Local and national capacity building

The project invested significantly in capacity building at the local and nation level through awareness raising on EbA/Eco-DRR, hands on field learning activities and training workshops. The project ensured that women were among those trained in all activities.

Local capacity building targeted mainly the five villages where the interventions took place but also involved representatives from villages who were involved in up-scaling the project interventions to a larger area of the wadi in the upstream section.  Awareness raising promote dialogue on dryland ecosystems and disaster risk management issues. 

 

Farm extension agents (2 in each village) were trained due to limited presence of the Government in the villages to provide agricultural extension support services. Moreover, eight community animal health workers also referred to as “paravets”, were trained on animal husbandry, treatment, animal drugs, feeding, and vaccination, through theoretical and practical sessions. The "paravets" also monitored the re-seeded pasture areas.

 

A national and a state-level training on Eco-DRR were also undertaken.

The major portion of capacity building took place in the field, as part of “learning by doing” through implementation of field interventions such as nursery establishment and management, rangeland re-seeding, and reforestation.

Local capacity-building trainings provided to communities improve the chances of continuity in the management of field interventions.

 

The State-level workshop initiated a series of dialogues in North Darfur on the importance of establishing a forum that serves as a platform for natural resource management that is both inclusive and conscious of water-related hazards.  Undertaking such trainings at the national and state-level, help mainstream ecosystem-based measures in national policies and programmes. Indeed IWRM was identified as a key measure to reducing disaster risks and adapting to climate change and weather extremes, which was reflected in the National Agenda for Action which was the main output of the national training.

Building partnerships and community engagement

Building strong partnerships at the local and national level and working with the local community is essential for the implementation and overall success and sustainability of the project.

Furthermore it was essential to connect the local communities to government bodies and ensure the state takes joint ownership of the activities so that any future support that is needed can be sought from the government.

UNEP had strong longstanding partnerships (with local stakeholders and local and national implementing partners)  in place in the project area. 

In a fragile context like in Sudan, having long standing partnerships are vital for the success of the project. 

 

During implementation of community based activities it was learned that community level projects must make it least demanding of time and energy from community members, and ensure the right timing of activities to match communities’ schedule, as project activities generally require voluntary work.

Moreover, when communities see clear evidence of the benefits of the interventions, they then become more willing to implement and continue with similar activities on their own in the future. Interventions that show less direct livelihood benefits require good dialogue and awareness raising campaigns.

 

 

 

Supporting national advocacy on ecosystem-based measures

To support the Government of DRC in its national transition towards IWRM a Roadmap was developed to guide the development of a National Water Policy. The Roadmap outlines the principal orientation and necessary steps in the elaboration of the National Water Policy, the principal stakeholders involved, an initial work plan, and a fund mobilization strategy. DRR is also highlighted in the Roadmap as a priority theme along with capacity building and cross-sectoral coordination. This Roadmap is influenced by the IWRM experience in Lukaya and makes specific reference to DRR and the role of local communities in IWRM.

 

A National working group on Eco-DRR was also formed at the demand of the Government, who had interest in establishing a National Platform on DRR.

National dialogue was sparked on Eco-DRR through the field demonstrations, the workshops and trainings.

The project’s success in raising awareness on Eco-DRR in the country was evidenced when the Government of DRC took the initiative to promote ecosystem-based approaches during preparatory discussions on the post-2015 global framework on DRR, now the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030). The Government of DRC has taken full ownership of promoting Eco-DRR approaches through IWRM.

Capacity building

As this was DRC’s first experience in applying both the Eco-DRR, as well as IWRM approach, it was critically important to progressively develop and strengthen capacities over time, which involved:

 

  • Awareness-raising;
  • training and workshops;
  • Hands-on learning activities in the field demonstration sites;
  • Field visits and study tours both in the country and in the region.

 

There was a total of 71 trainings and workshops. These covered general meetings (inception and presentation); national awareness raising workshops on Eco-DRR and IWRM; workshops related to IWRM, the role of Eco-DRR in IWRM and action planning; trainings on hydro-meteorological monitoring, soil erosion monitoring and flood risk modelling; training on agroforestry and value chain production; and trainings on soil loss monitoring and bioengineering to reduce soil erosion.

The project emphasized the importance of linking the local group AUBR/L with the relevant National Government ministries and other partners, whose capacity was also built so that the work is sustainable over time.

 

The project also created new partnerships, which facilitated study tours in the country and in the region.

A major portion of capacity building took place in the field, as part of “learning-by-doing” through implementation of the field interventions. While these were intended to support field interventions, they were also designed to establish locally-managed systems that would be long lasting. Therefore, trainings were added also according to needs identified during the implementation of the project. For example, it was identified that capacity needed to be established also on how to sell produce from agroforestry (not just on how to implement agroforestry) and on bushfire management after a fire destroyed a reforestation site.

Support provincial and national level advocacy on Eco-DRR

This component aimed to promote ecosystem based measures and disaster risk reduction in Afghanistan where such work is budding only nationally. The project therefore identified entry points such as climate change adaptation work and promoted the overall concept of disaster risk reduction in the country with ecosystem-based measures as an integral component of DRR.

Through its field interventions and multiple local, provincial and national-level trainings and workshops, the project sparked national dialogue on the effectiveness of ecosystem-based measures to achieve sustainable and disaster-resilient development. The project was timely because it provided a tangible experience of Eco-DRR in Afghanistan, which helped inform national policy dialogue leading up to the adoption of the new global framework on DRR.

The project has influenced national policy and programmes by promoting Eco-DRR as an integral component of DRR in humanitarian and disaster management activities, as well as by integrating EcoDRR in climate change adaptation activities. However high turnover of staff in government positions has been a limiting factor in efforts to build capacity and support policy advocacy on Eco-DRR. For instance, UNEP’s efforts to promote Eco-DRR in the 5-year Provincial Plan of Bamyan were undermined by a change in Provincial Governor and multiple temporary assignments to this position, which resulted in long delays in the development of the Provincial Plan. However, the national trainings and conferences ensure that capacity is built within technical government staff.

Planning the management of the Yaigojé Apaporis Indigenous Reserve and Natural National Park from an indigenous cosmovision

The creation of the Yaigojé Apaporis Indigenous Reserve and Natural National Park marked the beginning of a new relationship model between indigenous peoples and the Colombian Government. It was necessary to seek mechanisms to ensure the governance and integral conservation of their life systems, without interfering with their rights to their territorial autonomy and to the cultural management that they have traditionally carried out. Once the park was created, the process of formulating its Special Management Regime (REM) was initiated. This regime was the instrument through which the joint administration of the park was shared by the Colombian Natural National Parks (PNNC) and the Yaigojé Apaporis Indigenous Captains Association (ACIYA). Establishing the REM required an internal (or endogenous) research methodology, proposed by the indigenous communities and supported by the experience of the GAIA Amazonas Foundation. This methodology was based on the guidelines issued by an Amazon Indigenous Congress that identified the topics to be collected in each of the communities, in order to guide the design of the REM. This approach helped promote the participation of indigenous communities with three representatives and a shaman.

  • Legal figure of the REM that maintains the inalienability of the indigenous territories when they acquire a category of National Park .
  • Development of an internal methodology, led by the GAIA Amazonas Foundation in conjunction with the indigenous organizations, to establish the REM guidelines according to the particularities of the Park and the management regime.
  • Financial availability of State resources, and external support to implement a participatory process to build the REM.

The research process to develop the REM was carried out in two years. The Cooperation Agreement 011 of 2013 celebrated between PNNC and ACIYA established a reasonable timeframe of five years for the construction, formalization, and joint implementation of the REM. This process allowed the following:

  • Rescue ancestral values.
  • Promote greater involvement of young people in the design of the REM.
  • Revalue traditional knowledge.
  • Generat a greater relationship of coordination and management of the area between PPNC staff and indigenous populations.
  • Generate a better understanding of the biological characteristics of the territory and its cultural value, as an input for the design of the Park’s management strategies.
  • Become a replicable model for other REMs in the Colombian Amazon, since it allows the integration of traditional knowledge on the use of natural resources with the policies of PNNA regarding protected area management.
Local social organization and national governmental support for the creation of the protected area

The Yaigojé Apaporis Indigenous Reserve was created in 1998 through a request of the indigenous Tanimuca, Yucana, Letuama, Matapí, Cabayari, Macuna, Barazano, and Yujup-Macú peoples. In 2008, through a consensus in an extraordinary session of the Traditional Authorities and the Indigenous Captains (ATCI), these communities decided to request the creation of a National Park overlapping the limits of the Reserve. The request was based on the consideration that this would eliminate the development of mining operations and other natural resources exploitation that might endanger biodiversity, their sacred sites and, as a consequence, their customs, social composition, and environmental context.

The creation of the Yaigojé Apaporis Indigenous Reserve and Natural National Park has a long process of working with the GAIA Amazonas Foundation, which had the technical and financial support of the Gordon & Betty Moore Foundation. The decision to move to a Special Management Regime (REM) needed the have full local support, ensure the autonomy of the indigenous communities, and strengthen their traditional systems. In addition, it was necessary for them to have negotiation and coordination skills to establish an agreement with the State.

  • Traditional indigenous communities empowered in their decision-making.
  • Colombia's legal framework recognizes indigenous autonomy and their role as public and environmental authorities within their territories.
  • Availability of financial resources from the State and foreign organizations to implement an effective process of informed previous consultation.
  • Successful relationship experience between PNNC, indigenous authority and civil society to strengthen territorial environmental governance.

Once the decision to create the park was made, the following step was the agreement between the Colombian Natural National Parks (PNNC) and the Yaigojé Apaporis Indigenous Captains Association (ACIYA) to carry out a free, informed and previous consultation process that would allow greater social participation and collective construction in terms of definition of limits, area extension, conservation objectives and joint construction of the REM. As a result, the ATCI established management agreements between the State and the Indigenous Authorities stating that the integrated management of the area would be based on traditional knowledge and regulations received in accordance with the way of conceiving the world of each of the seven indigenous peoples and their 19 communities, respecting indigenous autonomy, their rights over their communal lands, their sacred sites, and their cultural values. Thus, in October 2009 the constitution of the Yaigojé Apaporis Natural Park was declared.

 

Conservation mosaics: An effective strategy to consolidate great expanses of protected territory in Brazil

The National System of Protected Areas Act, enacted in July of 2000, established the Conservation Mosaic Approach. Mosaics are a “set of Conservation Units (UC) of equal or different category that are close, adjoining or overlapping, and other public or private protected areas” that are managed in an integrated manner, according to the goals of each UC.

To address the challenge of managing socio-environmental conflicts and optimizing human, financial, and material resources, the Bajo Río Negro Conservation Mosaic was established in 2010, with a total area of 7,329,220 hectares, and integrated by 11 UC, among them the Jaú National Park and the Unini RESEX. The implementation of this approach prioritizes conservation processes for larger areas, which allows for landscape integrated management of areas along the Jaú and Unini rivers to the north, and the Bajo Río Negro to the south of the mosaic. By viewing the protected areas like parts of a larger unit, functional and interconnected, it was necessary to include a participatory methodology in the design of management plans, that encouraged the participation of multiple actors in the decision-making process related to the administration of the territory and its natural resources.

  • The Conservation Mosaic management approach enables the integration of multiple actors and opportunities of technical and financial assistance for territorial management.
  • Linkage of efforts in areas with a shared territorial identity, to achieve a common goal of conservation and sustainable management of natural resources.
  • Institutionalization of an Advisory Council as a mobilizing force in the area.
  • Strategy planning at a landscape scale.

The key elements for the integrated landsape management included the implementation of an Action Plan for the mosaic, the creation of an Advisory Council to support decision-making, the development of participatory methodologies for zoning community use and subsistance areas, and the strengthening of local capacities through training processes for natural resources management, sustainable agriculture, tourism, and rights and obligations of the local communities.

The benefits of integrated management are: resource optimization; integrated landscape planning; coordinating protection activities; environmental education, monitoring and awareness in the region; the possibility of developing an integrated territorial identity based on the characteristics of the region; the development of unified strategies for the valorization of products for communities around and inside the conservation units; and the facilitation of agreements and conflict resolution.

Local participation to guarantee access to natural resources and land possession

In 1979, the area presently occupied by the Jaú National Park was proposed as a Biological Reserve, a management category that is restrictive toward exploitation of natural resources in Brazil. In 1980, the Jaú National Park was created, and since then it has the challenge of managing the high level of socio-environmental conflict in the area.

The Vitória Amazônica Foundation (FVA), with presence in the area since 1991, has applied innovative and participatory mapping methodologies for natural resources use, which were the basis for the development of its zoning and Management Plan, between 1996 and 1998, within a co-management contract with the Federal Government of Brazil. Years later, Brazil created the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC) and developed tools for building participatory processes. As a result, the FVA, as the technical collaborating institution of the Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA) provided support to local communities during the creation of the Unini River Extractive Reserve (RESEX), in a process that lasted until 2006, with the intention of guaranteeing access to natural resources and land tenure for the populations in the Jaú and Unini rivers.

  • Creation of the National System of Conservation Units (SNUC).
  • Promotion of social participation in the management of conservation units (UC).
  • Development of tools for socio-environmental conflicts management.
  • Technical and financial support for training procceses between protected area managers and local representatives.
  • Creation of the Residents’ Association of the Unini River (AMORU) for the creation of the Unini River RESEX.

The creation of the Unini River RESEX required a participatory process that allowed negotiating and defining with the local communities a set of favorable conditions to enable the design and application of consultation mechanisms, natural resources use zoning, and the creation of participatory organisms such as the RESEX Deliberative Council, in 2008.

The first step was the creation of the AMORU, which in turn made the formal request for the creation of the RESEX. After that, a public consultation process was developed in the local communities, to underwrite the creation of the Reserve. Once the reserve was created, the Chico Méndez Institute for Biodiversity Conservation (ICMBio), an institution connected with the Ministry of the Environment, together with the FVA, began the management processes. Among this was the formation of the Deliberative Council, integrated by representatives of government agencies, civil society organizations, and local population representative of the area.

Governance Beyond Borders

The Amazonian border integration initiative known as the Tri-National Program, was promoted by the Administrators of three protected areas (The La Paya National Park-Colombia, the Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve-Ecuador, and the Güeppí National Park-Peru), enabling a management optimization under a regionally coordinated model.

It all started in 2005 as a result of the dialogue efforts carried on by the representatives of the three Protected Areas. In 2006 the initiative was consolidated as the Tri-National Program, since then it has continuously been strengthened over time.

The first important decision towards financial support for the initiative, was sought trough an agreement among the environmental funds available in each of the three participating countries. Afterwards, additional financial support was pursued through several projects that could cover the expenses of priority lines such as protected and buffer area’s management, social participation, organizational capacity improvement and the conservation corridor´s enhancement.

In this context, the Goverments united to seek operational, technical and financial mechanisms to ensure the conservation and sustainable development of the Corridor, with the ambition of becoming a successful pilot experience of transboundary management.

  • A shared vision among the three protected areas to solve similar issues in the border region.
  • Well defined structure of the Program under specific management guidelines, with a Coordinating Committee (three national authorities representing each of the Protected Areas National Systems) a Technical Committee (Head Managers of the three Protected Areas,) and a Technical Secretariat (rotating headquarters every two years among the three environmental authorities).
  • Procurement of technical and financial support from cooperation agencies.

The program’s institutional background was strengthened thanks to a strong structure comprised of: The Coordinating Committee; The Technical Committee; and, The Technical Secretariat. Furthermore, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed by the parties which provided a clear guideline for the job ahead.

Thanks to the technical and financial support gained, several coordinated actions were carried out to increase the functionality and management capabilities of the three areas. In Cuyabeno, guarding posts were repaired and equipped, and the Monitoring and Vigilance Program was consolidated as part of the Area’s Management Plan; later this was articulated with the park ranger’s work in all three Areas to effectively monitor strategic conservation spots inside the protected areas, buffer zones, and borders.

In regards of social participation for sustainable management, the work was aimed to strengthen the organic coffee and fine aromatic cocoa productivity chain and communitarian tourism innitiatives.