to communicate the results of a complex analysis such as a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) in a non-technical way. Outcomes were reported to communities in the form of key messages encompassing the effects of EbA on community welfare, traditions and customary rules. For instance, restoring historical wells for provision of water during climate emergencies also comes with social benefits, such as maintaining historical and customary sites. Similarly, the EbA solution for watershed protection also helps to protect areas used to provide plants for traditional medicinal uses. We found that an effective way to communicate solutions, synergies and trade-offs is to tap into traditional uses of services and resources from the ecosystems.

Support from local NGOs, Communities interest in challenges and opportunities

a) It is crucial to break down CBA results into non-technical language, through key messages that spell out benefits and costs, in order for individuals, households and community to weigh challenges and opportunities of EbA solutions;

b) it was important to report benefits as opportunities in terms of capacity building, alternative source of income or livelihoods and describing welfare improvement for households and community;

c) where possible, presenting costs in terms of time that communities should commit for implementing and enforcing a solution (e.g. maintaining wells, vegetation strips, etc.) improve understanding of the results.

Identifying EbA solutions through participatory assessments

The identification of socially, economically and environmentally viable EbA solutions for each community were identified through:

(1) local participatory assessments to identify threats and potential solutions;

(2) household surveys to collect information on income sources and dependence on natural resources and

(3) social cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to explicitly compare the costs and benefits of adaptation options including impacts on ecosystem services.

Historically, Micronesian communities have relied on ecosystem services and the connection with ecosystems and nature is still strong at present. This strong connection, coupled with ownership and local knowledge, was the main driver of EbA acceptance and application. The grass-roots approach allowed the identification of traditional resource uses, which were generally associated with sustainable practices.

a) Participatory meetings were the essential settings for different stakeholders to come together and commit their time, as a community, for maintaining and managing their island ecosystems;

b) Using a participatory approach helped to reinforce the traditional governance system and enhance accountability and ownership of island communities;

c) active participation strengthened EbA solutions by acknowledging the relevance of adaptation to climate change for individuals, households and the entire community.

Integrated vulnerability analysis at national and local level

The vulnerability assessment was carried out for three periods: the status quo in 2014, the period 2030-2060 and the period 2070-2100. The assessment follows the eight-step approach described in GIZ’s Vulnerability Sourcebook, and was supplemented by a scientific modeling of the impacts of climate change for Burundi.

The study was carried out by three institutions (Adelphi, EURAC, PIK) in collaboration with GIZ / ACCES and its partners. Four national workshops were held with all relevant stakeholders. A group of experts was created to advise and direct the process. Activities at the local level at the selected project sites were carried out in close collaboration with local governmental and non-governmental actors and the local population.

The results of the assessment were presented in the form of vulnerability maps for the three factors of erosion, drought and malaria prevalence. Highly vulnerable areas have been identified to guide the identification of three pilot watersheds. In these watersheds, local vulnerability assessments were conducted to identify local challenges and appropriate adaptation measures.

  • National Workshops: enabled participants (government and civil society) to better understand the process and to share their perspectives and expertise on the topic.
  • Establishment of an expert group composed of experts from various Burundian ministries and institutions: important for the ownership of the process itself and its results.
  • Integration of vulnerability assessment into the National Adaptation Plan (NAP) process in Burundi.
  • Data availability was a major challenge. Most government records are not classified and documents and information are incomplete. Aggregate data are often only available at the national and provincial levels, making it difficult to communicate at the local level.
  • The results of the vulnerability assessment form the basis for integrating climate change adaptation into national and local investment policies, strategies and plans. Other actors can use this experience and information for adaptation planning.
  • The methodology used to assess vulnerability in Burundi is based on a standardized methodology, which allows for replication.
Holistic and participatory approach to CC adaptation

The ACCES project developed a holistic and participatory approach through the implementation of adaptation measures in the 3 pilot zones. This approach takes into account the environmental, societal, economic and pedoclimatic dimensions of Burundi.

The successive stages of implementation have consisted of establishing a list of adaptation measures that can respond to climatic stimuli. These measures have been categorized according to their typology: grey measures, green measures, capacity building, action research, policy framework. The project prioritized capacity building measures and green measures for feasibility and sustainability issues. The project then conducted participatory planning workshops in each of the pilot areas to assess their acceptability in consultation with the population. The result was a set of consensual and specific CCA measures for each of the zones. To ensure quality and sustainability, a follow-up technical committee was established locally (CTS-L). This committee is made up of people from the local administration, farmers leaders, association leaders, who are in charge of monitoring and sustaining the measures.

  • Capacity building of actors on all levels on CC and CCA
  • Good knowledge of the agricultural practices of the intervention zones (close collaboration with INADES-Formation Burundi)
  • Participatory planning of CCA measures with the local population to ensure good acceptability
  • Establishment and training of a Local Monitoring Technical Committee, a group representing the interests of the population in order to ensure the quality and sustainability of CCA measures.

In order to ensure the sustainability of CCA measures, it is imperative to ensure public support (through participatory planning), understanding (training, awareness-raising, capacity building) and accountability (Technical committee).

The holistic approach to adaptation measures has been based on a cross-cutting approach to environmental issues in Burundi, also drawing on the expertise of other GIZ projects (ProSecEau and EnDev Programs).

Innovative measures were first tested on a small scale to assess their impacts. Once validated, these measures could be duplicated in the other intervention areas of the project.

Adaptation, gender and the empowerment of women: an integrated approach

In Burundi, gender inequalities continue to restrict women's access to decision-making, resources and benefits (education, information, land ownership, time, jobs, credits, etc.) and the equitable distribution of tasks. Faced with this situation, women are becoming more vulnerable but are also excluded from efforts to mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change.

The ACCES project carried out a gender analysis in its intervention zones. The evaluation of the status of gender mainstreaming in planning and implementation of adaptation measures, in information and early warning systems and in Community Development Community Plans (PCDCs) yielded several recommendations. One recommendation was the CCA model household approach. The goal is that couples are trained in replicating the techniques, skills and experiences gained through the project within their respective CCA households, taking into account that women are powerful change agents and development and in order to empower women.

  • Human resources trained on gender and knowledgeable of Burundian culture and traditions (eg gender focal points)
  • Gender analysis as a basis for mainstreaming gender, carried out at all levels and in all fields of intervention.
  • Capacity building of the members of the communal gender platforms and its integration in risk analysis and assessment as well as in the information and early warning systems.
  • Training and sensitization of model households (training of awareness-raising agents) is an essential prerequisite for changing mores and attitudes.
  • Showing by example is probably the most appropriate method for initiating a change in men's perception of the role and responsibilities of women at the household and community level in general.
  • Producing a booklet as a training guide for model households helps capitalize lessons learned and is a product that will serve as a vehicle for future scaling up.
  • Focus on qualitative and not just quantitative aspects in order to grasp the social and cultural mechanisms that impede the empowerment of women is key (not only the number of women involved in activities is important but the processes of change within the household or community).
Scientific cooperation

Joint migratory bird monitoring programmes and support of common scientific and management projects to promote conservation and management of the natural resources of the Wadden Sea and Banc d’Arguin. The ambition is for the two sites to take lead in simultaneous counts along the entire East Atlantic Flyway in order to get a full picture on the status of migratory bird populations using the flyway. Research on migratory birds in the Wadden Sea and Banc d'Arguin is closely interconnected and significant for all other wintering, breeding and staging sites along the flyway. Thus, only scientific cooperation can reach a holistic perception of the flyway and a common basis for successful management.

Shared research questions and similarities of nature sites.

Cultural differences lead to different understanding of monitoring and scientific research, e.g. different approaches to scientific research and monitoring had to be viewed and discussed to find a common path.

Exchange of know-how

Regular exchange visits and exchange of know-how between experts and site managers. These meetings are means of capacity building with harmonised values and methods taught and practiced both in Banc d’Arguin and the Wadden Sea. Common monitoring and management methods are harmonized and a shared level of knowledge and understanding is created. Participants are scientists, site managers and other experts of the respective protected areas.

The exchange visits of experts and managers are funded by the Trilateral Wadden Sea Cooperation and partners in the countries, e.g. the national parks. From the beginning, all partners on regional and national level of the MOU understood the advantages to enhance the conservation of their WH properties and especially migratory bird along the East Atlantic Flyway.

Cultural differences lead to different understanding of nature conservation and management, e.g. the diverse views on nature conservation has to be acknowledged on both sites in order to define common goals and methods of managing the sites.

Drinking water systems rehabilitation and disaster preparedness

To rehabilitate, reconstruct and redesign drinking water systems damaged by Tropical Storm Stan in 2005, the Tacaná project facilitated communications, damage assessment and the organisation of donor coordination in the immediate aftermath of the disaster. In conjunction with municipalities and governmental authorities, a reconstruction plan for the Department of San Marcos was developed. WANI coordinated the rehabilitation and reconstruction of 72 drinking water systems and four small irrigation systems.

A total of 77 communities with approximately 34,092 inhabitants comprising 6,616 families took part in water supply system studies. Disaster preparedness plans and mechanisms were developed alongside the drinking water systems reconstruction. 

This crisis was instrumental in galvanizing commitments to IWRM and water governance reforms. 

The devastation caused by this tropical storm alerted the authorities and communities to the area’s vulnerability to climate change impacts and the need to increase resilience to tropical storms and flooding through improved infrastructure and restored ecosystems.

Developing alliances and integration of local to national levels

At the community level in Guatemala, WANI facilitated the development of collaborations with the Community Development Committees and coordinated with Municipal and National Development Councils to enable integration of microwatershed planning and management with community-led action on development. Implementation has demonstrated that projects formulated by the communities rather than external institutions respond to the real demands of communities.

At the department level in San Marcos, in Guatemala, an alliance was created with 16 government and NGOs, to form the Inter-Institutional Coordination for Natural Resources and the Environment of San Marcos. CORNASAM has adopted the microwatershed as the unit of planning and, together, these groups have coordinated outreach and training in the micro-watershed approach.

As a result of the success of the Microwatershed model at the local level, the National Microwatershed Commission of Guatemala was established, comprising several government ministries and NGOs/ IGOs (Action Against Hunger, FAO and IUCN) to lead application of governance reform through microwatershed management country-wide. This National Commission will facilitate the preparation of national public water policies.

In Mexico the new water law of 2003 outlined and supported the implementation of water councils.

At the transboundary level the signing of the “Tapachula Declaration of Intent” by Mexican and Guatemalan mayors supported cooperation on joint actions on watershed management and to provide a platform for information sharing by governmental agencies at the very local level.  

Strengthening community-based alliances and integrating them with municipal and national development institutions increases coordination between administrative levels. This promotes integrated and coordinated water resource planning across the watershed and shared experiences with other community groups and networks.