Existing biodiversity consideration and an in-company champion.

Heidelberg already had a biodiversity policy and were organising a reward initiative related to biodiversity. This meant that there was already a good foundation to build on, and someone to advocate strongly for it within the company.

For a company to be aware of sustainability and biodiversity factors , it can depend on the presence of a conscientious employee or manager, the response to legal, financial or social pressures, or willingness over the years to discuss with civil society.

It was necessary for the NGOs to study the company and assess how far the company was in terms of environmental awareness, and knowing where and how to make the most impact. 

Regulatory measures

 The government of Bangladesh manages its artisanal hilsa fishery through a number of different regulatory measures, most of which focus on protecting juvenile fish:

  1. Hilsa fishing is banned throughout the country during the perceived peak breeding season (22 days in October), with the aim of minimising disturbance to spawning and recruitment. Enforcement is focused on areas known to be important spawning grounds.
  2. There is an eight-month nationwide ban on capture, possession, selling and transport of juvenile hilsa (fry less than 25 cm long) between November and July to maximise recruitment of juveniles to the fishery. Enforcement is focused on 7,000 square kilometres of coastal, estuarine and riverine areas. 
  3. There is a year-round ban on use and production of monofilament gillnets, again for the protection of juvenile hilsa. 
  4. Six hilsa sanctuaries have been designated to protect major hilsa nursery grounds. These sanctuaries range from 20-100 km sections of river. All fishing is banned for at least 2 months in these areas during their peak periods of juvenile presence.

A ‘mobile court’ team operates at the subdistrict level to enforce these regulations, with support from the police and other agencies.

Effective monitoring and enforcement of fisheries regulations relies on human, physical and financial resources, but these are limited in Bangladesh. In lieu of proper monitoring and enforcement, the provision of compensation enables and incentivises fishers to comply with these regulations by offsetting or reducing the socioeconomic cost.

The regulations must be grounded in robust ecological and biological research if they are to have a positive impact on hilsa stocks. The geographical placement and seasonal timings of regulations designed to protect hilsa have been adapted over time in response to new scientific evidence.

Local government tools for local management of protected areas

In order to manage biodiversity at the municipal level, stakeholders and local governments need to have a clear understanding of their roles and competencies, as well as the tools that enable them to do so. For example, the tool for creating municipal systems of protected areas allows the municipality to consolidate the management of conservation areas, the actors involved in these processes, have more information about their territory and in many cases include the areas in land use planning. These systems are a platform that guarantees the participation and social appropriation of the municipality's inhabitants.

  • Understanding of the application of conservation regulations that enable municipalities' competencies for biodiversity management.
  • Compilation of biodiversity management tools and general information on those that can be applied by local governments.
  • Support from institutions with experience in the effective management of conservation areas.
  • It is important to be clear about the scope of action of conservation tools and which ones are within the range of action of local governments.
  • Keep in mind that biodiversity management is a task carried out by governments in cooperation and articulation with other actors at the municipal, regional and national levels.
Education as a tool for conservation

For the development of the virtual course, teaching and learning objectives were proposed and provided through two units: one on basic concepts and the other on practical tools for conservation. This process provided basic elements for understanding the relationship between biodiversity and the reality of the territories, as well as the identification of tools that facilitate the management of conservation areas by municipal representatives.

The participants developed the course over a period of one month, with an hourly intensity of 24 hours on the platform of the Escuela Superior de Administración Pública -ESAP- which uses a Moodle format.

  • Achieving a virtual course built jointly with ten institutions and in partnership with the Escuela Superior de Administración Pública-ESAP-, this participatory process facilitated the success of the course.
  • The course certificate issued by ESAP gives points on the resume (i.e. incentive or stimulus) to people working in public administration.
  • The dissemination of the call for the course was made through the networks of several institutions, which allowed a wide dissemination and the enrollment of 2100 people.

In the implementation of the course, some lessons learned were identified, such as:

  • Having a joint work strategy
  • Working under a vision of coordinated action
  • It is necessary to have the support of a group of professionals, experts in the different topics: pedagogue, proofreader and visualizer to transmit complex concepts, often new or unfamiliar to local governments.
Important aspects of FFS

FFS have been proven to have successful outcomes all over the world. They bring together aspects of agroecology, adult learning methods and community development and are widely adapted by NGOs, governments and international agencies. Overall there are some aspects that need to be considered to have successful outcomes:

 

  • Gradual learning process: Changing processes and mindsets needs time and enough space within the workshops. Problems occur in real time and good solutions need to be practiced. This gives everyone the experience of positive outcomes and advantages in changing their perspective. Seeing something new work with success usually starts an open thought process.
  • Farmers need to take the lead and define the programme.
  • The learning process should be done in a structured and practical oriented process with regular meetings.
  • Trainers need to facilitate rather than teach: Adult education needs to be considered by heart and supported by facilitators.
  • Group processes need to be established. Therefore, training should focus on:
    • Practical group work with exercises in the field
    • Critical and analytical skills
    • Planning skills
    • Evaluation and feedback skills
  • Situational and locally adapted approach during workshops.
  • Fitting training fields need to be available.
  • Strong facilitators who need to support adult education in a participate manner by heart. Giving additional training can support a positive outcome.
  • Committed and open-minded participants.
  • Facilitator must not only be technically well-trained, but also be convinced of the methods presented.
  • It is important to keep the attendance of the same farmers high during the whole duration of the workshops. This supports the gradual learning process and acceptance.
  • Facilitators/technicians need to be involved in the learning process and discuss this with the group.
  • Training in adult education for facilitators supports the learning process.
  • Selecting group leaders from within the participants helps to facilitate workshops. It is helpful to involve them at a high level.
  • Training must take place on the field. Flexible scheduling ensures that training can be offered even when weather conditions change.
  • Giving small incentives or "goodies" that support the work (e.g. canning jar) support overall acceptance of FFS and new approaches.
Exchange visits

Often more than one FFS is held during an implementation process. It is likely that groups develop slightly different approaches to tackle similar challenges or that groups choose different methods that are practiced at the training fields. Exchange visits offer the possibility to widen the experiences and solutions that are shared.

 

During exchange visits farmers from one field school visit another group of farmers that is held in a different region. Everyone is able to learn from a different experience and the outcomes of another group. This way good practices and success stories can be shared, and each group gets new input in a bottom up approach.

  • FFS need to be implemented in more than one region.
  • Group travel needs to be feasible.
  • The transfer of knowledge can be expanded at a participatory level.
  • Interregional knowledge exchange can be fostered.
  • New solutions and best practices can be introduced to FFS.
  • Experience between facilitators and partners is improved.
  • Farmers are more open towards new approaches if they see who else is implementing new methods and that the same approaches are implemented in different regions. If well planned, inspiring role models can be met.
  • Exchange of seeds/seedlings is easily done during exchange visits.
Transforming a scientific monitoring in a social and touristic event

The management of protected areas through conservation activities is normally separated from tourist use activities. Creating a connection between the two activities can be a tool to solve many problems, showing everybody that the Park's activities are part of a single and complex strategy.

The red deer census in Foreste Casentinesi National Park is at the same time an important action of wildlife monitoring and a big touristic event, based on high quality tourism. It directly involves, during four days in low touristic season, local accomodations like mountain huts and "agriturismi" (farms),  environmental guides and interpreters, restaurants and other economic enterprises.

 

 

The volunteers involved in the census are on average young and obviously take this opportunity also as an opportunity for recreation in nature and meeting people with their same passion. The census activities and the presence of hundreds of voluntueers from many Italian and foreign locations are quite visible to all the local population, also through the media. 

Thanks to the deer census, the National Park becomes the venue for a major national event of conservation and this is much appreciated by the local communities.

One of the keys for managing national parks is to use forms of development as conservation tools. The deer census, as organized in the Casentinesi Forests National Park, is an excellent example of this strategy. Thanks to the census, the local people look at the deer and its conservation activities as an opportunity for socio-economic development.

At the same time, the volunteers find a rare opportunity to be protagonists of the park management for a couple of days, feeling themselves being real part of it.

This experience demonstrates how environmental conservation can coincide with opportunities for sustainable socio-economic development.

Collaborating in a common framework

Each year, the working group agrees on the theme for a shared working study, which aims to share the good practices, identify the leverages and obstacles in order to better address the solutions. The co-creation of the study ensures the members’ interest in the discussed topics, thus guaranteeing their commitment. In addition, aiming towards common goals enhances the synergies among the working group.   

For example, a working group focused on the mobilization of employees identified 11 examples of successful practices such as organizing nature visits on site, displaying signs presenting biodiversity issues of operational sites, organizing events and moments of exchange with specialists, identifying a biodiversity referent, organizing training sessions or competitions. 

Two fundamental aspects to efficiently mobilize the employees were determined:  

  • On one hand, the requirement to elaborate an engaged social approach led by the top management of businesses (CEOs); 

  • On the other hand, the importance of promoting measures that lead to action and promoting their experiences.

  • Define a collaborative framework through a co-created study with the chair approval 

  • Diversity of ideas and skills to enlarge the spectrum of the opportunities to protect and restore biodiversity and the spectrum of envisioned solutions.   

  • Regular reporting to the working group members on the on-going and realized work

  • Bringing together different stakeholders enhances communication and understanding between cross-sector stakeholders around a common goal. A common goal can facilitate the publication of studies and tools needed by the working group members in their activities.   

  • Bringing external speakers from the IUCN network to share their expertise on the ongoing study enables to go deeper in the discussions as well as to answer to raised questions.

Enhancing multi-stakeholders dialogue

The working group serves as a dialogue platform to find better solutions for biodiversity.  

The chair is made up of French IUCN Committee teams and an President  is elected usually among the business partners for a three-year mandate. The President shares with the IUCN team the concerns of businesses in order to guarantee a relevant agenda.  

The dialogue is reinforced first through a virtual meeting to agree on the yearly agenda based on a chair’s proposal, and then complemented by two face-to-face meetings per year. An improvement the last years has been the organization of sites visits on a voluntary basis from our business partners to learn from each other and confront the practices through concrete actions. It gives an insight on the replicable actions as well as the context-specific ones.  According to the needs, more meetings and exchanges can be organised throughout the year.  

  • Frequent meetings and exchanges: face-to-face meetings, on-site visits, phone calls, e-mails 

  • Bi-monthly newsletter, with space given to the members to share their initiatives 

  • Diversity of members: scientists, NGOs, business biodiversity managers, protected areas managers, government representatives from the ministry of the ecology, representatives from the new governmental agency for biodiversity, international representatives of IUCN  

  • Trust and transparency between members

  • The confidence built with the business partners thanks to long-term partnerships enhance a fruitful participation among the working group members based on co-construction. 

  • It is essential not only to engage all relevant stakeholders, but also to have an IUCN internal dialogue without companies to define risks and opportunities beforehand. 

  • It is important to have an appointed focal point who agrees the agenda of the meetings and animates the discussions. The focal point should support working group members’ initiatives to put on the agenda their insights, struggles and solutions to deal with biodiversity issues that are raised.  

  • A diverse multi-stakeholder group ensures that different views are expressed and results will be widely shared and accepted in order to co-create solutions. The business representatives in the working group are specialized in biodiversity. A next step would include business members coming from non-environmental departments, such as the purchase department to further incorporate biodiversity issues in the whole company.
Organization of livestock breeders into silvopastoral management associations

Sheep farming is the main activity in the area. The number of livestock far exceeds the forage capacity of the forest rangelands. As a result, it is difficult to respect the parcels set aside for regeneration. However, the organization of livestock farmers into associations enables them to benefit from indemnities compensating them for the use of the cleared areas. This helps to regenerate the Atlas cedar, which is in danger of extinction.

The compensation agreement is governed by a commitment from the associations to respect the set-asides for regeneration,

-The compensation received is invested in infrastructure and equipment for livestock rearing and the purchase of feed;

-The organizations enable us to plan integrated development projects that make the most of the natural resources of all the pastoral parks and involve all social categories, especially young people and women.

There is a risk that the compensation received by the associations will be shared directly by the farmers, without the expected investments being made;

The herders themselves may serve as laborers to implement the actions contracted between the water and forestry department and the associations;

The associations need to be monitored and coached from the outset, so that they can grasp the concept of compensation and develop it into development projects.