Tourism development inside and adjacent to Machakhela National Park

Appropriate tourism development is an important means and opportunity for Protected areas (PA) and communities located adjacent to them to meet their aims and needs.

 

In the case of the Protected Areas, the aims are:

- to provide a recreational service to visitors

- to increase public awareness and understanding of the importance of conservation

- to generate incomes that enhance management and strengthen sustainable financing for that purpose.

 

In the case of local communities, the aim is to increase sustainable incomes, improve and diversify livelihoods.

 

In both cases, the emphasis is on “appropriate” tourism, i.e. tourism that does not overwhelm or degrade the fundamental tourism attraction (i.e. the pristine nature and cultural landscape). In the PA’s case, there is also an emphasis on educational and awareness aims. This requires that tourism development is carefully planned and focuses on maximizing overall longterm benefits, rather than short term financial benefits.

 

In this context, project's support concentrated initially on developing a sound strategic vision for the Ajara PA system as a whole and individual colchic forest PAs in particular. On this basis, appropriate tourism development was supported on the ground both in the new Machakhela NP and generally in the valley.

  • Existence of well-developed tourism sector on the Black Sea coast and generally “pro-tourism” policy of the Ajara and Georgian government
  • Development of a long-term tourism development policy that attempted to balance benefits with core conservation aims helped to build initial consensus and understanding of issues and approaches within Ajara-level tourism actors and national PA actor - the Agency of PAs
  • Use of regionally-based contractors helped to ensure incorporation of the input and experience of the existing tourism enitities

  • There is a very significant opportunity for colchic forest PAs to increase visitor numbers based on their nature values alone, without investments in substantial infrastructure – the primary “marketing value" of PA's are their intrinsic scenic and nature values, not artificial “attractions” which may be inappropriate.
  • Tourism operators are often focused on quantity of service and not quality - for ecologically and culturally sensitive destinations like Machakheli, tour operators need to prioritize sustainability criteria and focus on quality over quantity.
  • Individual consultations and trainings on the job appear as a most successful method and acceptable for locals in terms of capacity building.
  • Management of PA should build more intensive com­mu­nication with local community, involve them in decision making process for product development. Macha­khela NP should be communicated by Agency of PA, local government and tourism department of Ajara as integral part of the Valley. Tourism development strategies and action plans should be communicated to local community
Capacity Building of Protected areas administration and local stakeholders

The objective of the project was to increase the long-term effectiveness of conservation and land use in the colchic forests of Ajara, and this necessitated building the capacity of all relevant stakeholders to undertake appropriate activities and development in the future.

 

To build such capacity, the project pursued a multi-faceted approach involving:

  • provision of key equipment and infrastructure to National Park (NP) and local households
  • practically orientated trainings of Protected Areas (PA) staff and local stakeholders – formal / semi -formal training by specialist trainers or contractors
  • study tours within Georgia
  • in process / on-job practical experience

In the latter case, the project strategy was to ensure involvement of project stakeholders as much as possible in the activities led by outside contractors and consultants. The rationale behind this was to build as much local practical experience as possible in order to maximize the possibilities for beneficiaries to be able to undertake such activities themselves in the future. In other words, to build the practical experience and “on-job” capacity of beneficiaries (PA staff, local communities, local service providers, etc.).

  • Building of trust through better communication. During the initial implementation, particular focus was placed on building communication and trust between the National Park and local stakeholders in order to enable future meaningful cooperation.
  • Gaining a sound understanding of local stakeholder issues and priorities. Studies undertaken at the outset were critical in identifying the real capacity building needs of both NP and local stakeholders and helped to orientate project support
  • Participation and input from local stakeholders.

 

 

  • Combining formal training with on-job practical application of skills (when feasible) is much more effective to build long term sustained capacity. For example, training on law enforcement 
  • A holistic training approach that combines and integrates trainings relevant to a variety of stakeholders in a PA context (i.e. not just PA staff but local community, municipalities, NGOs, etc.) is an effective way to both broaden understanding and awareness of all parties, and build a wide basis of local capacities and knowledge (e.g. visit of stakeholders to other PAs)
  • The existence of a systematic training plan/programme within Agency of Protected Areas (APA) and the retention of relevant training materials and training service providers (i.e. a training clearing house mechanism) could greatly enhance the future effectiveness of relevant training for PA staff
  • Collaboration of capacity development efforts with other donor projects can be an effective means to ensure cost effectiveness and access for additional resources, as well as ensuring a more coordinated approach
Pasture Management Techniques

Pasture management Planning in Tajikistan

Overgrazing, especially in the immediate vicinity of villages puts significant pressure on the communal pasture lands and leads to serious land degradation. This land degradation puts the livelihood and food security of the rural Tajik population at risk. Despite the adoption of the pasture law in 2013 (which sets the framework), community-based controlled grazing mechanisms are not yet widespread. Main reasons are the absence of by-laws and weak law enforcement. Sustainable pasture management planning is consequently a crucial tool to be applied by pasture users.

 

1. Study of the current pasture management plans to identify needs for improvement

2. Pasture plant species catalog

3. Tool for calculating the pasture carrying capacity 

4. Grazing calendars

5. Techniques for sustainable fodder production for the winter season

 

For a successful implementation of sustainable pasture management techniques, the following should be considered:

  • Assess the current conditions of the pasture and look at the current way the community is managing its pasture;
  • Improve livestock management overall and do not only look at pasture management;
  • Apply a simple tool to calculate the pasture carrying capacity;
  • Provide practical exercises in the field for farmers, e.g. through farmer field schools;
  • Ensure the pastures can regenerate after a grazing period and pastures are not grazed too early in spring;
  • Provide low-cost fencing techniques;
  • Use traditional, local varieties of fodder seeds;

  • Increase plant diversity that provides nectar for pollinators and beneficial insects;

  • Control and prevent erosion;

  • Ensures economic benefits to farmers

  • Ensure optimal use of fodder production areas;

  • Ensure access to technologies through documentation of techniques on platforms like Wocat and PANORAMA.

Pasture Governance

Improvement of the legal framework

Tajikistan faces a major problem of unsustainable grazing pressure from high livestock numbers and insufficient pasture management. The country is in dire need of better pasture governance based on a solid legal basis. Therefore, GIZ Tajikistan has worked on the improvement of the legal framework and facilitated a dialogue between different stakeholders.

Additionally, and institutional analysis on pasture management in Tajikistan that outlines the institutional and legal set-up and distribution of roles and responsibilities in the pasture management sector of Tajikistan has been conducted together with other organisations to support the governance process in the future. 

 

Further, a Pasture Management Networking Platform has been supported. The objective of the PMNP is to contribute to the sustainable management of pastures in Tajikistan. The objective is pursued through national dialogue and knowledge exchange based on practical and on-the-ground experiences of the pasture management network members.

1. Conduct an institutional analysis on pasture management in Tajikistan

2. Support a strong law on Pasture and feasible by-laws 

3. Support the establishment of Pasture User Unions (PUU)*

 

*Pasture User Unions (PUU) are comprised of pasture users and are established at the jamoat (rural municipality) level with members from several villages. It is a formal organisation, replete with a statute and legal registration, stamp and bank account.

 

When improving the pasture governance the following should be considered:

  • Inform all stakeholders on the pasture law and support the enforcement of the by-laws;
  • Specify the roles and responsibilities in pasture management and ensure all stakeholders are aware of their roles and responsibilities;
  • Identify entry-points for future improvement of the legal framework;
  • Ensure good donor coordination;
  • Support the creation of Pasture User Unions (PUU) and Commission on Pastures (CoP);
  • Encourage knowledge transfer of good practices.
Scalable strategies for ecological landscape restoration in protected areas in Peru.

The project seeks to establish, together with the main local stakeholders, ecological restoration demonstration sites in the buffer zone of the PNCAZ, from which landscape connectivity can be re-established, generating spatially scalable experiences. This connectivity will contribute to the maintenance of natural values and ecological processes within the protected area in the medium and long term, as well as to a better quality of life for the inhabitants. Natural regeneration, exclusion of threats and assisted succession are used to establish these restoration demonstration areas, which will directly benefit some 200 families, all within the framework of the Blue Agreements and as a result of a participatory management strategy of territorial planning through quality of life plans.The aim is to generate a learning community, as well as to strengthen the technical and organizational capacities of the population through field schools, training of trainers, producing tools that will be the basis for adaptive management, appropriation, sustainability and spatial scaling of the model.

  • Respect and strengthening of the co-management model in the PNCAZ and the role of the Management Contract Executor (CIMA-Cordillera Azul).
  • Local populations are strategic allies and support co-management based on a conservation and development strategy, implemented through sustainable economic activity programs.
  • Local populations, based on a conservation and development strategy, perceive the benefits of forest conservation.
  • The commitments established between the local populations, CIMA-Cordillera Azul and the PNCAZ through the Blue Agreements are fundamental for the implementation of sustainable activities, among which the restoration project is framed.
  • The sustainability of the project is based, among others, on the training of specialized trainers in the design and implementation of restoration strategies and techniques that are organized in educational modules, replicable in new areas. These modules will be adopted in the academic curriculum and/or extension programs of at least one academic institution.
  • The strengthening of local populations, as managers of the protected area, is fundamental to guarantee the sustainability of the actions.
Villagers bet on forest conservation through sustainable productive activities

The villages settled in the PNCAZ's Buffer Zone have been using the area's resources since before its creation, mostly for informal timber extraction. The settlers commented that they saw the creation of the protected area as a threat because of the restrictions that could be imposed on them. However, the joint work between SERNANP and CIMA-Cordillera Azul has promoted the development of alternative economic activities such as coffee and cacao in agroforestry systems, as well as the development of local management instruments such as Quality of Life Plans. After years, the local people recognize that they have stopped working for timber and have begun to conserve their forests and natural resources for the sake of future generations. The population has prioritized increasing forest cover in their territories to improve water supply and increase coffee and cacao production, for greater economic benefit and quality of life. Its replication in other areas around the protected area in the Tocache sector and in general throughout the San Martin region, one of the regions most affected by deforestation in Peru, makes it a very important initiative.

  • Synergy between the park administration, the executor of the administration contract, and the inhabitants of the buffer zone for the joint management of the protected area.
  • Co-management between CIMA-Cordillera Azul and SERNANP aimed at the conservation of the PNCAZ and the sustainable development of the partner communities.
  • Approval of participatory management tools such as Quality of Life Plans and Blue Agreements.
  • The organizations that manage the protected area should work together according to their roles and functions, but with a single objective and common strategies.
  • Conservation and restoration actions should go hand in hand with the promotion of profitable productive activities that can generate income for the population.
  • The articulation of the State's efforts with other conservation and restoration initiatives, under a Management Contract approach, allows for the incorporation of joint and complementary actions in the protected area's management.
  • The development of local populations should go hand in hand with conservation actions.
Involving local communities in conservation process

To garner political and local support for Sangai conservation in KLNP, advocacy was done with all stakeholders. In addition, appropriate measures are being undertaken to improve the awareness of the local people for conserving the species and promote Sangai as the mascot of sustainable development through various capacity building programmes.

1. State forest department's interest.

2. Sangai is an important cultural symbol in Manipur, and hence is considered as pride of Manipur, by local people and Government of Manipur.

3. Supportive Government of India, which provides funding and other support.

1. Multi-stakeholder dialogue builds transparency and trust.

2. Addressing livelihoods of local communities dependent on resources is indispensable . 

 

Securing existing population in Keibul Lamjao National Park

The existing population of Sangai is being secured through integrated management plan, implemented by the Manipur Forest Department. Integrated management plan involves continuous habitat management strategies, habitat and population monitoring, enhanced patrolling strategies, genetic studies and involvement of local communities and different stakeholders at KLNP. 

1. State forest department's interest.

2.  Sangai is an important cultural symbol in Manipur, and hence is considered as pride of Manipur, by local people and Government of Manipur.

3. Supportive Government of India, which provides funding and other support.

 

1. Rigorous field work is critical for identification of habitat requirement of Sangai, and other related aspects of population management.

2. Continuous monitoring ensues long term success.

Commitment to conservation objectives through Conservation Agreements

Conservation Agreements (CAs) are binding grant contracts created and agreed upon by specific communities and the ECF. CAs set out clear, attainable and realistic conservation objectives and determine the scope of conservation measuresto be implemented within communities that demonstrate the have the organization, motivation and commitment to follow 10-year habitat management plans. Conservation objectives set by the ECF and local community use expert and local knowledge. Each agreement is tailored to the identified needs in the target community and the local landscape. These contracts bind communities to protect ecosystems but also assist traditional land users to use the land in a sustainable way. 

 

The communities that sign Conservation Agreements have been selected to do so because they show initiative, community involvement and potential through the FPA process and establishment of a CBO. In order to ensure the sustainability of the projects, the compliance of Conservation Agreements is monitored. Each community must submit annual technical reports. In case they fail to perform the planned activities, the payments under the agreement may be suspended until they meet the requirements, or subsequently terminated if they don’t comply for more than a year.

  1. Successful application of the FPA; communities practice using tools, models, financing
  2. Development of a philosophy of support and education, not policing
  3. Careful selection of communities which demonstrate the skills, organization and involvement to commence conservation measures
  4. Providing training and education to make decisions and manage landscapes in cooperation with nature conservation ideals
  5. Clearly defining activities being paid for creates a sense of purpose for CBOs
  6. Assisting communities secure additional funding 
  • Technical expertise is needed in very few cases for specific questions related to agreeing on habitat management plans.
  • The cost estimates were developed in cooperation with the local community representatives based on their knowledge of local markets. The final result is that a fair, full cost reimbursement is set by the conservation agreements that allows the CBOs to implement the Conservation Agreements and secure their economic sustainability over the contracted period.
  • Annual community reports include: a comparison of targeted and actual values for the planned measures; developments in project time frames; general financial report; information on problems and identification of possible solutions.
  • Each year, a sample of conservation agreements are selected for independent audit of performance by ECF or a third party. This is an opportunity to examine monitoring and reporting and a method to test performance of the conservation agreement process.
  • Examining connections between conservation objective and resilience/livelihoods of locals helps direct future projects. 
Securing long term land-use rights

Clear land ownership and land tenure (the right to use land) are the basic preconditions for the implementation of any habitat management measure. Land-use rights of all beneficiaries needs to be clear and secure before project initiatives commence, to avoids risk of undocumented dimensions in the planning and implementation of conservation measures. It also secures long-term interest of the land user to manage the land sustainably. The purpose of this measure is to clarify, legally regulate, obtain and hold land tenure rights needed for conservation actions and for sustainable livelihood. Land tenure rights encompasses land ownership, lease of land and/or other rights related to the use of land. 

 

In Azerbaijan, most land is state owned. But after the breakdown of the Soviet Union land tenure rights have not been properly documented or registered. Today, traditional land-use rights are based on verbal agreements and traditions are translated into legally documented/registered leases by the CBOs representing their respective villages. Resolving uncertain land tenure is one of the major benefits the ECF is bringing to partner communities, providing them with a clear economic perspective for the future while preserving the existing community management of shared pastures and meadows. 

  1. Readiness of state property authorities to document and register the existing community land use rights 
  2. Completion of a land tenure study to understand the land tenure uncertainties and existing rights 
  3. Accurate mapping of entire conservation area and communication of these findings (maps, figures, reports) accessible to the community and authorities
  4. Active involvement of local governments (municipality and department levels) 
  5. Voluntary involvement of local authorities, departments and administration
  6. Proper compensation for land-use
  • Properly identify land-use rights and open issues including research, data collection and GIS analysis performed i) formally (municipal and regional data collection), and ii) informally (discussions with locals).
  • Consideration of information documentation and lack of documentation. Locals may use pasturelands/meadows in a traditional way, with little or no documentation of their user rights. In the frame of the project, the land-use needs to be considered in both formal/political contexts and informal/traditional contexts. 
  • Communication between multiple land management bodies in Armenia (state, municipality, community, private) and land-use designations (forests, agricultural, protected areas, private land). Positive relationships and active communication with all stakeholders leads to healthy working relationships
  • Consideration of national and regional politics integral to securing land-use rights. 
  • Sufficient budgeting of costs required to obtain land-use rights.