Co-Management Between Indigenous Communities and the Government

One of the great challenges for the Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve was the consolidation of its boundaries and securing management agreements with the local populations and indigenous organizations. Under the previous logic of integrating cultural variables in the national preservation process, the project “Delimitation of the lower region, conflict resolution, and awareness of the communities about the resource management and use in the Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve” was successfully created.

The project main goal was to preserve the biological and cultural integrity of the Reserve under a strong alliance between the MAE and the indigenous communities that inhabit and coexisted in the territory: Siona, Secoya, Cofán, Kicwa, and Shuar.

As a result, in 1995 began the process of establishing Natural Resources Use and Management Agreements with most of the communities in these five indigenous nations. Such efforts promoted local participation and the recognition of the Protected Area for shared management.

The agreements became formal documents that legitimized the communities’ right to live in the Reserve and use the natural resources within under special conditions.

 

  • Empowering the indigenous organizations to actively participate in the protected area.
  • Negotiation strategies between the indigenous organizations and the Government, in order to establish the Use and Management Agreements.
  • MAE’s openness to participatory planning processes.
  • Promotion of the sustainable use of natural resources within the protected area.
  • Acknowledgment by the local communities of the protected area’s relevance: environmental, cultural, social, and economic importance.

The Use and Management Agreements include the following: Community Management Plans, Operational Plans and a Compliance Monitoring System. The Community Management Plans are valid for ten years and can be renewed.

The Community Management Plans were built as internal agreements by and for the community in accordance with: The regulations for natural resources use in communal spaces issued by the Reserve; The current status of use of such resources; and the rights of the indigenous communities. As a result of the previous, the boundaries of the Protected Area and the communities territories were consolidated.

Furthermore, spaces for discussion have been created in order to deal with convergent and divergent points of view that include the indigenous and governmental visions about the territory, its conservation, and sustainable management.

The co-management of the area between the MAE and indigenous organizations, achieved an important result: The ending of new settler’s arrivals to indigenous territories as well as the colonization/expansion of the local communities into the Reserve.

A co-administration model for effectiveness management and conservation of the protected area

The co-administration model of the Noel Kempff Mercado National Park (PNNKM) between the National Government of Bolivia and the Friends of Nature Foundation (FAN), from 1995 to 2005, set a foundation for institutional strengthening for the Park’s management. This model enabled the consolidation of the area and structured a planning process through the application of institutionalized management tools such as the Protection Plan (2013-2017) and the Annual Operational Plan, which had rarely been used in the National System of Protected Areas (SNAP). Likewise, the FAN contributed in procuring funding to ensure management sustainability, mainly through the Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project (PAC-NKM). Adding to this, the promotion of participatory mechanisms, such as the Park Management Committee and the involvement of members of local communities in operational instances and decision-making, have been fundamental in improving the Park’s management.

Sadly, this co-administration model was phased out in 2006 due to changes in the national socio-political context witch centralized management of protected areas within the National Government. The main impact of this change is seen in the Park’s financial sustainability.

  • Decision and political leadership of the Government of Bolivia to extend the PNNKM through Supreme Decree.
  • The signing of a co-management agreement between the FAN and the Ministry of Sustainable Development and Environment (1995).
  • Creation of the Management Committee of the PNNKM.
  • The inclusion of local communities in the planning, management, and natural resources protection processes in the Park.
  • Development of economic activities compatible with the principle of human-nature coexistence.
  • The strategic vision for establishing a mixed management model integrating a regulating and oversight role for the National Government with the management capacity of the FAN was a key driver for revitalizing the Park’s management.
  • Since 1997, the presence of logging concessions was reverted, and the protected area was extended from de 642,458 hectares to 1,523,446 hectares. This was
  • achieved under the framework of the PAC-NKM, with a process of economic compensation, together with the develpment of a Protection Program and a Community Development Program to promote governance and social participation.
  • The promotion of participatory mechanisms such as the Management Committee and the involvement of members of local communities made the Park to become the protected area with the second largest number of park rangers in the country, with a high percentage of representatives of local communities. This helped improve relations and support by local communities in the preservation of the area.
Developing a management model based on traditional knowledge

Palau has a long history of managing its fisheries. For generation upon generation, the Traditional Chiefs placed vulnerable reef areas off limits to fishing, known as a “bul,” to protect both biodiversity and the livelihoods and food security of their people. In these modern times, it is broadly accepted that “marine capture fisheries have direct impacts not only on the target market species, most significantly tuna, but also can have large impacts on a number of incidentally caught species, some of which are particularly vulnerable to overexploitation and can directly degrade habitat and can have broad indirect or collateral effects on community structure and processes. 

Using this traditional method of conservation, Palau has created a "whole-domain" management approach from ridge to reef and beyond, the most ambitous component being the Palau National Marine Sanctuary. As Palau moves forward with the implementation of the PNMS, the Bul concept is kept in the forefront of all processes. 

- Overwhelming commuinity support due to traditional knowledge and practice of the Bul

- Recognition of the relevance of traditonal practices by the National Government

- Global support for the use of traditional pracitices to guide formalization of conservation 

- Initiating community support early on in the process was crucial in the process of passing the legislation and implementing the MPA

- Seeking lasting partnerships with organizations and governments that recognize the values of the importance of tradition, community led conservation and environmental protection.

Coordination: Capacity development and governance

This building block´s approach is reflected in various activities ranging from training measures, spaces for exchange and dialogue between stakeholders and between institutions as well as support in the development of agreements. One example is the agreement between the Ministry of Environment, the protected area management unit and the university with regard to participatory monitoring and evaluation of nurseries and restoration trials. Strengthening of the protected area management committee is another key measure that aims to improve the area's governance.

In addition, the appropriation and integration of the national climate change policy in meso-level actions, such as the development of climate change plans, the implementation of adaptation measures in productive sectors and in the management of ecosystems, are reflected.

  • Will and trust among stakeholders to cooperate and share responsibilities.

  • Articulation and implementation of public climate policy at the local level.

  • Broad and participatory dialogue spaces are key to achieving lasting agreements with local populations and actors, when there is a real participation in decision-making (MAE and GIZ 2016).
  • The establishment of local governance spaces (e.g. protected area management committee) facilitates the design, implementation and ownership of ecosystem-based adaptation actions.
  • Improved coordination between the different state institutions that have jurisdiction over the area from the areas of their competence will allow a sustainable and integral management of the mangrove protected area located in the urban perimeter (MAE and GIZ 2016).
An ecoregionalization process leading to the creation of one of the largest MPA in the world

Since 2011, the scientific community has engaged an ecoregionalization work, leading to the identification of important marine areas in the French Southern Lands (TAF) and neighbouring high sea. In this frame, Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas have been designated by the CBD that include a large part of TAF waters. In 2016, the outcomes of the CROMEBA program (Crozet Marine Ecosystem Based Approach) and a workshop on Kerguelen marine ecosystems informed the spatial conservation planning of the enlarged TAF nature reserve. Scientific inputs allowed designating more than 128 000 km2 of strict protection area (Cat. Ia. IUCN) and identifying priorities for actions for the new management plan. In a context of major knowledge gaps on marine ecosystems, the strengthening of research programs in poorly documented areas, in particular on deep-sea and offshore ecosystems, contribute to the regular update of the management objectives, regulations and protection status of the nature reserve. This work will also contribute to the development of the CCAMLR MPA network in Antarctica and the promotion of the creation of high sea MPAs.

- A strong involvement of the scientific community with whom the territory and the extension process raised a strong interest

- A favourable political context, with the implementation of the “Biodiversity Law” in France, allowing the development of MPAs in the French EEZ, and the CCAMLR initiatives towards the establishment of an MPA network in the Southern Ocean

- Uninhabited territories, scientists and fishermen being the only users of the nature reserve, which reduces the possible use conflicts

- Scientific expertise is essential to fill data gaps and deal with uncertainty.

- Ecoregionalization process is a key tool toward building effective spatial conservation planning

- Political support and international conventions are decisive for an MPA implementation

A long term partnership with Scientists

Since the 1950’s, scientists are studying the uniqueness of the French Southern Lands (TAF) acting as an open-sky lab for researchers on natural sciences. The first scientific stations built then now constitute the districts capitals that welcome more than 200 scientists every year from 60 research programs. The Institut Polaire Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) coordinates those activities and ensures the excellence of scientific research in the TAF.

Since 1955, the local authority of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands (TAAF) administrates this territory, placing science and environmental protection as a key stone of French sovereignty on the TAF.

Aware of the vulnerability of these ecosystems, the scientific community advocated for the creation of the TAF nature reserve and advised its extension at sea in 2016. The nature reserve management, ensured by TAAF, is supported by a scientific committee, the Polar environment Committee (CEP), which provides advice for research and management actions.

With the enlarged perimeter of the reserve, the link with scientists is more essential than ever. The new management plan includes research activities to inform an adapted and efficient management of the rich and vulnerable ecosystems of TAF.

The historical partnership with the Institut Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV), coordinating scientific programs in TAF, ensures the excellence of research activities. The strong involvement of scientific partners enabled the creation of the Nature reserve and its extension at sea thanks to an ecoregionalization work. Their role in governance and in the elaboration of the management plan now ensures the robustness of management actions.

Scientific organizations being involved in TAF for more than 60 years, the adhesion of the whole scientific community is mandatory for the implementation of a nature reserve and its regulation.  Involving scientists in the governance and management of the reserve ensures the ownership of conservation actions by those major stakeholders.

 

While the mutual benefits of conservation and science activities are acknowledged by both scientists and the local authority of the French Southern and Antarctic Lands (TAAF), a clear statement of each organization’s responsibility, with for example the establishment of conventions, is essential to avoid any conflicts.

 

Research being one of the main activities in the French Southern Lands, the environmental impacts of scientific programs are to be properly assessed and validated by the scientific committee.

Incubating co-ops to rescue the value of their catch

Based on the results of the diagnostic evaluation conducted by our Impact team, SmartFish designs an improvement plan to ready the group and its products for preferential markets. After thorough review with fisher partners and any outside partners (eg facilitating NGO), SmartFish and the fishing group sign a formal contract that defines the terms of the intervention. 

 

Subsequently, SmartFish incubates the fishing group to improve their fishing, handling, processing and other business practices to produce premium quality seafood that is independently verifiable as socially and environmentally responsible or improving.

 

To bring their seafood to preferential markets, SmartFish helps partner fishers achieve the following:

 

  • independent evaluation or certification of environmental sustainability (eg MSC, Seafood Watch, or FIP)
  • independent evaluation of social sustainability (eg FairTrade)
  • optimization of catch, handling, processing, packaging, transport, and other technical aspects
  • optimization of general business practices
  • incorporation of traceability system
  • leveraging of local infrastructure to retain as much value locally as possible locally, including opportunities for women and other community members

 

  • Willingness and capcity of partner fishers
  • Expertise of SmartFish's production and enterprise departments (composed of fisheries engineers, commercial/finance specialists, and business consultants) 

Take care not to accelerate the vicious cycle of overfishing. The elements of the aforementioned Value Rescue intervention will help fishers earn more for their fish. If fishers are not commited to sustainability or if strong management is not in place this could contribute to overfishing.

 

 

Solar power plant installation

The old diesel powered generator on Cousin Island Special reserve was replaced by a modern and robust Photovoltaic Solar Power system. Research was required to procure equipment that could withstand the high salinity, heat and humidity on a tropical island. Once located in the United States, the different components had to be imported by the NGO Nature Seychelles (who manages teh Special Reserve) itself. All the equipment including the stands that had to be fabricated using high quality stainless steel had to be shipped to the island - Cousin island Special Reserve has no dock, harbor or quay and the landing of the equipment was fraught with difficulties. The stand-alone 5 kw photovoltaic energy system was installed in July 2015. Since then 2 controllers have had to be replaced because of corrosion.

  • National enabling environment for renewable energy -no tax imposed on solar equipment in the country.
  • Existence of company – ClimateCaring that had the knowledge and willingness to help design and set up the robust, off-grid PV installation.
  • Assistance on and off the island by the institution’s staff.
  • Large enough area for secure siting of and easy access to the installation.
  • Robust technology is required to withstand the harsh climate
  • Staff have to trained in use and maintenance of the system
  • Regular maintenance schedules need to be set up and adhered to
  • Budget has to be secured for maintenance and purchase of defective/damaged parts
Monitoring and being vigilant and active in implementation

Though ensuring the registration of a surf break is no easy task, it is critical to ensure thata once a surf break is recognized and registered, actions are taken to ensure that the promises and advantages of protection are delivered to all actors, and local fishing communities in particular. This building bloc implies, for example: regular capacity building and interaction with children and youngsters; cleaning of beaches campaigns; recognition of local champions and leaders; monitoring development initiatives (e.g. in infraestructure which may affect a surf break), regular mettings with local actors to explore ways in which the local environment an be improved, etc.    

1. Good relations with local communities and all involved actors. 

2. Available resources to undertake montoring and vigilance activities and actions. 

3. Permanent travel and visits by Do it for Your Wave to each registered surk break. 

4. Good communications and networking activities.  

This particular building bloc is key in the step by step process suggested. Actual formal protection is almost a FIRST step in a more long term effort to ensure integrity of surf breaks and their surroundings. Resources need to undertake a close monitoring of what is happening oin each site, regularly. Things may change rapidly, including if agreements have been set to ensure for example, that no infraestructure affects these sites (negatively). This has proved to be  a key challenge as expectations by all actors are often high. Protecting the surf break should enable a tangible benefit to all. This needs to be documented carefully and disseminated to ensure all actors are aware about the positive change taking place. 

Distribution of profit to families

The ADIO represents 110 families of the Ostional community. They are the main partners responsible for implementing the actions of habitat maintenance, collecting eggs according to plan management and conservation and packaging of eggs. Of the ADIO sales, 70% are distributed to members and 30% are reserved for local development such as construction of roads, bridges, health centers and school resources. The direct benefit that each family receives are: an endowment of eggs for consumption, an equitable distribution of family income, scholarships for students, aid to elderly and pregnant adults.

Ostional Development Association is a legal institution for engaging communities for collective benefit of the community. In this case the management and conservation of turtles is a model project developed by the community and for the community. The ADIO has partners and participates in assemblies of the people. It also has a Board of Directors who bears the burden of the project. They also form committees to monitor the actions of the management plan.

The participation of all people in the project is critical to creating the collective consciousness about sustainability. Jobs are evenly distributed: beach cleaning and habitat management mainly engage men; protection of turtle infants and release of turtles, mainly women. Surveillance by ADIO is done mostly by men; and supervision of tourists who observe the arrival, by youth. In this way, the contribution of the project to local community welfare and conservation is evident. When communities see a benefit for their families in the wildlife, they are able to organize themselves in order to protect those resources that provide that well-being.