Optimization of Land

Farmers will learn to adopt advanced Forest Garden planting and care, integrated pest management, and conservation techniques that optimize and ensure the long-term health, productivity, and profitability of their land.

  • Farmers are prepared for site visits

    • Technicians perform site visits monthly, and contents of the visit vary by which phase of the project the farmers are in

    • For example, Technicians:

      • check on tree planting and tree health

      • review training modules with farmers

      • check on crop progress

      • make sure farmers adhere to the approach (i.e. not using chemical fertilizers or pesticides, etc.)

      • make sure farmers have the tools to manage any problems that should arise (pest infestations, farm management)

Need to regularly check in on farmers to ensure that they have implemented their Forest Gardens and are practicing the skills they have learned

Diversification of Farmland

Farmers diversify the products they grow in their Forest Gardens. During this phase, farmers plant higher-value vegetables, fruit, nut, and timber trees. They also learn increasingly advanced skills and techniques that will help them manage their Forest Gardens more effectively and sustainably, such as fruit tree grafting, advanced composting, and marketing of crops.

 

  • Farmers need to follow training modules very strictly to ensure success of their FG

    • Training materials can be downloaded on our Forest Garden Training Center (training.trees.org), which allows users to become a certified FG Practitioner.  In 2019, this information will be developed into an mobile app, allowing trainers to access materials offline.

    • In the field, farmers are in constant contact with their technician/other farmers. They are given farmer workbooks to guide them and to take notes and draw pictures in.

 

  • Crop diversification gives farmers more nutritious foods for them and their families, and;

  • Farmers now have products they can sell at markets to boost income to either save or invest in their FG

Protecting Farmland

This block consists of providing farmers with the skills and resources needed to protect their Forest Garden sites. Farmers achieve this by planting green walls – an enhanced version of a living fence that TREES has developed – around the perimeters of their sites. They then plant fast-growing fertilizer trees throughout their sites, often in alleys among their crops, to further stabilize their soils and enhance land fertility. We decide which species to grow based on which species adapt best to the agro-ecological zones where we work. We consult with the farmers themselves on what they want to grow, eat, and sell and our technicians advise farmers on the best way to plant and plant, iterating year-on-year changes that may enhance their garden, sales, and production. For example in drier climates like Senegal and Singida, Tanzania, we train farmers on growing various acacia species, which do not require much rain. We also promote nitrogen-fixing trees and crops, such as gliricidia species, acacia species, pigeon peas, and fruit trees that have a shorter maturing period (3-5) years. We also grow species based on what is culturally popular, nutritious, and marketable, like bananas, a staple food in Uganda.

 

 

  • Fully trained technicians

  • Farmer’s land needs to be prepared and designed for FG implementation

Integrated pest management is crucial in early stages  of FGA as newly planted crops/trees can easily be hurt by diseases and pests

Mobilization of Farmers

We hire project staff and meet with relevant stakeholders (government representatives, community leaders, and potential local and international partners/donors) to solicit their support and formalize each new FG project. With the help of stakeholders we identify interested farmer groups, lead farmers, and participants, and host orientation workshops prior to pursuing training and extension activities. We contact farmers by working with local government and community leaders and using rural radio to promote TREES and the FGA. This process takes 1-2 months as we vet farmers to ensure that they are truly willing to participate in the program. We prepare our Monitoring and Evaluation process which consistently collects data over the 4-year period. The M&E process consists of collecting information on our farmers through a baseline survey before they start the program, on metrics such as household dietary diversity and food insecurity and resilience (based off of USAID indices), along with measurements of the species diversity, and the number of trees per hectare on FG land.  Lastly, we look into the number of food crops and marketable products our farmers grow. This information is followed up with an annual sample survey of farmers to see how these metrics change over the 4-year FGA.

 

  • Finding farmers who are able to commit to the four-year program

  • Finding appropriate stakeholders/funders

  • Ability to find appropriate staff members to serve as technicians to train farmers

We need to ensure that selection criteria includes a consultation with local leaders to be certain that farmers can dedicate secured, tenured (customary or statutory) land to the project

Designing volunteer projects by identifying organisational needs at TIDE and interests of potential participants to ensure maximum benefit to both parties.

One of the key components that makes the R2R experience unique, is that volunteers participate in the hands-on conservation activities of TIDE. It isn’t just a learning experience, but a way for every volunteer to contribute. Thus, volunteer programs are carefully planned with the different teams at TIDE to ensure that participants are fulfilling a need, as well as gaining the experience they seek.

 

There are two ways this is done. The first, is when interested participants or groups have a particular interest in mind. In this instance, the R2R team discusses options with the relevant TIDE personnel, to identify projects that are required by TIDE, that will fulfil the groups interests. The second method used to achieve this, is to plan projects before identifying the participants. On a regular basis, the R2R meets with different TIDE teams to discuss future needs, and identify any programs that would be suitable for volunteer participation. These programs are then proposed to new contacts and partner agents.

 

The key thing, is to always ensure that participants have a great and enriching experience, in a safe environment, whilst helping TIDE to progress with its mission.

The key enabling factor to designing volunteer programs, is the full support and co-operation of the TIDE team. Steps are taken to ensure that all TIDE staff understand the importance of the R2R program in TIDE’s future, and cooperate in the program planning and implementation stages.

 

It is also important that TIDE has a clear mission, so that when designing volunteer programs, it is easy to identify where participants can assist. The TIDE strategic plan and ongoing work plans are therefore an important tool in this process.

The key challenge in implementing this building block, is uncertainty in participant numbers and environmental conditions.

 

Unless R2R reaches booking capacity, there is a risk that activities identified by TIDE as something R2R can carry out, may not proceed. This has so far been avoided by only identifying programs for R2R that are not critical to TIDE’s mission, but rather enhance it. For example, a crocodile program is in development, that will help protected areas management at TIDE and in wider Belize, but isn’t an immediate priority in TIDE’s strategic plan. Thus, if this is advertised but doesn’t go ahead through R2R, TIDE has the option of carrying out this activity at a later date independently.

 

Environmental conditions are harder to avoid, and certainly impact the program offered. For example, if a group arrives to take part in marine surveys, but ocean conditions are unfavorable, then alternate activities are arranged. To manage this, it is made clear upon booking a program, that activities are subject to local weather conditions, and a ‘plan B’ is always in place.

Conservation Agreement

With the signing of the 2012 Conservation Agreement, the project's governance stage was initiated by the Aripao community, initially organized around the Conservation Committee, and formalized in a separate legal entity called the Arpao Afro-descendant Civil Association (ACA Aripao).

 

The Afro-descendant Civil Association Aripao and Phynatura initiated a feasibility study for Conservation Agreements with the indigenous communities of La Colonial, El Cejal, Payaraima and Karana, bordering the Suapure Conservation Area.

The indigenous communities showed interest in participate considering that their income and their territory could be improved. With the consolidation of the fair trade of non-timber products, the construction and operation of the collection center and the creation of the Civil Association Afro-descendants Aripao as an expression of organized community, the project begins to be accepted by the indigenous community as an alternative of livelihood, consolidating the sustainable development and the importance of conservation of natural resources.

The construction of alternative governance in communities, through empowerment, capacity building and territorial self-recognition, has been key to the sustainability of conservation agreements, allowing us to overcome the institutional weaknesses of the government actors involved with environmental management and education.

Availability of Data

Three types of data were particularly important in the design and promotion of the “Program for Earthquake-Resistant School Buildings”: school data, data on damages, and data on hazard risks. School data was collected by surveys and investigations conducted by FDMA and MEXT. A list of the surveys is indicated below.

  • School Basic Survey (annually since 1948) to collect basic data.
  • Public School Facilities Survey (annually since 1954) to collect building area and conditions of school facilities.
  • Status of Seismic Resistance of Public School Facilities (annually since 2002) to collect data on the seismic resistance of school structures as well as suspended ceilings of gymnasiums and other nonstructural elements of school buildings.

Earthquake Damage Investigation (after each mega-disaster such as the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake and the Great East Japan Earthquake) to collect damage to buildings, specifically the kind of damage suffered by various types of buildings, the location where the damage occurred and under what circumstances, and the kind of earthquake that caused the damage.

Use of social networks and non-traditional media to publicize the initiative

The communication strategy to disseminate the importance and actions of the CPY must be inclusive and innovative, through the creation of a brand and key messages to transmit each year to cyclists, participants should easily identify the main objective of the initiative.
In this sense, we create advertising products such as: press conference, advertising, infographics, maps, posters, jersey, buff, medals that are disclosed during the promotion and the development of events through digital platforms and social networks: website, facebook, twitter, etc. .).
Another space to spread the concept of cycling is that during the tour there are strategic stops for hydration, healthy and natural snacks for cyclists; These spaces are used by local governments and communities to promote the products of their agrobiodiversity and bioemprendimientos.
To socialize the concept of sustainability, during the advertising campaign on social networks, it is indicated that the food will be delivered in sustainable containers (banana leaves) and that the hydration will be delivered in its reusable bottles (plastic bottles should not be used).

Define a clear concept that we want to spread among cyclists.
Maintain the commitment of local governments to promote the products of their agrobiodiversity.
Establish the appropriate communication channels to reach the target group.
Use a registration website for the conceptualization of the event: yawisumak.cicloviajerosec.com / www.ciclorutadelagarua.com
Have a creative graphic designer and aware of the objective to be transmitted.

Having a concept of the bike-trip encourages interest and increases the participation of cyclists.
The dissemination of CPY concepts in advance during the promotion of the event is essential to sensitize cyclists.
The website and social networks are key platforms to have a national reach.
Having a good quality photographic record allows the participants to identify themselves in social networks, tag and share the photos and the message of the event once the event is over.

Building consensus among partners through consultation

Carry out coordination meetings between bicycle groups and CPY connectivity corridor promoter group  to define the budget, the route, the road map, the responsibilities and the message that will be transmitted in the current edition, for example: groups ethnic, spectacled bears - andean bears (Tremarctos Ornatus), mountain tapir (Tapirus pinchaque), water resource or etc.

In a second moment, all the actors meet: environmental authority, private company and aid institutions to agree on logistics, support issues and the contingency plan to ensure the safety of cyclists.

The structure and communication in a government space are key to the success of the event, sometimes it is complicated to handle certain conflicts for institutional leadership and protagonism.

  • Have a cooperation system.
  • Establish adequate communication channels.
  • Generate horizontal leadership, avoiding political and economic interests.
  • Be aware of a common goal
  • Leadership must be managed from civil society.
  • The management of the economic resources for the development of the event must be carried out by a civil society organization.
  • Interference of political interests in decisions should not be allowed.
  • The participation of private companies is the key to the sustainability.
  • The planning time should be about three months in advance.
Building on experiences

One of the biggest instigators for developing and promoting school retrofitting is the past experiences of earthquakes. The 1995 Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake triggered the development of the program’s comprehensive guidelines, and the program gained momentum after the 2004 Chuetsu Earthquake and 2008 Sichuan Earthquake in China which caused the collapse of 6,898 school buildings and 19,065 deaths of schoolchildren. This prompted MEXT officials to pass the revised Act on Special Measures for Earthquake Disaster Countermeasures, which supported additional national subsidies toward the school retrofitting and reconstruction program. The 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake prompted the program to give higher priority to nonstructural elements and highlighted the need for tsunami countermeasures and functional improvements of schools as evacuation centers. Learning from each disaster event and applying the lessons learned to the improvement of the systems has contributed to ensuring the seismic safety of public schools.

  • Identification of the need to prioritize the subject through national policy.
  • The political will to make improvements to policies to achieve a goal.

Political will and interest to identify the retrofitting of schools as a priority initiative was essential for the national government to take measures to improve its systems and policies building on experiences. The constant effort to promote the retrofitting program was in part induced by politicians’ interest in both humanitarian and economic reasons. In a culture that prioritizes human life, a policy for making schools earthquake-resistant has the aim of saving the lives of schoolchildren. The policy also is considered an effective investment that contributes to local economies and produces tangible results that are well-received by the public.