Mangrove ecotourism
In »jungle tours«, tourists are guided through the channels of the mangrove forest by boat. The trip includes environmental education and allows visitors to experience the interconnectedness of adjacent ecosystems such as mangroves and coral reefs.
tba
tba
Social license
Networking and linking up with other organisations to support fishers’ initiatives.
Availability of social media
Networking and linking up with other organisations is an important way to grow awareness and support for the fishers’ initiatives, for the first couple of years this was note done well.
Participatory Planning
The Israel Marine Plan’s basic approach emphasizes that the marine space is essentially (ultimately) public. It aspires to view the different interests of all the stakeholders fairly and guarantee the provision of its ecosystem services over time. Through its goals, the plan offers way for informed and responsible management of the sea, applying an overall ecological approach. It aims to develop marine knowledge, to improve public awareness of what exists in the marine space, and to shape the way it is depicted spatially. Stakeholders are actively involved in the planning process and accompanied by local and international professional scientific advisory committees. The planning process is supported by the use of the interactive GIS tool that helps to visualize resource use, potential conflicts, and management scenarios and thus enables comprehensive planning.
1) Time needed to showcase and use the tool 2) Enthusiasm by those involved 3) Public relations for use of the tool (i.e., mentioning it at every opportunity, etc.)
Lack of support among the core-team staff was a problem. Diversity of members on the team should be maintained (i.e., background, age, expertise, etc.). Time is crucial so that efforts are not rushed and full professionalism is maintained, especially for the compatibility matrices. This "solution" will not be appropriate in all situations; it depends on the level of funding, use of the internet and digital tools among the general population. After we started developing the tool we discovered that other organizations/entities had similar tools available. We could have tapped into these to avoid redundancy & improve base data. It would have been helpful to tie the information from the compatibility matrices to the ASDA tool so that one could see the compatibility and/or conflict found each areas as competing uses are selected. Monitoring usage of the tool would have been very helpful. High usage (and diverse usage) would generate more support for tool development and promotion.
Implementation of prioritized climate adaptation actions
Marine turtles, coral reefs and the pelagic ecosystem have been the conservation targets prioritized in Gorgona NP. The corresponding adaptation measures are being implemented, always taking into account local stakeholders’ participation, encouraging a capacity building process for the PA staff and providing the best information about a changing environment including possible scenarios for the area. Because adaptation strategies are integrated as part of the pre-existing management strategies of the PA, they are also in the “loop” of monitoring and effectiveness assessment.
• Protected area staff participation and commitment • Local stakeholders engagement • Monitoring and evaluation of every selected measure, to determine its effectiveness • Results analysis to include management tools, especially the protected area management plan
The implementation of pilot climate adaptation actions, that are also an integral part of the PA management plan, allows incorporation of climate change into conservation action. Specifically, the integration of climate hazards, climate risks and climate resilience of conservation targets allows PA managers to systematically test assumptions in order to adapt and learn. The commitment of the protected area team is the key factor to maintain, monitor and evaluate the success of the implemented actions. • Different models were considered in order to respond to the different Conservation & Climate Adaptation challenges. No single model can cover the entire agenda. • Local context defines different needs and availability of information and resources to start a Climate Smart Conservation Initiative • Try to identify the sources of ecological strength and functionality of ecosystems
Training of representatives of the fishermen institutions
Stakeholders (fishers, surveillance, MPA managers, processor of seafood, NGOs) are trained to respond to accidental capture.
Only available in French. To read this section in French, please download the document "Blue Solution Template in French: ‘AfricaSaw, Réseau d’alerte/sauvegarde du poisson-scie, Afrique de l’Ouest’” from the bottom of this page, under 'Resources'.
Only available in French. To read this section in French, please download the document "Blue Solution Template in French: ‘AfricaSaw, Réseau d’alerte/sauvegarde du poisson-scie, Afrique de l’Ouest’” from the bottom of this page, under 'Resources'.
Informed behavior change
After the first full year of data gathering, Trident Systems, the company that developed the observation tool, was asked to produce data sets based on the SNA1 Agreement including how many vessels moved on because they were catching undersized snapper and what volumes of small snapper were being caught by each fishing method. Specific information is confidential to each fisher, but an overall analysis is made public. This is the first time in New Zealand that inshore fin fishers can see the effect of their fishing practices on collective industry catching allocations. They start to recognize how they personally can contribute to sustainability of the snapper stock by changing their practices. New Zealand fisheries are data rich yet it is rarely used to build awareness and facilitate discussions between fishers to bring about change. Fishers involved in science projects are keener to understand the results of the work, are reviewing data and asking questions in a way that scientists are not used to. This review process is challenging and most often face-to-face. Scientists are reporting data to other scientists, but they are also bringing together fishers and providing advice and learnings on how to change fishing practices.
• the government supported this initiative by being open to considering cameras as a cost effective substitute to human observers • local fisher leaders were willing to support and defend decisions such as installing cameras on vessels • both the scientists and the software innovators were prepared to look at what fishers wanted rather than just improving the products already available
Maintaining the confidentiality of fisher’s information and data is crucial.
Monitoring and evaluation
Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) are vital components of every Pride campaign, without which assessment of the effectiveness of the intervention cannot be conducted. M&E takes place in every component of the Theory of Change (please refer to the building block 'Theory of Change' for a brief description of each component). Monitoring keeps score on how effectively capacities are built, how effectively social marketing efforts lead to changes in behavior, and if those behavior changes lead to desired conservation outcomes. Monitoring basically tracks every component of the ToC. M&E of knowledge, attitude, interpersonal communications and behavior change is based on pre and post campaign surveys of the fishers, while threat reduction and conservation results use specific protocols validated by experts.
• Having a local monitoring partner or consultant is key to develop timely baseline data and monitor threat reduction and conservation results. • As with any project or program, having adequate and sufficient funding is key. Teams may rely on existing human, equipment, facilities, and financial capacities to reduce costs. • Sites with long term tradition of monitoring are better suited to produce a solid baseline of biological monitoring indicators.
An important lesson related to biological monitoring is when there is the possibility of having a two person team for each campaign, a Campaign Manager (CM) and a Fisheries Fellow (FF). This arrangement allows for one person to concentrate on the fisheries technical aspects, including the necessary time for biological monitoring. The level of involvement of the FF in the monitoring component depends on his/her personal inclination towards science. There are examples where the FF devoted a considerable amount of time and effort to conducting monitoring and analyzing data, while others did not participate at all. This could improve with a clearer definition of the FF’s role in regards to biological monitoring. Having a person dedicated to monitoring in Rare’s team ensured all fisheries campaigns had baseline and post campaign impact data.
Participatory monitoring
The tourism operators and park rangers are required to collect data on biophysical and economic indicators to ensure that the limits are not surpassed. This data therefore also allows adapting management actions in the park. Economic indicators measure income per each activity, employers generated and willingness to pay (tourist).
- Network of locals that received capacity-building on biological monitoring - Support from academia and necessary equipment to collect the data (boats, diving equipment)
- promote respect and foster good relationships between operators to avoid conflicts and improve cooperation
Formulation and implementation of waste management bylaws
The community group identified in building block 2 together with a selection of village leaders is trained in bylaw formulation and implementation. Topics covered in the training include government structures in Tanzania and types of laws and regulations; concept and fundamentals of local government; management of natural resources at village level; Tanzania legislation related to waste management; meaning of bylaws; regulations that guide formulation of bylaws; process of local bylaw formulation; approval of formulated bylaws at district level; and implementation of approved bylaws (including opportunities and challenges). The training process enables the group to conduct a detailed analysis of the current status of waste management in their communities and understand the expected impact of poor waste management if it is not well considered in the bylaws. Understanding the process of bylaw formulation and approval also helps participants to recognize the existing management and administrative gaps between the district council, village council and community members so that an effective strategy can be put together to address the gaps and build a strong co-management approach.
Support and commitment from village government for formulation, implementation and enforcement of waste management bylaws, support and action from District Legal Team for the bylaw approval process.
It is of considerable benefit (but not essential) to invite a police officer to participate in bylaw training to provide advice and guidance on the practicalities of law enforcement and judicial processes and to build relationships between trainees and law enforcement authorities.
GIS-based interactive decision making tool
The ASDA GIS (Asda = platform in Hebrew) tool for marine spatial planning supports existing layers of information as well as the products of the ongoing planning process in an inclusive, flexible, visual, transparent, and participatory way. It allows experts and professional stakeholders from different disciplines to cross-reference and analyze data, respond and participate interactively, hold dialogue, and exchange spatial and textual ideas and opinions relating to planning the marine space. This tool serves all participants and showcases the plan’s products at its various stages. It provides solutions in three areas of activity: planning, participation, and management. The planning component is designed for professional experts and advisors from different disciplines, enabling group dialogue among experts & flexible and visual exchange of information and ideas regarding marine spatial planning; the participation component is designed for the general public & stakeholders, enabling observation of & reaction to the marine spatial plan’s work products; the management component is designed for decision makers at various levels, enabling spatial and statistical analyses as well as information-based reviews of development scenarios.
1) Funding 2) Capacity (staff with GIS and programming skills)
The lack of willingness of the planning staff to support the development of such a tool can be a major challenge. When planning the ASDA as part of the Israel Maine Plan, several planners were not supportive. They preferred to use hard-copy maps and thought the on-line tool would be a waste of time. Among the members of the core planning team, supporters made up about 50%. Having more young, internet savvy people, and perhaps more academics (interested in innovative solutions) on the core team could help solve this problem. Another activity that could have helped in this regard, would have been to monitor the use of the tool, thus "proving" its utility. In the end, this was not done systematically or thoroughly. There needs to be a certain openness to this type of tool, especially by those who are not familiar with the technology. Political and technical support is required not only for the development of the tool but also for promoting it and using it at every opportunity.